Rep Power: 966

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1968-...QQcmdZViewItem

*drools*

 
Rep Power: 930

Damn thats nice, its up to 51K now g man

 
Rep Power: 966

yup - i mistyped. Still.

 
Rep Power: 870

damn that thing is really nice. the 1 part i dont like about it is the red boot cover for the top. i would have done black

 
Rep Power: 0

Well new it's over $62,000.

It's nice but it's definitly not my personal taste. I'm not a huge convertable fan on cars that have back seats. I just don't care for the look, that is unless you are smart like Grant and have the cover put on.

 
Rep Power: 966

 
Rep Power: 750

Nice. I personally don't like the jump in rim size from front to back, 17 inch to 20 inch is just to much difference for me.

 
Rep Power: 962

yeah the rims are too staggered. and i hate the car overall. the interior is too red, the intake manifold needs to be polished, the stripes along the side look incomplete, the rear end looks stupid, the whole car just looks overdone.

i like simple but badass.

 
Rep Power: 1088

Looks amazingly nice... bump the rear rims down a size or two, and it would look much better.

 
Rep Power: 817

i simply don't like those camaros with verts.. but that car is amazing

 
Rep Power: 828

Black interior and a hard top and i would rock it.

 
Rep Power: 755

I like the car overall, but there are two things that I wouldn't be happy about if it were mine. Number one is the headlights...they sag down at the outer edges. I think you can see what I mean when you look at the lines of the billet grill on them vs. the center grill.

Number two is the way the door panels are fixed onto the door itself. They used black tabs and stuck them through the red leather. They should have concealed the tabs behind the leather on the board so you can't see them. It looks very cheap the way they did it and causes bulges in the door panel.



See what I'm talking about?

 
Rep Power: 0

that car looks sexy as hell wish i had the 62+ 4 it

 
Rep Power: 762

So clean and shiney!