GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks.

GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks. (https://www.gtcarz.com/)
-   Automotive Pictures & videos (https://www.gtcarz.com/automotive-pictures-videos-11/)
-   -   New Camaro Shots (https://www.gtcarz.com/automotive-pictures-videos-11/new-camaro-shots-26699/)

2TONE_93GT 06-10-2006 02:47 PM

New Camaro Shots
 
http://www.gtcars.ca/gallery/files/5/5/5/6/PICT1217.jpg

http://www.gtcars.ca/gallery/files/5/5/5/6/PICT1215.jpg

http://www.gtcars.ca/gallery/files/5/5/5/6/PICT1214.jpg

koloman 06-10-2006 03:35 PM

aaaahhhhh gimmie gimmie gimmie

GM better stop screwing around and actually put that thing into production.

Turbo Jer 06-10-2006 03:41 PM

Oh don't worry, it's coming. They've been telling us at the meetings.

R/T kota 06-10-2006 04:25 PM

GM did sign a contract with the CAW not to build the F body cars for ten years after puuling out of the Quebec plant.
Unless they are willing to buy out the contract or build the car in Canada, it may not be out till 2012. I hope its out sooner but GM cant really afford any law suits right now.

un4givn 06-10-2006 06:43 PM

^ the trick is, this Camaro isn't an F-body. The f-body chassis is long dead. This new Camaro is intended to be built on the Zeta platform, or as GM now calls it "Global RWD Architecture".

Right.

Now all they have to do is revive the Nomad concept.... :smilie_da

koloman 06-10-2006 08:58 PM

i can't wait until 2012 :nono:

ALLAN_M 06-11-2006 03:21 AM

thats amazing n it looks badder then nething

shuller1458 06-11-2006 03:01 PM

oh yeah, ooooooohhhh yeah... AND it is going to be independent rear suspention. Thank god, solid rear end is sooo last century.

Midnight Racer 06-11-2006 10:53 PM

still looks badass:smilie_da

rabbitman 06-11-2006 11:01 PM

Now, that is nice. Looks a little too much like the challenger, but, that's not a bad thing. Can't wait to see it on the street.:smilie_da

Red Liner 06-13-2006 01:37 PM

that car is actually from the new movie "Transformers"

thats supposed to be bumblebee...yeah, i dunno how they went from a beetle to a camaro but hey...who cares

and yea, it looks SICK

Z28 MeTaL HeAd 06-13-2006 05:07 PM


Originally Posted by Red Liner
that car is actually from the new movie "Transformers"

thats supposed to be bumblebee...yeah, i dunno how they went from a beetle to a camaro but hey...who cares

and yea, it looks SICK

Oh wow, look whos alive!

P.S. It IS going into production...lets just say I knew someone on the inside of the company who IS ALREADY PRODUCING the engine cradles for them :smilie_da

-Jay

Z28 MeTaL HeAd 06-13-2006 05:09 PM


Originally Posted by shuller1458
oh yeah, ooooooohhhh yeah... AND it is going to be independent rear suspention. Thank god, solid rear end is sooo last century.

You DO realize that its been proven that a properly setup solid axle car can handle with the best of them right? :thumbsdow

-Jay

shuller1458 06-13-2006 11:03 PM


Originally Posted by Z28 MeTaL HeAd
You DO realize that its been proven that a properly setup solid axle car can handle with the best of them right? :thumbsdow

-Jay

suuuuure.... you DO know that mustang is the only sports RWD car with solid rear axel in production left(not 100% sure, but I think it is the obly one). That should tell you something. I can go on pointing other points, but you know the truth.

Mustangs and Comaros can be very fast. I am not saying anything. BUt solid axel fells like a "handicap trait": you can acheeve(sp) very good results, but there will be always an independent setup which will be always on top of you. Thats is what I don't like to feel, owning a car, the car originally disigned with a "difect".

rabbitman 06-14-2006 03:57 PM


Originally Posted by Z28 MeTaL HeAd
You DO realize that its been proven that a properly setup solid axle car can handle with the best of them right? :thumbsdow

-Jay

It will always be at a disadvantage, due to lack of camber adjustment. And weight. Period.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.05844 seconds with 3 queries