Twin engine cutlass
 

http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....D-9486F01242C7

total sleeper!

What a POS, a ****ing twin engine car, total displacement is 6.2 liters 12 cylinders, 310hp and 370 lb/ft, and it runs only 14???? ha ha , what a waste of money, an old mustang with minor mods will run 14. and total cost for a car and mods will be 00 times less than this car.

actually i think his best et was a 13.8

front engine STOCK 3.1L 150HP give or take

REAR STOCK 3.8L 165HP.


with a trand total of 315hp... running 13s its prolly dead on. On top of which the project was made from misc GM parts so the swap was cheap and done well. ALSO since he has already mounted the rear engine a L67 front and back swap could be done easily. That should pull some serious numbers!

still crazy idea

that car is so slow

yah... seems like a lot of work for 14.00

waste of money, waste of time... :smilie_d0
cost him more in time to do that than if he had of gone and bought a 88 5L mustang, added a gear and nitrous and would have been hella faster...

What was this guy thinking :laugh:

thing looks like it popped out of Unique Whips :retard:

They did that in the 60's with a hurst olds. Called it the Hairy Hurst, or something like that. Twin blown big blocks, it was almost impossible to drive.

id rather have a tein engine 90s family sedan then another 5.slow on the street..


but thats just me ;)