GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks.

GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks. (https://www.gtcarz.com/)
-   Honda Mailing List (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/)
-   -   1st service fo my 05 Accord (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/1st-service-fo-my-05-accord-289243/)

Skipper 09-03-2005 07:53 PM

1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
Hello folks;

I've purchased my 05 Accord LX-G 5 speed Manual 4 cyl on May 27th, 2005. It
is coming up to 4 months now, I went to the dealership to book an
appointment for it's 1st service, well the guy @ the counter recommended
that I wait until I reach close to 8000km or 1 year before I get that 1st
service done. This seems like a long time between oil changes even with the
new advanced 5W20 that Honda puts in the engines now days. I looked at the
maintenance schedule and it says for the "severe" service that every 8000km
or 4 moths, the oil, filter should be changed along with the recommended
servicing. Should I insist on having this service done or wait?

I live in Northern Ontario and sooner then later we will have our 1st winter
storm, I want to be ready for it. Besides, I am going on my annual hunting
trip which requires me to travel 500km one way.


Thank you for your advice;


Rick



jim beam 09-03-2005 08:10 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
Skipper wrote:
> Hello folks;
>
> I've purchased my 05 Accord LX-G 5 speed Manual 4 cyl on May 27th, 2005. It
> is coming up to 4 months now, I went to the dealership to book an
> appointment for it's 1st service, well the guy @ the counter recommended
> that I wait until I reach close to 8000km or 1 year before I get that 1st
> service done. This seems like a long time between oil changes even with the
> new advanced 5W20 that Honda puts in the engines now days. I looked at the
> maintenance schedule and it says for the "severe" service that every 8000km
> or 4 moths, the oil, filter should be changed along with the recommended
> servicing. Should I insist on having this service done or wait?
>
> I live in Northern Ontario and sooner then later we will have our 1st winter
> storm, I want to be ready for it. Besides, I am going on my annual hunting
> trip which requires me to travel 500km one way.
>
>
> Thank you for your advice;
>
>
> Rick
>
>

what does it say in the owners manual?


Elmo P. Shagnasty 09-03-2005 08:27 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
In article <oGqSe.43330$884.1119932@news20.bellglobal.com>,
"Skipper" <rickcyr@sympatico.ca> wrote:

> I've purchased my 05 Accord LX-G


What's an LX-G?


Skipper 09-03-2005 10:19 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
I read the manual and it does not specifically say anything about the 1st
service.


Rick
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:kKKdndbO0L7FpofeRVn-ug@speakeasy.net...
> Skipper wrote:
>> Hello folks;
>>
>> I've purchased my 05 Accord LX-G 5 speed Manual 4 cyl on May 27th, 2005.
>> It is coming up to 4 months now, I went to the dealership to book an
>> appointment for it's 1st service, well the guy @ the counter recommended
>> that I wait until I reach close to 8000km or 1 year before I get that 1st
>> service done. This seems like a long time between oil changes even with
>> the new advanced 5W20 that Honda puts in the engines now days. I looked
>> at the maintenance schedule and it says for the "severe" service that
>> every 8000km or 4 moths, the oil, filter should be changed along with the
>> recommended servicing. Should I insist on having this service done or
>> wait?
>>
>> I live in Northern Ontario and sooner then later we will have our 1st
>> winter storm, I want to be ready for it. Besides, I am going on my
>> annual hunting trip which requires me to travel 500km one way.
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your advice;
>>
>>
>> Rick

> what does it say in the owners manual?
>




Skipper 09-03-2005 10:24 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
My mistake, my previous car was an 02 Civic DX-G (the G stood for a group
option package) , I presently own an 05 Accord LX.


Rick



"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-684E77.20271603092005@nntp2.usenetserver.com...
> In article <oGqSe.43330$884.1119932@news20.bellglobal.com>,
> "Skipper" <rickcyr@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> I've purchased my 05 Accord LX-G

>
> What's an LX-G?
>




jim beam 09-03-2005 11:26 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
Skipper wrote:
> I read the manual and it does not specifically say anything about the 1st
> service.


but it gives you the service schedule. that's all you need to worry about.

>
>
> Rick
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
> news:kKKdndbO0L7FpofeRVn-ug@speakeasy.net...
>
>>Skipper wrote:
>>
>>>Hello folks;
>>>
>>>I've purchased my 05 Accord LX-G 5 speed Manual 4 cyl on May 27th, 2005.
>>>It is coming up to 4 months now, I went to the dealership to book an
>>>appointment for it's 1st service, well the guy @ the counter recommended
>>>that I wait until I reach close to 8000km or 1 year before I get that 1st
>>>service done. This seems like a long time between oil changes even with
>>>the new advanced 5W20 that Honda puts in the engines now days. I looked
>>>at the maintenance schedule and it says for the "severe" service that
>>>every 8000km or 4 moths, the oil, filter should be changed along with the
>>>recommended servicing. Should I insist on having this service done or
>>>wait?
>>>
>>>I live in Northern Ontario and sooner then later we will have our 1st
>>>winter storm, I want to be ready for it. Besides, I am going on my
>>>annual hunting trip which requires me to travel 500km one way.
>>>
>>>
>>>Thank you for your advice;
>>>
>>>
>>>Rick

>>
>>what does it say in the owners manual?
>>

>
>
>



doug 09-03-2005 11:28 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
Rick

Ignore the "manual" mavens and get the service done. One year/8k km is just
too long an interval unless you drive long distance trips almost
exclusively. I have a 2005 Accord EX I purchased in early May and it just
turned 4k miles. I'm changing the oil and filter done this week with the
recommended 5W-20, but I'm using Mobil 1, which I use in all of my vehicles
and have done so for over 20 years. My schedule is 4 months or 4000 miles,
whichever comes first (it's always 4 months, though). I almost always do it
myself to keep expenses reasonable, and I've not had any type of engine
component failure - ever. Cheap insurance for the engine, better mileage,
easier starts in cold weather, etc.

doug


"Skipper" <rickcyr@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:oGqSe.43330$884.1119932@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Hello folks;
>
> I've purchased my 05 Accord LX-G 5 speed Manual 4 cyl on May 27th, 2005.
> It is coming up to 4 months now, I went to the dealership to book an
> appointment for it's 1st service, well the guy @ the counter recommended
> that I wait until I reach close to 8000km or 1 year before I get that 1st
> service done. This seems like a long time between oil changes even with
> the new advanced 5W20 that Honda puts in the engines now days. I looked
> at the maintenance schedule and it says for the "severe" service that
> every 8000km or 4 moths, the oil, filter should be changed along with the
> recommended servicing. Should I insist on having this service done or
> wait?
>
> I live in Northern Ontario and sooner then later we will have our 1st
> winter storm, I want to be ready for it. Besides, I am going on my annual
> hunting trip which requires me to travel 500km one way.
>
>
> Thank you for your advice;
>
>
> Rick
>




jim beam 09-03-2005 11:45 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
doug wrote:
> Rick
>
> Ignore the "manual" mavens and get the service done. One year/8k km is just
> too long an interval unless you drive long distance trips almost
> exclusively. I have a 2005 Accord EX I purchased in early May and it just
> turned 4k miles. I'm changing the oil and filter done this week with the
> recommended 5W-20, but I'm using Mobil 1, which I use in all of my vehicles
> and have done so for over 20 years. My schedule is 4 months or 4000 miles,
> whichever comes first (it's always 4 months, though). I almost always do it
> myself to keep expenses reasonable, and I've not had any type of engine
> component failure - ever. Cheap insurance for the engine, better mileage,
> easier starts in cold weather, etc.
>
> doug


do you wait for tires to wear out or do you follow some gut feeling
method for their change schedule as well? fact is, if you're following
the manufacturer spec, and are using a decent oil with a decent additive
package, there's nothing to worry about. especially not for first service.

>
>
> "Skipper" <rickcyr@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:oGqSe.43330$884.1119932@news20.bellglobal.com ...
>
>>Hello folks;
>>
>>I've purchased my 05 Accord LX-G 5 speed Manual 4 cyl on May 27th, 2005.
>>It is coming up to 4 months now, I went to the dealership to book an
>>appointment for it's 1st service, well the guy @ the counter recommended
>>that I wait until I reach close to 8000km or 1 year before I get that 1st
>>service done. This seems like a long time between oil changes even with
>>the new advanced 5W20 that Honda puts in the engines now days. I looked
>>at the maintenance schedule and it says for the "severe" service that
>>every 8000km or 4 moths, the oil, filter should be changed along with the
>>recommended servicing. Should I insist on having this service done or
>>wait?
>>
>>I live in Northern Ontario and sooner then later we will have our 1st
>>winter storm, I want to be ready for it. Besides, I am going on my annual
>>hunting trip which requires me to travel 500km one way.
>>
>>
>>Thank you for your advice;
>>
>>
>>Rick
>>

>
>
>



John Horner 09-05-2005 11:43 AM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
doug wrote:
> Rick
>
> Ignore the "manual" mavens and get the service done. One year/8k km is just
> too long an interval unless you drive long distance trips almost
> exclusively. I have a 2005 Accord EX I purchased in early May and it just
> turned 4k miles. I'm changing the oil and filter done this week with the
> recommended 5W-20, but I'm using Mobil 1, which I use in all of my vehicles
> and have done so for over 20 years. My schedule is 4 months or 4000 miles,
> whichever comes first (it's always 4 months, though). I almost always do it
> myself to keep expenses reasonable, and I've not had any type of engine
> component failure - ever. Cheap insurance for the engine, better mileage,
> easier starts in cold weather, etc.
>
> doug



It is a shame to waste Mobil-1 on 4 month/4,000 mile oil change
intervals. You are discarding a lot of perfectly good motor oil way
before it's time. If you are running a top grade synthetic like that
there is no reason not to go the full 7,500 mile (V-6) or 10,000 mile
(4) intervals Honda calls for in it's current vehicles. By using such
an expensive oil you are already giving yourself a huge safety margin
over the factory recommendations. In fact, there are plenty of good
sub $2.00/quart motor oils on the market now which are completely up to
the job.

Oils, fuels and engines are all light-years better today than they were
20 years ago.

John


Woody 09-05-2005 07:16 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
The oils and engines are light years ahead but the people in this country
are to entwined in the past to understand that. If 3000 miles was good for
my great grandpa then I should change it every week......


"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:xIZSe.13925$QN4.3053@trnddc02...
> doug wrote:
>> Rick
>>
>> Ignore the "manual" mavens and get the service done. One year/8k km is
>> just too long an interval unless you drive long distance trips almost
>> exclusively. I have a 2005 Accord EX I purchased in early May and it just
>> turned 4k miles. I'm changing the oil and filter done this week with the
>> recommended 5W-20, but I'm using Mobil 1, which I use in all of my
>> vehicles and have done so for over 20 years. My schedule is 4 months or
>> 4000 miles, whichever comes first (it's always 4 months, though). I
>> almost always do it myself to keep expenses reasonable, and I've not had
>> any type of engine component failure - ever. Cheap insurance for the
>> engine, better mileage, easier starts in cold weather, etc.
>>
>> doug

>
>
> It is a shame to waste Mobil-1 on 4 month/4,000 mile oil change intervals.
> You are discarding a lot of perfectly good motor oil way before it's time.
> If you are running a top grade synthetic like that there is no reason not
> to go the full 7,500 mile (V-6) or 10,000 mile (4) intervals Honda calls
> for in it's current vehicles. By using such an expensive oil you are
> already giving yourself a huge safety margin over the factory
> recommendations. In fact, there are plenty of good sub $2.00/quart motor
> oils on the market now which are completely up to the job.
>
> Oils, fuels and engines are all light-years better today than they were 20
> years ago.
>
> John
>




mvl_groups_user@yahoo.com 09-05-2005 08:24 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
Beware that on my manual, it says there is special breakin oil that
Honda initially uses, and warns you against replacing it early as it
interferes with the breakin process.

-MVL


Dave L 09-05-2005 08:36 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
<mvl_groups_user@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1125966260.449752.201380@g43g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> Beware that on my manual, it says there is special breakin oil that
> Honda initially uses, and warns you against replacing it early as it
> interferes with the breakin process.
>
> -MVL


This is also for the '05 Accord? If so, could you tell me which page? When
I purchased my Accord, the salesman recommended changing it within 4k miles.
I asked him about the break-in oil and he didn't know anything about it. He
called me the next day and said he spoke w/the service department who said
there is no more breakin oil. Just additives in the initial oil. I skimmed
the manual but did not *read* everything that carefully.

Thanks,
-Dave



doug 09-07-2005 02:24 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 

Do you wait for your engine to sludge up or do you blindly follow the
"Recommended" service intervals in your beloved manual? The fact is that a
number of well regarded automobile manufacturers have experienced engine
problems caused by the oil change interval given to their customers. You can
believe it or not - I guess it comes down to whether you can accept a truth
contrary to your opinion. Just check out the Toyota and Saab newsgroups.
With very few exceptions, I believe that every car owner should use the
extreme service recommendations as a guideline. More frequent oil changes
won't damage an engine. It will hurt your wallet a little, but as I said,
it's cheap insurance.


"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:5tSdnfFPrqxP8IfeRVn-hw@speakeasy.net...
> doug wrote:
>> Rick

>
> do you wait for tires to wear out or do you follow some gut feeling method
> for their change schedule as well? fact is, if you're following the
> manufacturer spec, and are using a decent oil with a decent additive
> package, there's nothing to worry about. especially not for first
> service.
>
>>
>>
>> "Skipper" <rickcyr@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>> news:oGqSe.43330$884.1119932@news20.bellglobal.com ...
>>
>>>Hello folks;
>>>
>>>I've purchased my 05 Accord LX-G 5 speed Manual 4 cyl on May 27th, 2005.
>>>It is coming up to 4 months now, I went to the dealership to book an
>>>appointment for it's 1st service, well the guy @ the counter recommended
>>>that I wait until I reach close to 8000km or 1 year before I get that 1st
>>>service done. This seems like a long time between oil changes even with
>>>the new advanced 5W20 that Honda puts in the engines now days. I looked
>>>at the maintenance schedule and it says for the "severe" service that
>>>every 8000km or 4 moths, the oil, filter should be changed along with the
>>>recommended servicing. Should I insist on having this service done or
>>>wait?
>>>
>>>I live in Northern Ontario and sooner then later we will have our 1st
>>>winter storm, I want to be ready for it. Besides, I am going on my
>>>annual hunting trip which requires me to travel 500km one way.
>>>
>>>
>>>Thank you for your advice;
>>>
>>>
>>>Rick
>>>

>>
>>
>>

>




doug 09-07-2005 02:42 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
Waste of good oil? Hardly. If you want to run oil - even Mobil 1 - for
10,000 miles in your engine, be my guest. Some day in the future, the
dealership will welcome you with open arms. The demands of driving in most
areas today, e.g., frequent starts, stop and go driving, combined with the
higher level of design, machine tolerances and assembly of modern engines,
require a much higher quality level for lubricants. You are correct that
current dino-based oils are much better today than 20 years ago, but the
demands placed upon them have significantly increased also. If you think
that a sub $2.00 per quart oil is the best option for YOUR engine, it's your
choice.

doug


"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:xIZSe.13925$QN4.3053@trnddc02...
> doug wrote:
>> Rick
>>
>> Ignore the "manual" mavens and get the service done. One year/8k km is
>> just too long an interval unless you drive long distance trips almost
>> exclusively. I have a 2005 Accord EX I purchased in early May and it just
>> turned 4k miles. I'm changing the oil and filter done this week with the
>> recommended 5W-20, but I'm using Mobil 1, which I use in all of my
>> vehicles and have done so for over 20 years. My schedule is 4 months or
>> 4000 miles, whichever comes first (it's always 4 months, though). I
>> almost always do it myself to keep expenses reasonable, and I've not had
>> any type of engine component failure - ever. Cheap insurance for the
>> engine, better mileage, easier starts in cold weather, etc.
>>
>> doug

>
>
> It is a shame to waste Mobil-1 on 4 month/4,000 mile oil change intervals.
> You are discarding a lot of perfectly good motor oil way before it's time.
> If you are running a top grade synthetic like that there is no reason not
> to go the full 7,500 mile (V-6) or 10,000 mile (4) intervals Honda calls
> for in it's current vehicles. By using such an expensive oil you are
> already giving yourself a huge safety margin over the factory
> recommendations. In fact, there are plenty of good sub $2.00/quart motor
> oils on the market now which are completely up to the job.
>
> Oils, fuels and engines are all light-years better today than they were 20
> years ago.
>
> John
>




Brian Smith 09-07-2005 03:04 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 

"Skipper" <rickcyr@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:oGqSe.43330$884.1119932@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Hello folks;


<snipped for space>

> Thank you for your advice;


Rick, I have always changed my engine oil and filter at the 5000 km mark,
regardless of what the owners manual or dealership says. I feel that it is a
small price to pay for peace of mind. I also rotate my tires at the same
time (one appointment and no wasted time). The fact that so many people have
ignored is that you live in Northern Ontario, as far as I am concerned that
is a real good reason for changing the oil more frequently than the manual
recommends. I live in Halifax and I firmly believe that more is better when
it comes to frequency of changes.

Brian



Seth 09-07-2005 05:27 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
"doug" <dougejNOSPAM@SPAMFREEhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ISdnSrM-pnCrYLeRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
>
> Do you wait for your engine to sludge up or do you blindly follow the
> "Recommended" service intervals in your beloved manual? The fact is that a
> number of well regarded automobile manufacturers have experienced engine
> problems caused by the oil change interval given to their customers. You
> can believe it or not - I guess it comes down to whether you can accept a
> truth contrary to your opinion. Just check out the Toyota and Saab
> newsgroups. With very few exceptions, I believe that every car owner
> should use the extreme service recommendations as a guideline. More
> frequent oil changes won't damage an engine. It will hurt your wallet a
> little, but as I said, it's cheap insurance.


I change the cheap dino oil in my '01 V6 Accord every 7K to 7500 miles. I
now have 134,000 miles on it and it starts up everytime and runs smooth.
When should I expect this sludge problem to start? Keep in mind, my car
isn't a Toyota or Saab.


Michael Pardee 09-07-2005 08:40 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
"doug" <dougejNOSPAM@SPAMFREEhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ISdnSrM-pnCrYLeRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
>
> Do you wait for your engine to sludge up or do you blindly follow the
> "Recommended" service intervals in your beloved manual? The fact is that a
> number of well regarded automobile manufacturers have experienced engine
> problems caused by the oil change interval given to their customers. You
> can believe it or not - I guess it comes down to whether you can accept a
> truth contrary to your opinion. Just check out the Toyota and Saab
> newsgroups. With very few exceptions, I believe that every car owner
> should use the extreme service recommendations as a guideline. More
> frequent oil changes won't damage an engine. It will hurt your wallet a
> little, but as I said, it's cheap insurance.
>

For the horror stories and the photos to go with them, it's hard to beat
TeGGer's collection:
http://tegger.com/hondafaq/sludge/index.html
Look what can happen in just 8700 miles!
http://tegger.com/hondafaq/sludge/cleaning_sludge.html

Mike



Michael Pardee 09-07-2005 08:54 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
"Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sXITe.6498$cg.3222@news02.roc.ny...
> "doug" <dougejNOSPAM@SPAMFREEhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:9ISdnSrM-pnCrYLeRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
>>
>> Do you wait for your engine to sludge up or do you blindly follow the
>> "Recommended" service intervals in your beloved manual? The fact is that
>> a number of well regarded automobile manufacturers have experienced
>> engine problems caused by the oil change interval given to their
>> customers. You can believe it or not - I guess it comes down to whether
>> you can accept a truth contrary to your opinion. Just check out the
>> Toyota and Saab newsgroups. With very few exceptions, I believe that
>> every car owner should use the extreme service recommendations as a
>> guideline. More frequent oil changes won't damage an engine. It will hurt
>> your wallet a little, but as I said, it's cheap insurance.

>
> I change the cheap dino oil in my '01 V6 Accord every 7K to 7500 miles. I
> now have 134,000 miles on it and it starts up everytime and runs smooth.
> When should I expect this sludge problem to start? Keep in mind, my car
> isn't a Toyota or Saab.
>

Mine came to roost around 210K or 220K miles on our '85 turbo Volvo. The
crankcase is probably as clean as the rocker assy I can see through the oil
filler (pretty nice, even if brown) but the grunge carried in the oil mist
that circulated through the crankcase ventilation system plugged a 3/8 inch
hose solid. I never thought about cleaning such a large hose, so it went
unnoticed until I saw a large cloud of blue smoke following me down the
freeway. At the next turnoff, about five miles later, I opened the hood to
see everything on the driver's side coated with oil spewing from the
dipstick tube. I had lost 3 quarts in 5 minutes. Tearing the ventilation
system down later, I found the air/oil separator baffle box nearly plugged.
It also weighed several ounces more than the new one because of the hardened
sludge inside it.

It was that experience that convinced me to change to synthetic in the Volvo
in spite of the risk of leaks. The top guru on the alt.autos.volvo group
reported engines running synthetic don't generate those oil mist deposits,
so I took the chance. When it didn't leak I changed my daughter's Accord to
synthetic.

To each their own, but I'm a confirmed synthetic user now.

Mike



jim beam 09-07-2005 09:38 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
doug wrote:
> Waste of good oil? Hardly. If you want to run oil - even Mobil 1 - for
> 10,000 miles in your engine, be my guest. Some day in the future, the
> dealership will welcome you with open arms. The demands of driving in most
> areas today, e.g., frequent starts, stop and go driving, combined with the
> higher level of design, machine tolerances and assembly of modern engines,
> require a much higher quality level for lubricants. You are correct that
> current dino-based oils are much better today than 20 years ago, but the
> demands placed upon them have significantly increased also. If you think
> that a sub $2.00 per quart oil is the best option for YOUR engine, it's your
> choice.
>
> doug


ok, so which one of you is going to present the technical rationale for
this well researched decision of yours? i want numbers.

>
>
> "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:xIZSe.13925$QN4.3053@trnddc02...
>
>>doug wrote:
>>
>>>Rick
>>>
>>>Ignore the "manual" mavens and get the service done. One year/8k km is
>>>just too long an interval unless you drive long distance trips almost
>>>exclusively. I have a 2005 Accord EX I purchased in early May and it just
>>>turned 4k miles. I'm changing the oil and filter done this week with the
>>>recommended 5W-20, but I'm using Mobil 1, which I use in all of my
>>>vehicles and have done so for over 20 years. My schedule is 4 months or
>>>4000 miles, whichever comes first (it's always 4 months, though). I
>>>almost always do it myself to keep expenses reasonable, and I've not had
>>>any type of engine component failure - ever. Cheap insurance for the
>>>engine, better mileage, easier starts in cold weather, etc.
>>>
>>>doug

>>
>>
>>It is a shame to waste Mobil-1 on 4 month/4,000 mile oil change intervals.
>>You are discarding a lot of perfectly good motor oil way before it's time.
>>If you are running a top grade synthetic like that there is no reason not
>>to go the full 7,500 mile (V-6) or 10,000 mile (4) intervals Honda calls
>>for in it's current vehicles. By using such an expensive oil you are
>>already giving yourself a huge safety margin over the factory
>>recommendations. In fact, there are plenty of good sub $2.00/quart motor
>>oils on the market now which are completely up to the job.
>>
>>Oils, fuels and engines are all light-years better today than they were 20
>>years ago.
>>
>>John
>>

>
>
>



doug 09-08-2005 06:18 AM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
There is one in every group. I guess you're him.

"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:PJCdnZ2dnZ1cA5DFnZ2dnYULgt6dnZ2dRVn-zZ2dnZ0@speakeasy.net...
> doug wrote:
>> Waste of good oil? Hardly. If you want to run oil - even Mobil 1 - for
>> 10,000 miles in your engine, be my guest. Some day in the future, the
>> dealership will welcome you with open arms. The demands of driving in
>> most areas today, e.g., frequent starts, stop and go driving, combined
>> with the higher level of design, machine tolerances and assembly of
>> modern engines, require a much higher quality level for lubricants. You
>> are correct that current dino-based oils are much better today than 20
>> years ago, but the demands placed upon them have significantly increased
>> also. If you think that a sub $2.00 per quart oil is the best option for
>> YOUR engine, it's your choice.
>>
>> doug

>
> ok, so which one of you is going to present the technical rationale for
> this well researched decision of yours? i want numbers.
>
>>
>>
>> "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:xIZSe.13925$QN4.3053@trnddc02...
>>
>>>doug wrote:
>>>
>>>>Rick
>>>>
>>>>Ignore the "manual" mavens and get the service done. One year/8k km is
>>>>just too long an interval unless you drive long distance trips almost
>>>>exclusively. I have a 2005 Accord EX I purchased in early May and it
>>>>just turned 4k miles. I'm changing the oil and filter done this week
>>>>with the recommended 5W-20, but I'm using Mobil 1, which I use in all of
>>>>my vehicles and have done so for over 20 years. My schedule is 4 months
>>>>or 4000 miles, whichever comes first (it's always 4 months, though). I
>>>>almost always do it myself to keep expenses reasonable, and I've not had
>>>>any type of engine component failure - ever. Cheap insurance for the
>>>>engine, better mileage, easier starts in cold weather, etc.
>>>>
>>>>doug
>>>
>>>
>>>It is a shame to waste Mobil-1 on 4 month/4,000 mile oil change
>>>intervals. You are discarding a lot of perfectly good motor oil way
>>>before it's time. If you are running a top grade synthetic like that
>>>there is no reason not to go the full 7,500 mile (V-6) or 10,000 mile (4)
>>>intervals Honda calls for in it's current vehicles. By using such an
>>>expensive oil you are already giving yourself a huge safety margin over
>>>the factory recommendations. In fact, there are plenty of good sub
>>>$2.00/quart motor oils on the market now which are completely up to the
>>>job.
>>>
>>>Oils, fuels and engines are all light-years better today than they were
>>>20 years ago.
>>>
>>>John
>>>

>>
>>
>>

>




jim beam 09-08-2005 09:09 AM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
doug wrote:
> There is one in every group. I guess you're him.


eh? so next time you fly, is it going to be ok with you if the pilot
doesn't bother to calculate the fuel load against the destination
distance? how about the inspection crew only bothering to look for
fatigue cracks when they "felt" it was time? alternatively, imagine
you're the fleet manager for a large haulage company. how are you going
to formulate your maintenance schedules? will your customers mind if
you charge them extra because you "feel" you need to spend 3 times as
much on lubes as your competitors?

bottom line, there's some method to this madness. disregard is both
expensive and stupid.


>
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
> news:PJCdnZ2dnZ1cA5DFnZ2dnYULgt6dnZ2dRVn-zZ2dnZ0@speakeasy.net...
>
>>doug wrote:
>>
>>>Waste of good oil? Hardly. If you want to run oil - even Mobil 1 - for
>>>10,000 miles in your engine, be my guest. Some day in the future, the
>>>dealership will welcome you with open arms. The demands of driving in
>>>most areas today, e.g., frequent starts, stop and go driving, combined
>>>with the higher level of design, machine tolerances and assembly of
>>>modern engines, require a much higher quality level for lubricants. You
>>>are correct that current dino-based oils are much better today than 20
>>>years ago, but the demands placed upon them have significantly increased
>>>also. If you think that a sub $2.00 per quart oil is the best option for
>>>YOUR engine, it's your choice.
>>>
>>>doug

>>
>>ok, so which one of you is going to present the technical rationale for
>>this well researched decision of yours? i want numbers.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:xIZSe.13925$QN4.3053@trnddc02...
>>>
>>>
>>>>doug wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Rick
>>>>>
>>>>>Ignore the "manual" mavens and get the service done. One year/8k km is
>>>>>just too long an interval unless you drive long distance trips almost
>>>>>exclusively. I have a 2005 Accord EX I purchased in early May and it
>>>>>just turned 4k miles. I'm changing the oil and filter done this week
>>>>>with the recommended 5W-20, but I'm using Mobil 1, which I use in all of
>>>>>my vehicles and have done so for over 20 years. My schedule is 4 months
>>>>>or 4000 miles, whichever comes first (it's always 4 months, though). I
>>>>>almost always do it myself to keep expenses reasonable, and I've not had
>>>>>any type of engine component failure - ever. Cheap insurance for the
>>>>>engine, better mileage, easier starts in cold weather, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>doug
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It is a shame to waste Mobil-1 on 4 month/4,000 mile oil change
>>>>intervals. You are discarding a lot of perfectly good motor oil way
>>>>before it's time. If you are running a top grade synthetic like that
>>>>there is no reason not to go the full 7,500 mile (V-6) or 10,000 mile (4)
>>>>intervals Honda calls for in it's current vehicles. By using such an
>>>>expensive oil you are already giving yourself a huge safety margin over
>>>>the factory recommendations. In fact, there are plenty of good sub
>>>>$2.00/quart motor oils on the market now which are completely up to the
>>>>job.
>>>>
>>>>Oils, fuels and engines are all light-years better today than they were
>>>>20 years ago.
>>>>
>>>>John
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

>
>



Steve Bigelow 09-08-2005 07:14 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 

"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:5e2dnUxge9Cdpb3eRVn-qg@speakeasy.net...
> doug wrote:
>> There is one in every group. I guess you're him.

>
> eh? so next time you fly, is it going to be ok with you if the pilot
> doesn't bother to calculate the fuel load against the destination
> distance? how about the inspection crew only bothering to look for
> fatigue cracks when they "felt" it was time? alternatively, imagine
> you're the fleet manager for a large haulage company. how are you going
> to formulate your maintenance schedules? will your customers mind if you
> charge them extra because you "feel" you need to spend 3 times as much on
> lubes as your competitors?


Nope.
Oil analysis.

Did you manage to destroy M1 in 10k miles, Jim?
Or did you just "feel" you did?



jim beam 09-08-2005 10:03 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
Steve Bigelow wrote:
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
> news:5e2dnUxge9Cdpb3eRVn-qg@speakeasy.net...
>
>>doug wrote:
>>
>>>There is one in every group. I guess you're him.

>>
>>eh? so next time you fly, is it going to be ok with you if the pilot
>>doesn't bother to calculate the fuel load against the destination
>>distance? how about the inspection crew only bothering to look for
>>fatigue cracks when they "felt" it was time? alternatively, imagine
>>you're the fleet manager for a large haulage company. how are you going
>>to formulate your maintenance schedules? will your customers mind if you
>>charge them extra because you "feel" you need to spend 3 times as much on
>>lubes as your competitors?

>
>
> Nope.
> Oil analysis.


that's the way to answer the scheuling question.

>
> Did you manage to destroy M1 in 10k miles, Jim?
> Or did you just "feel" you did?


why are you asking me that question? i'm not the one defending 4k mobil
1 change schedule.


doug 09-09-2005 01:04 AM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
Thank you for proving my point with your inane diatribe. As I said, there's
one in every group.

What you seem incapable of recognizing is that this is my maintenance
schedule for my car. It has nothing to do with airplane pilots, inspection
crews, or fleet managers. Admittedly, though, if they wanted to go beyond
the minimum requirements for me, I'd be grateful. I presume that you
wouldn't be. After all, why do anything beyond the minimum requirements if
you don't have to? Gee, you might save $5 a year.

As for customers being charged extra ??? WTF is that about? In my case, it
costs me less to change the oil myself with Mobil 1 than it does to have it
done by the dealer. So if it costs me $22 per change x 3 changes per year =
$66 versus 2 changes x $31 per change = $62, I'd say that for an extra
$4 annually, I'm getting a hell a deal! As an experienced mechanic, I find
that to be an excellent trade off. Something you don't seem to understand.

>>Did you manage to destroy M1 in 10k miles, Jim?
>>Or did you just "feel" you did?

(Courtesy of Steve Bigelow)

Is he suggesting that you followed your own advice on extended oill change
intervals. LOL





"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:5e2dnUxge9Cdpb3eRVn-qg@speakeasy.net...
> doug wrote:
>> There is one in every group. I guess you're him.

>
> eh? so next time you fly, is it going to be ok with you if the pilot
> doesn't bother to calculate the fuel load against the destination
> distance? how about the inspection crew only bothering to look for
> fatigue cracks when they "felt" it was time? alternatively, imagine
> you're the fleet manager for a large haulage company. how are you going
> to formulate your maintenance schedules? will your customers mind if you
> charge them extra because you "feel" you need to spend 3 times as much on
> lubes as your competitors?
>
> bottom line, there's some method to this madness. disregard is both
> expensive and stupid.
>
>
>>
>> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
>> news:PJCdnZ2dnZ1cA5DFnZ2dnYULgt6dnZ2dRVn-zZ2dnZ0@speakeasy.net...
>>
>>>doug wrote:
>>>
>>>>Waste of good oil? Hardly. If you want to run oil - even Mobil 1 - for
>>>>10,000 miles in your engine, be my guest. Some day in the future, the
>>>>dealership will welcome you with open arms. The demands of driving in
>>>>most areas today, e.g., frequent starts, stop and go driving, combined
>>>>with the higher level of design, machine tolerances and assembly of
>>>>modern engines, require a much higher quality level for lubricants. You
>>>>are correct that current dino-based oils are much better today than 20
>>>>years ago, but the demands placed upon them have significantly increased
>>>>also. If you think that a sub $2.00 per quart oil is the best option for
>>>>YOUR engine, it's your choice.
>>>>
>>>>doug
>>>
>>>ok, so which one of you is going to present the technical rationale for
>>>this well researched decision of yours? i want numbers.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:xIZSe.13925$QN4.3053@trnddc02...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>doug wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Rick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Ignore the "manual" mavens and get the service done. One year/8k km is
>>>>>>just too long an interval unless you drive long distance trips almost
>>>>>>exclusively. I have a 2005 Accord EX I purchased in early May and it
>>>>>>just turned 4k miles. I'm changing the oil and filter done this week
>>>>>>with the recommended 5W-20, but I'm using Mobil 1, which I use in all
>>>>>>of my vehicles and have done so for over 20 years. My schedule is 4
>>>>>>months or 4000 miles, whichever comes first (it's always 4 months,
>>>>>>though). I almost always do it myself to keep expenses reasonable, and
>>>>>>I've not had any type of engine component failure - ever. Cheap
>>>>>>insurance for the engine, better mileage, easier starts in cold
>>>>>>weather, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>doug
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>It is a shame to waste Mobil-1 on 4 month/4,000 mile oil change
>>>>>intervals. You are discarding a lot of perfectly good motor oil way
>>>>>before it's time. If you are running a top grade synthetic like that
>>>>>there is no reason not to go the full 7,500 mile (V-6) or 10,000 mile
>>>>>(4) intervals Honda calls for in it's current vehicles. By using such
>>>>>an expensive oil you are already giving yourself a huge safety margin
>>>>>over the factory recommendations. In fact, there are plenty of good
>>>>>sub $2.00/quart motor oils on the market now which are completely up to
>>>>>the job.
>>>>>
>>>>>Oils, fuels and engines are all light-years better today than they were
>>>>>20 years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>John
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

>>
>>

>




Dave Kelsen 09-09-2005 09:58 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
On 9/8/2005 5:18 AM doug spake these words of knowledge:

> There is one in every group. I guess you're him.


No, Doug. I'm him.
Trust me.


RFT!!!
Dave Kelsen
--
.... I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't care.

shortspark 09-10-2005 07:38 AM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
Does the vehicle in question have an oil life monitor (OLM)? I ask
because my Ridgeline truck has one and the manual states that oil should
be changed (and this is true of the factory fill as well) when the
monitor falls between 15% and 0% oil life expectancy. For most owners
of Ridgelines at least, this service due notice appears between 5,000
and 7,000 miles, depending on driving habits.

The OLM is a better way to determine oil change interval than some
arbitrary mileage/time factor such as 3000 miles/6 months - today's
engines and oil packs are much better than that. Even though the OLM
assumes dino oil is being used, if an extra margin of safety is required
due to "severe" use, it is not necessary as before to do more frequent
changes but rather use better oil such as your GRP III and GRP IV and
synthetics. Chances are the oil interval will be extended as well as
you can go right to the "0%" notice on the monitor, especially with
synthetics.

OLMs are very sophisticated and are not the idiot light mileage counters
of old. Today's OLMs measure how we actually drive and bases it
assumptions on our driving habits. It does so by recording many things
such as temps and engine revolutions and places penalties on things like
short trip, cold start driving. The software is matched to the
particular engine in the car and this is very important.

As far as the factory fill is concerned and when to change it, much
depends on the oil you intend to use. Honda does not use some special
factory oil. It is a Superflo formula made by ExxonMobil but it is
super rich in moly. This moly additive, however, is not in the oil pack
itself but rather is part of the factory assembly lube and when mixed
with the oil provides an extra measure of safety during the critical
break-in period, hence, they want to make sure this formula is in there
for as long as possible. BTW, the old notion of removing engine ware
particles is of no concern these days due to tight tolerances and
improved filtering. This is true at least with the higher tech engines
made by Honda. Now, if Honda knew for a fact you were to change out oil
with something like Havoline dino or Redline synthetic (which are very
rich in moly) you could probably change the factory fill sooner than
recommended - but why do it? Let the monitor be your guide and follow
the manual except only under the most severe driving conditions.

Here is how I plan on doing it with my Ridgeline. I will change factory
fill when the OLM hits 15% with a quality dino such as Havoline or maybe
even a good blend like Mobil Clean 7500 or Motorcraft 5w20. I will use
only the Filtech or Nippon made filters and NOT the Fram/Honeywell. My
second oil change will be with the same oil and then a sample of that
drain will be sent to Blackstone labs for analysis. This will tell me
if my OCIs are timely and if the engine likes the oil I have chosen. If
there is any problem noted, especially in the TBN, which indicates oil
life depletion, I will switch to a good full synthetic and try that. I
have to assume the Accord would also be well served with this kind of
approach.

MARTY


jim beam 09-10-2005 10:30 AM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
shortspark wrote:
> Does the vehicle in question have an oil life monitor (OLM)? I ask
> because my Ridgeline truck has one and the manual states that oil should
> be changed (and this is true of the factory fill as well) when the
> monitor falls between 15% and 0% oil life expectancy. For most owners
> of Ridgelines at least, this service due notice appears between 5,000
> and 7,000 miles, depending on driving habits.
>
> The OLM is a better way to determine oil change interval than some
> arbitrary mileage/time factor such as 3000 miles/6 months - today's
> engines and oil packs are much better than that. Even though the OLM
> assumes dino oil is being used, if an extra margin of safety is required
> due to "severe" use, it is not necessary as before to do more frequent
> changes but rather use better oil such as your GRP III and GRP IV and
> synthetics. Chances are the oil interval will be extended as well as
> you can go right to the "0%" notice on the monitor, especially with
> synthetics.
>
> OLMs are very sophisticated and are not the idiot light mileage counters
> of old. Today's OLMs measure how we actually drive and bases it
> assumptions on our driving habits. It does so by recording many things
> such as temps and engine revolutions and places penalties on things like
> short trip, cold start driving. The software is matched to the
> particular engine in the car and this is very important.
>
> As far as the factory fill is concerned and when to change it, much
> depends on the oil you intend to use. Honda does not use some special
> factory oil. It is a Superflo formula made by ExxonMobil but it is
> super rich in moly. This moly additive, however, is not in the oil pack
> itself but rather is part of the factory assembly lube and when mixed
> with the oil provides an extra measure of safety during the critical
> break-in period, hence, they want to make sure this formula is in there
> for as long as possible. BTW, the old notion of removing engine ware
> particles is of no concern these days due to tight tolerances and
> improved filtering. This is true at least with the higher tech engines
> made by Honda. Now, if Honda knew for a fact you were to change out oil
> with something like Havoline dino or Redline synthetic (which are very
> rich in moly) you could probably change the factory fill sooner than
> recommended - but why do it? Let the monitor be your guide and follow
> the manual except only under the most severe driving conditions.
>
> Here is how I plan on doing it with my Ridgeline. I will change factory
> fill when the OLM hits 15% with a quality dino such as Havoline or maybe
> even a good blend like Mobil Clean 7500 or Motorcraft 5w20.


i had an entirely negative experience using kotorcraft 5w30 in my civic.
it made it sound rattly, so bad i was wondering if the engine was
shot, and this was compounded by the oil seals leaking lke crazy. and i
mean crazy. at stop lights, clouds of smoke were coming up out from
under the hood where the main seal was leaking onto the exhaust.
castrol gtx quieted up the engine so it sounds "normal" and the leak has
subsided almost completely. doesn't drip on the driveway any more.

neither may of be particular concern on your new vehicle, but any oil
that behaves like that on an older engine does not bode well for your
future.

> I will use
> only the Filtech or Nippon made filters and NOT the Fram/Honeywell. My
> second oil change will be with the same oil and then a sample of that
> drain will be sent to Blackstone labs for analysis. This will tell me
> if my OCIs are timely and if the engine likes the oil I have chosen. If
> there is any problem noted, especially in the TBN, which indicates oil
> life depletion, I will switch to a good full synthetic and try that. I
> have to assume the Accord would also be well served with this kind of
> approach.
>
> MARTY
>



shortspark 09-10-2005 12:49 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
I don't know anything about the Motorcraft 5w30 but I think it is an
entirely different pack than the 5w20. In fact, I do not believe the
5w30 is even a synthetic blend, but rather a plain dino oil. Used oil
analysis reports maintained on the Bobistheoilguy.com site show the
Motorcraft 5w20 to be a terrific engine lubricant.

However, what you intimate is true in that different cars react
differently to driving styles and type of oil used. That is why the $40
spent for a lab analysis of your used oil is money well spent. Of
course in your case no report was necessary, the problem was obvious.
In most cases it is not that noticeable.

MARTY


jim beam 09-10-2005 02:29 PM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
shortspark wrote:
> I don't know anything about the Motorcraft 5w30 but I think it is an
> entirely different pack than the 5w20. In fact, I do not believe the
> 5w30 is even a synthetic blend, but rather a plain dino oil.


well, when i looked at both bottles in the store, the "info" on the
bottles was the same. besides, what exactly is "synthetic blend"?
there's no recognized definition. other than being a great advertising
tool of course.

> Used oil
> analysis reports maintained on the Bobistheoilguy.com site show the
> Motorcraft 5w20 to be a terrific engine lubricant.


really? i've just looked, but in the couple of minutes i spent poking
about, i don't see it. please post a link so i can read that report too.

>
> However, what you intimate is true in that different cars react
> differently to driving styles and type of oil used. That is why the $40
> spent for a lab analysis of your used oil is money well spent. Of
> course in your case no report was necessary, the problem was obvious.
> In most cases it is not that noticeable.
>
> MARTY
>



shortspark 09-11-2005 09:40 AM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
Jim, I double checked the Virgin Oil analysis reports at BITOG site and
the 5w20 and the new 5w30 are indeed both synthetic blends. I don't
think this was always the case however and the 5w30 you had such bad
results from may have been the older, straight dino stock - it all
depends when you bought it. Here is a quote from BITOG and the source
is probably Ford but I'm not sure about that:

"This new oil (5w20) has been designed to provide the durability,
cleanliness, and fuel economy expected of a Motorcraft product. Tests
show it outperforms our own SAE 5w30 Super Premium Motor Oil. This oil
has been thoroughly evaluated by Ford. It has performed flawlessly in
over 300 dynamometer durability tests and has undergone vehicle testing,
reaching as high as 250,000 miles in some cases. This is an oil you can
trust. This new oil truly "exceeds the need". Refer to Owners Manual
to determine which vehicles should be serviced with 5w20. Refer to TSB
01-4-7 for a listing of older vehicles which should be serviced with
this oil".

Since then, it appears Motorcraft has introduced their 5w30 as a
synthetic blend as well, however, a look at the Virgin Oil reports for
both shows that they are a little different in their additive packs,
most notably in factors such as zinc, iron and copper although moly
content is nearly the same.

Synthetic blends such as these and others from the Phillips stall
(TropArtic 5w30 and Kendall) are hard to define, as you point out, since
there is no exact measure as to how much dino and how much synthetic
must be in the mix before it qualifies as a "blend". Mobil Clean 7500
is rumored to contain a third synthetic but Mobil always keeps their
formulas close to the vest.

I agree too that "blend" is a marketing tool but they are suppose to
provide longer oil change intervals than straight dino which usually
shows wear at, and should not exceed, about 5000 miles in normal driving
conditions. Full synthetics are said to be able to go 10,000 miles so
somewhere in between seems to make sense for the "blends". They are
usually priced "in between" dino and full synthetic as well.

If you go to the BIOTG site and click on the forums you will find many
different forum links, including Virgin Oil Analysis and Used Oil
Analysis as well as general lubrication and gasoline engine oil forums.
Try doing a search of "Motorcraft 5w20" at any of these and there will
be many threads listed where you can read reviews of analysis reports
and general comments about the Motorcraft oil (there are even some in
which it was used in Honda engines). You will find that, like any oil,
some are good and some not so good but, along with Havoline straight
dino 5w20, you will see that most of the oil geeks there consider it
among the best.

MARTY


Elmo P. Shagnasty 09-11-2005 10:32 AM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
In article <5945-432433CB-722@storefull-3137.bay.webtv.net>,
martyi@webtv.net (shortspark) wrote:

> I agree too that "blend" is a marketing tool but they are suppose to
> provide longer oil change intervals than straight dino which usually
> shows wear at, and should not exceed, about 5000 miles in normal driving
> conditions.


Consider: ALL motor oil sold today is a synthetic blend.

There is NO "straight dino oil" being sold for automotive use.

ALL oils have (drum roll, please) synthetic compounds blended
in--commonly known as the "additive package".

So technically, every oil can advertise itself as a "synthetic blend".

You've been owned.


jim beam 09-11-2005 11:06 AM

Re: 1st service fo my 05 Accord
 
shortspark wrote:
> Jim, I double checked the Virgin Oil analysis reports at BITOG site and
> the 5w20 and the new 5w30 are indeed both synthetic blends. I don't
> think this was always the case however and the 5w30 you had such bad
> results from may have been the older, straight dino stock - it all
> depends when you bought it. Here is a quote from BITOG and the source
> is probably Ford but I'm not sure about that:


mine was definitely "synthetic blend". i still have a bottle i'm going
to throw into recycling.

>
> "This new oil (5w20) has been designed to provide the durability,
> cleanliness, and fuel economy expected of a Motorcraft product. Tests
> show it outperforms our own SAE 5w30 Super Premium Motor Oil. This oil
> has been thoroughly evaluated by Ford. It has performed flawlessly in
> over 300 dynamometer durability tests and has undergone vehicle testing,
> reaching as high as 250,000 miles in some cases. This is an oil you can
> trust. This new oil truly "exceeds the need". Refer to Owners Manual
> to determine which vehicles should be serviced with 5w20. Refer to TSB
> 01-4-7 for a listing of older vehicles which should be serviced with
> this oil".


the "TSB" makes it sound like ford propaganda to me!

>
> Since then, it appears Motorcraft has introduced their 5w30 as a
> synthetic blend as well, however, a look at the Virgin Oil reports for
> both shows that they are a little different in their additive packs,
> most notably in factors such as zinc, iron and copper although moly
> content is nearly the same.


those are all fine solid state additives, but they do nothing for
thixotropy [the property that affects grade with temperature - otherwise
known as viscosity index improver] or seal conditioning. the thixotropy
thing is very important because either insufficient quantity or quality
can quickly break down leaving you with thin runny base that may not be
able to sustain the right hydro-dynamic film engines depend on. [if i
really wanted to be contrarian, i'd even ask why it's even worth
bothering with solid state lubes, moly, etc., if the hydrodynamic film
is being sufficiently sustained - but i'm not a tribologist.] and
simply measuring viscosity alone is not necessarily the answer because
it's usually measured at 100C whereas pistons & rings operate at higher
temps than that, and that soot/combustion product can increase viscosity
while decreasing lubricity. i think this was the situation i
experienced - and the reason the engine sounded like it was about to
fall apart - the oil film needs to be right because it keeps parts
"floating" on oil, not directly touching. regarding seal conditioning,
same thing, you need sufficient quantity & quality of the right organic
conditioners to do the job.

now, here's the rub regarding traditional oil analysis - it won't show
you /any/ info on these organic additives!!! the relevant compounds for
both those jobs are not metallics so they don't show on the spark
spectrometry or acid/base reading! oil analysis is an /excellent/ tool
for assessing wear product and therefore engine health, but from what i
can see, without the ability to detect or quantify organic contents,
it's next to useless as a measure of initial oil quality.

>
> Synthetic blends such as these and others from the Phillips stall
> (TropArtic 5w30 and Kendall) are hard to define, as you point out, since
> there is no exact measure as to how much dino and how much synthetic
> must be in the mix before it qualifies as a "blend". Mobil Clean 7500
> is rumored to contain a third synthetic but Mobil always keeps their
> formulas close to the vest.
>
> I agree too that "blend" is a marketing tool but they are suppose to
> provide longer oil change intervals than straight dino which usually
> shows wear at, and should not exceed, about 5000 miles in normal driving
> conditions. Full synthetics are said to be able to go 10,000 miles so
> somewhere in between seems to make sense for the "blends". They are
> usually priced "in between" dino and full synthetic as well.


when mobil 1 first came out, didn't they claim 30k between changes? to
back away from that as mobil have done, it means that either
1. their initial claims were bogus
2. they're now scared of law suits
3. they've changed formulation, or
4. like everyone else, the bean counters are interested in sales volume,
so forget the facts!

>
> If you go to the BIOTG site and click on the forums you will find many
> different forum links, including Virgin Oil Analysis and Used Oil
> Analysis as well as general lubrication and gasoline engine oil forums.
> Try doing a search of "Motorcraft 5w20" at any of these and there will
> be many threads listed where you can read reviews of analysis reports
> and general comments about the Motorcraft oil (there are even some in
> which it was used in Honda engines). You will find that, like any oil,
> some are good and some not so good but, along with Havoline straight
> dino 5w20, you will see that most of the oil geeks there consider it
> among the best.
>
> MARTY
>


thanks marty! i may try havoline next time. but for the moment, i'm
happy with castrol gtx. especially on the crude & unscientific basis of
keeping my engine quiet & leak free!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.05974 seconds with 5 queries