Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
Hoover wrote:
> turns out it was the belt pulley - it's fixed. good. > > "jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote in message > news:LpidnVqhGoj7CG3bnZ2dnUVZ_qzinZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... >> Longstreet wrote: >>> i took the car over today - they found a slight leak in the pump, which >>> supposedly caused the brake fluid to leak too - I did a complete service, >>> which was overdue, and they told me the belts, everything else were fine. >>> They said the noise may be there for the next 100,000 miles but said it's >>> in perfect condition - thoughts? >> yes, i think they're blowing smoke - hondas don't make noises like that >> normally, and if they do, they certainly won't last for 100k miles. >> >> if the pump seal is leaking, it's not long after that until the bearing >> goes. then the timing belt goes and you lose valves/pistons in your >> interference engine. >> >> find a different mechanic and get a second opinion. >> >> >>> <2003 Honda owner> wrote in message >>> news:k6vse3l0h1278b4pb3e8mfjc19u5khbifg@4ax.com... >>>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:45:43 -0700, "Howard Lester" >>>> <heylester@dakotacom.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Brian Smith" wrote >>>>> >>>>>>> :-) Yeah, that was pretty dumb, huh? OK, let me try it a different >>>>>>> way: >>>>>>> where *replacing* a timing belt is concerned, the owner's manual >>>>>>> indicates it's necessary only in the 6 cylinder. How's that? >>>>>> In the Owners Manuals of all of my 4 cylinder Honda cars ('79, '83, >>>>>> '85, '88, another '88, '91, '94 and '97) they stated the timing belt >>>>>> should be replaced around 96,000 kilometres. The '01 V6 required the >>>>>> timing belt to be changed at 160,000 kilometres. >>>>> But in '03 apparently things must have changed. My Accord is an '04 >>>>> 4-cylinder. The Service Interval section of the Owner's Manual refers >>>>> to >>>>> changing the timing belt at 105,000 miles, or 60,000 miles severe >>>>> service, >>>>> and specifies "6-cylinder only." In the 4-cylinder Service Interval >>>>> section >>>>> of the manual there is no reference at all to a timing belt, intimating >>>>> there is no service required. >>>>> >>>>> Therefore, Your Honor, I conclude.... >>>>> >>>>> Now, what about this OP's whirring noise? :-) >>>>> >>>> Brian's right, you need to read your owner's manual again and think >>>> about this. I am not sure about the 2004 Accord vs. 2003 Accord tho I >>>> suspect the same for the 4 cylinder engine. Maybe someone can confirm >>>> this ???? >>>> >>>> For the 2003 4cyl Accord, it specifies a drive belt which includes >>>> timing as part of functions. For this belt is says to inspect it at >>>> certain intervals and depending on the findings, it may need to be >>>> replaced. >>>> >>>> ref (2003 Accord sedan) : >>>> https://techinfo.honda.com/rjanisis/...303O00302B.pdf >>>> and >>>> https://techinfo.honda.com/rjanisis/...303O00248B.pdf >>>> (see page 250 and 252) >>>> >>>> ref (2004 Accord sedan) : >>>> https://techinfo.honda.com/rjanisis/...404O00234B.pdf >>>> (pg 235) >>>> >>>> >>>> Hope this helps !! > |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
Brian Smith wrote:
> "Howard Lester" <heylester@dakotacom.net> wrote in message > news:13erakstcm8ll53@corp.supernews.com... >> 4 or 6 cyl? How many miles? (Only 6 cyl's have a timing belt per my '04 >> manual.) > > You had better read another manual. {;^) > > Modern Honda 4 cylinder engines use a timing chain, not a replaceable timing belt. The V-6s still use a belt. |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
Brian Smith wrote:
> "Howard Lester" <heylester@dakotacom.net> wrote in message > news:13erakstcm8ll53@corp.supernews.com... >> 4 or 6 cyl? How many miles? (Only 6 cyl's have a timing belt per my '04 >> manual.) > > You had better read another manual. {;^) > > Modern Honda 4 cylinder engines use a timing chain, not a replaceable timing belt. The V-6s still use a belt. |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
Howard Lester wrote:
> > But in '03 apparently things must have changed. My Accord is an '04 > 4-cylinder. The Service Interval section of the Owner's Manual refers to > changing the timing belt at 105,000 miles, or 60,000 miles severe service, > and specifies "6-cylinder only." In the 4-cylinder Service Interval section > of the manual there is no reference at all to a timing belt, intimating > there is no service required. > Change they did. Honda's current 4 cylinder engines use a timing chain. Many customers are really unhappy about having to pay for costly timing belt replacements and thus many companies are going back to timing chains. |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
Howard Lester wrote:
> > But in '03 apparently things must have changed. My Accord is an '04 > 4-cylinder. The Service Interval section of the Owner's Manual refers to > changing the timing belt at 105,000 miles, or 60,000 miles severe service, > and specifies "6-cylinder only." In the 4-cylinder Service Interval section > of the manual there is no reference at all to a timing belt, intimating > there is no service required. > Change they did. Honda's current 4 cylinder engines use a timing chain. Many customers are really unhappy about having to pay for costly timing belt replacements and thus many companies are going back to timing chains. |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
Hancock wrote:
> it's a 6 cylinder, 70,000 miles > My guess would be that it is either the accessory drive belt or one of the things it runs such as the alternator or power steering pump. |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
Hancock wrote:
> it's a 6 cylinder, 70,000 miles > My guess would be that it is either the accessory drive belt or one of the things it runs such as the alternator or power steering pump. |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
Hancock wrote:
> thanks - I thought it was the belt - any idea of the cost to replace this? > > "jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote in message > news:pLSdnWEGr_BBC3DbnZ2dnUVZ_tbinZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... >> Hancock wrote: >>> Any ideas? It started just yesterday - it's very noticeable when >>> accelerating and appears to be coming from the belt area on the driver's >>> side under the hood. >> timing belt about to break? >> >> inspect asap and quit driving until fixed. > > I doubt it is the timing belt, but it might be the accessory drive belt. |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
Hancock wrote:
> thanks - I thought it was the belt - any idea of the cost to replace this? > > "jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote in message > news:pLSdnWEGr_BBC3DbnZ2dnUVZ_tbinZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... >> Hancock wrote: >>> Any ideas? It started just yesterday - it's very noticeable when >>> accelerating and appears to be coming from the belt area on the driver's >>> side under the hood. >> timing belt about to break? >> >> inspect asap and quit driving until fixed. > > I doubt it is the timing belt, but it might be the accessory drive belt. |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
John Horner wrote:
> Hancock wrote: >> thanks - I thought it was the belt - any idea of the cost to replace >> this? >> >> "jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote in message >> news:pLSdnWEGr_BBC3DbnZ2dnUVZ_tbinZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... >>> Hancock wrote: >>>> Any ideas? It started just yesterday - it's very noticeable when >>>> accelerating and appears to be coming from the belt area on the >>>> driver's side under the hood. >>> timing belt about to break? >>> >>> inspect asap and quit driving until fixed. >> >> > > I doubt it is the timing belt, but it might be the accessory drive belt. you'd better hope you're right! when timing belts fray, they /do/ make a whining noise. ignoring that costs real dollars. |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
John Horner wrote:
> Hancock wrote: >> thanks - I thought it was the belt - any idea of the cost to replace >> this? >> >> "jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote in message >> news:pLSdnWEGr_BBC3DbnZ2dnUVZ_tbinZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... >>> Hancock wrote: >>>> Any ideas? It started just yesterday - it's very noticeable when >>>> accelerating and appears to be coming from the belt area on the >>>> driver's side under the hood. >>> timing belt about to break? >>> >>> inspect asap and quit driving until fixed. >> >> > > I doubt it is the timing belt, but it might be the accessory drive belt. you'd better hope you're right! when timing belts fray, they /do/ make a whining noise. ignoring that costs real dollars. |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
John Horner wrote:
> Howard Lester wrote: > >> >> But in '03 apparently things must have changed. My Accord is an '04 >> 4-cylinder. The Service Interval section of the Owner's Manual refers >> to changing the timing belt at 105,000 miles, or 60,000 miles severe >> service, and specifies "6-cylinder only." In the 4-cylinder Service >> Interval section of the manual there is no reference at all to a >> timing belt, intimating there is no service required. >> > > Change they did. Honda's current 4 cylinder engines use a timing chain. > Many customers are really unhappy about having to pay for costly > timing belt replacements and thus many companies are going back to > timing chains. it's bizarre that in a time of improving emissions control, manufacturers would do that. as chains stretch, valve timing drifts and so consequently, does emissions. belts don't stretch ans remain dead-on accurate through their whole service life. and car owners getting ripped off by unscrupulous dealers and repair shops for over-expensive belt changes if not going to disappear because of a chain - there will always be something else to hose the customer with. |
Re: 2003 Accord Whirring Noise in Engine?
John Horner wrote:
> Howard Lester wrote: > >> >> But in '03 apparently things must have changed. My Accord is an '04 >> 4-cylinder. The Service Interval section of the Owner's Manual refers >> to changing the timing belt at 105,000 miles, or 60,000 miles severe >> service, and specifies "6-cylinder only." In the 4-cylinder Service >> Interval section of the manual there is no reference at all to a >> timing belt, intimating there is no service required. >> > > Change they did. Honda's current 4 cylinder engines use a timing chain. > Many customers are really unhappy about having to pay for costly > timing belt replacements and thus many companies are going back to > timing chains. it's bizarre that in a time of improving emissions control, manufacturers would do that. as chains stretch, valve timing drifts and so consequently, does emissions. belts don't stretch ans remain dead-on accurate through their whole service life. and car owners getting ripped off by unscrupulous dealers and repair shops for over-expensive belt changes if not going to disappear because of a chain - there will always be something else to hose the customer with. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands