2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
02-24-2004, 05:42 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
Hi,
I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
'04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
purchase decision for myself.
Best Regards,
EH
I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
'04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
purchase decision for myself.
Best Regards,
EH
02-24-2004, 06:54 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
On 2/24/2004 4:42 PM eyhang spake these words of knowledge:
> Hi,
>
> I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>
> I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
>
> These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> purchase decision for myself.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> EH
I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
but I am not unhappy with what I have.
It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
likely be happy with your choice.
Dave Kelsen
--
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
> Hi,
>
> I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>
> I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
>
> These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> purchase decision for myself.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> EH
I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
but I am not unhappy with what I have.
It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
likely be happy with your choice.
Dave Kelsen
--
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
02-24-2004, 06:54 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
On 2/24/2004 4:42 PM eyhang spake these words of knowledge:
> Hi,
>
> I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>
> I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
>
> These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> purchase decision for myself.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> EH
I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
but I am not unhappy with what I have.
It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
likely be happy with your choice.
Dave Kelsen
--
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
> Hi,
>
> I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>
> I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
>
> These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> purchase decision for myself.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> EH
I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
but I am not unhappy with what I have.
It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
likely be happy with your choice.
Dave Kelsen
--
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
02-24-2004, 06:54 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
On 2/24/2004 4:42 PM eyhang spake these words of knowledge:
> Hi,
>
> I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>
> I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
>
> These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> purchase decision for myself.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> EH
I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
but I am not unhappy with what I have.
It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
likely be happy with your choice.
Dave Kelsen
--
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
> Hi,
>
> I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>
> I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
>
> These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> purchase decision for myself.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> EH
I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
but I am not unhappy with what I have.
It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
likely be happy with your choice.
Dave Kelsen
--
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
02-24-2004, 06:54 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
On 2/24/2004 4:42 PM eyhang spake these words of knowledge:
> Hi,
>
> I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>
> I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
>
> These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> purchase decision for myself.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> EH
I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
but I am not unhappy with what I have.
It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
likely be happy with your choice.
Dave Kelsen
--
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
> Hi,
>
> I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>
> I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
>
> These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> purchase decision for myself.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> EH
I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
but I am not unhappy with what I have.
It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
likely be happy with your choice.
Dave Kelsen
--
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
02-24-2004, 08:27 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
--
"Dave Kelsen" <kelsen@elmore.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HuR_b.108381$jH.779902@twister.tampabay.rr.co m...
> On 2/24/2004 4:42 PM eyhang spake these words of knowledge:
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> > time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
> >
> > I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> > your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> > Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> > with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> > on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> > '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> > good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
> >
> > These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> > Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> > purchase decision for myself.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > EH
>
> I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
> power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
> small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
> but I am not unhappy with what I have.
>
> It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
> V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
> likely be happy with your choice.
>
> Dave Kelsen
> --
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
I agree with everything Dave said. It has more pick up then I need and as
an added benefit when I got My insurance, my agent said that the 4 was
cheaper Insurance then the 6 cylinder.
Iam very happy with my decision. EX
Bill M
02-24-2004, 08:27 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
--
"Dave Kelsen" <kelsen@elmore.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HuR_b.108381$jH.779902@twister.tampabay.rr.co m...
> On 2/24/2004 4:42 PM eyhang spake these words of knowledge:
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> > time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
> >
> > I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> > your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> > Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> > with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> > on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> > '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> > good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
> >
> > These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> > Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> > purchase decision for myself.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > EH
>
> I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
> power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
> small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
> but I am not unhappy with what I have.
>
> It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
> V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
> likely be happy with your choice.
>
> Dave Kelsen
> --
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
I agree with everything Dave said. It has more pick up then I need and as
an added benefit when I got My insurance, my agent said that the 4 was
cheaper Insurance then the 6 cylinder.
Iam very happy with my decision. EX
Bill M
02-24-2004, 08:27 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
--
"Dave Kelsen" <kelsen@elmore.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HuR_b.108381$jH.779902@twister.tampabay.rr.co m...
> On 2/24/2004 4:42 PM eyhang spake these words of knowledge:
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> > time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
> >
> > I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> > your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> > Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> > with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> > on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> > '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> > good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
> >
> > These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> > Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> > purchase decision for myself.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > EH
>
> I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
> power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
> small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
> but I am not unhappy with what I have.
>
> It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
> V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
> likely be happy with your choice.
>
> Dave Kelsen
> --
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
I agree with everything Dave said. It has more pick up then I need and as
an added benefit when I got My insurance, my agent said that the 4 was
cheaper Insurance then the 6 cylinder.
Iam very happy with my decision. EX
Bill M
02-24-2004, 08:27 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
--
"Dave Kelsen" <kelsen@elmore.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HuR_b.108381$jH.779902@twister.tampabay.rr.co m...
> On 2/24/2004 4:42 PM eyhang spake these words of knowledge:
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
> > time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
> >
> > I know I am comparing orange and apple. Just want to get
> > your opinions on whether EX V6's eng/trans is worth the 4K difference.
> > Which one do you think provides better value (I know V6 comes
> > with some more luxury features)? I have heard some nagative feedbacks
> > on Accord V6's transmission in the past. Has it improved in the
> > '04 model? Is V6's maintance charge signifficantly higher? Any
> > good/bad experiences with your purchase so far?
> >
> > These questions may sound rather stupid for some of you experts.
> > Just want to get your opinions so that I can make the correct
> > purchase decision for myself.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > EH
>
> I have an 03 Accord I4, and it provides me with all the acceleration and
> power I need; even all I want most of the time. If money was a fairly
> small concern, I would have gotten the V6 (with the manual transmission)
> but I am not unhappy with what I have.
>
> It comes down to how often you might *want* the power available in the
> V6, and whether it's worth it to you to pay for it. Either way, you'll
> likely be happy with your choice.
>
> Dave Kelsen
> --
Of beautiful birds in circling flight,
I agree with everything Dave said. It has more pick up then I need and as
an added benefit when I got My insurance, my agent said that the 4 was
cheaper Insurance then the 6 cylinder.
Iam very happy with my decision. EX
Bill M
02-24-2004, 09:37 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
eyhang <eyhang@no-spam.org> wrote:
: Hi,
: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
: ...
Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
about fuel economy makes good sense.
I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
not important to me.
The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
---
James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
: Hi,
: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
: ...
Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
about fuel economy makes good sense.
I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
not important to me.
The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
---
James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
02-24-2004, 09:37 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
eyhang <eyhang@no-spam.org> wrote:
: Hi,
: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
: ...
Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
about fuel economy makes good sense.
I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
not important to me.
The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
---
James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
: Hi,
: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
: ...
Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
about fuel economy makes good sense.
I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
not important to me.
The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
---
James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
02-24-2004, 09:37 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
eyhang <eyhang@no-spam.org> wrote:
: Hi,
: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
: ...
Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
about fuel economy makes good sense.
I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
not important to me.
The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
---
James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
: Hi,
: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
: ...
Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
about fuel economy makes good sense.
I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
not important to me.
The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
---
James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
02-24-2004, 09:37 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
eyhang <eyhang@no-spam.org> wrote:
: Hi,
: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
: ...
Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
about fuel economy makes good sense.
I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
not important to me.
The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
---
James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
: Hi,
: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
: ...
Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
about fuel economy makes good sense.
I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
not important to me.
The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
---
James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
02-25-2004, 06:49 AM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:37:28 -0600, jdhoward@helps.com wrote:
>eyhang <eyhang@no-spam.org> wrote:
>: Hi,
>
>: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
>: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>: ...
>
>Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
>This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
>I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
>and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
>expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
>
>When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
>I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
>I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
>On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
>74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
>more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
>slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
>I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
>about fuel economy makes good sense.
>
>I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
>V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
>not important to me.
>
>The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
>miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
>I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
>
>The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
>how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
>can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
>who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
>
>
> ---
> James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
From my past reading on the net, it seemed to me that more people had
problems after some years with the 6 cyl vs. 4 cyl. . Of course this
is just my opinion not a scientific survey. But I didn't seem to
notice any difference in the first few years between the two.
I'm no race car driver but when I compare my early 90's accord 4 cyl.
to my 03 accord 4 cyl. , the '03 seems to have plenty of power to
accelerate. It's not as powerful as an 8 cyl. but it seems quite
satisfactory for my type of driving (no towing).
>eyhang <eyhang@no-spam.org> wrote:
>: Hi,
>
>: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
>: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>: ...
>
>Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
>This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
>I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
>and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
>expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
>
>When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
>I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
>I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
>On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
>74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
>more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
>slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
>I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
>about fuel economy makes good sense.
>
>I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
>V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
>not important to me.
>
>The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
>miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
>I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
>
>The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
>how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
>can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
>who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
>
>
> ---
> James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
From my past reading on the net, it seemed to me that more people had
problems after some years with the 6 cyl vs. 4 cyl. . Of course this
is just my opinion not a scientific survey. But I didn't seem to
notice any difference in the first few years between the two.
I'm no race car driver but when I compare my early 90's accord 4 cyl.
to my 03 accord 4 cyl. , the '03 seems to have plenty of power to
accelerate. It's not as powerful as an 8 cyl. but it seems quite
satisfactory for my type of driving (no towing).
02-25-2004, 06:49 AM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord: EX or EX V6
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:37:28 -0600, jdhoward@helps.com wrote:
>eyhang <eyhang@no-spam.org> wrote:
>: Hi,
>
>: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
>: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>: ...
>
>Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
>This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
>I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
>and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
>expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
>
>When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
>I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
>I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
>On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
>74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
>more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
>slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
>I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
>about fuel economy makes good sense.
>
>I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
>V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
>not important to me.
>
>The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
>miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
>I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
>
>The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
>how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
>can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
>who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
>
>
> ---
> James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
From my past reading on the net, it seemed to me that more people had
problems after some years with the 6 cyl vs. 4 cyl. . Of course this
is just my opinion not a scientific survey. But I didn't seem to
notice any difference in the first few years between the two.
I'm no race car driver but when I compare my early 90's accord 4 cyl.
to my 03 accord 4 cyl. , the '03 seems to have plenty of power to
accelerate. It's not as powerful as an 8 cyl. but it seems quite
satisfactory for my type of driving (no towing).
>eyhang <eyhang@no-spam.org> wrote:
>: Hi,
>
>: I am about to purchase a new Accord and having a tough
>: time deciding between a EX I4 or EX V6.
>: ...
>
>Last April, I bought the 2003 EX-L-Nav with I4 and manual transmission.
>This is my first Honda. I had been a big American V8 driver(Cad).
>I bought the Honda based on its reputation of reliably, value, economy
>and performance. It is living up to that reputation better than I
>expected. I expected to be disappointed, but I haven't been yet.
>
>When I saw the economy numbers, I removed the V6 from consideration.
>I have driven about 26,000 miles. When street racing on dry pavement,
>I get tire spin in first and second gears and usually win the race.
>On the Interstate, I get fuel economy of 35+ mpUSg while cruising at
>74 MPH. If I cruise at 105+ MPH, the economy goes down, but is still
>more than 30+ mpUSg. If I try hard, coast down hills, accelerate
>slowly, I can get 42 mpUSg. Around town in the stop and go traffic
>I get 28 mpUSg or better. With gas getting more expensive, thinking
>about fuel economy makes good sense.
>
>I like the styling of the wheels on the I4 better than the ones on the
>V6. The curtain airbags and power passenger seat that the V6 has, are
>not important to me.
>
>The only service required so far has been oil changes. I had over 200,000
>miles on my last car and expect to keep this one for a long time. The
>I4 looks easier to service than the V6.
>
>The real reason to get the I4 instead of the V6 is that you can brag about
>how much smarter you were to buy it. You will have more for less and you
>can prove it. Your bragging rights are even more when you talk to some one
>who bought a V6 Toyota, Mazda, Nisson, ...
>
>
> ---
> James D. Howard Austin TX USA jdhoward@helps.com
From my past reading on the net, it seemed to me that more people had
problems after some years with the 6 cyl vs. 4 cyl. . Of course this
is just my opinion not a scientific survey. But I didn't seem to
notice any difference in the first few years between the two.
I'm no race car driver but when I compare my early 90's accord 4 cyl.
to my 03 accord 4 cyl. , the '03 seems to have plenty of power to
accelerate. It's not as powerful as an 8 cyl. but it seems quite
satisfactory for my type of driving (no towing).