Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:34:39 -0500, no name <jason*.nyhq@yahoo.com>
wrote: >The manufacturer's recommended break-in period for a Honda Accord, six >cylinder, with automatic is 600 miles. I was advised by someone at the >dealership that cruise control should not be used until the vehicle >has been driven for 1500 miles. The owner's manual makes no mention of >a separate break-in for the cruise control. Has anyone else ever >heard this? Yeah, I heard it forty years ago for GM iron engines, except they didnt even HAVE cruise control back then, but you were supposed to vary your speed a lot. Does not seem to be an issue for current Honda alumino-silicate engine technology. No 500 mile break-in oil, either. Don't even have to crank the engine manually to start them anymore, either. Still have to parallel-park them yourself, but how much longer can that go on?! J. |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:34:39 -0500, no name <jason*.nyhq@yahoo.com>
wrote: >The manufacturer's recommended break-in period for a Honda Accord, six >cylinder, with automatic is 600 miles. I was advised by someone at the >dealership that cruise control should not be used until the vehicle >has been driven for 1500 miles. The owner's manual makes no mention of >a separate break-in for the cruise control. Has anyone else ever >heard this? Yeah, I heard it forty years ago for GM iron engines, except they didnt even HAVE cruise control back then, but you were supposed to vary your speed a lot. Does not seem to be an issue for current Honda alumino-silicate engine technology. No 500 mile break-in oil, either. Don't even have to crank the engine manually to start them anymore, either. Still have to parallel-park them yourself, but how much longer can that go on?! J. |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:34:39 -0500, no name <jason*.nyhq@yahoo.com>
wrote: >The manufacturer's recommended break-in period for a Honda Accord, six >cylinder, with automatic is 600 miles. I was advised by someone at the >dealership that cruise control should not be used until the vehicle >has been driven for 1500 miles. The owner's manual makes no mention of >a separate break-in for the cruise control. Has anyone else ever >heard this? Yeah, I heard it forty years ago for GM iron engines, except they didnt even HAVE cruise control back then, but you were supposed to vary your speed a lot. Does not seem to be an issue for current Honda alumino-silicate engine technology. No 500 mile break-in oil, either. Don't even have to crank the engine manually to start them anymore, either. Still have to parallel-park them yourself, but how much longer can that go on?! J. |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:34:39 -0500, no name <jason*.nyhq@yahoo.com>
wrote: >The manufacturer's recommended break-in period for a Honda Accord, six >cylinder, with automatic is 600 miles. I was advised by someone at the >dealership that cruise control should not be used until the vehicle >has been driven for 1500 miles. The owner's manual makes no mention of >a separate break-in for the cruise control. Has anyone else ever >heard this? Yeah, I heard it forty years ago for GM iron engines, except they didnt even HAVE cruise control back then, but you were supposed to vary your speed a lot. Does not seem to be an issue for current Honda alumino-silicate engine technology. No 500 mile break-in oil, either. Don't even have to crank the engine manually to start them anymore, either. Still have to parallel-park them yourself, but how much longer can that go on?! J. |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
AZ Nomad wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:53:45 GMT, John Horner <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> Grumpy AuContraire wrote: > >>> >>> Uh, generally, break-in periods suggest not driving at constant speeds. >>> So, in this case, the advice may well have been appropriate. >>> >>> JT > >> Well, I just pulled out the owner's manual for my '06 Acura TSX. The >> only restrictions for the first 600 miles are to avoid full throttle >> acceleration, avoid agressive acceleration, avoid panic stop braking and >> to leave the factory motor oil in the motor until the first oil change >> interval. > >> The old procedures for running in rings, cams and the like do not seem >> to apply to modern Honda products. I'm pretty sure Honda knows what >> they are doing in this regard. > > Sure. Can't have all their engines lasting 300K miles. It's much > better for honda if their engines only last through the period of their > extended warranties. dude, with respect, time to move on. the improvements in precision, materials and lubricants since the 50's and the detroit hunk-o-junk's hay day render the old run-in procedure obsolete. besides, have you ever worked on diesels? if so, you'll know that the engine is controlled by the injection governor, not the pedal under the drivers foot - it gives full throttle/injection with absolutely zero regard to news groups. with that new knowledge and fear of blatant abuse, can we suddenly expect the nation's diesel engine lifespans to dramatically reduce? |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
AZ Nomad wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:53:45 GMT, John Horner <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> Grumpy AuContraire wrote: > >>> >>> Uh, generally, break-in periods suggest not driving at constant speeds. >>> So, in this case, the advice may well have been appropriate. >>> >>> JT > >> Well, I just pulled out the owner's manual for my '06 Acura TSX. The >> only restrictions for the first 600 miles are to avoid full throttle >> acceleration, avoid agressive acceleration, avoid panic stop braking and >> to leave the factory motor oil in the motor until the first oil change >> interval. > >> The old procedures for running in rings, cams and the like do not seem >> to apply to modern Honda products. I'm pretty sure Honda knows what >> they are doing in this regard. > > Sure. Can't have all their engines lasting 300K miles. It's much > better for honda if their engines only last through the period of their > extended warranties. dude, with respect, time to move on. the improvements in precision, materials and lubricants since the 50's and the detroit hunk-o-junk's hay day render the old run-in procedure obsolete. besides, have you ever worked on diesels? if so, you'll know that the engine is controlled by the injection governor, not the pedal under the drivers foot - it gives full throttle/injection with absolutely zero regard to news groups. with that new knowledge and fear of blatant abuse, can we suddenly expect the nation's diesel engine lifespans to dramatically reduce? |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
AZ Nomad wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:53:45 GMT, John Horner <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> Grumpy AuContraire wrote: > >>> >>> Uh, generally, break-in periods suggest not driving at constant speeds. >>> So, in this case, the advice may well have been appropriate. >>> >>> JT > >> Well, I just pulled out the owner's manual for my '06 Acura TSX. The >> only restrictions for the first 600 miles are to avoid full throttle >> acceleration, avoid agressive acceleration, avoid panic stop braking and >> to leave the factory motor oil in the motor until the first oil change >> interval. > >> The old procedures for running in rings, cams and the like do not seem >> to apply to modern Honda products. I'm pretty sure Honda knows what >> they are doing in this regard. > > Sure. Can't have all their engines lasting 300K miles. It's much > better for honda if their engines only last through the period of their > extended warranties. dude, with respect, time to move on. the improvements in precision, materials and lubricants since the 50's and the detroit hunk-o-junk's hay day render the old run-in procedure obsolete. besides, have you ever worked on diesels? if so, you'll know that the engine is controlled by the injection governor, not the pedal under the drivers foot - it gives full throttle/injection with absolutely zero regard to news groups. with that new knowledge and fear of blatant abuse, can we suddenly expect the nation's diesel engine lifespans to dramatically reduce? |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
In article <7j4ll2dus1omee34d2bnc6htfvhir5lkeq@4ax.com>,
JXStern <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote: > Still have to parallel-park them yourself, but how much longer can > that go on?! About 10 years. That's when the current Lexus gee-whiz parallel parking technology will move its way down to the base Civic. |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
In article <7j4ll2dus1omee34d2bnc6htfvhir5lkeq@4ax.com>,
JXStern <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote: > Still have to parallel-park them yourself, but how much longer can > that go on?! About 10 years. That's when the current Lexus gee-whiz parallel parking technology will move its way down to the base Civic. |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
In article <7j4ll2dus1omee34d2bnc6htfvhir5lkeq@4ax.com>,
JXStern <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote: > Still have to parallel-park them yourself, but how much longer can > that go on?! About 10 years. That's when the current Lexus gee-whiz parallel parking technology will move its way down to the base Civic. |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
AZ Nomad wrote:
> > Sure. Can't have all their engines lasting 300K miles. It's much > better for honda if their engines only last through the period of their > extended warranties. You must be joking, right? A good deal of Honda's business success today is built upon their reputation for robust long lasting vehicles. John |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
AZ Nomad wrote:
> > Sure. Can't have all their engines lasting 300K miles. It's much > better for honda if their engines only last through the period of their > extended warranties. You must be joking, right? A good deal of Honda's business success today is built upon their reputation for robust long lasting vehicles. John |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
AZ Nomad wrote:
> > Sure. Can't have all their engines lasting 300K miles. It's much > better for honda if their engines only last through the period of their > extended warranties. You must be joking, right? A good deal of Honda's business success today is built upon their reputation for robust long lasting vehicles. John |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:WnM6h.2138$5F2.1151@trnddc04... > AZ Nomad wrote: > >> >> Sure. Can't have all their engines lasting 300K miles. It's much >> better for honda if their engines only last through the period of their >> extended warranties. > > You must be joking, right? A good deal of Honda's business success today > is built upon their reputation for robust long lasting vehicles. > > John Exactly so. Looking in today's auto classifieds I see a 2001 Ford Taurus advertised for $2950 and a 2001 Honda Civic DX for $9995. Fords have a reputation for the sort of design you mention, AZ. Hondas don't... and it shows. Mike |
Re: 2007 Accord - Cruise Control
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:WnM6h.2138$5F2.1151@trnddc04... > AZ Nomad wrote: > >> >> Sure. Can't have all their engines lasting 300K miles. It's much >> better for honda if their engines only last through the period of their >> extended warranties. > > You must be joking, right? A good deal of Honda's business success today > is built upon their reputation for robust long lasting vehicles. > > John Exactly so. Looking in today's auto classifieds I see a 2001 Ford Taurus advertised for $2950 and a 2001 Honda Civic DX for $9995. Fords have a reputation for the sort of design you mention, AZ. Hondas don't... and it shows. Mike |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands