Re: '87 Honda Civic Advice
"TeGGeR®" wrote:
> > > I am hesitant because there could be something wrong with the bottom of > > the motor.. and I would have to replace the whole motor. I am not a > > good enough mechanic to do this.. don't have the time, or the facility. > > Do yourself a favor. Leave this mechanical experiment to someone else. > This is NOT the car for you. > Agreed. Sometimes it's best to just walk away. However, one time I had a little fun. I was considering getting an old 'Lude that didn't run as a project car but the owner thought she had gold and wanted too much money for it. So, just for fun, I did as much of an inspection on the car as I could without taking the wheels off, getting under it, etc. and handed her a work needed list for her "golden" 'Lude that was about two 8.5x11 pages full and then walked away. About a week later the same car was advertised in the local paper for a lower price but it was still too high! Find something that runs dependably. Personally, I would suggest avoiding the '84-7 Civics and find yourself a nicely maintained '91. You'll pay a little more but I think you'll be better off in the long run. Eric |
Re: '87 Honda Civic Advice
"TeGGeR®" wrote:
> > > I am hesitant because there could be something wrong with the bottom of > > the motor.. and I would have to replace the whole motor. I am not a > > good enough mechanic to do this.. don't have the time, or the facility. > > Do yourself a favor. Leave this mechanical experiment to someone else. > This is NOT the car for you. > Agreed. Sometimes it's best to just walk away. However, one time I had a little fun. I was considering getting an old 'Lude that didn't run as a project car but the owner thought she had gold and wanted too much money for it. So, just for fun, I did as much of an inspection on the car as I could without taking the wheels off, getting under it, etc. and handed her a work needed list for her "golden" 'Lude that was about two 8.5x11 pages full and then walked away. About a week later the same car was advertised in the local paper for a lower price but it was still too high! Find something that runs dependably. Personally, I would suggest avoiding the '84-7 Civics and find yourself a nicely maintained '91. You'll pay a little more but I think you'll be better off in the long run. Eric |
Re: '87 Honda Civic Advice
Matt Ion wrote: > Larry in AZ wrote: > > Waiving the right to remain silent, david <carroll6@kc.rr.com> said: > > > > > >>The question.. should I buy it? It has 153,000 miles on it. > > > > > > Not unless you're getting it as a "backup" car. > > It's not gonna cool any better in reverse... The air would blow out instead of blowing in the engine compartment. |
Re: '87 Honda Civic Advice
Matt Ion wrote: > Larry in AZ wrote: > > Waiving the right to remain silent, david <carroll6@kc.rr.com> said: > > > > > >>The question.. should I buy it? It has 153,000 miles on it. > > > > > > Not unless you're getting it as a "backup" car. > > It's not gonna cool any better in reverse... The air would blow out instead of blowing in the engine compartment. |
Re: '87 Honda Civic Advice
Matt Ion wrote: > Larry in AZ wrote: > > Waiving the right to remain silent, david <carroll6@kc.rr.com> said: > > > > > >>The question.. should I buy it? It has 153,000 miles on it. > > > > > > Not unless you're getting it as a "backup" car. > > It's not gonna cool any better in reverse... The air would blow out instead of blowing in the engine compartment. |
Re: '87 Honda Civic Advice
Matt Ion wrote: > Larry in AZ wrote: > > Waiving the right to remain silent, david <carroll6@kc.rr.com> said: > > > > > >>The question.. should I buy it? It has 153,000 miles on it. > > > > > > Not unless you're getting it as a "backup" car. > > It's not gonna cool any better in reverse... The air would blow out instead of blowing in the engine compartment. |
Re: '87 Honda Civic Advice
Alan wrote:
> Matt Ion wrote: > >>Larry in AZ wrote: >> >>>Waiving the right to remain silent, david <carroll6@kc.rr.com> said: >>> >>> >>> >>>>The question.. should I buy it? It has 153,000 miles on it. >>> >>> >>>Not unless you're getting it as a "backup" car. >> >>It's not gonna cool any better in reverse... > > > The air would blow out instead of blowing in the engine compartment. Yeah, but then it's pulling the air off the driver's feet... eeeeeewww! |
Re: '87 Honda Civic Advice
Alan wrote:
> Matt Ion wrote: > >>Larry in AZ wrote: >> >>>Waiving the right to remain silent, david <carroll6@kc.rr.com> said: >>> >>> >>> >>>>The question.. should I buy it? It has 153,000 miles on it. >>> >>> >>>Not unless you're getting it as a "backup" car. >> >>It's not gonna cool any better in reverse... > > > The air would blow out instead of blowing in the engine compartment. Yeah, but then it's pulling the air off the driver's feet... eeeeeewww! |
Re: '87 Honda Civic Advice
Alan wrote:
> Matt Ion wrote: > >>Larry in AZ wrote: >> >>>Waiving the right to remain silent, david <carroll6@kc.rr.com> said: >>> >>> >>> >>>>The question.. should I buy it? It has 153,000 miles on it. >>> >>> >>>Not unless you're getting it as a "backup" car. >> >>It's not gonna cool any better in reverse... > > > The air would blow out instead of blowing in the engine compartment. Yeah, but then it's pulling the air off the driver's feet... eeeeeewww! |
Re: '87 Honda Civic Advice
Alan wrote:
> Matt Ion wrote: > >>Larry in AZ wrote: >> >>>Waiving the right to remain silent, david <carroll6@kc.rr.com> said: >>> >>> >>> >>>>The question.. should I buy it? It has 153,000 miles on it. >>> >>> >>>Not unless you're getting it as a "backup" car. >> >>It's not gonna cool any better in reverse... > > > The air would blow out instead of blowing in the engine compartment. Yeah, but then it's pulling the air off the driver's feet... eeeeeewww! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands