GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks.

GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks. (https://www.gtcarz.com/)
-   Honda Mailing List (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/)
-   -   88 Accord Timing (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/88-accord-timing-290729/)

Gabbie 04-08-2006 01:02 PM

88 Accord Timing
 
Hello,

Could someone let me know the correct timing procedure for this car.
My accord is a automatic and has the distributor with the two vacuum hoses
on it.

I tried per a Clinton manual and it indicates to remove and plug the two
vacuum hoses on the vacuum advance ( I do have this on mine style of carb).
However, if I remove the left one as you face the engine, it really runs
bad. Prior to making any changes the timing light was on the first white
mark closest to the timing light. I went ahead and timed it with the hoses
attached and set the timing on the red mark per the manual. I suspect this
is incorrect, however it does seems to run better. But I think it could run
a little better if I got it correct. Have one red mark in the middle of two
white marks for the timing marks.

Could someone please let me know if you have any ideas?

Thanks,

Terry



Headknocker via CarKB.com 04-08-2006 02:36 PM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Gabbie wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Could someone let me know the correct timing procedure for this car.
>My accord is a automatic and has the distributor with the two vacuum hoses
>on it.
>
>I tried per a Clinton manual and it indicates to remove and plug the two
>vacuum hoses on the vacuum advance ( I do have this on mine style of carb).
>However, if I remove the left one as you face the engine, it really runs
>bad. Prior to making any changes the timing light was on the first white
>mark closest to the timing light. I went ahead and timed it with the hoses
>attached and set the timing on the red mark per the manual. I suspect this
>is incorrect, however it does seems to run better. But I think it could run
>a little better if I got it correct. Have one red mark in the middle of two
>white marks for the timing marks.
>
>Could someone please let me know if you have any ideas?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Terry


I have an '88 Accord and I have always felt the directions for setting the
timing to be a little confusing. It also doesn't help that the directions in
my Haynes manual and the Factory Service manual don't jive.

I used the directions in the Haynes manual (which coincides with those in
your Chilton manual) the first time I did the procedure and the timing was
WAY off since I was setting it at 15 degrees BTDC(the red mark). Per the
Factory Service manual, the timing should at 4 degrees BTDC with the vacuum
hoses plugged although I don't ever recall seeing that mark.

You actually set it correctly. Keep the hoses connected and put your auto
trans in gear (using the emergency brake to hold it) and align the pointer
with the RED mark. That's IT.

I was baffled by this myself and I came to the conclusion that the folks at
Haynes and Chilton misunderstood Honda's instructions. The only real reason
to remove to vacuum hoses is to check if the vacuum advance is working
properly..which is done with a vacuum pump gauge.

BTW, my '88 is still running like a top at 239,000 miles. I'm amazed at the
thing.

--
Message posted via CarKB.com
http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200604/1

Headknocker via CarKB.com 04-08-2006 02:36 PM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Gabbie wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Could someone let me know the correct timing procedure for this car.
>My accord is a automatic and has the distributor with the two vacuum hoses
>on it.
>
>I tried per a Clinton manual and it indicates to remove and plug the two
>vacuum hoses on the vacuum advance ( I do have this on mine style of carb).
>However, if I remove the left one as you face the engine, it really runs
>bad. Prior to making any changes the timing light was on the first white
>mark closest to the timing light. I went ahead and timed it with the hoses
>attached and set the timing on the red mark per the manual. I suspect this
>is incorrect, however it does seems to run better. But I think it could run
>a little better if I got it correct. Have one red mark in the middle of two
>white marks for the timing marks.
>
>Could someone please let me know if you have any ideas?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Terry


I have an '88 Accord and I have always felt the directions for setting the
timing to be a little confusing. It also doesn't help that the directions in
my Haynes manual and the Factory Service manual don't jive.

I used the directions in the Haynes manual (which coincides with those in
your Chilton manual) the first time I did the procedure and the timing was
WAY off since I was setting it at 15 degrees BTDC(the red mark). Per the
Factory Service manual, the timing should at 4 degrees BTDC with the vacuum
hoses plugged although I don't ever recall seeing that mark.

You actually set it correctly. Keep the hoses connected and put your auto
trans in gear (using the emergency brake to hold it) and align the pointer
with the RED mark. That's IT.

I was baffled by this myself and I came to the conclusion that the folks at
Haynes and Chilton misunderstood Honda's instructions. The only real reason
to remove to vacuum hoses is to check if the vacuum advance is working
properly..which is done with a vacuum pump gauge.

BTW, my '88 is still running like a top at 239,000 miles. I'm amazed at the
thing.

--
Message posted via CarKB.com
http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200604/1

gateway 04-08-2006 06:44 PM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Hello,

Thanks for the information. What I can not figure out is if you disconnect
the vacuum hoses, it runs so bad I don't think the timing light is even close

to any timing marks? It sounds like when my vac hoses were connect it was at
0 degrees per the white mark?

Wish the manuals would only cover one model etc. Its sort of a pain to make
sure your're always following instructions for the correct model.

Let me know if you receive this ok since I have another questions for ya.
I think you answered a previous email for someone else conerning idealing .

I'm at 193K.

Headknocker wrote:
>>Hello,
>>

>[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>
>>Terry

>
>I have an '88 Accord and I have always felt the directions for setting the
>timing to be a little confusing. It also doesn't help that the directions in
>my Haynes manual and the Factory Service manual don't jive.
>
>I used the directions in the Haynes manual (which coincides with those in
>your Chilton manual) the first time I did the procedure and the timing was
>WAY off since I was setting it at 15 degrees BTDC(the red mark). Per the
>Factory Service manual, the timing should at 4 degrees BTDC with the vacuum
>hoses plugged although I don't ever recall seeing that mark.
>
>You actually set it correctly. Keep the hoses connected and put your auto
>trans in gear (using the emergency brake to hold it) and align the pointer
>with the RED mark. That's IT.
>
>I was baffled by this myself and I came to the conclusion that the folks at
>Haynes and Chilton misunderstood Honda's instructions. The only real reason
>to remove to vacuum hoses is to check if the vacuum advance is working
>properly..which is done with a vacuum pump gauge.
>
>BTW, my '88 is still running like a top at 239,000 miles. I'm amazed at the
>thing.


gateway 04-08-2006 06:44 PM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Hello,

Thanks for the information. What I can not figure out is if you disconnect
the vacuum hoses, it runs so bad I don't think the timing light is even close

to any timing marks? It sounds like when my vac hoses were connect it was at
0 degrees per the white mark?

Wish the manuals would only cover one model etc. Its sort of a pain to make
sure your're always following instructions for the correct model.

Let me know if you receive this ok since I have another questions for ya.
I think you answered a previous email for someone else conerning idealing .

I'm at 193K.

Headknocker wrote:
>>Hello,
>>

>[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>
>>Terry

>
>I have an '88 Accord and I have always felt the directions for setting the
>timing to be a little confusing. It also doesn't help that the directions in
>my Haynes manual and the Factory Service manual don't jive.
>
>I used the directions in the Haynes manual (which coincides with those in
>your Chilton manual) the first time I did the procedure and the timing was
>WAY off since I was setting it at 15 degrees BTDC(the red mark). Per the
>Factory Service manual, the timing should at 4 degrees BTDC with the vacuum
>hoses plugged although I don't ever recall seeing that mark.
>
>You actually set it correctly. Keep the hoses connected and put your auto
>trans in gear (using the emergency brake to hold it) and align the pointer
>with the RED mark. That's IT.
>
>I was baffled by this myself and I came to the conclusion that the folks at
>Haynes and Chilton misunderstood Honda's instructions. The only real reason
>to remove to vacuum hoses is to check if the vacuum advance is working
>properly..which is done with a vacuum pump gauge.
>
>BTW, my '88 is still running like a top at 239,000 miles. I'm amazed at the
>thing.


Eric 04-08-2006 09:24 PM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
gateway wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the information. What I can not figure out is if you
> disconnect the vacuum hoses, it runs so bad I don't think the timing
> light is even close to any timing marks? It sounds like when my vac
> hoses were connect it was at 0 degrees per the white mark?
>
> Wish the manuals would only cover one model etc. Its sort of a pain to
> make sure your're always following instructions for the correct model.
>


If you provide a valid email address then I will send you a copy of the
timing procedure from the factory Helm manual. The manual discusses
removing the vacuum hoses to check for the presence of vacuum on the #2 hose
but then it shows in a diagram that the timing should be checked with both
vacuum hoses connected (and while in gear for the automatic). However, it
does say to plug the hoses so it's not entirely clear. It's been a long
time since I've worked on one of these units so I don't remember the exact
procedure that I used to follow.

Eric

Eric 04-08-2006 09:24 PM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
gateway wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the information. What I can not figure out is if you
> disconnect the vacuum hoses, it runs so bad I don't think the timing
> light is even close to any timing marks? It sounds like when my vac
> hoses were connect it was at 0 degrees per the white mark?
>
> Wish the manuals would only cover one model etc. Its sort of a pain to
> make sure your're always following instructions for the correct model.
>


If you provide a valid email address then I will send you a copy of the
timing procedure from the factory Helm manual. The manual discusses
removing the vacuum hoses to check for the presence of vacuum on the #2 hose
but then it shows in a diagram that the timing should be checked with both
vacuum hoses connected (and while in gear for the automatic). However, it
does say to plug the hoses so it's not entirely clear. It's been a long
time since I've worked on one of these units so I don't remember the exact
procedure that I used to follow.

Eric

gateway via CarKB.com 04-09-2006 01:42 AM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Hello Eric,

Thanks, I would really appreciate that.

gabbie73 at verizon dot net



Eric wrote:
>> Hello,
>>

>[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> Wish the manuals would only cover one model etc. Its sort of a pain to
>> make sure your're always following instructions for the correct model.

>
>If you provide a valid email address then I will send you a copy of the
>timing procedure from the factory Helm manual. The manual discusses
>removing the vacuum hoses to check for the presence of vacuum on the #2 hose
>but then it shows in a diagram that the timing should be checked with both
>vacuum hoses connected (and while in gear for the automatic). However, it
>does say to plug the hoses so it's not entirely clear. It's been a long
>time since I've worked on one of these units so I don't remember the exact
>procedure that I used to follow.
>
>Eric


--
Message posted via CarKB.com
http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200604/1

gateway via CarKB.com 04-09-2006 01:42 AM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Hello Eric,

Thanks, I would really appreciate that.

gabbie73 at verizon dot net



Eric wrote:
>> Hello,
>>

>[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> Wish the manuals would only cover one model etc. Its sort of a pain to
>> make sure your're always following instructions for the correct model.

>
>If you provide a valid email address then I will send you a copy of the
>timing procedure from the factory Helm manual. The manual discusses
>removing the vacuum hoses to check for the presence of vacuum on the #2 hose
>but then it shows in a diagram that the timing should be checked with both
>vacuum hoses connected (and while in gear for the automatic). However, it
>does say to plug the hoses so it's not entirely clear. It's been a long
>time since I've worked on one of these units so I don't remember the exact
>procedure that I used to follow.
>
>Eric


--
Message posted via CarKB.com
http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200604/1

gateway via CarKB.com 04-10-2006 11:21 PM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Hello Eric,

Let me know if you are unable to figure out my email addess.
Just substitute the at and dot for the at symbol and period.

Gateway


gateway wrote:
>Hello Eric,
>
>Thanks, I would really appreciate that.
>
>gabbie73 at verizon dot net
>
>>> Hello,
>>>

>[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>
>>Eric


--
Gateway

Message posted via CarKB.com
http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200604/1

gateway via CarKB.com 04-10-2006 11:21 PM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Hello Eric,

Let me know if you are unable to figure out my email addess.
Just substitute the at and dot for the at symbol and period.

Gateway


gateway wrote:
>Hello Eric,
>
>Thanks, I would really appreciate that.
>
>gabbie73 at verizon dot net
>
>>> Hello,
>>>

>[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>
>>Eric


--
Gateway

Message posted via CarKB.com
http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200604/1

Matt Ion 04-10-2006 11:51 PM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Gabbie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone let me know the correct timing procedure for this car.
> My accord is a automatic and has the distributor with the two vacuum hoses
> on it.
>
> I tried per a Clinton manual and it indicates to remove and plug the two
> vacuum hoses on the vacuum advance ( I do have this on mine style of carb).
> However, if I remove the left one as you face the engine, it really runs
> bad. Prior to making any changes the timing light was on the first white
> mark closest to the timing light. I went ahead and timed it with the hoses
> attached and set the timing on the red mark per the manual. I suspect this
> is incorrect, however it does seems to run better. But I think it could run
> a little better if I got it correct. Have one red mark in the middle of two
> white marks for the timing marks.
>
> Could someone please let me know if you have any ideas?


I ran into the same confusion with the factory shop manual, Terry, and
when I pointed it out as poor wording in the manual I got flamed no end.

In fact, you need to check the timing with the vacuum lines attached and
the car at a proper idle (650-850rpm depending on the exact model). The
part of the procedure that has you pulling them off appears to be only
for the sake of testing that they have proper vacuum; the "outer" hose
(farthest from the distributor body) I believe is operational only while
the engine is cold, while the "inner" hose (labeled #2) is used during
normal running.

See if these pages help any:
http://www.moltenimage.com/freebies/...rical/24-4.JPG
http://www.moltenimage.com/freebies/...rical/24-5.JPG


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0615-0, 04/08/2006
Tested on: 4/10/2006 8:51:29 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com




Matt Ion 04-10-2006 11:51 PM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Gabbie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone let me know the correct timing procedure for this car.
> My accord is a automatic and has the distributor with the two vacuum hoses
> on it.
>
> I tried per a Clinton manual and it indicates to remove and plug the two
> vacuum hoses on the vacuum advance ( I do have this on mine style of carb).
> However, if I remove the left one as you face the engine, it really runs
> bad. Prior to making any changes the timing light was on the first white
> mark closest to the timing light. I went ahead and timed it with the hoses
> attached and set the timing on the red mark per the manual. I suspect this
> is incorrect, however it does seems to run better. But I think it could run
> a little better if I got it correct. Have one red mark in the middle of two
> white marks for the timing marks.
>
> Could someone please let me know if you have any ideas?


I ran into the same confusion with the factory shop manual, Terry, and
when I pointed it out as poor wording in the manual I got flamed no end.

In fact, you need to check the timing with the vacuum lines attached and
the car at a proper idle (650-850rpm depending on the exact model). The
part of the procedure that has you pulling them off appears to be only
for the sake of testing that they have proper vacuum; the "outer" hose
(farthest from the distributor body) I believe is operational only while
the engine is cold, while the "inner" hose (labeled #2) is used during
normal running.

See if these pages help any:
http://www.moltenimage.com/freebies/...rical/24-4.JPG
http://www.moltenimage.com/freebies/...rical/24-5.JPG


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0615-0, 04/08/2006
Tested on: 4/10/2006 8:51:29 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com




Matt Ion 04-11-2006 12:23 AM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Eric wrote:
> gateway wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Thanks for the information. What I can not figure out is if you
>>disconnect the vacuum hoses, it runs so bad I don't think the timing
>>light is even close to any timing marks? It sounds like when my vac
>>hoses were connect it was at 0 degrees per the white mark?
>>
>>Wish the manuals would only cover one model etc. Its sort of a pain to
>>make sure your're always following instructions for the correct model.
>>

>
>
> If you provide a valid email address then I will send you a copy of the
> timing procedure from the factory Helm manual. The manual discusses
> removing the vacuum hoses to check for the presence of vacuum on the #2 hose
> but then it shows in a diagram that the timing should be checked with both
> vacuum hoses connected (and while in gear for the automatic). However, it
> does say to plug the hoses so it's not entirely clear. It's been a long
> time since I've worked on one of these units so I don't remember the exact
> procedure that I used to follow.


See, that's exactly what I said about that manual - the instructions are
vague, contradictory, or just poorly worded - and I got absolutely
on by the "experts" in here. Nice to know I'm not the only one who sees
a problem here.


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0615-0, 04/08/2006
Tested on: 4/10/2006 9:23:50 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com




Matt Ion 04-11-2006 12:23 AM

Re: 88 Accord Timing
 
Eric wrote:
> gateway wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Thanks for the information. What I can not figure out is if you
>>disconnect the vacuum hoses, it runs so bad I don't think the timing
>>light is even close to any timing marks? It sounds like when my vac
>>hoses were connect it was at 0 degrees per the white mark?
>>
>>Wish the manuals would only cover one model etc. Its sort of a pain to
>>make sure your're always following instructions for the correct model.
>>

>
>
> If you provide a valid email address then I will send you a copy of the
> timing procedure from the factory Helm manual. The manual discusses
> removing the vacuum hoses to check for the presence of vacuum on the #2 hose
> but then it shows in a diagram that the timing should be checked with both
> vacuum hoses connected (and while in gear for the automatic). However, it
> does say to plug the hoses so it's not entirely clear. It's been a long
> time since I've worked on one of these units so I don't remember the exact
> procedure that I used to follow.


See, that's exactly what I said about that manual - the instructions are
vague, contradictory, or just poorly worded - and I got absolutely
on by the "experts" in here. Nice to know I'm not the only one who sees
a problem here.


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0615-0, 04/08/2006
Tested on: 4/10/2006 9:23:50 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.09224 seconds with 5 queries