Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> 1. consider returning the distributor under warranty. > 2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit. You mean just the distributor sub-assembly. > 3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the > fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year. > check wiring & connectors. |
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> 1. consider returning the distributor under warranty. > 2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit. You mean just the distributor sub-assembly. > 3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the > fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year. > check wiring & connectors. |
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> 1. consider returning the distributor under warranty. > 2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit. You mean just the distributor sub-assembly. > 3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the > fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year. > check wiring & connectors. |
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
Burt wrote:
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote > > >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty. >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit. > > > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly. whatever you bought a month ago. > > >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year. >> check wiring & connectors. > > > > > |
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
Burt wrote:
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote > > >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty. >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit. > > > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly. whatever you bought a month ago. > > >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year. >> check wiring & connectors. > > > > > |
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
Burt wrote:
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote > > >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty. >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit. > > > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly. whatever you bought a month ago. > > >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year. >> check wiring & connectors. > > > > > |
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
Burt wrote:
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote > > >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty. >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit. > > > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly. whatever you bought a month ago. > > >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year. >> check wiring & connectors. > > > > > |
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
don't know if this'll get buried anyway in the forum. thought i'd give
a follow up. took my distributer to napa tonight for warranty replacement. i bought it last year, june 17th. five days left on that one! can you say LUCK? the guy at napa made no hassle whatsoever. he knows me probably a little too well. got home, threw in the new dist. car started right up. went for a test drive after clearing ECU. drove for at least 15 minutes and everything seemed fine. i was doubtful the dist was faulty (i'm pretty skeptical after all the s**t i've been thru with cars), but figured what the heck. she ran fine. i think the timing was a tad off, but that can wait. so keep your fingers crossed for me! this car just dodged a bullet by five days. if the warranty had expired it would've gone to the junk yard. thanks to all. jim beam wrote: > Burt wrote: > > "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote > > > > > >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty. > >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit. > > > > > > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly. > > whatever you bought a month ago. > > > > > > >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the > >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year. > >> check wiring & connectors. > > > > > > > > > > |
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
don't know if this'll get buried anyway in the forum. thought i'd give
a follow up. took my distributer to napa tonight for warranty replacement. i bought it last year, june 17th. five days left on that one! can you say LUCK? the guy at napa made no hassle whatsoever. he knows me probably a little too well. got home, threw in the new dist. car started right up. went for a test drive after clearing ECU. drove for at least 15 minutes and everything seemed fine. i was doubtful the dist was faulty (i'm pretty skeptical after all the s**t i've been thru with cars), but figured what the heck. she ran fine. i think the timing was a tad off, but that can wait. so keep your fingers crossed for me! this car just dodged a bullet by five days. if the warranty had expired it would've gone to the junk yard. thanks to all. jim beam wrote: > Burt wrote: > > "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote > > > > > >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty. > >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit. > > > > > > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly. > > whatever you bought a month ago. > > > > > > >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the > >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year. > >> check wiring & connectors. > > > > > > > > > > |
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
don't know if this'll get buried anyway in the forum. thought i'd give
a follow up. took my distributer to napa tonight for warranty replacement. i bought it last year, june 17th. five days left on that one! can you say LUCK? the guy at napa made no hassle whatsoever. he knows me probably a little too well. got home, threw in the new dist. car started right up. went for a test drive after clearing ECU. drove for at least 15 minutes and everything seemed fine. i was doubtful the dist was faulty (i'm pretty skeptical after all the s**t i've been thru with cars), but figured what the heck. she ran fine. i think the timing was a tad off, but that can wait. so keep your fingers crossed for me! this car just dodged a bullet by five days. if the warranty had expired it would've gone to the junk yard. thanks to all. jim beam wrote: > Burt wrote: > > "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote > > > > > >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty. > >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit. > > > > > > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly. > > whatever you bought a month ago. > > > > > > >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the > >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year. > >> check wiring & connectors. > > > > > > > > > > |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands