|
94 Civic Distributor leak
Took car to fix minor exhaust leak. While on rack the pointed out oil leak
@ distributor housing & told me I needed to replace distributor. I almost ordered new one from autozone. Pulled rotor cap & inside was basically dry - had a tiny bit of oil near rim by bottom bolt, but I'm thinking that seeped in from bottom of housing as I was removing cap. After reading past posts, I pulled cap again to check. inner Dust cap was dry & no evidence of oil in dist. I didn't pull rotor or dust cap. I'm thinking that the shaft seal must be fine and that the leak is likely the O ring. The car runs fine. Any other opinions? BTW Tegger. on '94 it looks like there is a notch in the dust cap to allow you to use a full sized phillips on the rotor screw. I didn't try it because I figgure why fix what ain't broke. |
Re: 94 Civic Distributor leak
"jim L" <jtl57@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:6u5Ok.54708$rD2.44929@bignews4.bellsouth.net: > Took car to fix minor exhaust leak. While on rack the pointed out oil > leak @ distributor housing & told me I needed to replace distributor. > I almost ordered new one from autozone. Pulled rotor cap & inside > was basically dry - had a tiny bit of oil near rim by bottom bolt, > but I'm thinking that seeped in from bottom of housing as I was > removing cap. After reading past posts, I pulled cap again to check. > inner Dust cap was dry & no evidence of oil in dist. I didn't pull > rotor or dust cap. > > I'm thinking that the shaft seal must be fine and that the leak is > likely the O ring. The car runs fine. Any other opinions? > > BTW Tegger. on '94 it looks like there is a notch in the dust cap to > allow you to use a full sized phillips on the rotor screw. I didn't > try it because I figgure why fix what ain't broke. > > > > try a new O ring. you can probably get them from a decent auto parts store. (if the Honda dealer doesn't sell them) -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
Re: 94 Civic Distributor leak
"jim L" <jtl57@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:6u5Ok.54708$rD2.44929@bignews4.bellsouth.net: > Took car to fix minor exhaust leak. While on rack the pointed out oil > leak @ distributor housing & told me I needed to replace distributor. > I almost ordered new one from autozone. You don't replace a distributor for an oil leak. And an AZ replacement would be near suicide. Don't do it. > Pulled rotor cap & inside > was basically dry - had a tiny bit of oil near rim by bottom bolt, > but I'm thinking that seeped in from bottom of housing as I was > removing cap. After reading past posts, I pulled cap again to check. > inner Dust cap was dry & no evidence of oil in dist. I didn't pull > rotor or dust cap. It's the O-ring that you can easily replace by pulling the entire distributor assembly (three bolts, two connectors). The O-ring is about two dollars at the dealer. Forget trying to locate the exact same size and material composition at Home Depot or Lowe's or some other hardware store. Just go to your local Honda dealer. http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/...-leaky-o-ring/ Put some fresh oil on the new ring before worrying it into place, and make sure you don't twist it up as you work it in place. > > I'm thinking that the shaft seal must be fine and that the leak is > likely the O ring. The car runs fine. Any other opinions? See above. > > BTW Tegger. on '94 it looks like there is a notch in the dust cap to > allow you to use a full sized phillips on the rotor screw. Really? I need to check that out by inspecting an inmate of my local automotive asylum...sorry..."wreckers"...sorry..."recyclers". -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Re: 94 Civic Distributor leak
Hi - I replaced the O ring with one from the dealer. It doesn't seem like
the right one to me - right diameter , but it seems like the rubber should be thicker - it only about half fills the channel. Also - It wasn't a tight squeeze to get it on. The old one was hard & brittle like plastic. Anyway, I'll keep an eye on it & see if leak is stopped. The p/n is 30110-PA1-732 or K8A11 on the bag. The Dist id a TD-42U. "Tegger" <invalid@invalid.inv> wrote in message news:Xns9B48DD3599B6Dtegger@208.90.168.18... > "jim L" <jtl57@bellsouth.net> wrote in > news:6u5Ok.54708$rD2.44929@bignews4.bellsouth.net: > >> Took car to fix minor exhaust leak. While on rack the pointed out oil >> leak @ distributor housing & told me I needed to replace distributor. >> I almost ordered new one from autozone. > > > > You don't replace a distributor for an oil leak. > > And an AZ replacement would be near suicide. Don't do it. > > > >> Pulled rotor cap & inside >> was basically dry - had a tiny bit of oil near rim by bottom bolt, >> but I'm thinking that seeped in from bottom of housing as I was >> removing cap. After reading past posts, I pulled cap again to check. >> inner Dust cap was dry & no evidence of oil in dist. I didn't pull >> rotor or dust cap. > > > > It's the O-ring that you can easily replace by pulling the entire > distributor assembly (three bolts, two connectors). The O-ring is about > two > dollars at the dealer. Forget trying to locate the exact same size and > material composition at Home Depot or Lowe's or some other hardware store. > Just go to your local Honda dealer. > > http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/...-leaky-o-ring/ > > Put some fresh oil on the new ring before worrying it into place, and make > sure you don't twist it up as you work it in place. > > > >> >> I'm thinking that the shaft seal must be fine and that the leak is >> likely the O ring. The car runs fine. Any other opinions? > > > > See above. > > > >> >> BTW Tegger. on '94 it looks like there is a notch in the dust cap to >> allow you to use a full sized phillips on the rotor screw. > > > Really? I need to check that out by inspecting an inmate of my local > automotive asylum...sorry..."wreckers"...sorry..."recyclers". > > > -- > Tegger > > The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ > www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Re: 94 Civic Distributor leak
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:06:19 -0500, "jim L" <jtl57@bellsouth.net>
wrote: Had the same problem last year and the new O-Ring fixed it on our 99 Accord. >Hi - I replaced the O ring with one from the dealer. It doesn't seem like >the right one to me - right diameter , but it seems like the rubber should >be thicker - it only about half fills the channel. Also - It wasn't a >tight squeeze to get it on. >The old one was hard & brittle like plastic. Anyway, I'll keep an eye on >it & see if leak is stopped. The p/n is 30110-PA1-732 or K8A11 on the bag. >The Dist id a TD-42U. > > >"Tegger" <invalid@invalid.inv> wrote in message >news:Xns9B48DD3599B6Dtegger@208.90.168.18... >> "jim L" <jtl57@bellsouth.net> wrote in >> news:6u5Ok.54708$rD2.44929@bignews4.bellsouth.net: >> >>> Took car to fix minor exhaust leak. While on rack the pointed out oil >>> leak @ distributor housing & told me I needed to replace distributor. >>> I almost ordered new one from autozone. >> >> >> >> You don't replace a distributor for an oil leak. >> >> And an AZ replacement would be near suicide. Don't do it. >> >> >> >>> Pulled rotor cap & inside >>> was basically dry - had a tiny bit of oil near rim by bottom bolt, >>> but I'm thinking that seeped in from bottom of housing as I was >>> removing cap. After reading past posts, I pulled cap again to check. >>> inner Dust cap was dry & no evidence of oil in dist. I didn't pull >>> rotor or dust cap. >> >> >> >> It's the O-ring that you can easily replace by pulling the entire >> distributor assembly (three bolts, two connectors). The O-ring is about >> two >> dollars at the dealer. Forget trying to locate the exact same size and >> material composition at Home Depot or Lowe's or some other hardware store. >> Just go to your local Honda dealer. >> >> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/...-leaky-o-ring/ >> >> Put some fresh oil on the new ring before worrying it into place, and make >> sure you don't twist it up as you work it in place. >> >> >> >>> >>> I'm thinking that the shaft seal must be fine and that the leak is >>> likely the O ring. The car runs fine. Any other opinions? >> >> >> >> See above. >> >> >> >>> >>> BTW Tegger. on '94 it looks like there is a notch in the dust cap to >>> allow you to use a full sized phillips on the rotor screw. >> >> >> Really? I need to check that out by inspecting an inmate of my local >> automotive asylum...sorry..."wreckers"...sorry..."recyclers". >> >> >> -- >> Tegger >> >> The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ >> www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ > |
Re: 94 Civic Distributor leak
On Oct 31, 8:45 pm, Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote:
> "jim L" <jt...@bellsouth.net> wrote innews:6u5Ok.54708 > > > BTW Tegger. on '94 it looks like there is a notch in the dust capto > > allow you to use a full sized phillips on the rotor screw. > > Really? I need to check that out by inspecting an inmate of my local > automotive asylum...sorry..."wreckers"...sorry..."recyclers". > > -- > Tegger > > The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQwww.tegger.com/hondafaq/ the parts listing specifies a "diamagnetic" screw there, though. i assume they mean nonmagnetic, to avoid interference with the sensors? whoever replaced the rotor on mine last used a rotor with a springy thing to hold it on rather than the screw, so i can't check. (the down side of that is that the spring rusts onto the shaft nicely) but physically i've managed to fit both a home depot metric machine screw or a home depot allenhead cap screw without any interference from the dust cover. the car wouldn't run and i thought it was the above mentioned problem from a magnetic screw, so i put the old rotor back and buttoned it up, whereupon i discovered i had just forgotten to plug the distributor connector back in. d'oh! |
Re: 94 Civic Distributor leak
z <gzuckier@snail-mail.net> wrote in news:a8605eb9-d9d2-4b8c-8b19-
c5bee1008bd8@q30g2000prq.googlegroups.com: > On Oct 31, 8:45 pm, Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote: >> "jim L" <jt...@bellsouth.net> wrote innews:6u5Ok.54708 >> >> > BTW Tegger. on '94 it looks like there is a notch in the dust cap > to >> > allow you to use a full sized phillips on the rotor screw. >> >> Really? I need to check that out by inspecting an inmate of my local >> automotive asylum...sorry..."wreckers"...sorry..."recyclers". >> >> > > > > the parts listing specifies a "diamagnetic" screw there, though. i > assume they mean nonmagnetic, to avoid interference with the sensors? "Diamagnetic" is a term I'd never heard of, so I did a quick Google. First entry in the list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism I'm guessing that diamagmetic property is in fact there in order to avoid interference with the Hall-effect sensors inside the distributor. Hall-effect sensors respond to magnetism, so I imagine a screw that could inadvertently become magnetized could play havoc with the ECU's readings. However... I have a few used distributor screws (OEM). They all stick to a magnet. I just tried it right now. Maybe I'm misunderstanding something about the term "diamagnetic". Maybe the term simply means "less magnetic than normal for a ferric material"? > whoever replaced the rotor on mine last used a rotor with a springy > thing to hold it on rather than the screw, so i can't check. (the down > side of that is that the spring rusts onto the shaft nicely) That's an aftermarket rotor. Get rid of it. Aftermarket ignition parts are damagingly garbage-ish. Aftermarket sucks and blows both at the very same time. > > but physically i've managed to fit both a home depot metric machine > screw or a home depot allenhead cap screw without any interference > from the dust cover. the car wouldn't run and i thought it was the > above mentioned problem from a magnetic screw, so i put the old rotor > back and buttoned it up, whereupon i discovered i had just forgotten > to plug the distributor connector back in. d'oh! Well there y'go. Glad it's fixed. -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Re: 94 Civic Distributor leak
On Nov 4, 6:20 pm, Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote:
> z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote in news:a8605eb9-d9d2-4b8c-8b19- > c5bee1008...@q30g2000prq.googlegroups.com: > > > > > > > On Oct 31, 8:45 pm, Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote: > >> "jim L" <jt...@bellsouth.net> wrote innews:6u5Ok.54708 > > >> > BTW Tegger. on '94 it looks like there is a notch in the dust cap > > to > >> > allow you to use a full sized phillips on the rotor screw. > > >> Really? I need to check that out by inspecting an inmate of my local > >> automotive asylum...sorry..."wreckers"...sorry..."recyclers". > > > the parts listing specifies a "diamagnetic" screw there, though. i > > assume they mean nonmagnetic, to avoid interference with the sensors? > > "Diamagnetic" is a term I'd never heard of, so I did a quick Google. > First entry in the list:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism > > I'm guessing that diamagmetic property is in fact there in order to > avoid interference with the Hall-effect sensors inside the distributor. > Hall-effect sensors respond to magnetism, so I imagine a screw that > could inadvertently become magnetized could play havoc with the ECU's > readings. > > However... I have a few used distributor screws (OEM). They all stick to > a magnet. I just tried it right now. Maybe I'm misunderstanding > something about the term "diamagnetic". Maybe the term simply means > "less magnetic than normal for a ferric material"? > > > whoever replaced the rotor on mine last used a rotor with a springy > > thing to hold it on rather than the screw, so i can't check. (the down > > side of that is that the spring rusts onto the shaft nicely) > > That's an aftermarket rotor. Get rid of it. > > Aftermarket ignition parts are damagingly garbage-ish. Aftermarket sucks > and blows both at the very same time. > > > > > but physically i've managed to fit both a home depot metric machine > > screw or a home depot allenhead cap screw without any interference > > from the dust cover. the car wouldn't run and i thought it was the > > above mentioned problem from a magnetic screw, so i put the old rotor > > back and buttoned it up, whereupon i discovered i had just forgotten > > to plug the distributor connector back in. d'oh! > > Well there y'go. Glad it's fixed. > > -- > Tegger > > The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQwww.tegger.com/hondafaq/- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - huh. i remembered the difference between ferromagnetic, diamanetic, etc. from science class in high school, but assumed they just meant nonmagnetic and translated it badly. like you I assumed so that it wouldn't interfere with the sensor, which is right there beneath it. so, i just today ordered one distributor screw from the dealer, for 64 cents, since i couldn't find a brass 5 mm screw at home depoo. a special order part, that distributor screw; they must think i'm insane. i'll confirm whether it's magnetic or not. that aftermarket rotor doesn't so much seem to be crappily made, as crappily designed, as proved by the spring rusting onto the distributor shaft. and it's not like the innards of the distributor are particularly rustish. i wish i could remember which of the varied crew of mechanics who've been attacking the distributor installed that item. that's the kind of thing that's making me do everything myself now to get it back to factory specs. wherever anything on the distributor needed N screws to hold it on, there were (N-1) screws. 2 distributor holddown screws instead of three. 2 screws on the cap instead of three. how do you lose a distributor cap screw? they're captive for crissake. and of course the no-screws rotor instead of the real rotor. anyway, it's now got a new cap, new wires, new unobtanium plugs, and the new rotor is just waiting for the famous diamagnetic screw to arrive. new topic, how's the headlight wiring on the teg seem to you? a few years back, the advice of daniel stern the lighting guy around the car groups confirmed my growing suspicions that the civic lighting wiring was grossly undersized, so i ran some wire of the generally recommended gauge from the battery, along with fusible links, via relays that ran off the original headlight wiring, and damn if it didn't make a real difference to the headlight output. i'm just curious how the teg wires measure up, if you've thought about the question. |
Integra headlight wiring (was: 94 Civic Distributor leak)
z <gzuckier@snail-mail.net> wrote in
news:a29e7a94-d71e-4d40-8e31-863186f7c794@r37g2000prr.googlegroups.com: > > new topic, how's the headlight wiring on the teg seem to you? a few > years back, the advice of daniel stern the lighting guy around the car > groups confirmed my growing suspicions that the civic lighting > wiring was grossly undersized, so i ran some wire of the generally > recommended gauge from the battery, along with fusible links, via > relays that ran off the original headlight wiring, and damn if it > didn't make a real difference to the headlight output. i'm just > curious how the teg wires measure up, if you've thought about the > question. I've also been told that Honda headlamp wiring is undersized, this being part of the reason for my own car's rather poor forward illumination at night (and it is pretty bad). However, I refuse to do anything to the car that would alter the factory wiring setup. Besides, I hardly ever drive at night, and when I do, I drive according to my available headlight illumination, so having tallow candles up front isn't really a problem. What I do find to be a MAJOR problem are all those complete morons who go around ALL DAY and ALL NIGHT with their high beams on ALL the time, even in a well-lit city environment, and often with auxiliary lamps thrown into the mix. This is a /very/ modern phenomenon, something you never encountered ten years ago. Please! Turn 'em DOWN, people! Drilling laser holes through other peoples' eyes does NOT automatically make you "safer"! -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Re: 94 Civic Distributor leak
On Nov 5, 11:51 pm, z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote:
> so, i just today ordered one distributor screw from the dealer, for 64 > cents, since i couldn't find a brass 5 mm screw at home depoo. a > special order part, that distributor screw; they must think i'm > insane. i'll confirm whether it's magnetic or not. that aftermarket > rotor doesn't so much seem to be crappily made, as crappily designed, > as proved by the spring rusting onto the distributor shaft. and it's > not like the innards of the distributor are particularly rustish. i > wish i could remember which of the varied crew of mechanics who've > been attacking the distributor installed that item. that's the kind of > thing that's making me do everything myself now to get it back to > factory specs. wherever anything on the distributor needed N screws to > hold it on, there were (N-1) screws. 2 distributor holddown screws > instead of three. 2 screws on the cap instead of three. how do you > lose a distributor cap screw? they're captive for crissake. and of > course the no-screws rotor instead of the real rotor. anyway, it's now > got a new cap, new wires, new unobtanium plugs, and the new rotor is > just waiting for the famous diamagnetic screw to arrive. well, i was eager to see if it was magnetic or nonmagnetic, but there was a third possibility; it was nonmaterial. yes, honda sent me a sealed plastic bag full of nothing. i'm assuming it was an error, but we'll see.... |
Re: 94 Civic Distributor leak
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:01:08 -0800, z wrote:
> On Nov 5, 11:51 pm, z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote: > >> so, i just today ordered one distributor screw from the dealer, for 64 >> cents, since i couldn't find a brass 5 mm screw at home depoo. a >> special order part, that distributor screw; they must think i'm insane. >> i'll confirm whether it's magnetic or not. that aftermarket rotor >> doesn't so much seem to be crappily made, as crappily designed, as >> proved by the spring rusting onto the distributor shaft. and it's not >> like the innards of the distributor are particularly rustish. i wish i >> could remember which of the varied crew of mechanics who've been >> attacking the distributor installed that item. that's the kind of thing >> that's making me do everything myself now to get it back to factory >> specs. wherever anything on the distributor needed N screws to hold it >> on, there were (N-1) screws. 2 distributor holddown screws instead of >> three. 2 screws on the cap instead of three. how do you lose a >> distributor cap screw? they're captive for crissake. and of course the >> no-screws rotor instead of the real rotor. anyway, it's now got a new >> cap, new wires, new unobtanium plugs, and the new rotor is just waiting >> for the famous diamagnetic screw to arrive. > > well, i was eager to see if it was magnetic or nonmagnetic, but there > was a third possibility; it was nonmaterial. yes, honda sent me a > sealed plastic bag full of nothing. i'm assuming it was an error, but > we'll see.... because it'll stick to a magnet doesn't mean it doesn't have special magnetic properties. while i'm not sure "diamagnetic" is the correct term, they probably want a screw that doesn't /retain/ any magnetism. many steels, especially hardened ones, retain a magnetic field after one has been applied. we've all magnetized things like screwdrivers, right? if i had to guess, i'd say this screw is probably an alloy similar to a transformer core steel which doesn't. |
Re: Integra headlight wiring (was: 94 Civic Distributor leak)
Tegger (invalid@invalid.inv) writes:
> z <gzuckier@snail-mail.net> wrote in > news:a29e7a94-d71e-4d40-8e31-863186f7c794@r37g2000prr.googlegroups.com: > > >> >> new topic, how's the headlight wiring on the teg seem to you? a few >> years back, the advice of daniel stern the lighting guy around the car >> groups confirmed my growing suspicions that the civic lighting >> wiring was grossly undersized, so i ran some wire of the generally >> recommended gauge from the battery, along with fusible links, via >> relays that ran off the original headlight wiring, and damn if it >> didn't make a real difference to the headlight output. i'm just >> curious how the teg wires measure up, if you've thought about the >> question. > > > > I've also been told that Honda headlamp wiring is undersized, this being > part of the reason for my own car's rather poor forward illumination at > night (and it is pretty bad). > It's your headlights not the wires... the headlights are crap. There are some solutions though. Possibly an expensive solution (with good aesthetics) and no guarantee of "light performance" (but better than what you have now) would be a swap out of the headlights with headlights (Euro Code asymmetric lens, H-4 bulbs) from a European-Market Integra. An inexpensive solution (money wise... not work wise, re brackets, wires, relays, switches, etc.) and something with "light performance" would be to add some hot-rod lamps (don't laugh). Aesthetics? That's a matter of taste etc. 5 3/4" H-4 Euro Code hot-rod lamps (housings and lights with H-4 bulbs and asymmetric lenses) can be purchased in the USA at reasonable prices from hot-rod suppliers. They are round and have a true parabolic reflector (unlike non-round lights which don't have a proper reflector shape). I have run rectangular 7"X5" Bosch (7"X5" seal beam replacements) in older (1980's) Hondas with 55/100 watt H-4 bulbs on the regular Honda wires and had no problems. With the 100 watt high beam... I could see clear into next week! The 7"X5" Bosch rectangular had only fair low beams (but were significantly better than the original sealed beams). Adding cheap halogen fog lights (55 watt H-3 bulbs) made the light performance (on low beam) as good as the 7" round Cibies (H-4) and the 5 3/4" round S.E.V. Marchals (H-4), that I used on cars from the 1970's and 1960's. I also ran Cibie (H-1 55 watt) Super Oscars (driving lights) on some of the cars I had in the 1970's. ... I could drive fast at night back then. One car I had, I installed a pair of 7" S.E.V Marchal Amplilux (H-1 low beam, H-3 high beam) headlights (the preferred headlight to use at the 24 Hours of Le Mans, back in the 1960's/1970's). Talk about cool headlights... the high beam was independently adjustable! Never got a chance to try and run them with 100 watt bulbs on high beam and low beam. Just as well... 100 watt low beam bulbs would have probably been overkill, and possibly nasty to on coming traffic (even if properly adjusted). I do remember passing a Citroen one night on the Metropolitan, in Montreal, back in the early 1980's, which I swear was running Amplilux's with 100 watt low beams. He was frying the concrete in front of his car with his low beams! I couldn't believe it... he was lightin' up the road more than me! When I passed him I checked the mirrors... his low beams were adjusted much lower than the standard adjustment for Euro code lights (probably to compensate for 100 watt bulbs) which meant his low beams were not annoying, but were noticeably strong. > However, I refuse to do anything to the car that would alter the factory > wiring setup. Besides, I hardly ever drive at night, and when I do, I drive > according to my available headlight illumination, so having tallow candles > up front isn't really a problem. > > What I do find to be a MAJOR problem are all those complete morons who go > around ALL DAY and ALL NIGHT with their high beams on ALL the time, even in > a well-lit city environment, and often with auxiliary lamps thrown into the > mix. This is a /very/ modern phenomenon, something you never encountered > ten years ago. Please! Turn 'em DOWN, people! Drilling laser holes through > other peoples' eyes does NOT automatically make you "safer"! A problem of driving with weak headlights, and ageing eyes. Eyes age, and oncoming headlights annoy. When driving with weak headlights, the iris of the eyes open up, and oncoming lights annoy, younger eyes have faster reacting irises, but oncoming lights still annoy when driving with weak headlights. Eyes are also drawn to light unconsciously. Humans have to consciously look away from lights to reduce the annoyance. Tegger, what can I say... better headlights... and knowledge about the human body will give you the edge. > > > -- > Tegger > > The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ > www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Re: 94 Civic Distributor leak
On Nov 10, 8:50 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:01:08 -0800, z wrote: > > On Nov 5, 11:51 pm, z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote: > > >> so, i just today ordered one distributor screw from the dealer, for 64 > >> cents, since i couldn't find a brass 5 mm screw at home depoo. a > >> special order part, that distributor screw; they must think i'm insane.. > >> i'll confirm whether it's magnetic or not. that aftermarket rotor > >> doesn't so much seem to be crappily made, as crappily designed, as > >> proved by the spring rusting onto the distributor shaft. and it's not > >> like the innards of the distributor are particularly rustish. i wish i > >> could remember which of the varied crew of mechanics who've been > >> attacking the distributor installed that item. that's the kind of thing > >> that's making me do everything myself now to get it back to factory > >> specs. wherever anything on the distributor needed N screws to hold it > >> on, there were (N-1) screws. 2 distributor holddown screws instead of > >> three. 2 screws on the cap instead of three. how do you lose a > >> distributor cap screw? they're captive for crissake. and of course the > >> no-screws rotor instead of the real rotor. anyway, it's now got a new > >> cap, new wires, new unobtanium plugs, and the new rotor is just waiting > >> for the famous diamagnetic screw to arrive. > > > well, i was eager to see if it was magnetic or nonmagnetic, but there > > was a third possibility; it was nonmaterial. yes, honda sent me a > > sealed plastic bag full of nothing. i'm assuming it was an error, but > > we'll see.... > > because it'll stick to a magnet doesn't mean it doesn't have special > magnetic properties. while i'm not sure "diamagnetic" is the correct > term, they probably want a screw that doesn't /retain/ any magnetism. > many steels, especially hardened ones, retain a magnetic field after one > has been applied. we've all magnetized things like screwdrivers, right? > if i had to guess, i'd say this screw is probably an alloy similar to a > transformer core steel which doesn't.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - umm. an interesting point. the real official honda rotor screw arrived today, and it is attracted by a magnet after all. when i saw that, i was going to just be cynical and use the allen head cap screw i got from home depot, since that solves the problem of trying to thread the screw with the limited access with the dust cover in place under the rotor, but now you make me paranoid again, and I'll have to try and deal with the philips head. "i wish they all could be philips head screws" -the beach boys |
Re: 94 Civic Distributor leak
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:31:53 -0800, z wrote:
> On Nov 10, 8:50 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:01:08 -0800, z wrote: >> > On Nov 5, 11:51 pm, z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote: >> >> >> so, i just today ordered one distributor screw from the dealer, for >> >> 64 cents, since i couldn't find a brass 5 mm screw at home depoo. a >> >> special order part, that distributor screw; they must think i'm >> >> insane. i'll confirm whether it's magnetic or not. that aftermarket >> >> rotor doesn't so much seem to be crappily made, as crappily >> >> designed, as proved by the spring rusting onto the distributor >> >> shaft. and it's not like the innards of the distributor are >> >> particularly rustish. i wish i could remember which of the varied >> >> crew of mechanics who've been attacking the distributor installed >> >> that item. that's the kind of thing that's making me do everything >> >> myself now to get it back to factory specs. wherever anything on the >> >> distributor needed N screws to hold it on, there were (N-1) screws. >> >> 2 distributor holddown screws instead of three. 2 screws on the cap >> >> instead of three. how do you lose a distributor cap screw? they're >> >> captive for crissake. and of course the no-screws rotor instead of >> >> the real rotor. anyway, it's now got a new cap, new wires, new >> >> unobtanium plugs, and the new rotor is just waiting for the famous >> >> diamagnetic screw to arrive. >> >> > well, i was eager to see if it was magnetic or nonmagnetic, but >> > there was a third possibility; it was nonmaterial. yes, honda sent >> > me a sealed plastic bag full of nothing. i'm assuming it was an >> > error, but we'll see.... >> >> because it'll stick to a magnet doesn't mean it doesn't have special >> magnetic properties. while i'm not sure "diamagnetic" is the correct >> term, they probably want a screw that doesn't /retain/ any magnetism. >> many steels, especially hardened ones, retain a magnetic field after >> one has been applied. we've all magnetized things like screwdrivers, >> right? if i had to guess, i'd say this screw is probably an alloy >> similar to a transformer core steel which doesn't.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > umm. an interesting point. the real official honda rotor screw arrived > today, and it is attracted by a magnet after all. when i saw that, i was > going to just be cynical and use the allen head cap screw i got from > home depot, since that solves the problem of trying to thread the screw > with the limited access with the dust cover in place under the rotor, > but now you make me paranoid again, and I'll have to try and deal with > the philips head. > > "i wish they all could be philips head screws" -the beach boys again, being attracted to a magnet is different from retaining that magnetism. as for access, rotate the engine until you have the rotor pointing to a suitable access point - there is at least one position on the rotor where you have great straight line access to that screw. for paranoia, 89 civics come with an allen head screw [with a dab of loctite on the threads]. find one of those in a junk yard and use that if you're worried about the philips. i'm not sure if it's the same thread, but i'd be surprised if it wasn't, and the beauty of the junkyard is that you can check before leaving. |
Re: Integra headlight wiring (was: 94 Civic Distributor leak)
cf005@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (M.A. Stewart) wrote in
news:gfgmh8$qr9$1@theodyn.ncf.ca: > > > A problem of driving with weak headlights, and ageing eyes. Eyes age, > and oncoming headlights annoy. When driving with weak headlights, the > iris of the eyes open up, and oncoming lights annoy, younger eyes have > faster reacting irises, but oncoming lights still annoy when driving > with weak headlights. > > Eyes are also drawn to light unconsciously. Humans have to consciously > look away from lights to reduce the annoyance. > > Tegger, what can I say... better headlights... and knowledge about the > human body will give you the edge. > This is different from "aging eyes", though I do possess those. I'm convinced that somewhere around two or three years ago there was a change in headlamp regulation or design change that results in the newest cars having headlights and DRLs that are significantly brighter than in previous years. Check out the DRLs on any new Chrysler product for an extreme example (Curly even pointed this out some time ago). You can spot those immediately in a thick stream of oncoming traffic, even in bright sunlight. And that modern fad of leaving your high beams on all the time -- even in the city at night -- is NOT something I'm imagining. Even my wife has noticed this, independently of me. Turn 'em down, people! -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands