|
Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:dCn7k.2478$1I.1673@bignews4.bellsouth.net... > Price per barrel: > > Oil $133 > Coca Cola $126 > Milk $163 > Perrier Water $300 > Budweiser $447 > Starbucks Latte $954 > Ben & Jerry's $1,609 > Tabasco Sauce $6,155 > Chanel No 5 $1,666,560 This has been posted in here before and let me say again, it is f-ing retarded. Are you an apologist for big oil? I am sorry but how much Ben and Jerry's do you need? How much Tabasco sauce do you need? How much Perrier do you need? Furthermore, how the f__k do you think that stuff gets to your location when you do decide to dabble in it? Stop being a dumbass moron. |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Dont Taze Me, Bro!" <DontTaze@MeBro.com> wrote in message news:PXD7k.972$9J.3@trnddc06... > > "Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:dCn7k.2478$1I.1673@bignews4.bellsouth.net... >> Price per barrel: >> >> Oil $133 >> Coca Cola $126 >> Milk $163 >> Perrier Water $300 >> Budweiser $447 >> Starbucks Latte $954 >> Ben & Jerry's $1,609 >> Tabasco Sauce $6,155 >> Chanel No 5 $1,666,560 I don't see the nations economy and infrastructure running on lattes and Coke. Or F-22's or M1 Abrams for that matter. Idiot. |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Augustus" <no_one@no_where.net> wrote in message news:uuE7k.851$2G6.661@edtnps83... > > "Dont Taze Me, Bro!" <DontTaze@MeBro.com> wrote in message > news:PXD7k.972$9J.3@trnddc06... >> >> "Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> news:dCn7k.2478$1I.1673@bignews4.bellsouth.net... >>> Price per barrel: >>> >>> Oil $133 >>> Coca Cola $126 >>> Milk $163 >>> Perrier Water $300 >>> Budweiser $447 >>> Starbucks Latte $954 >>> Ben & Jerry's $1,609 >>> Tabasco Sauce $6,155 >>> Chanel No 5 $1,666,560 > > I don't see the nations economy and infrastructure running on lattes and > Coke. Or F-22's or M1 Abrams for that matter. Idiot. indeed, but maybe exxon will find a way to make a cocacola engine, and then they can raise the cost 7 more dollars a barrel. |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Dont Taze Me, Bro!" <DontTaze@MeBro.com> wrote in message news:PXD7k.972$9J.3@trnddc06... > > "Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:dCn7k.2478$1I.1673@bignews4.bellsouth.net... >> Price per barrel: >> >> Oil $133 >> Coca Cola $126 >> Milk $163 >> Perrier Water $300 >> Budweiser $447 >> Starbucks Latte $954 >> Ben & Jerry's $1,609 >> Tabasco Sauce $6,155 >> Chanel No 5 $1,666,560 > > This has been posted in here before and let me say again, it is f-ing > retarded. Are you an apologist for big oil? > > I am sorry but how much Ben and Jerry's do you need? How much Tabasco > sauce do you need? How much Perrier do you need? Furthermore, how the f__k > do you think that stuff gets to your location when you do decide to dabble > in it? > > Stop being a dumbass moron. If you want to look at it your way. A barrel of each would last a person: Oil 1 day(maybe) Coca Cola 3 months Milk 3 months Perrier Water 3 weeks Budweiser 2 months Starbucks Latte 2 year Ben & Jerry's 2 year Tabasco Sauce 20 years Chanel No 5 100 years(really don't use the stuff myself) Now if a barrel of oil could last as long as any of these we would be doing real good. You dumbshit! These are my estimation and not to be taken serious. |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Dont Taze Me, Bro!" <DontTaze@MeBro.com> wrote in message news:xyE7k.2767$gE.1234@trnddc07... > > "Augustus" <no_one@no_where.net> wrote in message > news:uuE7k.851$2G6.661@edtnps83... > > > > "Dont Taze Me, Bro!" <DontTaze@MeBro.com> wrote in message > > news:PXD7k.972$9J.3@trnddc06... > >> > >> "Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message > >> news:dCn7k.2478$1I.1673@bignews4.bellsouth.net... > >>> Price per barrel: > >>> > >>> Oil $133 > >>> Coca Cola $126 > >>> Milk $163 > >>> Perrier Water $300 > >>> Budweiser $447 > >>> Starbucks Latte $954 > >>> Ben & Jerry's $1,609 > >>> Tabasco Sauce $6,155 > >>> Chanel No 5 $1,666,560 > > > > I don't see the nations economy and infrastructure running on lattes and > > Coke. Or F-22's or M1 Abrams for that matter. Idiot. > > indeed, but maybe exxon will find a way to make a cocacola engine, You obviously never saw the ORIGINAL Charlie and the Chocolate Factory or you would have remembered the Wonkamobile. Ted |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Ripcord" <kf@beth.net> wrote in message
news:oBG7k.10844$PZ6.5290@bignews5.bellsouth.net.. . > If you want to look at it your way. > A barrel of each would last a person: > Oil 1 day(maybe) > Coca Cola 3 months > Milk 3 months > Perrier Water 3 weeks > Budweiser 2 months > Starbucks Latte 2 year > Ben & Jerry's 2 year > Tabasco Sauce 20 years > Chanel No 5 100 years(really don't use the stuff myself) > Now if a barrel of oil could last as long as any of these we would be > doing real good. > You dumbshit! > > These are my estimation and not to be taken serious. There are 42 gallons in barrel of oil. Although only about half of that is made into gasoline during the refining process, the remaining half is made into other products that sell for about the same price as gasoline (on average). So you can either assume that a barrel of oil does produce 42 gallons (they could do that if they wanted to), or the price per barrel should be cut in half, since the other half of the barrel is made into other valuable petroleum products. Assuming we get 42 gallons per barrel and our car averages 25 miles per gallon, that would be 1050 miles per barrel. That would last me more than a month. You claim it only lasts 1 day. Now who is the moron? |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote > There are 42 gallons in barrel of oil. Although only about half of that is > made into gasoline during the refining process,..... > Assuming we get 42 gallons per barrel... > and our car averages 25 miles per > gallon, that would be 1050 miles per barrel. That would last me more than a > month. You claim it only lasts 1 day. > > Now who is the moron? Er, you'd only have 21 gallons, thereby only getting 525 miles/barrel For someone living where I do who commutes 50 miles and back each day to work on the offshore oil rigs, that would last them about 5 days :-) Furthermore, the Ben and Jerrys would probably only last a day or two at my place :-) |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:i8I7k.10929$3F5.1056@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. . > > There are 42 gallons in barrel of oil. Although only about half of that is > made into gasoline during the refining process, the remaining half is made > into other products that sell for about the same price as gasoline (on > average). So you can either assume that a barrel of oil does produce 42 > gallons (they could do that if they wanted to), or the price per barrel > should be cut in half, since the other half of the barrel is made into > other valuable petroleum products. > > Assuming we get 42 gallons per barrel and our car averages 25 miles per > gallon, that would be 1050 miles per barrel. That would last me more than > a month. You claim it only lasts 1 day. > > Now who is the moron? I'd have to go with "you" as the answer to that question (no offence meant <g>). You would only have 21 gallons of gas to use and depending on each individual's requirements, that would last some longer and others far less time. Personally, I drive an F-150 crewcab four by four and I manage to squeeze just about 60 miles out of every $30.00 that I put in the fuel tank (at today's price). |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Brian Smith" <Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote in message
news:91J7k.866$2G6.26@edtnps83... > I'd have to go with "you" as the answer to that question (no offence > meant <g>). You would only have 21 gallons of gas to use and depending on > each individual's requirements, that would last some longer and others far > less time. Personally, I drive an F-150 crewcab four by four and I manage > to squeeze just about 60 miles out of every $30.00 that I put in the fuel > tank (at today's price). No, they can make 42 gallons of gas from a barrel of oil if they wanted to. Instead, they typically make about half that, but the remaining product produced is jet fuel, heating oil , etc. If you assume that there are only 21 gallons of gas per barrel, then the cost per barrel should be cut in half since the other products besides gasoline that are refined from the same barrel are worth about the same as the gasoline (on average). I chose to leave the cost of the barrel the same, and assume there are 42 gallons of gas per barrel. Some of you morons cannot read (no offense). |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Ripcord" <kf@beth.net> wrote in message news:oBG7k.10844$PZ6.5290@bignews5.bellsouth.net.. . > > "Dont Taze Me, Bro!" <DontTaze@MeBro.com> wrote in message > news:PXD7k.972$9J.3@trnddc06... >> >> "Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> news:dCn7k.2478$1I.1673@bignews4.bellsouth.net... >>> Price per barrel: >>> >>> Oil $133 >>> Coca Cola $126 >>> Milk $163 >>> Perrier Water $300 >>> Budweiser $447 >>> Starbucks Latte $954 >>> Ben & Jerry's $1,609 >>> Tabasco Sauce $6,155 >>> Chanel No 5 $1,666,560 >> >> This has been posted in here before and let me say again, it is f-ing >> retarded. Are you an apologist for big oil? >> >> I am sorry but how much Ben and Jerry's do you need? How much Tabasco >> sauce do you need? How much Perrier do you need? Furthermore, how the >> f__k do you think that stuff gets to your location when you do decide to >> dabble in it? >> >> Stop being a dumbass moron. > > If you want to look at it your way. > A barrel of each would last a person: > Oil 1 day(maybe) > Coca Cola 3 months > Milk 3 months > Perrier Water 3 weeks > Budweiser 2 months > Starbucks Latte 2 year > Ben & Jerry's 2 year > Tabasco Sauce 20 years > Chanel No 5 100 years(really don't use the stuff myself) Chanel No. 19 is nicer, anyway. ;-) Cathy > Now if a barrel of oil could last as long as any of these we would be > doing real good. > You dumbshit! > > These are my estimation and not to be taken serious. > > |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:10:18 GMT, "Augustus" <no_one@no_where.net> wrote:
> >"Dont Taze Me, Bro!" <DontTaze@MeBro.com> wrote in message >news:PXD7k.972$9J.3@trnddc06... >> >> "Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> news:dCn7k.2478$1I.1673@bignews4.bellsouth.net... >>> Price per barrel: >>> >>> Oil $133 >>> Coca Cola $126 >>> Milk $163 >>> Perrier Water $300 >>> Budweiser $447 >>> Starbucks Latte $954 >>> Ben & Jerry's $1,609 >>> Tabasco Sauce $6,155 >>> Chanel No 5 $1,666,560 > >I don't see the nations economy and infrastructure running on lattes and >Coke. Or F-22's or M1 Abrams for that matter. Idiot. > Well, the Abrams will run on Chanel No 5, or jack Daniel's, for that matter. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Retired Shop Rat: 14,647 days in a GM plant. Speak softly and carry a loaded .45 Lifetime member; Vast Right Wing Conspiracy Web Site: www.destarr.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:b8J7k.10954$3F5.5275@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. . > > No, they can make 42 gallons of gas from a barrel of oil if they wanted > to. Instead, they typically make about half that, but the remaining > product produced is jet fuel, heating oil , etc. If you assume that there > are only 21 gallons of gas per barrel, then the cost per barrel should be > cut in half since the other products besides gasoline that are refined > from the same barrel are worth about the same as the gasoline (on > average). I chose to leave the cost of the barrel the same, and assume > there are 42 gallons of gas per barrel. > > Some of you morons cannot read (no offense). Okay, I'll rephrase my response to you. Depending on each individual's requirements, that would last some longer and others far less time. Personally, I drive an F-150 crewcab four by four and I manage to squeeze just about 60 miles out of every $30.00 that I put in the fuel tank (at today's price). By the way, you still appear to be a moron. |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:b8J7k.10954$3F5.5275@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. . > "Brian Smith" <Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote in message > news:91J7k.866$2G6.26@edtnps83... >> I'd have to go with "you" as the answer to that question (no offence >> meant <g>). You would only have 21 gallons of gas to use and depending on >> each individual's requirements, that would last some longer and others >> far less time. Personally, I drive an F-150 crewcab four by four and I >> manage to squeeze just about 60 miles out of every $30.00 that I put in >> the fuel tank (at today's price). > > No, they can make 42 gallons of gas from a barrel of oil if they wanted > to. Instead, they typically make about half that, but the remaining > product produced is jet fuel, heating oil , etc. If you assume that there > are only 21 gallons of gas per barrel, then the cost per barrel should be > cut in half since the other products besides gasoline that are refined > from the same barrel are worth about the same as the gasoline (on > average). I chose to leave the cost of the barrel the same, and assume > there are 42 gallons of gas per barrel. > I am not a chemist or expert on refining oil, but I don't think that it is economically feasible to get 42 gallons of gas from 42 gallons of crude oil because the crude oil has different components with different properties. These articles seem to confirm this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_refinery http://science.howstuffworks.com/oil-refining3.htm -- Ray O (correct punctuation to reply) |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Ray O" <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote in message
news:MZudnTyEW9gD9f3VnZ2dnUVZ_qDinZ2d@comcast.com. .. > I am not a chemist or expert on refining oil, but I don't think that it is > economically feasible to get 42 gallons of gas from 42 gallons of crude > oil because the crude oil has different components with different > properties. > > These articles seem to confirm this: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_refinery > http://science.howstuffworks.com/oil-refining3.htm > > > Ray O I think you are missing the point. When a barrel (42 gallons) of oil is refined, and it produces 21 gallons of gasoline, it also produces 21 gallons of other refined hydrocarbons with a fairly substantial economic value. So the economic value of the output of the refining process needs to be distributed among the products produced. So if you want to stick with 21 gallons of refined gasoline per barrel of crude, then you need to cost the barrel of crude at about $68 (about one half the current price of $136 per barrel). Otherwise you are assuming that the raw material cost of the other refined products in a barrel of oil (including jet fuel, fuel oil, etc) is zero (which might surprise a lot of airlines and homeowners). |
Re: Which Cost More? Oil or ...
"Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:_2_7k.11604$PZ6.9198@bignews5.bellsouth.net.. . > "Ray O" <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote in message > news:MZudnTyEW9gD9f3VnZ2dnUVZ_qDinZ2d@comcast.com. .. >> I am not a chemist or expert on refining oil, but I don't think that it >> is economically feasible to get 42 gallons of gas from 42 gallons of >> crude oil because the crude oil has different components with different >> properties. >> >> These articles seem to confirm this: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_refinery >> http://science.howstuffworks.com/oil-refining3.htm >> >> >> Ray O > > I think you are missing the point. When a barrel (42 gallons) of oil is > refined, and it produces 21 gallons of gasoline, it also produces 21 > gallons of other refined hydrocarbons with a fairly substantial economic > value. So the economic value of the output of the refining process needs > to be distributed among the products produced. > > So if you want to stick with 21 gallons of refined gasoline per barrel of > crude, then you need to cost the barrel of crude at about $68 (about one > half the current price of $136 per barrel). Otherwise you are assuming > that the raw material cost of the other refined products in a barrel of > oil (including jet fuel, fuel oil, etc) is zero (which might surprise a > lot of airlines and homeowners). That explanation makes a lot more sense. -- Ray O (correct punctuation to reply) |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands