Re: debating getting a new honda
"Zoofreak" <no_spam@gmail.com> wrote
> We were able to get an Accord SE for the same price as a > Civic EX. The > Civics were going for full MSRP, the Accord SEs were > priced below Invoice. > No sunroof on the Accord SE, but alot more space and > comfort with a not bad > 34 mpg highway rating. The above might be the dealbreaker. I suggest test driving several models of the Accord and Civic, noting the invoice prices. I think the difference in comfort will be obvious. |
Re: debating getting a new honda
tww wrote:
> As the owner of a new 06 Accord I4, I think you would be better off with > the Accord vs the Civic. I think you would be pressed to fit a child seat > and two adults in the back of a Civic. The I4 Accord has plenty of power > and gets decent gas mileage on regular -- 28 - 33 has been my experience so > far. The I4 Accord has a chain cam drive rather than a belt which will cut > your long-term maintenance costs. Actually, the current Civic is also chain-driven. The Accord V6 still uses a belt I believe. |
Re: debating getting a new honda
tww wrote:
> As the owner of a new 06 Accord I4, I think you would be better off with > the Accord vs the Civic. I think you would be pressed to fit a child seat > and two adults in the back of a Civic. The I4 Accord has plenty of power > and gets decent gas mileage on regular -- 28 - 33 has been my experience so > far. The I4 Accord has a chain cam drive rather than a belt which will cut > your long-term maintenance costs. Actually, the current Civic is also chain-driven. The Accord V6 still uses a belt I believe. |
Re: debating getting a new honda
tww wrote:
> As the owner of a new 06 Accord I4, I think you would be better off with > the Accord vs the Civic. I think you would be pressed to fit a child seat > and two adults in the back of a Civic. The I4 Accord has plenty of power > and gets decent gas mileage on regular -- 28 - 33 has been my experience so > far. The I4 Accord has a chain cam drive rather than a belt which will cut > your long-term maintenance costs. Actually, the current Civic is also chain-driven. The Accord V6 still uses a belt I believe. |
Re: debating getting a new honda
mrmatrix wrote:
> Hello all, we currently have a highlander for our "family car", V6 and > AWD, which means about 18.5 mpg for us (UGGH)......well, gas prices > have us reconsidering its legitimacy. We are thinking about getting > either a new Civic EX, Accord LX, SE or EX 4 cyl, or new Camry LE or SE > 4 cylinder. (I don't like the Corolla) > > Specifically, will the civic be suitable for use as a primary "family" > car. We have one child (no more planned, trust me!). I know it is a > "step down" from the highlander, but we really like the looks of the > civic, and we LOVE the MPG it gets! Could 2 normal sized adults fit in > the back of the new civic with a small child seat in the middle? This > is an occasional situation for us, but rarely. This would be one of > the reasons I may reconsider and get an Accord or Camry 4 cyl instead. > > Also, are there any major issues with the new civic with it being a > redesign and all? Thanks for any and all comments. > The new Civic is nice, but if the ability to put three in the back with some comfort is an issue, move up to the Accord. Also, the new Civic is in shorter supply than the Accord, so the price difference might be smaller than otherwise expected. Of all you mentioned, the Accord is the best bet because it is now a proven design (made since 2003) and gives you a lot of space, safety and comfort for your dollar. The 4 cylinder version is plenty powerful enough as long as charging over mountain ranges with a full vehicle at 80 MPH isn't your thing. For normal use the 4 has plenty of power. The 4 also gets better fuel economy than the V-6 and has a timing chain instead of a belt, which means lower maintenance costs down the road. If, however, capacity for 4 people is enough then the new Civic is a hard car to beat. Any of the vehicles you are considering will probably serve you well. John |
Re: debating getting a new honda
mrmatrix wrote:
> Hello all, we currently have a highlander for our "family car", V6 and > AWD, which means about 18.5 mpg for us (UGGH)......well, gas prices > have us reconsidering its legitimacy. We are thinking about getting > either a new Civic EX, Accord LX, SE or EX 4 cyl, or new Camry LE or SE > 4 cylinder. (I don't like the Corolla) > > Specifically, will the civic be suitable for use as a primary "family" > car. We have one child (no more planned, trust me!). I know it is a > "step down" from the highlander, but we really like the looks of the > civic, and we LOVE the MPG it gets! Could 2 normal sized adults fit in > the back of the new civic with a small child seat in the middle? This > is an occasional situation for us, but rarely. This would be one of > the reasons I may reconsider and get an Accord or Camry 4 cyl instead. > > Also, are there any major issues with the new civic with it being a > redesign and all? Thanks for any and all comments. > The new Civic is nice, but if the ability to put three in the back with some comfort is an issue, move up to the Accord. Also, the new Civic is in shorter supply than the Accord, so the price difference might be smaller than otherwise expected. Of all you mentioned, the Accord is the best bet because it is now a proven design (made since 2003) and gives you a lot of space, safety and comfort for your dollar. The 4 cylinder version is plenty powerful enough as long as charging over mountain ranges with a full vehicle at 80 MPH isn't your thing. For normal use the 4 has plenty of power. The 4 also gets better fuel economy than the V-6 and has a timing chain instead of a belt, which means lower maintenance costs down the road. If, however, capacity for 4 people is enough then the new Civic is a hard car to beat. Any of the vehicles you are considering will probably serve you well. John |
Re: debating getting a new honda
mrmatrix wrote:
> Hello all, we currently have a highlander for our "family car", V6 and > AWD, which means about 18.5 mpg for us (UGGH)......well, gas prices > have us reconsidering its legitimacy. We are thinking about getting > either a new Civic EX, Accord LX, SE or EX 4 cyl, or new Camry LE or SE > 4 cylinder. (I don't like the Corolla) > > Specifically, will the civic be suitable for use as a primary "family" > car. We have one child (no more planned, trust me!). I know it is a > "step down" from the highlander, but we really like the looks of the > civic, and we LOVE the MPG it gets! Could 2 normal sized adults fit in > the back of the new civic with a small child seat in the middle? This > is an occasional situation for us, but rarely. This would be one of > the reasons I may reconsider and get an Accord or Camry 4 cyl instead. > > Also, are there any major issues with the new civic with it being a > redesign and all? Thanks for any and all comments. > The new Civic is nice, but if the ability to put three in the back with some comfort is an issue, move up to the Accord. Also, the new Civic is in shorter supply than the Accord, so the price difference might be smaller than otherwise expected. Of all you mentioned, the Accord is the best bet because it is now a proven design (made since 2003) and gives you a lot of space, safety and comfort for your dollar. The 4 cylinder version is plenty powerful enough as long as charging over mountain ranges with a full vehicle at 80 MPH isn't your thing. For normal use the 4 has plenty of power. The 4 also gets better fuel economy than the V-6 and has a timing chain instead of a belt, which means lower maintenance costs down the road. If, however, capacity for 4 people is enough then the new Civic is a hard car to beat. Any of the vehicles you are considering will probably serve you well. John |
Re: debating getting a new honda
My brother got a new Civic about 2 months ago. My wife has a 2003
Accord. My brother likes the Civic, and so do I, but the Accord is better(and not just because it's roomier). It's easy to get a good price on Accords(at least in my area) but my brother had to do some intensive shopping around to get a reasonable price on the Civic. Ken mrmatrix wrote: > Hello all, we currently have a highlander for our "family car", V6 and > AWD, which means about 18.5 mpg for us (UGGH)......well, gas prices > have us reconsidering its legitimacy. We are thinking about getting > either a new Civic EX, Accord LX, SE or EX 4 cyl, or new Camry LE or SE > 4 cylinder. (I don't like the Corolla) > > Specifically, will the civic be suitable for use as a primary "family" > car. We have one child (no more planned, trust me!). I know it is a > "step down" from the highlander, but we really like the looks of the > civic, and we LOVE the MPG it gets! Could 2 normal sized adults fit in > the back of the new civic with a small child seat in the middle? This > is an occasional situation for us, but rarely. This would be one of > the reasons I may reconsider and get an Accord or Camry 4 cyl instead. > > Also, are there any major issues with the new civic with it being a > redesign and all? Thanks for any and all comments. > |
Re: debating getting a new honda
My brother got a new Civic about 2 months ago. My wife has a 2003
Accord. My brother likes the Civic, and so do I, but the Accord is better(and not just because it's roomier). It's easy to get a good price on Accords(at least in my area) but my brother had to do some intensive shopping around to get a reasonable price on the Civic. Ken mrmatrix wrote: > Hello all, we currently have a highlander for our "family car", V6 and > AWD, which means about 18.5 mpg for us (UGGH)......well, gas prices > have us reconsidering its legitimacy. We are thinking about getting > either a new Civic EX, Accord LX, SE or EX 4 cyl, or new Camry LE or SE > 4 cylinder. (I don't like the Corolla) > > Specifically, will the civic be suitable for use as a primary "family" > car. We have one child (no more planned, trust me!). I know it is a > "step down" from the highlander, but we really like the looks of the > civic, and we LOVE the MPG it gets! Could 2 normal sized adults fit in > the back of the new civic with a small child seat in the middle? This > is an occasional situation for us, but rarely. This would be one of > the reasons I may reconsider and get an Accord or Camry 4 cyl instead. > > Also, are there any major issues with the new civic with it being a > redesign and all? Thanks for any and all comments. > |
Re: debating getting a new honda
My brother got a new Civic about 2 months ago. My wife has a 2003
Accord. My brother likes the Civic, and so do I, but the Accord is better(and not just because it's roomier). It's easy to get a good price on Accords(at least in my area) but my brother had to do some intensive shopping around to get a reasonable price on the Civic. Ken mrmatrix wrote: > Hello all, we currently have a highlander for our "family car", V6 and > AWD, which means about 18.5 mpg for us (UGGH)......well, gas prices > have us reconsidering its legitimacy. We are thinking about getting > either a new Civic EX, Accord LX, SE or EX 4 cyl, or new Camry LE or SE > 4 cylinder. (I don't like the Corolla) > > Specifically, will the civic be suitable for use as a primary "family" > car. We have one child (no more planned, trust me!). I know it is a > "step down" from the highlander, but we really like the looks of the > civic, and we LOVE the MPG it gets! Could 2 normal sized adults fit in > the back of the new civic with a small child seat in the middle? This > is an occasional situation for us, but rarely. This would be one of > the reasons I may reconsider and get an Accord or Camry 4 cyl instead. > > Also, are there any major issues with the new civic with it being a > redesign and all? Thanks for any and all comments. > |
Re: debating getting a new honda
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 17:35:35 GMT, John Horner <jthorner@yahoo.com>
wrote: >The 4 cylinder version is plenty powerful enough as long as charging >over mountain ranges with a full vehicle at 80 MPH isn't your thing. >For normal use the 4 has plenty of power. Hey my 4EX goes up the Sepulveda Pass at 80MPH with the air on, though I do have to convince it to downshift to fourth, but that's with just me, not five and luggage (and it is pretty nearly sea level). Of course, more often it goes up the pass at 8MPH due to traffic, but that's another story! Civic will save you two or three grand at purchase, maybe another hundred a year on insurance, and with another three MPG on a good day, maybe a grand a year on gas, if you're doing lots of miles. And the Civic sheet metal is prettier than the Accord, that new Accord rear end is pretty blech (I just finally got used to the curvy taillights on the old model!) I think the current Civic is larger than my old 1987 Accord, but the new Accords do have a pretty roomy back seat. The new Accord is actually a bit larger than I really like to drive around in, but if you're coming down from a Highlander, I suppose you don't have that issue! Civic will be OK on power, but uphill with a full load you will have to rev it, while the Accord, with larger displacement, can still lug its way along, just not in overdrive. I'd say let the available colors decide, but they seem to come in about the same ones, and an unattractive palette it is. The good news is, you can't go wrong with this stuff. J. |
Re: debating getting a new honda
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 17:35:35 GMT, John Horner <jthorner@yahoo.com>
wrote: >The 4 cylinder version is plenty powerful enough as long as charging >over mountain ranges with a full vehicle at 80 MPH isn't your thing. >For normal use the 4 has plenty of power. Hey my 4EX goes up the Sepulveda Pass at 80MPH with the air on, though I do have to convince it to downshift to fourth, but that's with just me, not five and luggage (and it is pretty nearly sea level). Of course, more often it goes up the pass at 8MPH due to traffic, but that's another story! Civic will save you two or three grand at purchase, maybe another hundred a year on insurance, and with another three MPG on a good day, maybe a grand a year on gas, if you're doing lots of miles. And the Civic sheet metal is prettier than the Accord, that new Accord rear end is pretty blech (I just finally got used to the curvy taillights on the old model!) I think the current Civic is larger than my old 1987 Accord, but the new Accords do have a pretty roomy back seat. The new Accord is actually a bit larger than I really like to drive around in, but if you're coming down from a Highlander, I suppose you don't have that issue! Civic will be OK on power, but uphill with a full load you will have to rev it, while the Accord, with larger displacement, can still lug its way along, just not in overdrive. I'd say let the available colors decide, but they seem to come in about the same ones, and an unattractive palette it is. The good news is, you can't go wrong with this stuff. J. |
Re: debating getting a new honda
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 17:35:35 GMT, John Horner <jthorner@yahoo.com>
wrote: >The 4 cylinder version is plenty powerful enough as long as charging >over mountain ranges with a full vehicle at 80 MPH isn't your thing. >For normal use the 4 has plenty of power. Hey my 4EX goes up the Sepulveda Pass at 80MPH with the air on, though I do have to convince it to downshift to fourth, but that's with just me, not five and luggage (and it is pretty nearly sea level). Of course, more often it goes up the pass at 8MPH due to traffic, but that's another story! Civic will save you two or three grand at purchase, maybe another hundred a year on insurance, and with another three MPG on a good day, maybe a grand a year on gas, if you're doing lots of miles. And the Civic sheet metal is prettier than the Accord, that new Accord rear end is pretty blech (I just finally got used to the curvy taillights on the old model!) I think the current Civic is larger than my old 1987 Accord, but the new Accords do have a pretty roomy back seat. The new Accord is actually a bit larger than I really like to drive around in, but if you're coming down from a Highlander, I suppose you don't have that issue! Civic will be OK on power, but uphill with a full load you will have to rev it, while the Accord, with larger displacement, can still lug its way along, just not in overdrive. I'd say let the available colors decide, but they seem to come in about the same ones, and an unattractive palette it is. The good news is, you can't go wrong with this stuff. J. |
Re: debating getting a new honda
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:7frucqd3flj7$.dlg@hightech.misfit... > tww wrote: > > > As the owner of a new 06 Accord I4, I think you would be better off with > > the Accord vs the Civic. I think you would be pressed to fit a child seat > > and two adults in the back of a Civic. The I4 Accord has plenty of power > > and gets decent gas mileage on regular -- 28 - 33 has been my experience so > > far. The I4 Accord has a chain cam drive rather than a belt which will cut > > your long-term maintenance costs. > > Actually, the current Civic is also chain-driven. > > The Accord V6 still uses a belt I believe. Yes. It does. |
Re: debating getting a new honda
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:7frucqd3flj7$.dlg@hightech.misfit... > tww wrote: > > > As the owner of a new 06 Accord I4, I think you would be better off with > > the Accord vs the Civic. I think you would be pressed to fit a child seat > > and two adults in the back of a Civic. The I4 Accord has plenty of power > > and gets decent gas mileage on regular -- 28 - 33 has been my experience so > > far. The I4 Accord has a chain cam drive rather than a belt which will cut > > your long-term maintenance costs. > > Actually, the current Civic is also chain-driven. > > The Accord V6 still uses a belt I believe. Yes. It does. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands