GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks.

GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks. (https://www.gtcarz.com/)
-   Honda Mailing List (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/)
-   -   Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5) (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/debugging-funny-pgm-fi-eacv-problem-89-1-5-a-292305/)

jim beam 07-03-2006 04:36 PM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
andrew m. boardman wrote:
> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>>hmm, the #1 cause on this group is insufficient coolant level. check
>>inside the radiator - if there's the smallest leak, air sucks back
>>rather than coolant, so the expansion bottle level stays the same.

>
>
> Yeah, I spent some time reading through the archives and was impressed by
> all of the ways that low coolant level can make the engine misbehave.
> Unfortunately, the coolant level is good, overflow isn't dropping after
> use,


but it should! level in the expansion [overflow] bottle should go down
as it cools. and you /did/ check inside the radiator, not just look at
the bottle? need to be sure...

> and it's been bled by the book.
>
> It's also jumping around very sharply; the EACV signal will jump from
> 3.5v or so up to 9v, sit for a bit, then back down to 3.5v; I don't think
> a temperature sensor could react that fast.


sure it would!

> More to the point, though,
> it does this even with the coolant temp sensor disconnected.


ok.

> (Voltages
> quoted are the difference between the two EACV wires; it gets a constant
> +12 plus a control line from the ECU which varies between +12 and ground
> depending on how far the ECU thinks the EACV should be open.)


ok, but that's output - you need to find the input that's triggering
this response from the ecu.

i read before that you disconnected the temp sender, but there are three
on this vehicle: one for the radiator fan, one for the gauge on the
instrument panel and one for the ecu - just check you have the right
one. and i'd test the ecu output with a potentiometer wired in place of
the sender. it's supposed to range between about 20k and 100 ohms, with
lower resistance being the higher temp, so you can read the effect it
has on ecu output accordingly. that area of the head tends to get badly
fouled with oil leaks from the distributor, so check the quality of the
connection as well.

if still no dice, i'd check the electric load sensor.

>
>
>>insufficient coolant level in the block means the coolant foams and
>>gives spurious temp readings to the ecu, so it hunts back and forth
>>between "cold" and "normal" idle behavior.

>
>
> What might also be important here is that the engine is being revved up
> way way beyond what might be called for even with a very cold engine;
> seeing it pop up to 4k RPM is not unusual.


that just corresponds with open eacv.

> I suppose there's some chance
> that flaky coolant temperature sensor wiring is making the engine look
> really really really cold, but not far enough out of spec to flag the
> sensor as failed. (It does flag it as failed when unplugged, though.)


right, but the system also tolerates a degree of noise, so a full
disconnect is different to something fuzzy or high resistance.

jim beam 07-03-2006 04:36 PM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
andrew m. boardman wrote:
> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>>hmm, the #1 cause on this group is insufficient coolant level. check
>>inside the radiator - if there's the smallest leak, air sucks back
>>rather than coolant, so the expansion bottle level stays the same.

>
>
> Yeah, I spent some time reading through the archives and was impressed by
> all of the ways that low coolant level can make the engine misbehave.
> Unfortunately, the coolant level is good, overflow isn't dropping after
> use,


but it should! level in the expansion [overflow] bottle should go down
as it cools. and you /did/ check inside the radiator, not just look at
the bottle? need to be sure...

> and it's been bled by the book.
>
> It's also jumping around very sharply; the EACV signal will jump from
> 3.5v or so up to 9v, sit for a bit, then back down to 3.5v; I don't think
> a temperature sensor could react that fast.


sure it would!

> More to the point, though,
> it does this even with the coolant temp sensor disconnected.


ok.

> (Voltages
> quoted are the difference between the two EACV wires; it gets a constant
> +12 plus a control line from the ECU which varies between +12 and ground
> depending on how far the ECU thinks the EACV should be open.)


ok, but that's output - you need to find the input that's triggering
this response from the ecu.

i read before that you disconnected the temp sender, but there are three
on this vehicle: one for the radiator fan, one for the gauge on the
instrument panel and one for the ecu - just check you have the right
one. and i'd test the ecu output with a potentiometer wired in place of
the sender. it's supposed to range between about 20k and 100 ohms, with
lower resistance being the higher temp, so you can read the effect it
has on ecu output accordingly. that area of the head tends to get badly
fouled with oil leaks from the distributor, so check the quality of the
connection as well.

if still no dice, i'd check the electric load sensor.

>
>
>>insufficient coolant level in the block means the coolant foams and
>>gives spurious temp readings to the ecu, so it hunts back and forth
>>between "cold" and "normal" idle behavior.

>
>
> What might also be important here is that the engine is being revved up
> way way beyond what might be called for even with a very cold engine;
> seeing it pop up to 4k RPM is not unusual.


that just corresponds with open eacv.

> I suppose there's some chance
> that flaky coolant temperature sensor wiring is making the engine look
> really really really cold, but not far enough out of spec to flag the
> sensor as failed. (It does flag it as failed when unplugged, though.)


right, but the system also tolerates a degree of noise, so a full
disconnect is different to something fuzzy or high resistance.

TE Chea 07-04-2006 07:52 AM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
| Any educated guesses would be deeply appreciated.

Air Boost, Fast Idle & EGR valves, disable 1 @ a time & see.
http://www.autozone.com/images/cds/g...3d800cf4a6.gif




TE Chea 07-04-2006 07:52 AM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
| Any educated guesses would be deeply appreciated.

Air Boost, Fast Idle & EGR valves, disable 1 @ a time & see.
http://www.autozone.com/images/cds/g...3d800cf4a6.gif




TE Chea 07-04-2006 07:52 AM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
| Any educated guesses would be deeply appreciated.

Air Boost, Fast Idle & EGR valves, disable 1 @ a time & see.
http://www.autozone.com/images/cds/g...3d800cf4a6.gif




TE Chea 07-04-2006 07:52 AM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
| Any educated guesses would be deeply appreciated.

Air Boost, Fast Idle & EGR valves, disable 1 @ a time & see.
http://www.autozone.com/images/cds/g...3d800cf4a6.gif




TeGGeR® 07-04-2006 11:15 PM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
amb@bronze.lcs.mit.edu (andrew m. boardman) wrote in
news:e8bhrc$13nt$1@grapevine.csail.mit.edu:

>
> The short version: What, on an '89 DPFI 1.5l engine, does the ECU use
> to determine target EACV opening and idle speed? What would cause the
> ECU to suddenly decide to command a full-open EACV without also
> indicating an error?
>



You have a giant air leak.

I don't know if you have a Fast Idle Valve, but on multi-port cars this is
the prime culprit.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

TeGGeR® 07-04-2006 11:15 PM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
amb@bronze.lcs.mit.edu (andrew m. boardman) wrote in
news:e8bhrc$13nt$1@grapevine.csail.mit.edu:

>
> The short version: What, on an '89 DPFI 1.5l engine, does the ECU use
> to determine target EACV opening and idle speed? What would cause the
> ECU to suddenly decide to command a full-open EACV without also
> indicating an error?
>



You have a giant air leak.

I don't know if you have a Fast Idle Valve, but on multi-port cars this is
the prime culprit.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

TeGGeR® 07-04-2006 11:15 PM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
amb@bronze.lcs.mit.edu (andrew m. boardman) wrote in
news:e8bhrc$13nt$1@grapevine.csail.mit.edu:

>
> The short version: What, on an '89 DPFI 1.5l engine, does the ECU use
> to determine target EACV opening and idle speed? What would cause the
> ECU to suddenly decide to command a full-open EACV without also
> indicating an error?
>



You have a giant air leak.

I don't know if you have a Fast Idle Valve, but on multi-port cars this is
the prime culprit.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

TeGGeR® 07-04-2006 11:15 PM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
amb@bronze.lcs.mit.edu (andrew m. boardman) wrote in
news:e8bhrc$13nt$1@grapevine.csail.mit.edu:

>
> The short version: What, on an '89 DPFI 1.5l engine, does the ECU use
> to determine target EACV opening and idle speed? What would cause the
> ECU to suddenly decide to command a full-open EACV without also
> indicating an error?
>



You have a giant air leak.

I don't know if you have a Fast Idle Valve, but on multi-port cars this is
the prime culprit.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

jim beam 07-05-2006 12:07 AM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
"TeGGeRï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï ¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½" wrote:
> amb@bronze.lcs.mit.edu (andrew m. boardman) wrote in
> news:e8bhrc$13nt$1@grapevine.csail.mit.edu:
>
>
>>The short version: What, on an '89 DPFI 1.5l engine, does the ECU use
>>to determine target EACV opening and idle speed? What would cause the
>>ECU to suddenly decide to command a full-open EACV without also
>>indicating an error?
>>

>
>
>
> You have a giant air leak.
>
> I don't know if you have a Fast Idle Valve, but on multi-port cars this is
> the prime culprit.
>

yes, but the ecu's commanding the eacv to do stuff. it's got to be one
of the input sensors...

jim beam 07-05-2006 12:07 AM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
"TeGGeRï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï ¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½" wrote:
> amb@bronze.lcs.mit.edu (andrew m. boardman) wrote in
> news:e8bhrc$13nt$1@grapevine.csail.mit.edu:
>
>
>>The short version: What, on an '89 DPFI 1.5l engine, does the ECU use
>>to determine target EACV opening and idle speed? What would cause the
>>ECU to suddenly decide to command a full-open EACV without also
>>indicating an error?
>>

>
>
>
> You have a giant air leak.
>
> I don't know if you have a Fast Idle Valve, but on multi-port cars this is
> the prime culprit.
>

yes, but the ecu's commanding the eacv to do stuff. it's got to be one
of the input sensors...

jim beam 07-05-2006 12:07 AM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
"TeGGeRï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï ¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½" wrote:
> amb@bronze.lcs.mit.edu (andrew m. boardman) wrote in
> news:e8bhrc$13nt$1@grapevine.csail.mit.edu:
>
>
>>The short version: What, on an '89 DPFI 1.5l engine, does the ECU use
>>to determine target EACV opening and idle speed? What would cause the
>>ECU to suddenly decide to command a full-open EACV without also
>>indicating an error?
>>

>
>
>
> You have a giant air leak.
>
> I don't know if you have a Fast Idle Valve, but on multi-port cars this is
> the prime culprit.
>

yes, but the ecu's commanding the eacv to do stuff. it's got to be one
of the input sensors...

jim beam 07-05-2006 12:07 AM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
"TeGGeRï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï ¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½" wrote:
> amb@bronze.lcs.mit.edu (andrew m. boardman) wrote in
> news:e8bhrc$13nt$1@grapevine.csail.mit.edu:
>
>
>>The short version: What, on an '89 DPFI 1.5l engine, does the ECU use
>>to determine target EACV opening and idle speed? What would cause the
>>ECU to suddenly decide to command a full-open EACV without also
>>indicating an error?
>>

>
>
>
> You have a giant air leak.
>
> I don't know if you have a Fast Idle Valve, but on multi-port cars this is
> the prime culprit.
>

yes, but the ecu's commanding the eacv to do stuff. it's got to be one
of the input sensors...

TeGGeR® 07-05-2006 07:28 AM

Re: Debugging a Funny PGM-FI EACV Problem ('89 1.5)
 
jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
news:UsGdnczhoJVjpzbZnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t:

> "TeGGeRï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï ¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï
> ¿½" wrote:
>> amb@bronze.lcs.mit.edu (andrew m. boardman) wrote in
>> news:e8bhrc$13nt$1@grapevine.csail.mit.edu:
>>
>>
>>>The short version: What, on an '89 DPFI 1.5l engine, does the ECU use
>>>to determine target EACV opening and idle speed? What would cause
>>>the ECU to suddenly decide to command a full-open EACV without also
>>>indicating an error?
>>>

>>
>>
>>
>> You have a giant air leak.
>>
>> I don't know if you have a Fast Idle Valve, but on multi-port cars
>> this is the prime culprit.
>>

> yes, but the ecu's commanding the eacv to do stuff. it's got to be
> one of the input sensors...
>



It's a big air leak. That means one of the secondary air inputs into the
intake is bad. Or there is an input that is not supposed to be there
(something split, etc). The ECU is feeding gas to keep the mixture correct,
then cutting fuel when the RPM limit is reached, then repeating itself...

Another diag tool I forgot to mention: Partially cover the throttle body
with your hand. Cover more and more until the idle settles down. If this
works, something is admitting way too much air.

With any port-injected car, the thing to do is to cover the lower port when
the car is warm and idle is fluctuating. If vacum is present at that lower
port and idle settles down when you cover up the port, then that's the
problem.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.08552 seconds with 5 queries