rick++

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/119287

Dano58

On Jun 26, 9:38 am, "rick++" <rick...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/119287

Ha, this is funny -

"Photo enforcement exists to help slow people down, thereby ensuring
the safety of everyone on the road. " said Roger Vanderpool, DPS
director, in a written statement.

Photo radar exists SOLELY to increase the revenues of the towns (and
companies!) that install it.

Dan D
'07 Ody EX
Central NJ USA

JXStern

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:38:18 -0700 (PDT), "rick++"
<rick303@hotmail.com> wrote:

>http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/119287


Photo *speed* enforcement? Ugh.

So far in Los Angeles, we just have red-light enforcement cameras, and
frankly, although I really hate to admit it, they help traffic.

Just a matter of time until I (and everyone!) gets caught unfairly in
some of the horrible situations that come up in heavy congestion, but
hasn't happened to me so far, so maybe the things sort of kind of
actually do work.

But I still think they should standardize on making them appear like
twelve foot high cartoon policemen or robocops or something.

J.

Euro_R

it sucks that they have the camera's all hidden, it's basically just to get money out of you, but then again it helps a bit