|
Honda Fit
My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for the
recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. I drive about 600 miles per month - mostly highway. I would appreciate any comments - positive or negative about the Honda Fit. |
Re: Honda Fit
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:34:19 -0500, "Paul E. Lehmann"
<someone@anywhere.com> wrote: >My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for the >recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. I >drive about 600 miles per month - mostly highway. > >I would appreciate any comments - positive or >negative about the Honda Fit. Wow, you have my admiration. The Fit will seem like a luxury car to you. I assume you are buying the MT. I don't have personal experience, but I from what I have read, I would recommend you get the Sport model. You could be driving this car for the next 20 years, so the small additional cost will add a lot of enjoyment. Live a little, you've earned it. |
Re: Honda Fit
"Paul E. Lehmann" <someone@anywhere.com> wrote in message news:Z8WdneUR_b43w6fanZ2dnUVZ_tvinZ2d@comcast.com. .. > My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for the > recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. I > drive about 600 miles per month - mostly highway. > > I would appreciate any comments - positive or > negative about the Honda Fit. I've had the Fit since early June of this year. I have no negative comments and plenty of positive ones about it. As of my last fill up, I am averaging 36.46 MPG overall. Of that, about 60% is city driving. My worst mileage was 33.59 MPG. My best mileage, which was almost all highway miles, was 43.98 MPG. I have a 5 speed manual Fit Sport model, but the automatic's mileage would not be as good. For a 1.5 liter engine, it has plenty of pep, especially the manual transmission. It corners effortlessly, and it shifts better than any other new car I have ever owned, and that includes a 1965 Mustang 289 4 speed, a 1969 Fiat 850 Spyder 4 speed, a 1978 Datsun 280Z 5 speed, and a bunch of Datzun/Nissan pickup trucks and still more cars. In the past, I lusted after the Mini Cooper, but could never justify it from a practical standpoint. This Fit has plenty of room for hauling, especially with the rear seats down. The rear seats raise up so you can transport objects over 4 feet high. It has a lot of great qualities, but what I like about it, most of all, is how much fun it is to drive! After driving pickup trucks since 1984, I had forgotten about driving fun. If you haven't noticed by now, I can't recommend this car highly enough, and I'm from the generation that came before the baby boomers ;) Oh, and the link below should provide all the information you need. I hoping you'll take the Fit (especially the manual tranny) for a test drive. http://www.fitfreak.net/forums/index...ferrerid=18289 Robert A. Cunningham |
Re: Honda Fit
Robert A. Cunningham wrote:
> > "Paul E. Lehmann" <someone@anywhere.com> wrote > in message > news:Z8WdneUR_b43w6fanZ2dnUVZ_tvinZ2d@comcast.com. .. >> My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for the >> recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. I >> drive about 600 miles per month - mostly >> highway. >> >> I would appreciate any comments - positive or >> negative about the Honda Fit. > > I've had the Fit since early June of this year. > I have no negative comments > and plenty of positive ones about it. As of my > last fill up, I am averaging > 36.46 MPG overall. Of that, about 60% is city > driving. My worst mileage was 33.59 MPG. My best > mileage, which was almost all highway miles, was > 43.98 > MPG. I have a 5 speed manual Fit Sport model, > but the automatic's mileage would not be as > good. > > For a 1.5 liter engine, it has plenty of pep, > especially the manual transmission. It corners > effortlessly, and it shifts better than any > other new car I have ever owned, and that > includes a 1965 Mustang 289 4 speed, a 1969 Fiat > 850 Spyder 4 speed, a 1978 Datsun 280Z 5 speed, > and a bunch of Datzun/Nissan pickup trucks and > still more cars. > > In the past, I lusted after the Mini Cooper, but > could never justify it from > a practical standpoint. This Fit has plenty of > room for hauling, especially > with the rear seats down. The rear seats raise > up so you can transport > objects over 4 feet high. It has a lot of great > qualities, but what I like about it, most of > all, is how much fun it is to drive! After > driving pickup > trucks since 1984, I had forgotten about driving > fun. If you haven't noticed by now, I can't > recommend this car highly enough, and I'm from > the generation that came before the baby boomers > ;) > > Oh, and the link below should provide all the > information you need. I hoping you'll take the > Fit (especially the manual tranny) for a test > drive. > > http://www.fitfreak.net/forums/index...ferrerid=18289 > > Robert A. Cunningham Thanks for the information. It sounds good. I am from the generation that came before the boomers myself (barely - born March 1945). I am an amateur wine maker and grower. It sounds like I will have no problem transporting 5 lugs or so of grapes - about 30 pounds per lug. I was initially considering getting a small pickup truck but this looks like a much better option. My wife recently bought an Accord and she is very happy with it and the dealer we bought from is very nice also. I think I will be giving him some more business. I may wait until spring. I don't want my new car to get all messed up with ice, mush and snow when it is brand new. |
Re: Honda Fit
"Paul E. Lehmann" <someone@anywhere.com> wrote in message news:xLCdnRQ6lZAd26HanZ2dnUVZ_tbinZ2d@comcast.com. .. > Robert A. Cunningham wrote: > >> >> "Paul E. Lehmann" <someone@anywhere.com> wrote >> in message >> > news:Z8WdneUR_b43w6fanZ2dnUVZ_tvinZ2d@comcast.com. .. >>> My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for the >>> recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. I >>> drive about 600 miles per month - mostly >>> highway. >>> >>> I would appreciate any comments - positive or >>> negative about the Honda Fit. >> >> I've had the Fit since early June of this year. >> I have no negative comments >> and plenty of positive ones about it. As of my >> last fill up, I am averaging >> 36.46 MPG overall. Of that, about 60% is city >> driving. My worst mileage was 33.59 MPG. My best >> mileage, which was almost all highway miles, was >> 43.98 >> MPG. I have a 5 speed manual Fit Sport model, >> but the automatic's mileage would not be as >> good. >> >> For a 1.5 liter engine, it has plenty of pep, >> especially the manual transmission. It corners >> effortlessly, and it shifts better than any >> other new car I have ever owned, and that >> includes a 1965 Mustang 289 4 speed, a 1969 Fiat >> 850 Spyder 4 speed, a 1978 Datsun 280Z 5 speed, >> and a bunch of Datzun/Nissan pickup trucks and >> still more cars. >> >> In the past, I lusted after the Mini Cooper, but >> could never justify it from >> a practical standpoint. This Fit has plenty of >> room for hauling, especially >> with the rear seats down. The rear seats raise >> up so you can transport >> objects over 4 feet high. It has a lot of great >> qualities, but what I like about it, most of >> all, is how much fun it is to drive! After >> driving pickup >> trucks since 1984, I had forgotten about driving >> fun. If you haven't noticed by now, I can't >> recommend this car highly enough, and I'm from >> the generation that came before the baby boomers >> ;) >> >> Oh, and the link below should provide all the >> information you need. I hoping you'll take the >> Fit (especially the manual tranny) for a test >> drive. >> >> > http://www.fitfreak.net/forums/index...ferrerid=18289 >> >> Robert A. Cunningham > > Thanks for the information. It sounds good. > I am from the generation that came before the > boomers myself (barely - born March 1945). > > I am an amateur wine maker and grower. It sounds > like I will have no problem transporting 5 lugs > or so of grapes - about 30 pounds per lug. I was > initially considering getting a small pickup > truck but this looks like a much better option. > > My wife recently bought an Accord and she is very > happy with it and the dealer we bought from is > very nice also. I think I will be giving him > some more business. I may wait until spring. I > don't want my new car to get all messed up with > ice, mush and snow when it is brand new. .. Well, based upon the information you provided I will make one recommendation. When you buy your fit please spend the extra money and buy the "cargo tray." It is a plastic molded tray that covers the whole area behind the rear seats. When you asked for positive and negatives about the Fit, I totally forgot about this, but it reminded me when you mentioned transporting "lugs of grapes." The rear floor area of the Fit, above the spare tire, is protected by only by some sort of mat over a thin piece of wood, or particle board, or something similar, and while I have never had any problem I would be very cautious about loading heavy articles, especially if they have a small footprint. By opening the hatch and lifting the tire cover you can see the material. I would highly recommend the Cargo Tray if you are going to do any hauling. This would also help to keep the area from getting messed up. |
Re: Honda Fit
Robert A. Cunningham wrote:
> > "Paul E. Lehmann" <someone@anywhere.com> wrote > in message > news:xLCdnRQ6lZAd26HanZ2dnUVZ_tbinZ2d@comcast.com. .. >> Robert A. Cunningham wrote: >> >>> >>> "Paul E. Lehmann" <someone@anywhere.com> wrote >>> in message >>> >> news:Z8WdneUR_b43w6fanZ2dnUVZ_tvinZ2d@comcast.com. .. >>>> My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for >>>> the >>>> recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. >>>> I drive about 600 miles per month - mostly >>>> highway. >>>> >>>> I would appreciate any comments - positive or >>>> negative about the Honda Fit. >>> >>> I've had the Fit since early June of this >>> year. I have no negative comments >>> and plenty of positive ones about it. As of >>> my last fill up, I am averaging >>> 36.46 MPG overall. Of that, about 60% is city >>> driving. My worst mileage was 33.59 MPG. My >>> best mileage, which was almost all highway >>> miles, was 43.98 >>> MPG. I have a 5 speed manual Fit Sport model, >>> but the automatic's mileage would not be as >>> good. >>> >>> For a 1.5 liter engine, it has plenty of pep, >>> especially the manual transmission. It corners >>> effortlessly, and it shifts better than any >>> other new car I have ever owned, and that >>> includes a 1965 Mustang 289 4 speed, a 1969 >>> Fiat 850 Spyder 4 speed, a 1978 Datsun 280Z 5 >>> speed, and a bunch of Datzun/Nissan pickup >>> trucks and still more cars. >>> >>> In the past, I lusted after the Mini Cooper, >>> but could never justify it from >>> a practical standpoint. This Fit has plenty >>> of room for hauling, especially >>> with the rear seats down. The rear seats >>> raise up so you can transport >>> objects over 4 feet high. It has a lot of >>> great qualities, but what I like about it, >>> most of all, is how much fun it is to drive! >>> After driving pickup >>> trucks since 1984, I had forgotten about >>> driving >>> fun. If you haven't noticed by now, I can't >>> recommend this car highly enough, and I'm from >>> the generation that came before the baby >>> boomers ;) >>> >>> Oh, and the link below should provide all the >>> information you need. I hoping you'll take >>> the Fit (especially the manual tranny) for a >>> test drive. >>> >>> >> http://www.fitfreak.net/forums/index...ferrerid=18289 >>> >>> Robert A. Cunningham >> >> Thanks for the information. It sounds good. >> I am from the generation that came before the >> boomers myself (barely - born March 1945). >> >> I am an amateur wine maker and grower. It >> sounds like I will have no problem transporting >> 5 lugs >> or so of grapes - about 30 pounds per lug. I >> was initially considering getting a small >> pickup truck but this looks like a much better >> option. >> >> My wife recently bought an Accord and she is >> very happy with it and the dealer we bought >> from is >> very nice also. I think I will be giving him >> some more business. I may wait until spring. >> I don't want my new car to get all messed up >> with ice, mush and snow when it is brand new. > . > Well, based upon the information you provided I > will make one > recommendation. When you buy your fit please > spend the extra money and buy > the "cargo tray." It is a plastic molded tray > that covers the whole area > behind the rear seats. When you asked for > positive and negatives about the Fit, I totally > forgot about this, but it reminded me when you > mentioned > transporting "lugs of grapes." The rear floor > area of the Fit, above the spare tire, is > protected by only by some sort of mat over a > thin piece of wood, or particle board, or > something similar, and while I have never had > any problem I would be very cautious about > loading heavy articles, especially if they have > a small footprint. By opening the hatch and > lifting the tire cover you can see the material. > I would highly recommend the Cargo Tray if you > are going to do any hauling. This would also > help to keep the area from getting messed up. Thanks a lot. I appreciate your help. Paul |
Re: Honda Fit
"Paul E. Lehmann" wrote: > My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for the > recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. I > drive about 600 miles per month - mostly highway. > > I would appreciate any comments - positive or > negative about the Honda Fit. The Fit would not be my first choice for that much highway driving. My wife drives a base model with A/T, ALL miles driven are city, the best mileage is a little over 25 MPG. Here's the fuel log I keep (because I can) starting from the second fillup. Date Brand Trip Fuel M P G Cost per Gal 7/30/2006 Chevron 320 9.57 33.44 $3.199 8/23/2006 Chevron 210 9.30 22.59 $3.119 9/19/2006 Chevron 230 9.20 25.00 $2.799 10/12/2006 Chevron 218 9.02 24.17 $2.499 11/2/2006 Chevron 224 9.18 24.45 $2.279 11/30/2006 Chevron 221 8.86 24.94 $2.399 1/2/2007 Chevron 205 8.99 22.80 $2.579 2/4/2007 Chevron 211 8.80 23.98 $2.479 3/6/2007 Chevron 209 8.70 24.02 $2.919 4/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.19 23.83 $3.239 4/29/2007 Chevron 213 8.31 25.63 $3.359 5/20/2007 Chevron 214 8.79 24.36 $3.395 6/12/2007 Chevron 205 8.61 23.80 $3.199 7/24/2007 Chevron 210 9.30 22.57 $2.999 9/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.30 23.55 $ 2.659 9/22/2007 Mobil 217 9.46 22.93 $2.889 10/14/2007 Chevron 231 9.00 25.67 $2.982 10/30/2007 Chevron 177 7.26 24.37 $3.119 While the Fit will get the job done for you; I think the CRv would be a better choice. -- Tp, -------- __o ----- -\<. -------- __o --- ( )/ ( ) ---- -\<. -------------------- ( )/ ( ) ----------------------------------------- No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron... |
Re: Honda Fit
Paul E. Lehmann wrote:
> My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for the > recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. I > drive about 600 miles per month - mostly highway. > > I would appreciate any comments - positive or > negative about the Honda Fit. Hi, Took a look at Nissan Versa? |
Re: Honda Fit
"TomP" <---roadcyc@socal.rr.com> wrote in message news:473F15E8.F440F3E2@socal.rr.com... > > > "Paul E. Lehmann" wrote: > >> My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for the >> recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. I >> drive about 600 miles per month - mostly highway. >> >> I would appreciate any comments - positive or >> negative about the Honda Fit. > > The Fit would not be my first choice for that > much highway driving. > My wife drives a base model with A/T, ALL > miles driven are city, the best mileage is a little > over 25 MPG. Here's the fuel log I keep (because I > can) starting from the second fillup. > > Date Brand Trip Fuel M > P G Cost per Gal > > 7/30/2006 Chevron 320 9.57 > 33.44 $3.199 > 8/23/2006 Chevron 210 9.30 > 22.59 $3.119 > 9/19/2006 Chevron 230 9.20 > 25.00 $2.799 > 10/12/2006 Chevron 218 9.02 > 24.17 $2.499 > 11/2/2006 Chevron 224 9.18 > 24.45 $2.279 > 11/30/2006 Chevron 221 8.86 > 24.94 $2.399 > 1/2/2007 Chevron 205 8.99 > 22.80 $2.579 > 2/4/2007 Chevron 211 8.80 > 23.98 $2.479 > 3/6/2007 Chevron 209 8.70 > 24.02 $2.919 > 4/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.19 > 23.83 $3.239 > 4/29/2007 Chevron 213 8.31 > 25.63 $3.359 > 5/20/2007 Chevron 214 8.79 > 24.36 $3.395 > 6/12/2007 Chevron 205 8.61 > 23.80 $3.199 > 7/24/2007 Chevron 210 9.30 > 22.57 $2.999 > 9/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.30 > 23.55 $ 2.659 > 9/22/2007 Mobil 217 9.46 > 22.93 $2.889 > 10/14/2007 Chevron 231 9.00 > 25.67 $2.982 > 10/30/2007 Chevron 177 7.26 > 24.37 $3.119 > > While the Fit will get the job done for you; > I think the CRv would be a better choice. The above mileages are for mostly city driving, with an automatic. Normally, I would not recommend the purchase of an automatic Fit, because the mileage, and the performance, would be lower and slower; however, due to the OP's claim that his mileage would be approx 600 miles per month, mostly highway, the automatic would probably be just as economical, but a lot of mileage depends upon driving habits, especially in the city. But in city driving, people with automatics have expressed more displeasure with their mileage. Also, I have kept record of every fill-up (though my sheet does not indicate price), other than the initial fill up by the dealer. Finally, the Fit sells for considerably less than the CR-V. Robert A. Cunningham |
Re: Honda Fit
Tony Hwang wrote:
> Paul E. Lehmann wrote: >> My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for the >> recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. I >> drive about 600 miles per month - mostly >> highway. >> >> I would appreciate any comments - positive or >> negative about the Honda Fit. > Hi, > Took a look at Nissan Versa? Not yet, but I will before spring. Do you have experience with this vehicle? |
Re: Honda Fit
"Robert A. Cunningham" wrote:
> "TomP" <---roadcyc@socal.rr.com> wrote in message > news:473F15E8.F440F3E2@socal.rr.com... > > > > > > "Paul E. Lehmann" wrote: > > > >> My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for the > >> recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. I > >> drive about 600 miles per month - mostly highway. > >> > >> I would appreciate any comments - positive or > >> negative about the Honda Fit. > > > > The Fit would not be my first choice for that > > much highway driving. > > My wife drives a base model with A/T, ALL > > miles driven are city, the best mileage is a little > > over 25 MPG. Here's the fuel log I keep (because I > > can) starting from the second fillup. > > > > Date Brand Trip Fuel M > > P G Cost per Gal > > > > 7/30/2006 Chevron 320 9.57 > > 33.44 $3.199 > > 8/23/2006 Chevron 210 9.30 > > 22.59 $3.119 > > 9/19/2006 Chevron 230 9.20 > > 25.00 $2.799 > > 10/12/2006 Chevron 218 9.02 > > 24.17 $2.499 > > 11/2/2006 Chevron 224 9.18 > > 24.45 $2.279 > > 11/30/2006 Chevron 221 8.86 > > 24.94 $2.399 > > 1/2/2007 Chevron 205 8.99 > > 22.80 $2.579 > > 2/4/2007 Chevron 211 8.80 > > 23.98 $2.479 > > 3/6/2007 Chevron 209 8.70 > > 24.02 $2.919 > > 4/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.19 > > 23.83 $3.239 > > 4/29/2007 Chevron 213 8.31 > > 25.63 $3.359 > > 5/20/2007 Chevron 214 8.79 > > 24.36 $3.395 > > 6/12/2007 Chevron 205 8.61 > > 23.80 $3.199 > > 7/24/2007 Chevron 210 9.30 > > 22.57 $2.999 > > 9/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.30 > > 23.55 $ 2.659 > > 9/22/2007 Mobil 217 9.46 > > 22.93 $2.889 > > 10/14/2007 Chevron 231 9.00 > > 25.67 $2.982 > > 10/30/2007 Chevron 177 7.26 > > 24.37 $3.119 > > > > While the Fit will get the job done for you; > > I think the CRv would be a better choice. > > The above mileages are for mostly city driving, with an automatic. > Normally, I would not recommend the purchase of an automatic Fit, because > the mileage, and the performance, would be lower and slower; however, due to > the OP's claim that his mileage would be approx 600 miles per month, mostly > highway, the automatic would probably be just as economical, but a lot of > mileage depends upon driving habits, especially in the city. But in city > driving, people with automatics have expressed more displeasure with their > mileage. Also, I have kept record of every fill-up (though my sheet > does not indicate price), other than the initial fill up by the dealer. > Finally, the Fit sells for considerably less than the CR-V. > > Robert A. Cunningham Robert is right on with his analysis. But, I could not spend that much time in a Fit at highway speeds, it's not going to be fun, nor will it be, what I consider, comfortable. -- Tp, -------- __o ----- -\<. -------- __o --- ( )/ ( ) ---- -\<. -------------------- ( )/ ( ) ----------------------------------------- No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron... |
Re: Honda Fit
TomP wrote:
> "Robert A. Cunningham" wrote: > >> "TomP" <---roadcyc@socal.rr.com> wrote in >> message news:473F15E8.F440F3E2@socal.rr.com... >> > >> > >> > "Paul E. Lehmann" wrote: >> > >> >> My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for >> >> the >> >> recycle bin. I am considering the Honda >> >> Fit. I drive about 600 miles per month - >> >> mostly highway. >> >> >> >> I would appreciate any comments - positive >> >> or negative about the Honda Fit. >> > >> > The Fit would not be my first choice >> > for that >> > much highway driving. >> > My wife drives a base model with A/T, >> > ALL >> > miles driven are city, the best mileage is a >> > little >> > over 25 MPG. Here's the fuel log I keep >> > (because I can) starting from the second >> > fillup. >> > >> > Date Brand Trip >> > Fuel M >> > P G Cost per Gal >> > >> > 7/30/2006 Chevron 320 9.57 >> > 33.44 $3.199 >> > 8/23/2006 Chevron 210 9.30 >> > 22.59 $3.119 >> > 9/19/2006 Chevron 230 9.20 >> > 25.00 $2.799 >> > 10/12/2006 Chevron 218 9.02 >> > 24.17 $2.499 >> > 11/2/2006 Chevron 224 9.18 >> > 24.45 $2.279 >> > 11/30/2006 Chevron 221 8.86 >> > 24.94 $2.399 >> > 1/2/2007 Chevron 205 8.99 >> > 22.80 $2.579 >> > 2/4/2007 Chevron 211 8.80 >> > 23.98 $2.479 >> > 3/6/2007 Chevron 209 8.70 >> > 24.02 $2.919 >> > 4/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.19 >> > 23.83 $3.239 >> > 4/29/2007 Chevron 213 8.31 >> > 25.63 $3.359 >> > 5/20/2007 Chevron 214 8.79 >> > 24.36 $3.395 >> > 6/12/2007 Chevron 205 8.61 >> > 23.80 $3.199 >> > 7/24/2007 Chevron 210 9.30 >> > 22.57 $2.999 >> > 9/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.30 >> > 23.55 $ 2.659 >> > 9/22/2007 Mobil 217 9.46 >> > 22.93 $2.889 >> > 10/14/2007 Chevron 231 9.00 >> > 25.67 $2.982 >> > 10/30/2007 Chevron 177 7.26 >> > 24.37 $3.119 >> > >> > While the Fit will get the job done >> > for you; >> > I think the CRv would be a better choice. >> >> The above mileages are for mostly city driving, >> with an automatic. Normally, I would not >> recommend the purchase of an automatic Fit, >> because the mileage, and the performance, would >> be lower and slower; however, due to the OP's >> claim that his mileage would be approx 600 >> miles per month, mostly highway, the automatic >> would probably be just as economical, but a lot >> of >> mileage depends upon driving habits, especially >> in the city. But in city driving, people with >> automatics have expressed more displeasure with >> their >> mileage. Also, I have kept record of every >> fill-up (though my sheet does not >> indicate price), other than the initial fill up >> by the dealer. Finally, the Fit sells for >> considerably less than the CR-V. >> >> Robert A. Cunningham > > Robert is right on with his analysis. > > But, I could not spend that much time in a > Fit at highway speeds, it's not > going to be fun, nor will it be, what I > consider, comfortable. > > > -- I live in a town of three stoplights and only drive through two of them on a daily basis (about two miles) to highway access on the west side of town. I live two blocks from farm land. My hightway driving is to a gym 15 miles away and back or occasionally into another town also 15 miles away in the other direction and back. I will not be doing hardly ANY stop and go driving. I do need a vehicle that can carry a very light and small load. Right now, I am able to get it into the trunk of my Mazda Protege but a more accessable compartment would be nice. I do not want to spend the amount of money that a CRV would cost because I need to buy other toys for my backyard vineyard and basement winery. Everyone has their priorities, I guess. |
Re: Honda Fit
In article <j6KdnRzFF-hY6d3anZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Paul E. Lehmann" <someone@anywhere.com> wrote: > TomP wrote: > > > "Robert A. Cunningham" wrote: > > > >> "TomP" <---roadcyc@socal.rr.com> wrote in > >> message news:473F15E8.F440F3E2@socal.rr.com... > >> > > >> > > >> > "Paul E. Lehmann" wrote: > >> > > >> >> My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for > >> >> the > >> >> recycle bin. I am considering the Honda > >> >> Fit. I drive about 600 miles per month - > >> >> mostly highway. > >> >> > >> >> I would appreciate any comments - positive > >> >> or negative about the Honda Fit. > >> > > >> > The Fit would not be my first choice > >> > for that > >> > much highway driving. > >> > My wife drives a base model with A/T, > >> > ALL > >> > miles driven are city, the best mileage is a > >> > little > >> > over 25 MPG. Here's the fuel log I keep > >> > (because I can) starting from the second > >> > fillup. > >> > > >> > Date Brand Trip > >> > Fuel M > >> > P G Cost per Gal > >> > > >> > 7/30/2006 Chevron 320 9.57 > >> > 33.44 $3.199 > >> > 8/23/2006 Chevron 210 9.30 > >> > 22.59 $3.119 > >> > 9/19/2006 Chevron 230 9.20 > >> > 25.00 $2.799 > >> > 10/12/2006 Chevron 218 9.02 > >> > 24.17 $2.499 > >> > 11/2/2006 Chevron 224 9.18 > >> > 24.45 $2.279 > >> > 11/30/2006 Chevron 221 8.86 > >> > 24.94 $2.399 > >> > 1/2/2007 Chevron 205 8.99 > >> > 22.80 $2.579 > >> > 2/4/2007 Chevron 211 8.80 > >> > 23.98 $2.479 > >> > 3/6/2007 Chevron 209 8.70 > >> > 24.02 $2.919 > >> > 4/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.19 > >> > 23.83 $3.239 > >> > 4/29/2007 Chevron 213 8.31 > >> > 25.63 $3.359 > >> > 5/20/2007 Chevron 214 8.79 > >> > 24.36 $3.395 > >> > 6/12/2007 Chevron 205 8.61 > >> > 23.80 $3.199 > >> > 7/24/2007 Chevron 210 9.30 > >> > 22.57 $2.999 > >> > 9/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.30 > >> > 23.55 $ 2.659 > >> > 9/22/2007 Mobil 217 9.46 > >> > 22.93 $2.889 > >> > 10/14/2007 Chevron 231 9.00 > >> > 25.67 $2.982 > >> > 10/30/2007 Chevron 177 7.26 > >> > 24.37 $3.119 > >> > > >> > While the Fit will get the job done > >> > for you; > >> > I think the CRv would be a better choice. > >> > >> The above mileages are for mostly city driving, > >> with an automatic. Normally, I would not > >> recommend the purchase of an automatic Fit, > >> because the mileage, and the performance, would > >> be lower and slower; however, due to the OP's > >> claim that his mileage would be approx 600 > >> miles per month, mostly highway, the automatic > >> would probably be just as economical, but a lot > >> of > >> mileage depends upon driving habits, especially > >> in the city. But in city driving, people with > >> automatics have expressed more displeasure with > >> their > >> mileage. Also, I have kept record of every > >> fill-up (though my sheet does not > >> indicate price), other than the initial fill up > >> by the dealer. Finally, the Fit sells for > >> considerably less than the CR-V. > >> > >> Robert A. Cunningham > > > > Robert is right on with his analysis. > > > > But, I could not spend that much time in a > > Fit at highway speeds, it's not > > going to be fun, nor will it be, what I > > consider, comfortable. > > > > > > -- > > I live in a town of three stoplights and only > drive through two of them on a daily basis (about > two miles) to highway access on the west side of > town. I live two blocks from farm land. > > My hightway driving is to a gym 15 miles away and > back or occasionally into another town also 15 > miles away in the other direction and back. > > I will not be doing hardly ANY stop and go > driving. > > I do need a vehicle that can carry a very light > and small load. Right now, I am able to get it > into the trunk of my Mazda Protege but a more > accessable compartment would be nice. > > I do not want to spend the amount of money that a > CRV would cost because I need to buy other toys > for my backyard vineyard and basement winery. > Everyone has their priorities, I guess. yep |
Re: Honda Fit
"TomP" <---roadcyc@socal.rr.com> wrote in message news:47405963.B96A0BB2@socal.rr.com... > "Robert A. Cunningham" wrote: > >> "TomP" <---roadcyc@socal.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:473F15E8.F440F3E2@socal.rr.com... >> > >> > >> > "Paul E. Lehmann" wrote: >> > >> >> My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for the >> >> recycle bin. I am considering the Honda Fit. I >> >> drive about 600 miles per month - mostly highway. >> >> >> >> I would appreciate any comments - positive or >> >> negative about the Honda Fit. >> > >> > The Fit would not be my first choice for that >> > much highway driving. >> > My wife drives a base model with A/T, ALL >> > miles driven are city, the best mileage is a little >> > over 25 MPG. Here's the fuel log I keep (because I >> > can) starting from the second fillup. >> > >> > Date Brand Trip Fuel M >> > P G Cost per Gal >> > >> > 7/30/2006 Chevron 320 9.57 >> > 33.44 $3.199 >> > 8/23/2006 Chevron 210 9.30 >> > 22.59 $3.119 >> > 9/19/2006 Chevron 230 9.20 >> > 25.00 $2.799 >> > 10/12/2006 Chevron 218 9.02 >> > 24.17 $2.499 >> > 11/2/2006 Chevron 224 9.18 >> > 24.45 $2.279 >> > 11/30/2006 Chevron 221 8.86 >> > 24.94 $2.399 >> > 1/2/2007 Chevron 205 8.99 >> > 22.80 $2.579 >> > 2/4/2007 Chevron 211 8.80 >> > 23.98 $2.479 >> > 3/6/2007 Chevron 209 8.70 >> > 24.02 $2.919 >> > 4/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.19 >> > 23.83 $3.239 >> > 4/29/2007 Chevron 213 8.31 >> > 25.63 $3.359 >> > 5/20/2007 Chevron 214 8.79 >> > 24.36 $3.395 >> > 6/12/2007 Chevron 205 8.61 >> > 23.80 $3.199 >> > 7/24/2007 Chevron 210 9.30 >> > 22.57 $2.999 >> > 9/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.30 >> > 23.55 $ 2.659 >> > 9/22/2007 Mobil 217 9.46 >> > 22.93 $2.889 >> > 10/14/2007 Chevron 231 9.00 >> > 25.67 $2.982 >> > 10/30/2007 Chevron 177 7.26 >> > 24.37 $3.119 >> > >> > While the Fit will get the job done for you; >> > I think the CRv would be a better choice. >> >> The above mileages are for mostly city driving, with an automatic. >> Normally, I would not recommend the purchase of an automatic Fit, because >> the mileage, and the performance, would be lower and slower; however, due >> to >> the OP's claim that his mileage would be approx 600 miles per month, >> mostly >> highway, the automatic would probably be just as economical, but a lot of >> mileage depends upon driving habits, especially in the city. But in city >> driving, people with automatics have expressed more displeasure with >> their >> mileage. Also, I have kept record of every fill-up (though my >> sheet >> does not indicate price), other than the initial fill up by the dealer. >> Finally, the Fit sells for considerably less than the CR-V. >> >> Robert A. Cunningham > > Robert is right on with his analysis. > > But, I could not spend that much time in a Fit at highway speeds, it's > not > going to be fun, nor will it be, what I consider, comfortable. > > > -- > Tp, Well, you may be correct, but since both fun, and comfort, are relative terms, every person will have his/her own definition of each term, but in my experience, I have found the Fit to be one heck of a lot of fun, at any speed, and very comfortable as well. Moreover, I came to that conclusion, after I drove it, not before. My only recommendation for someone interested in buying a new car is to take the Fit (or for that matter, any new car) for a test drive. You may like it, love it, or hate it, but you will come to your own conclusion based upon your experience, not with a preconceived notion of what you may think it would be like. Robert A. Cunningham |
Re: Honda Fit
"Paul E. Lehmann" wrote:
> TomP wrote: > > > "Robert A. Cunningham" wrote: > > > >> "TomP" <---roadcyc@socal.rr.com> wrote in > >> message news:473F15E8.F440F3E2@socal.rr.com... > >> > > >> > > >> > "Paul E. Lehmann" wrote: > >> > > >> >> My 1994 Mazda Protege is getting ready for > >> >> the > >> >> recycle bin. I am considering the Honda > >> >> Fit. I drive about 600 miles per month - > >> >> mostly highway. > >> >> > >> >> I would appreciate any comments - positive > >> >> or negative about the Honda Fit. > >> > > >> > The Fit would not be my first choice > >> > for that > >> > much highway driving. > >> > My wife drives a base model with A/T, > >> > ALL > >> > miles driven are city, the best mileage is a > >> > little > >> > over 25 MPG. Here's the fuel log I keep > >> > (because I can) starting from the second > >> > fillup. > >> > > >> > Date Brand Trip > >> > Fuel M > >> > P G Cost per Gal > >> > > >> > 7/30/2006 Chevron 320 9.57 > >> > 33.44 $3.199 > >> > 8/23/2006 Chevron 210 9.30 > >> > 22.59 $3.119 > >> > 9/19/2006 Chevron 230 9.20 > >> > 25.00 $2.799 > >> > 10/12/2006 Chevron 218 9.02 > >> > 24.17 $2.499 > >> > 11/2/2006 Chevron 224 9.18 > >> > 24.45 $2.279 > >> > 11/30/2006 Chevron 221 8.86 > >> > 24.94 $2.399 > >> > 1/2/2007 Chevron 205 8.99 > >> > 22.80 $2.579 > >> > 2/4/2007 Chevron 211 8.80 > >> > 23.98 $2.479 > >> > 3/6/2007 Chevron 209 8.70 > >> > 24.02 $2.919 > >> > 4/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.19 > >> > 23.83 $3.239 > >> > 4/29/2007 Chevron 213 8.31 > >> > 25.63 $3.359 > >> > 5/20/2007 Chevron 214 8.79 > >> > 24.36 $3.395 > >> > 6/12/2007 Chevron 205 8.61 > >> > 23.80 $3.199 > >> > 7/24/2007 Chevron 210 9.30 > >> > 22.57 $2.999 > >> > 9/2/2007 Chevron 219 9.30 > >> > 23.55 $ 2.659 > >> > 9/22/2007 Mobil 217 9.46 > >> > 22.93 $2.889 > >> > 10/14/2007 Chevron 231 9.00 > >> > 25.67 $2.982 > >> > 10/30/2007 Chevron 177 7.26 > >> > 24.37 $3.119 > >> > > >> > While the Fit will get the job done > >> > for you; > >> > I think the CRv would be a better choice. > >> > >> The above mileages are for mostly city driving, > >> with an automatic. Normally, I would not > >> recommend the purchase of an automatic Fit, > >> because the mileage, and the performance, would > >> be lower and slower; however, due to the OP's > >> claim that his mileage would be approx 600 > >> miles per month, mostly highway, the automatic > >> would probably be just as economical, but a lot > >> of > >> mileage depends upon driving habits, especially > >> in the city. But in city driving, people with > >> automatics have expressed more displeasure with > >> their > >> mileage. Also, I have kept record of every > >> fill-up (though my sheet does not > >> indicate price), other than the initial fill up > >> by the dealer. Finally, the Fit sells for > >> considerably less than the CR-V. > >> > >> Robert A. Cunningham > > > > Robert is right on with his analysis. > > > > But, I could not spend that much time in a > > Fit at highway speeds, it's not > > going to be fun, nor will it be, what I > > consider, comfortable. > > > > > > -- > > I live in a town of three stoplights and only > drive through two of them on a daily basis (about > two miles) to highway access on the west side of > town. I live two blocks from farm land. > > My hightway driving is to a gym 15 miles away and > back or occasionally into another town also 15 > miles away in the other direction and back. > > I will not be doing hardly ANY stop and go > driving. > > I do need a vehicle that can carry a very light > and small load. Right now, I am able to get it > into the trunk of my Mazda Protege but a more > accessable compartment would be nice. Sounds like it will "Fit" your needs; go for it! > I do not want to spend the amount of money that a > CRV would cost because I need to buy other toys Me too. -- Tp, -------- __o ----- -\<. -------- __o --- ( )/ ( ) ---- -\<. -------------------- ( )/ ( ) ----------------------------------------- No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron... |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands