Message response
 

This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
an "Re:" subject.

In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
follow.

John

Re: Message response
 

The same reason they don't use spell check I guess.

John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John

Re: Message response
 

The same reason they don't use spell check I guess.

John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John

Re: Message response
 

The same reason they don't use spell check I guess.

John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John

Re: Message response
 

The same reason they don't use spell check I guess.

John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John

Re: Message response
 

John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.

Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.

Re: Message response
 

John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.

Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.

Re: Message response
 

John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.

Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.

Re: Message response
 

John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.

Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.

Re: Message response
 

In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
wrote:

> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.

Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.

Re: Message response
 

In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
wrote:

> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.

Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.

Re: Message response
 

In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
wrote:

> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.

Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.

Re: Message response
 

In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
wrote:

> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.

Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.

Re: Message response
 

Sorry, 4 other news groups all show up threaded. Matt's reply makes sense
though.
John

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" wrote:

> In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> > group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> > the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> > an "Re:" subject.
> >
> > In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> > maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> > the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> > follow.
>
> Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
> threaded. check your preferences.

Re: Message response
 

Sorry, 4 other news groups all show up threaded. Matt's reply makes sense
though.
John

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" wrote:

> In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> > group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> > the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> > an "Re:" subject.
> >
> > In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> > maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> > the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> > follow.
>
> Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
> threaded. check your preferences.