Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ
 

Bucky wrote:
> TeGGeR® wrote:
>
>>I also found a few broken internal links. How come nobody notifies me of
>>these things?
>
>
> There's free tools that can scan your site for broken links. You should
> look into those. I haven't used one before, so I can't recommend one.

I still say a Wiki backend would make this all easier... yes yes, I know
the argument about anyone-can-edit-it... that's why you use one that
allows only the administrator or specified contributors to edit it,
and/or requires the admin to approve updates.


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0614-3, 04/07/2006
Tested on: 4/7/2006 10:40:16 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com

Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ
 

Bucky wrote:
> TeGGeR® wrote:
>
>>I also found a few broken internal links. How come nobody notifies me of
>>these things?
>
>
> There's free tools that can scan your site for broken links. You should
> look into those. I haven't used one before, so I can't recommend one.

I still say a Wiki backend would make this all easier... yes yes, I know
the argument about anyone-can-edit-it... that's why you use one that
allows only the administrator or specified contributors to edit it,
and/or requires the admin to approve updates.


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0614-3, 04/07/2006
Tested on: 4/7/2006 10:40:16 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com

Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ
 

Boy, Who pissed in your Cornflakes today?

"Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:kWUYf.12067$Bj7.7703@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net...
> "TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote
>> I also found a few broken internal links. How come nobody
>> notifies me of
>> these things?
>
> Perhaps because there are things even more important than
> broken links with which people have objections. Agreeing to
> disagree is often the best way to go with you, along with a lot
> of patience (or just ignoring you) when you go into the mode,
> "My way is the best way. I can't prove it. But it is."
>
> Thus my silence on your latest page.
>

Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ
 

Boy, Who pissed in your Cornflakes today?

"Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:kWUYf.12067$Bj7.7703@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net...
> "TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote
>> I also found a few broken internal links. How come nobody
>> notifies me of
>> these things?
>
> Perhaps because there are things even more important than
> broken links with which people have objections. Agreeing to
> disagree is often the best way to go with you, along with a lot
> of patience (or just ignoring you) when you go into the mode,
> "My way is the best way. I can't prove it. But it is."
>
> Thus my silence on your latest page.
>

Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ
 

Girl, who dumped in yours?

The guy asked a question. I responded with my opinion. If
you have a problem with the ultimate marketplace of ideas,
then you shouldn't be on moderated-free Usenet. I'd be more
specific about the at least two gross errors on Tegger's
latest page, but it's clear to me he often prefers playing
games rather than adhere to truth.

So sod off, idiot.

"Ice" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.com> wrote
> Boy, Who pissed in your Cornflakes today?
>
> "Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote
>> "TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote
>>> I also found a few broken internal links. How come
>>> nobody notifies me of
>>> these things?
>>
>> Perhaps because there are things even more important than
>> broken links with which people have objections. Agreeing
>> to disagree is often the best way to go with you, along
>> with a lot of patience (or just ignoring you) when you go
>> into the mode, "My way is the best way. I can't prove it.
>> But it is."
>>
>> Thus my silence on your latest page.

Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ
 

Girl, who dumped in yours?

The guy asked a question. I responded with my opinion. If
you have a problem with the ultimate marketplace of ideas,
then you shouldn't be on moderated-free Usenet. I'd be more
specific about the at least two gross errors on Tegger's
latest page, but it's clear to me he often prefers playing
games rather than adhere to truth.

So sod off, idiot.

"Ice" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.com> wrote
> Boy, Who pissed in your Cornflakes today?
>
> "Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote
>> "TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote
>>> I also found a few broken internal links. How come
>>> nobody notifies me of
>>> these things?
>>
>> Perhaps because there are things even more important than
>> broken links with which people have objections. Agreeing
>> to disagree is often the best way to go with you, along
>> with a lot of patience (or just ignoring you) when you go
>> into the mode, "My way is the best way. I can't prove it.
>> But it is."
>>
>> Thus my silence on your latest page.