|
Re: question for hachiroku
On Sun, 18 May 2008 21:01:01 -0700, jim beam wrote:
> Hachiroku γγγγ― wrote: >> On Sun, 18 May 2008 20:11:12 -0700, jim beam wrote: >> >>> now, bleat to me one more time about how it's not in the owners manual >>> - because its in all the honda ones. >> >> I don't own Hondas, I own Toyotas. So how the hell would I know what was >> in a Honda manual? >> >> But, good for Honda for placing that info in the manual. Maybe they >> should give out a Honda manual with every new Toyota. >> >>> and bleat to me about how it's not your problem. because it most >>> definitely is. oh, wait, you had a crash and totaled your car hitting >>> someone in front of you because you couldn't stop in time. well, well, >>> well... >> >> It was < 2 years old and only had 40,000 miles on it, in a severe >> thunderstorm with torrential downpours, and the kid cut less than 15 >> feet in front of me while I was doing 35 MPH, douchebag. >> >> > why do you always snip the factual information? is it because you have no > interest? No, it makes it easier to focus on the bullshit. |
Re: question for hachiroku
Hachiroku γγγγ― wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2008 21:01:01 -0700, jim beam wrote: > >> Hachiroku γγγγ― wrote: >>> On Sun, 18 May 2008 20:11:12 -0700, jim beam wrote: >>> >>>> now, bleat to me one more time about how it's not in the owners manual >>>> - because its in all the honda ones. >>> I don't own Hondas, I own Toyotas. So how the hell would I know what was >>> in a Honda manual? >>> >>> But, good for Honda for placing that info in the manual. Maybe they >>> should give out a Honda manual with every new Toyota. >>> >>>> and bleat to me about how it's not your problem. because it most >>>> definitely is. oh, wait, you had a crash and totaled your car hitting >>>> someone in front of you because you couldn't stop in time. well, well, >>>> well... >>> It was < 2 years old and only had 40,000 miles on it, in a severe >>> thunderstorm with torrential downpours, and the kid cut less than 15 >>> feet in front of me while I was doing 35 MPH, douchebag. >>> >>> >> why do you always snip the factual information? is it because you have no >> interest? > > No, it makes it easier to focus on the bullshit. > > then it's narcissism. |
Re: question for hachiroku
"Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote > Don't pay much attention to beam. Planes ain't cars. Apples 'n oranges > for sure. > > While he does dispense some good info on occasion, most of his posts > reflect a narrow personal view that is out of touch with the average > motorist. He has also adopted the false mantra of dealer service while > ignoring its main function, generation of revenue. > > Just pour a cool one and enjoy the afternoon... > > JT Amen ( raises glass of shiraz to make a toast to you ). Peace, Polfus |
Re: question for hachiroku
On Sun, 18 May 2008 21:38:36 -0700, jim beam wrote:
>>>> It was < 2 years old and only had 40,000 miles on it, in a severe >>>> thunderstorm with torrential downpours, and the kid cut less than 15 >>>> feet in front of me while I was doing 35 MPH, douchebag. >>>> >>>> >>> why do you always snip the factual information? is it because you >>> have no interest? >> >> No, it makes it easier to focus on the bullshit. >> >> >> > then it's narcissism. Since you keep changing the focus of the 'discussion', then I help you keep up with that. We went from oil changes to brake fluid changes, to crashing a Corolla because some idiot crossed in front of me in a torrential downpour. I don't want you getting lost, after all... |
Re: question for hachiroku
οΏ½hachiroku γγγγ― wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2008 21:38:36 -0700, jim beam wrote: > >>>>> It was < 2 years old and only had 40,000 miles on it, in a severe >>>>> thunderstorm with torrential downpours, and the kid cut less than 15 >>>>> feet in front of me while I was doing 35 MPH, douchebag. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> why do you always snip the factual information? is it because you >>>> have no interest? >>> No, it makes it easier to focus on the bullshit. >>> >>> >>> >> then it's narcissism. > > Since you keep changing the focus of the 'discussion', then I help you > keep up with that. We went from oil changes to brake fluid changes, to > crashing a Corolla because some idiot crossed in front of me in a > torrential downpour. > > I don't want you getting lost, after all... > what part of "you were driving too fast" didn't you understand from last time? the more you reveal of the facts, like road conditions, the more clear it becomes that you're reckless and stupid. |
Re: question for hachiroku
On Mon, 19 May 2008 19:57:35 -0700, jim beam wrote:
>> Since you keep changing the focus of the 'discussion', then I help you >> keep up with that. We went from oil changes to brake fluid changes, to >> crashing a Corolla because some idiot crossed in front of me in a >> torrential downpour. >> >> I don't want you getting lost, after all... >> >> > what part of "you were driving too fast" didn't you understand from last > time? the more you reveal of the facts, like road conditions, the more > clear it becomes that you're reckless and stupid. And the more you respond, the more clear it becomes you're an . The speed limit was 45 MPH. I was driving 35 MPH and the rain was letting up. I was also keeping with the flow of traffic. So now what, smart ass? |
Re: question for hachiroku
"Bruce L. Bergman" <blnospambergman@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message news:mr2u245ec9h31v8cp6nmi4fvug3ns8d370@4ax.com... > On Fri, 16 May 2008 23:57:15 -0500, "Ray O" > <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote: > >> >>"jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote in message >>news:xo-dnR8T3I79qrPVnZ2dnUVZ_rbinZ2d@speakeasy.net... >>> hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 20:08:51 -0700, jim beam wrote: >>>> >>>>> 1. how often do you change your engine coolant? >>>>> >>>>> 2. how often do you change your brake fluid? >>>> >>>> LOL! I'm pobably baiting myself here, but I'll bite: >>>> >>>> I change the coolant when it needs it. When it stops looking 'green' >>>> enough. One car I ran 120,000 miles before changing it, and didn't >>>> change >>>> it again after that. I traded it at 244,000 and saw it around 4 more >>>> years after that. >>>> >>>> The car that replaced it had a coolant change at 150,000 miles, That >>>> one >>>> currently has 259,000 and is sitting in my back yard. >>>> >>>> Brake fluid gets changed the moment I notice a difference in pedal >>>> pressure. If I start to lose 'modulation' I check the fluid and chenge >>>> it. This usually happens around 150,000 or so when the fluid is dark >>>> brown, but not black. The place I used to have do my brakes would bleed >>>> or flush accordingly, and brakes last me ~60,000 miles. >>> >>> <snip irrelevance> >>> >>> so not only do you disregard the owners manual with too frequent oil >>> changes, you disregard it with too infrequent coolant or brake fluid >>> changes. the latter being a material factor in vehicle safety. >>> >> >>Toyota does not have a recommended brake fluid change. > > Yes, but they should. Brake fluid is hygroscopic and will absorb > moisture out of the air over time, and you still want to deep bleed > the brakes with fresh fluid to effectively change it occasionally. > > Though I would never stretch it to 150K, do it every time the > calipers are rebuilt or other major brake work is done to the car, in > the 30K to 60K range. > > --<< Bruce >>-- > I agree that there should be a replacement for brake fluid. My recommendation is to replace it every other brake job. -- Ray O (correct punctuation to reply) |
Re: question for hachiroku
Hachiroku γγγγ― wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 19:57:35 -0700, jim beam wrote: > >>> Since you keep changing the focus of the 'discussion', then I help you >>> keep up with that. We went from oil changes to brake fluid changes, to >>> crashing a Corolla because some idiot crossed in front of me in a >>> torrential downpour. >>> >>> I don't want you getting lost, after all... >>> >>> >> what part of "you were driving too fast" didn't you understand from last >> time? the more you reveal of the facts, like road conditions, the more >> clear it becomes that you're reckless and stupid. > > > And the more you respond, the more clear it becomes you're an . and the more clear it becomes that you haven't figured how much i don't care! > > The speed limit was 45 MPH. I was driving 35 MPH and the rain was letting > up. I was also keeping with the flow of traffic. > > So now what, smart ass? > as any cop will tell you, you have to adjust your speed for the conditions. if a posted speed limit is 65 and it's raining so you can't see 10 yards, you're being reckless and stupid to drive much more than walking pace. and you can get a ticket for speeding! just because some jackass ahead of you is driving too fast, doesn't mean you have to! |
Re: question for hachiroku
On Mon, 19 May 2008 21:29:48 -0700, jim beam wrote:
> >> The speed limit was 45 MPH. I was driving 35 MPH and the rain was >> letting up. I was also keeping with the flow of traffic. >> >> So now what, smart ass? >> >> > as any cop will tell you, you have to adjust your speed for the > conditions. if a posted speed limit is 65 and it's raining so you can't > see 10 yards, you're being reckless and stupid to drive much more than > walking pace. and you can get a ticket for speeding! just because some > jackass ahead of you is driving too fast, doesn't mean you have to! And the jackass beside me and the jackass behind me? You sure you don't drive a Prius at 25 MPH everywhere you go? |
Re: question for hachiroku
Hachiroku γγγγ― wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 21:29:48 -0700, jim beam wrote: > >>> The speed limit was 45 MPH. I was driving 35 MPH and the rain was >>> letting up. I was also keeping with the flow of traffic. >>> >>> So now what, smart ass? >>> >>> >> as any cop will tell you, you have to adjust your speed for the >> conditions. if a posted speed limit is 65 and it's raining so you can't >> see 10 yards, you're being reckless and stupid to drive much more than >> walking pace. and you can get a ticket for speeding! just because some >> jackass ahead of you is driving too fast, doesn't mean you have to! > > > And the jackass beside me and the jackass behind me? baaaa. the bleating of sheep. > > You sure you don't drive a Prius at 25 MPH everywhere you go? strawman. |
Re: question for hachiroku
Polfus wrote: > > "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote > >> Don't pay much attention to beam. Planes ain't cars. Apples 'n >> oranges for sure. >> >> While he does dispense some good info on occasion, most of his posts >> reflect a narrow personal view that is out of touch with the average >> motorist. He has also adopted the false mantra of dealer service while >> ignoring its main function, generation of revenue. >> >> Just pour a cool one and enjoy the afternoon... >> >> JT > > > Amen ( raises glass of shiraz to make a toast to you ). > > Peace, > Polfus My poison is Pinch... On the rocks please! <G> JT |
Re: question for hachiroku
On Mon, 19 May 2008 21:40:04 -0700, jim beam wrote:
>>> as any cop will tell you, you have to adjust your speed for the >>> conditions. if a posted speed limit is 65 and it's raining so you >>> can't see 10 yards, you're being reckless and stupid to drive much >>> more than walking pace. and you can get a ticket for speeding! just >>> because some jackass ahead of you is driving too fast, doesn't mean >>> you have to! >> >> >> And the jackass beside me and the jackass behind me? > > baaaa. the bleating of sheep. > > > >> You sure you don't drive a Prius at 25 MPH everywhere you go? > > strawman. And you're trying to extrapolate a situation from details you don't fully understand. Of course, if I were a Super driver like you, I could have popped the front wheels in the air and climbed over the car like Bigfoot with a Corolla 1200. Too bad we aren't all gifted with skills like yours. At least we change our oil no later than MFG's reccomendations. |
Re: question for hachiroku
Ray O wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 23:57:15 -0500, "Ray O" >> <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote: > I agree that there should be a replacement for brake fluid. My > recommendation is to replace it every other brake job. What constitutes a "brake job" and how often are doing one? <serious question, BTW> |
Re: question for hachiroku
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:49:43 -0400, Tony Harding wrote:
> Ray O wrote: >>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 23:57:15 -0500, "Ray O" >>> <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote: >> I agree that there should be a replacement for brake fluid. My >> recommendation is to replace it every other brake job. > > What constitutes a "brake job" and how often are doing one? > <serious question, BTW> Hmmm...since I've had a string of beaters in the past 10 years, I usually remove the wheels after I 'acquire' the car and have a look at the pads, rotors and calipers. If I see the pads are below 50% I replace them, if the rotors are gouged I replaced them, and if the calipers are in rough shape I check them for leaks or sticking. After that, I check them when I change tires from summer to winter and vice versa, looking for pad and rotor wear. Other than that I let my ears tell me what to do. Pads have 'wear indicators' either in them or on them that make a squealing sound when they need replacing, generally 25-40,000 miles depending on how hard you are on your brakes. I've gone 60,000 before, but then you're looking at replacing the rotors for sure. Usually a check at 25-30,000 miles is a good rule; if the pads are ~50% I let them go till they start squealing. I did pads and rotors on the front of the Supra in 2005, and drive the car about 10,000 miles a year, so it's time to look. They seem good, but I'll pull the wheels and have a look. Depending on the car, pads are $12-35, rotors are $18 and up. I bought a set of rotors for an '83 Tercel wagon for $6 each!!! What's the car, are there any symptoms? |
Re: question for hachiroku
"Tony Harding" <ToHarding@UniversalExports.org> wrote in message news:48d15f57$0$4967$607ed4bc@cv.net... > Ray O wrote: >>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 23:57:15 -0500, "Ray O" >>> <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote: >> I agree that there should be a replacement for brake fluid. My >> recommendation is to replace it every other brake job. > > What constitutes a "brake job" and how often are doing one? > <serious question, BTW> I consider a "brake job" to be replacement of brake linings (pads and/or shoes) and any work associated with the lining replacement, like machining or replacing rotors or drums, servicing or replacement of calipers and/or wheel cylinders, brake hoses, etc. Depending on driving conditions and driving style, front brake last anywhere from 20,000 to 60,000 miles, with 40,000 to 45,000 miles being typical life. Rear disc brake pads last roughly twice as long. Rear drum brakes often last more than twice as long because they are often not adjusted properly, with the payoff being more frequent front brake pad replacement because they are doing more of the work to stop the vehicle. -- Ray O (correct punctuation to reply) |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands