Run Car on Water Myth Busted
|
Re: Run Car on Water Myth Busted
<jenneylist@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:08601812-5672-4837-b7ee-e9ec87e398a1@q1g2000vbn.googlegroups.com... > Run Car on Water Myth Busted... > http://automotiveguides.googlepages....er_myth_busted > How could that be?!? Now I'll have to use an electric motor on the front wheels and a generator on my rear wheels to get my free energy. |
Re: Run Car on Water Myth Busted
"Michael Pardee" <null@null.org> wrote in news:_J-
dnVtZr4X2jizUnZ2dnUVZ_tbinZ2d@sedona.net: > <jenneylist@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:08601812-5672-4837-b7ee-e9ec87e398a1@q1g2000vbn.googlegroups.com... >> Run Car on Water Myth Busted... >> http://automotiveguides.googlepages....er_myth_busted >> > > How could that be?!? Now I'll have to use an electric motor on the front > wheels and a generator on my rear wheels to get my free energy. > > > My idea is to drive on roads that only go downhill. This way you would not only use zero energy, but you'd use your generator to make surplus electricity at the same time. Such a deal! Perpetual motion machines? Phooey. My idea puts them to shame. -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Re: Run Car on Water Myth Busted
what about hydrogen cars or steam cars?
|
Re: Run Car on Water Myth Busted
"Toommy" <retard.y@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:71hfo5Flbir0U1@mid.individual.net... > what about hydrogen cars or steam cars? > > The outrageous thing about the "run your car on water" scam was the perpetual motion (of the first type) aspect of it. In their scheme the hydrogen was produced on board from electricity that was in turn produced by the alternator and ultimately supplied by the engine output. The hydrogen was used as a supplement to the gasoline normally supplied to the engine so it worked just fine, but the system naturally reduced rather than increased efficiency by virtue of the conversion losses. Mike |
Re: Run Car on Water Myth Busted
Thus spake "Michael Pardee" <null@null.org> :
> >"Toommy" <retard.y@googlemail.com> wrote in message >news:71hfo5Flbir0U1@mid.individual.net... >> what about hydrogen cars or steam cars? >> >> > >The outrageous thing about the "run your car on water" scam was the >perpetual motion (of the first type) aspect of it. In their scheme the >hydrogen was produced on board from electricity that was in turn produced by >the alternator and ultimately supplied by the engine output. The hydrogen >was used as a supplement to the gasoline normally supplied to the engine so >it worked just fine, but the system naturally reduced rather than increased >efficiency by virtue of the conversion losses. > >Mike > In the Mythbusters episode, Jamie and Adam calculated that, using the "water to hydrogen" kit they bought, which used grid power to generate the hydrogen, they would need about 1 MW to produce enough hydrogen to run the car, at idle, for 10 minutes. Oh yeah, they had to find a car with a carb, since it didn't work with injectors. And the sucker burped through the carb a couple of times. -- - dillon I am not invalid Hi, I'm Michael Phelps and Olympic Gold isn't the only Gold I'm thinking of. Hi, I'm Michael Phelps and when I'm on Maui, Wowwie. |
ppl will belive anything
|
Re: Run Car on Water Myth Busted
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 05:12:47 -0700, "Michael Pardee" <null@null.org>
wrote: > >"Toommy" <retard.y@googlemail.com> wrote in message >news:71hfo5Flbir0U1@mid.individual.net... >> what about hydrogen cars or steam cars? >> >> > >The outrageous thing about the "run your car on water" scam was the >perpetual motion (of the first type) aspect of it. In their scheme the >hydrogen was produced on board from electricity that was in turn produced by >the alternator and ultimately supplied by the engine output. The hydrogen >was used as a supplement to the gasoline normally supplied to the engine so >it worked just fine, but the system naturally reduced rather than increased >efficiency by virtue of the conversion losses. > >Mike > I am not sure, but I think the theory is that you only engage the electrolysis when you are slowing down. At that time, the kinetic energy is being wasted anyway. Basically it is like a hybrid except, even the biggest alternator you can get wouldn't produce enough hydrogen under those conditions to have any noticeable impact on fuel economy. Needless to say, it's a fraud. |
Re: Run Car on Water Myth Busted
On Mar 6, 6:40 am, jenneyl...@gmail.com wrote:
> Run Car on Water Myth Busted...http://automotiveguides.googlepages....er_myth_busted It must be true. I remember when Detroit used to make those big huge cars, and people used to say "there goes a big boat". |
Re: Run Car on Water Myth Busted
Thus spake z <gzuckier@snail-mail.net> :
>On Mar 6, 6:40 am, jenneyl...@gmail.com wrote: >> Run Car on Water Myth Busted...http://automotiveguides.googlepages....er_myth_busted > >It must be true. I remember when Detroit used to make those big huge >cars, and people used to say "there goes a big boat". Every year, hundreds of people die thinking they can run their cars on water. Even an inch of running water is enough to sweep a car away. Oh, wait, that's not what they meant? Never mind. -- - dillon I am not invalid Hi, I'm Michael Phelps and Olympic Gold isn't the only Gold I'm thinking of. Hi, I'm Michael Phelps and when I'm on Maui, Wowwie. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands