THE TRUTH ABOUT: ===> MeatyGirl <=> MeatGirl <===
 

Look at what we found in a NNTP archive.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.-sucking , alt.fan.scat
Subject: black, ebony, mullato, Baltimore men wanted by a very MeatyGirl
From: MeatyGirl <MeatyGirl@somewhere.com>
Message-ID: <ChsUNTskXBAGDF5MeatyGirl@216.196.97.142>
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.24
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2004 00:22:48
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Postfilter: 1.3.11
NNTP-Archive-TAG: <MeatyGirl@somewhere.com>, <MeatGirl@somewhere.com>

ROTUND MEATYGIRL LOOKING FOR MEN IN THE MARYLAND AREA WHO WANT
REGULAR HEAD, BLOW JOB, THEIR SUCKED AND SLUPRED
BAY A WHORISH WHITE TRAMP WHO LOVES BLACK MENS SPERM. I WANTZ COAL
BLACK MEN, MULLATOS, FILIPINOS, ASIANS, AMERICAN INDIANS, CAJUN
MEN WHO L O V E LONG SLOW HEAD. I LIKE TO BE FACED
ED AND TONGUE DIRTY ASSHOLES AND VERBAL ABUSE. WOULD BE WILLING
TO TRAVEL FO' THE RIGHT BLACK MENS DIRTY MEATY HOLES WILL SNIFF THEIR
FOUL FARTS. REPLY TO POSTING.

Love,
MeatyGirl

Email-to:
MeatyGirl.@giganews.com
MeatyGirl@gmail.com
MeatyGirl@hotmail.com

Re: THE LIES ABOUT ANYTHING
 

What a miserable life you must have made for yourself. Nobody would believe
you about anything - as you well know - and you are so ashamed of what you
do you hide your identity.

THE TRUTH ABOUT =====>Michael Pardee from Arizona <====
 

>What a miserable life you must have made for yourself. Nobody would
>believe you about anything - as you well know - and you are so ashamed
>of what you do you hide your identity.

off Pardee!!!!
Ain't that the pot calling the kettle black? Look at your nullified
email address in .

MICHAEL T PARDEE Born Sep 1952
5145 HAWTHORNE DR
FLAGSTAFF, AZ 86004 (928) 522-9393

MICHAEL T PARDEE
6407 46TH AVE
GLENDALE, AZ 85301 (623) 842-3780

So Michael dear have you taken care of you drunk driving convictions? Hmmm?
I bet you got your lips locked and ready to suck up around MeatyGirls
tight hairy rubbery sphincter, right!
You sill bitch! Now the world can see what a potty mouth you are.

Re: THE TRUTH ABOUT =====>Michael Pardee from Arizona <====
 

"Anonymous" <nobody@remailer.neush.net> wrote in message
news:382557dc7ed5175f276c1d027ce6bf0c@remailer.neu sh.net...
> >What a miserable life you must have made for yourself. Nobody would
>>believe you about anything - as you well know - and you are so ashamed
>>of what you do you hide your identity.
>
> off Pardee!!!!
> Ain't that the pot calling the kettle black? Look at your nullified
> email address in .
>
> MICHAEL T PARDEE Born Sep 1952
> 5145 HAWTHORNE DR
> FLAGSTAFF, AZ 86004 (928) 522-9393
>
> MICHAEL T PARDEE
> 6407 46TH AVE
> GLENDALE, AZ 85301 (623) 842-3780
>
> So Michael dear have you taken care of you drunk driving convictions?
> Hmmm?
> I bet you got your lips locked and ready to suck up around MeatyGirls
> tight hairy rubbery sphincter, right!
> You sill bitch! Now the world can see what a potty mouth you are.
>
>

You proved my point better than I could have with that bizarre glimpse into
the wreckage of your mind. You were undoubtedly born a decent human being
but you threw it away, apparently for cocaine (judging by your lurid and
grandiose language; it is a hallmark of cocaine addicts. Every coke addict
is a legend in his own mind.)

The munged email is for the benefit of the spambots, of course. I also have
no problem with people who use handles - a desire for basic privacy is not
shameful - but anybody is free to Google me, as you obviously did. I don't
mind. That is why I use my real name, but for some weird reason you seem to
think I'd be shocked that you did. I don't do things I'm ashamed of (your
fantasy of DWIs notwithstanding; people who matter are too smart to think
that anyway). Why you feel the need to use an anonymous remailer is
obvious - many of the most degenerate trolls do... but you made yourself a
nobody long before you ever appeared here. What a waste.

Mike

Re: THE TRUTH ABOUT =====>Michael Pardee from Arizona <====
 

On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:53:55 +0100 (CET), Anonymous who thought that every
major problem could be solved just with potatoes, wrote:

>>What <slap>

Right....
Another coward/troll hiding behind a remailer..
'T was the last thing I'd expected in this group...

--
Hans

"Forty-two!"
"Is that all you've got to show for seven and a half million years of
work?"
"I checked it very thoroughly", said the computer...

Re: THE TRUTH ABOUT =====>Michael Pardee from Arizona <====
 

Hans van Eynsbergen wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:53:55 +0100 (CET), Anonymous who thought that every
> major problem could be solved just with potatoes, wrote:
>
>>> What <slap>
>
> Right....
> Another coward/troll hiding behind a remailer..
> 'T was the last thing I'd expected in this group...
>

Hans,

I think you will find that most users of this group (alt.coffee)ignore
trolls. They tend to play in the sandbox for awhile but eventually
return to their shallow end of the gene pool.

R.J.(Bob) Ross
Calgary, Alberta, CANADA

Re: THE TRUTH ABOUT =====>Michael Pardee from Arizona <====
 

On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:06:55 -0700, Bob Ross who thought that every major
problem could be solved just with potatoes, wrote:

> Hans van Eynsbergen wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:53:55 +0100 (CET), Anonymous who thought that every
>> major problem could be solved just with potatoes, wrote:
>>
>>>> What <slap>
>>
>> Right....
>> Another coward/troll hiding behind a remailer..
>> 'T was the last thing I'd expected in this group...
>>
>
> Hans,
>
> I think you will find that most users of this group (alt.coffee)ignore
> trolls. They tend to play in the sandbox for awhile but eventually
> return to their shallow end of the gene pool.
>
> R.J.(Bob) Ross
> Calgary, Alberta, CANADA

I know...
It's better to pay no attention to them, but I do tend to reply every so
often.
It's worse in groups like Alt.Hackers.Malicious and the 2600 groups and
flame wars are not uncommon.
A good flame war can be fun though...

--
Hans

"Forty-two!"
"Is that all you've got to show for seven and a half million years of
work?"
"I checked it very thoroughly", said the computer...

Re: Squeaky Stick; Also "Frank" or "Moose"?
 

My poor ol' 91 Civic's stickshift has long been prone to squeakiness.
It recently started rattling, too. Too much play. So under the car I
go. One bolt, two bushings to be replaced. From the looks of what was
left of the old bushings, I got my money's worth.

Emissions troubleshooting still underway. You can ask me anything
about the evaporative system now, though, and I bet I can answer
intelligently.

One other important thing: Malia and Sasha Obama's new rescue dog,
should it be named "Frank" or "Moose"? Those are the choices with
which they have come up so far. (Have the little girls planned for the
possibility that said pooch may be a boy?)

Re: Squeaky Stick; Also "Frank" or "Moose"?
 

honda.lioness@gmail.com wrote in news:b2c5fb70-f744-474d-a384-b146a6989c73
@q30g2000vbn.googlegroups.com:

> My poor ol' 91 Civic's stickshift has long been prone to squeakiness.
> It recently started rattling, too. Too much play. So under the car I
> go. One bolt, two bushings to be replaced. From the looks of what was
> left of the old bushings, I got my money's worth.
>
> Emissions troubleshooting still underway. You can ask me anything
> about the evaporative system now, though, and I bet I can answer
> intelligently.
>
> One other important thing: Malia and Sasha Obama's new rescue dog,
> should it be named "Frank" or "Moose"? Those are the choices with
> which they have come up so far. (Have the little girls planned for the
> possibility that said pooch may be a boy?)
>



Doin' the old "topic change" tactic, huh? I'll bite.

1) Shifter bushings buzz when worn, not rattle. In my experience, anyway.

2) Who needs to troubleshoot EVAP on the stone-age systems you and I have
on our '91s? Even if they screw up, you'd never know. For all I know, my
317,000 mile-old system is totally inop at this point. (Two months left
till smog check with the new cat!)

3) Moose. It's ironic (li'l dog, big name).


--
Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Re: Squeaky Stick; Also "Frank" or "Moose"?
 

Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote:
> Doin' the old "topic change" tactic, huh? I'll bite.

Obviously I am not clever.

> 1) Shifter bushings buzz when worn, not rattle. In my experience, anyway.

It seems the outermost bushing (part #5 on the bkhondaparts.com
drawing) disintegrated. The innermost one (with four o-rings) on my
Civic is not a pretty site: o-rings beat up, metal all rusted. The
play was enormous. At certain speeds, the stick rattled. Anyway, I am
pleased it is such an easy fix.

> 2) Who needs to troubleshoot EVAP on the stone-age systems you and I have

Ha ya well I have been studying your smog numbers (at your site) and
am resigned to the fact that I have not kept up my car the way you
have yours. No surprise, eh? :-)

> on our '91s? Even if they screw up, you'd never know.

ISTM if the evap system's purge cut-out solenoid valve failed, then it
could be a bona fide vacuum leak. At least, this was one area I was
checking. Or if the two way valve (between fuel tank and charcoal
canister) failed. Or if a person filled their charcoal canister with
gas due to parking downhill or numerous overfills of the tank (so
several sites say).

> For all I know, my
> 317,000 mile-old system is totally inop at this point.

I doubt it. Bet it passes fine.

> (Two months left
> till smog check with the new cat!)

> 3) Moose. It's ironic (li'l dog, big name).

Mrs. Obama has veto'd the daughters and said it is not going to be
"Moose." :-(

Re: Squeaky Stick; Also "Frank" or "Moose"?
 

<honda.lioness@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4e367859-a417-4ede-bfbf-e61250b141c1@v15g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote:
>
>> For all I know, my
>> 317,000 mile-old system is totally inop at this point.
>
> I doubt it. Bet it passes fine.
>
FWIW, a problem that I have had with really old evap systems is cracked
hoses. My old Volvo failed smog two years in a row because a couple of hoses
on top of the fuel tank had cracked. The first one was not bad to get to but
the second one was no fun at all. As far as I know, there are no tests to
determine whether the charcoal is still active, though. They just verified
the tank would hold pressure.

Mike

Re: Squeaky Stick; Also "Frank" or "Moose"?
 

On Feb 25, 7:31 pm, "Michael Pardee" <n...@null.org> wrote:
> <honda.lion...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote:
> >> For all I know, my
> >> 317,000 mile-old system is totally inop at this point.
>
> > I doubt it. Bet it passes fine.
>
> FWIW, a problem that I have had with really old evap systems is cracked
> hoses. My old Volvo failed smog two years in a row because a couple of hoses
> on top of the fuel tank had cracked. The first one was not bad to get to but
> the second one was no fun at all.

I bet just finding the cause of the smog test failure was no fun
either.

> As far as I know, there are no tests to
> determine whether the charcoal is still active, though. They just verified
> the tank would hold pressure.

Where I am, my 91 Civic's evap system is not tested per se. I just get
idle and high speed CO and HC readings, and these are the whole test.
I did get under near the fuel tank yesterday looking for the two-way
valve and the vent hoses; but they passed one test so I stopped short
of actually putting my hands on the two-way valve and its hoses. The
evap system has a few hoses that one way or another route back to the
throttle body (as you know), hence I went looking for vacuum leaks in
various evap system hoses/parts. I do not think I have seen a claim
that the charcoal canister will ever need replacement, short of
messing up, overfilling the fuel tank, and filling the thing with
gasoline.

My under-hood vac hoses seem intact. I have hand vacuum pumped nearly
all of them at this point, as well as testing the throttle body and
associated valves/regulators per the shop manual. Everything's
passing. I am pretty sure I did find a bona fide leak at the TB
gasket. I had been hearing a whistling; used my trusty 3/8" tubing as
a stethoscope (great tool!) narrowed down the source; and finally
determined it was at the gasket. Threw some of that amazing gasket
maker "Hondabond" in there (I am a bit rushed lately) and it seems to
have sealed it nicely. No more noise.

Right now my theory is that vac leaks at the TB gasket caused my Honda
to run rich for some time, destroying my O2 sensor and cat. I am
trying to test the O2 sensor (car warmed up and so in closed loop) and
so far, its readings do not seem right. No real oscillation around
0.45 volts. Car still runs great, with 37-42 mpg, and also including
at idle, so it is a little baffling. All I can imagine is that I do so
little idling that I would not catch only a small reduction in mpg due
to idle being too rich.

I am not ruling out the ECT sensor just yet, either, per an earlier
thread. Nor am I ruling out worn rings <taps play>.

Re: THE TRUTH ABOUT =====>Michael Pardee from Arizona <====
 

Hans van Eynsbergen wrote:

>
> A good flame war can be fun though...
>

I may be good for those flaming or being flamed, but not necessarily for
those who must endure them from the sidelines.
--
They said someone HAD to move to Hawaii and I raised my hand first!

Re: Squeaky Stick; Also "Frank" or "Moose"?
 

<honda.lioness@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c7e42b29-ec91-4526-8008-16eb9c9ce8f1@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 25, 7:31 pm, "Michael Pardee" <n...@null.org> wrote:
>> <honda.lion...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote:
>> >> For all I know, my
>> >> 317,000 mile-old system is totally inop at this point.
>>
>> > I doubt it. Bet it passes fine.
>>
>> FWIW, a problem that I have had with really old evap systems is cracked
>> hoses. My old Volvo failed smog two years in a row because a couple of
>> hoses
>> on top of the fuel tank had cracked. The first one was not bad to get to
>> but
>> the second one was no fun at all.
>
> I bet just finding the cause of the smog test failure was no fun
> either.
>
Not as bad as I initially thought. I ripped the valve stem off a bicycle
tube and taped it in the end of a short hose. There was an easy place to
access the vent tube in the filler neck (it was a station wagon) so I
connected the hose there and gave a bicycle pump a few strokes. I could feel
the pressure bleedig off and I could hear the hiss, so I had somebody pump
while I dived. But yes, it was pretty low brow :-)

>> As far as I know, there are no tests to
>> determine whether the charcoal is still active, though. They just
>> verified
>> the tank would hold pressure.
>
> Where I am, my 91 Civic's evap system is not tested per se. I just get
> idle and high speed CO and HC readings, and these are the whole test.
> I did get under near the fuel tank yesterday looking for the two-way
> valve and the vent hoses; but they passed one test so I stopped short
> of actually putting my hands on the two-way valve and its hoses. The
> evap system has a few hoses that one way or another route back to the
> throttle body (as you know), hence I went looking for vacuum leaks in
> various evap system hoses/parts. I do not think I have seen a claim
> that the charcoal canister will ever need replacement, short of
> messing up, overfilling the fuel tank, and filling the thing with
> gasoline.
>
> My under-hood vac hoses seem intact. I have hand vacuum pumped nearly
> all of them at this point, as well as testing the throttle body and
> associated valves/regulators per the shop manual. Everything's
> passing. I am pretty sure I did find a bona fide leak at the TB
> gasket. I had been hearing a whistling; used my trusty 3/8" tubing as
> a stethoscope (great tool!) narrowed down the source; and finally
> determined it was at the gasket. Threw some of that amazing gasket
> maker "Hondabond" in there (I am a bit rushed lately) and it seems to
> have sealed it nicely. No more noise.
>
> Right now my theory is that vac leaks at the TB gasket caused my Honda
> to run rich for some time, destroying my O2 sensor and cat. I am
> trying to test the O2 sensor (car warmed up and so in closed loop) and
> so far, its readings do not seem right. No real oscillation around
> 0.45 volts. Car still runs great, with 37-42 mpg, and also including
> at idle, so it is a little baffling. All I can imagine is that I do so
> little idling that I would not catch only a small reduction in mpg due
> to idle being too rich.
>

Have you been able to get a scope on it? The one time I did that (with a
Taurus that was surging) I could see the mixture hunt and could see the
oscillations for a moment before the voltage momentarily stuck high (rich).
Turned out the TBI was dripping and breaking the closed loop. Anyway, being
able to see that it was trying to operate closed loop and seeing how it fell
out of loop helped a lot. But if the O2 sensor voltage is just hanging at
..45 I really fear for the sensor.

> I am not ruling out the ECT sensor just yet, either, per an earlier
> thread. Nor am I ruling out worn rings <taps play>.
>

Re: Squeaky Stick; Also "Frank" or "Moose"?
 

"Michael Pardee" <n...@null.org> wrote:
> <honda.lion...@gmail.com> wrote
> > I bet just finding the cause of the smog test failure was no fun
> > either.
>
> Not as bad as I initially thought. I ripped the valve stem off a bicycle
> tube and taped it in the end of a short hose. There was an easy place to
> access the vent tube in the filler neck (it was a station wagon) so I
> connected the hose there and gave a bicycle pump a few strokes. I could feel
> the pressure bleedig off and I could hear the hiss, so I had somebody pump
> while I dived. But yes, it was pretty low brow :-)

I call this "ingenuity."

> > Right now my theory is that vac leaks at the TB gasket caused my Honda
> > to run rich for some time, destroying my O2 sensor and cat. I am
> > trying to test the O2 sensor (car warmed up and so in closed loop) and
> > so far, its readings do not seem right. No real oscillation around
> > 0.45 volts. Car still runs great, with 37-42 mpg, and also including
> > at idle, so it is a little baffling. All I can imagine is that I do so
> > little idling that I would not catch only a small reduction in mpg due
> > to idle being too rich.
>
> Have you been able to get a scope on it? The one time I did that (with a
> Taurus that was surging) I could see the mixture hunt and could see the
> oscillations for a moment before the voltage momentarily stuck high (rich).
> Turned out the TBI was dripping and breaking the closed loop. Anyway, being
> able to see that it was trying to operate closed loop and seeing how it fell
> out of loop helped a lot. But if the O2 sensor voltage is just hanging at
> .45 I really fear for the sensor.

I only have a multimeter. It has the alleged acceptable input
impedance for the O2 sensor test of >=10 Megohms. After warmup, the
sensor is hanging way high at around 0.8V. I swapped in my older
sensor (original one, 154k miles, 13 years), and it hung high at
around 0.6V. Very few crossings over 0.45 inside a minute. When I give
the car gas, the reading does what it is supposed to (V rises), then
when letting fully off the throttle, V falls, as it is supposed to. So
the sensor still seems somewhat operational. Then again, I am not sure
the multimeter can capture rapid crossings. On the third hand, just
the two sensors having such different readings under the same
conditions makes me suspicious.

Both sensors get a sooty buildup near the threads after just a few
weeks, as does the tailpipe at its end, which is consistent with rich
running. (From the emissions test, there is really no doubt the engine
is running rich at idle.) So it is hard to say whether the rich
running was a result of the faulty O2 sensor; or the rich running was
due to something else and killed my O2 sensor. I am on my second tank
of gas with a bottle of Chevron Techron added. I swapped the injectors
with a junkyard set from a car with much lower mileage. Attempted to
clean the injectors (o-rings off) with carb cleaner first, though I
doubt this is a very thorough method.

For the record, both O2 sensors are Denso (OEM manufactured). A new
Denso one arrives within about a week.

I figure I will try at least two more tanks of Chevron Techron; a
compression test; maybe a completely new ECT (I have a lower mileage
shiny looking one in the car now); trying a (free) emissions re-test
after every major adjustment before I give up. Which I hate to do. Got
that "mission" mentality at this point. I am learning a helluva lot
very quickly though, so this exercise has value.