GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks.

GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks. (https://www.gtcarz.com/)
-   Honda Mailing List (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/)
-   -   When To Change Brakes (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/when-change-brakes-276405/)

Chris G. 10-19-2003 11:27 PM

When To Change Brakes
 
I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted the
front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering at
what point should they be replaced.



Sandlot 10-19-2003 11:38 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
How many miles you have on them?

"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

at
> what point should they be replaced.
>
>




Sandlot 10-19-2003 11:38 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
How many miles you have on them?

"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

at
> what point should they be replaced.
>
>




Sandlot 10-19-2003 11:38 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
How many miles you have on them?

"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

at
> what point should they be replaced.
>
>




Mike R 10-20-2003 12:54 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
In article <qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote:

> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering at
> what point should they be replaced.


Brake specs/service limits:

1.6mm for front/rear pad thickness.
2.0mm for rear lining thickness.

HTH

--
Mike

Mike R 10-20-2003 12:54 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
In article <qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote:

> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering at
> what point should they be replaced.


Brake specs/service limits:

1.6mm for front/rear pad thickness.
2.0mm for rear lining thickness.

HTH

--
Mike

Mike R 10-20-2003 12:54 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
In article <qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote:

> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering at
> what point should they be replaced.


Brake specs/service limits:

1.6mm for front/rear pad thickness.
2.0mm for rear lining thickness.

HTH

--
Mike

Chris G. 10-20-2003 01:04 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
23,000 miles

"Sandlot" <sandlot@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:PMIkb.5293$z94.3161@newssvr29.news.prodigy.co m...
> How many miles you have on them?
>
> "Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
> news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

> the
> > front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

> at
> > what point should they be replaced.
> >
> >

>
>




Chris G. 10-20-2003 01:04 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
23,000 miles

"Sandlot" <sandlot@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:PMIkb.5293$z94.3161@newssvr29.news.prodigy.co m...
> How many miles you have on them?
>
> "Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
> news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

> the
> > front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

> at
> > what point should they be replaced.
> >
> >

>
>




Chris G. 10-20-2003 01:04 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
23,000 miles

"Sandlot" <sandlot@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:PMIkb.5293$z94.3161@newssvr29.news.prodigy.co m...
> How many miles you have on them?
>
> "Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
> news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

> the
> > front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

> at
> > what point should they be replaced.
> >
> >

>
>




Brian Smith 10-20-2003 06:23 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 

"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

at
> what point should they be replaced.


--
Brian
www.accesswave.ca/~orion


How many kilometres are on your car? You gave us the measurements, how much
is that in a percentage? What did the technician recommend?

It's really hard to give you an answer, because different people drive in
(sometimes) radically different ways. I replaced the rear pads on my '01
Accord V6 after 89,000 kilometres of combined mileage (mostly city, though).
If my Wife was to be the only driver of the car, I would have had to change
them a considerable amount sooner.



Brian Smith 10-20-2003 06:23 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 

"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

at
> what point should they be replaced.


--
Brian
www.accesswave.ca/~orion


How many kilometres are on your car? You gave us the measurements, how much
is that in a percentage? What did the technician recommend?

It's really hard to give you an answer, because different people drive in
(sometimes) radically different ways. I replaced the rear pads on my '01
Accord V6 after 89,000 kilometres of combined mileage (mostly city, though).
If my Wife was to be the only driver of the car, I would have had to change
them a considerable amount sooner.



Brian Smith 10-20-2003 06:23 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 

"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

at
> what point should they be replaced.


--
Brian
www.accesswave.ca/~orion


How many kilometres are on your car? You gave us the measurements, how much
is that in a percentage? What did the technician recommend?

It's really hard to give you an answer, because different people drive in
(sometimes) radically different ways. I replaced the rear pads on my '01
Accord V6 after 89,000 kilometres of combined mileage (mostly city, though).
If my Wife was to be the only driver of the car, I would have had to change
them a considerable amount sooner.



tflfb 10-20-2003 10:34 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
Tom
"Brian Smith" <Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote in message
news:TIOkb.94098$PD3.5007461@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>
> "Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
> news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

> the
> > front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

> at
> > what point should they be replaced.

>
> --
> Brian
> www.accesswave.ca/~orion
>
>
> How many kilometres are on your car? You gave us the measurements, how

much
> is that in a percentage? What did the technician recommend?
>
> It's really hard to give you an answer, because different people drive in
> (sometimes) radically different ways. I replaced the rear pads on my '01
> Accord V6 after 89,000 kilometres of combined mileage (mostly city,

though).
> If my Wife was to be the only driver of the car, I would have had to

change
> them a considerable amount sooner.
>
>




tflfb 10-20-2003 10:34 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
Tom
"Brian Smith" <Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote in message
news:TIOkb.94098$PD3.5007461@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>
> "Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
> news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

> the
> > front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

> at
> > what point should they be replaced.

>
> --
> Brian
> www.accesswave.ca/~orion
>
>
> How many kilometres are on your car? You gave us the measurements, how

much
> is that in a percentage? What did the technician recommend?
>
> It's really hard to give you an answer, because different people drive in
> (sometimes) radically different ways. I replaced the rear pads on my '01
> Accord V6 after 89,000 kilometres of combined mileage (mostly city,

though).
> If my Wife was to be the only driver of the car, I would have had to

change
> them a considerable amount sooner.
>
>




tflfb 10-20-2003 10:34 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
Tom
"Brian Smith" <Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote in message
news:TIOkb.94098$PD3.5007461@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>
> "Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote in message
> news:qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted

> the
> > front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering

> at
> > what point should they be replaced.

>
> --
> Brian
> www.accesswave.ca/~orion
>
>
> How many kilometres are on your car? You gave us the measurements, how

much
> is that in a percentage? What did the technician recommend?
>
> It's really hard to give you an answer, because different people drive in
> (sometimes) radically different ways. I replaced the rear pads on my '01
> Accord V6 after 89,000 kilometres of combined mileage (mostly city,

though).
> If my Wife was to be the only driver of the car, I would have had to

change
> them a considerable amount sooner.
>
>




Jim Yanik 10-21-2003 10:58 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
"tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote in
news:gX0lb.1201$8j5.41536@news.uswest.net:

> Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
> Tom



City driving or a lot of stop n' go driving is harder on brakes,so you
can't go by mileage alone.

--
Jim Yanik,NRA member
jyanik-at-kua.net

Jim Yanik 10-21-2003 10:58 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
"tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote in
news:gX0lb.1201$8j5.41536@news.uswest.net:

> Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
> Tom



City driving or a lot of stop n' go driving is harder on brakes,so you
can't go by mileage alone.

--
Jim Yanik,NRA member
jyanik-at-kua.net

Jim Yanik 10-21-2003 10:58 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
"tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote in
news:gX0lb.1201$8j5.41536@news.uswest.net:

> Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
> Tom



City driving or a lot of stop n' go driving is harder on brakes,so you
can't go by mileage alone.

--
Jim Yanik,NRA member
jyanik-at-kua.net

Bill B. Johnson 10-21-2003 01:36 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
In article <qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote:

> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering at
> what point should they be replaced.




Hello,
I agree with HTH--when the brakes are at or below the below figures--it's
time to have them replaced regardless of the mileage.

Brake specs/service limits:

1.6mm for front/rear pad thickness.
2.0mm for rear lining thickness.

Bill B. Johnson 10-21-2003 01:36 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
In article <qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote:

> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering at
> what point should they be replaced.




Hello,
I agree with HTH--when the brakes are at or below the below figures--it's
time to have them replaced regardless of the mileage.

Brake specs/service limits:

1.6mm for front/rear pad thickness.
2.0mm for rear lining thickness.

Bill B. Johnson 10-21-2003 01:36 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
In article <qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote:

> I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted the
> front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering at
> what point should they be replaced.




Hello,
I agree with HTH--when the brakes are at or below the below figures--it's
time to have them replaced regardless of the mileage.

Brake specs/service limits:

1.6mm for front/rear pad thickness.
2.0mm for rear lining thickness.

Ed 10-21-2003 01:55 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
Jim Yanik <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in
news:Xns941B6FE612D52jyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21:

> "tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote in
> news:gX0lb.1201$8j5.41536@news.uswest.net:
>
>> Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
>> Tom

>
>
> City driving or a lot of stop n' go driving is harder on brakes,so you
> can't go by mileage alone.
>


Driving style prevails, as is the quality of the pads. I had 92K miles on a
set of pads in a manual Sentra, 60K miles on a set of pads in an automatic
Sentra, 30K miles on the original pads in the Accord and they're still have
66% tread. Most of my driving is city/suburb. Automatic transmission is
harsher on the pads. If you go easy on the brakes, they will last longer.

Ed 10-21-2003 01:55 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
Jim Yanik <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in
news:Xns941B6FE612D52jyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21:

> "tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote in
> news:gX0lb.1201$8j5.41536@news.uswest.net:
>
>> Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
>> Tom

>
>
> City driving or a lot of stop n' go driving is harder on brakes,so you
> can't go by mileage alone.
>


Driving style prevails, as is the quality of the pads. I had 92K miles on a
set of pads in a manual Sentra, 60K miles on a set of pads in an automatic
Sentra, 30K miles on the original pads in the Accord and they're still have
66% tread. Most of my driving is city/suburb. Automatic transmission is
harsher on the pads. If you go easy on the brakes, they will last longer.

Ed 10-21-2003 01:55 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
Jim Yanik <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in
news:Xns941B6FE612D52jyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21:

> "tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote in
> news:gX0lb.1201$8j5.41536@news.uswest.net:
>
>> Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
>> Tom

>
>
> City driving or a lot of stop n' go driving is harder on brakes,so you
> can't go by mileage alone.
>


Driving style prevails, as is the quality of the pads. I had 92K miles on a
set of pads in a manual Sentra, 60K miles on a set of pads in an automatic
Sentra, 30K miles on the original pads in the Accord and they're still have
66% tread. Most of my driving is city/suburb. Automatic transmission is
harsher on the pads. If you go easy on the brakes, they will last longer.

Mike 10-22-2003 03:28 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
The manual's limits are what you can get without hardware damage. But
if the pad has less than 25%-30% left, then its' time to change. You
are likely to start noticing brake fades and the thinner pads wear
faster than newer ones. 4-5mm (front) is about where I'll change mine.
(I think the accord started with 5mm at the rear? Dunno)


billbjohnson555@nospamhotmail.com (Bill B. Johnson) wrote in message news:<billbjohnson555-2110031036240001@pm3-broad-201.snlo.dialup.fix.net>...
> In article <qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
> "Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote:
>
> > I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted the
> > front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering at
> > what point should they be replaced.

>
>
>
> Hello,
> I agree with HTH--when the brakes are at or below the below figures--it's
> time to have them replaced regardless of the mileage.
>
> Brake specs/service limits:
>
> 1.6mm for front/rear pad thickness.
> 2.0mm for rear lining thickness.


Mike 10-22-2003 03:28 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
The manual's limits are what you can get without hardware damage. But
if the pad has less than 25%-30% left, then its' time to change. You
are likely to start noticing brake fades and the thinner pads wear
faster than newer ones. 4-5mm (front) is about where I'll change mine.
(I think the accord started with 5mm at the rear? Dunno)


billbjohnson555@nospamhotmail.com (Bill B. Johnson) wrote in message news:<billbjohnson555-2110031036240001@pm3-broad-201.snlo.dialup.fix.net>...
> In article <qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
> "Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote:
>
> > I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted the
> > front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering at
> > what point should they be replaced.

>
>
>
> Hello,
> I agree with HTH--when the brakes are at or below the below figures--it's
> time to have them replaced regardless of the mileage.
>
> Brake specs/service limits:
>
> 1.6mm for front/rear pad thickness.
> 2.0mm for rear lining thickness.


Mike 10-22-2003 03:28 AM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
The manual's limits are what you can get without hardware damage. But
if the pad has less than 25%-30% left, then its' time to change. You
are likely to start noticing brake fades and the thinner pads wear
faster than newer ones. 4-5mm (front) is about where I'll change mine.
(I think the accord started with 5mm at the rear? Dunno)


billbjohnson555@nospamhotmail.com (Bill B. Johnson) wrote in message news:<billbjohnson555-2110031036240001@pm3-broad-201.snlo.dialup.fix.net>...
> In article <qCIkb.185974$0v4.14358042@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
> "Chris G." <computech@invalid.att.net> wrote:
>
> > I took my 2002 Honda Civic LX in for service yesterday. The tech noted the
> > front brakes is at 6.9MM and the rear brakes is at 3.4MM. I'm wondering at
> > what point should they be replaced.

>
>
>
> Hello,
> I agree with HTH--when the brakes are at or below the below figures--it's
> time to have them replaced regardless of the mileage.
>
> Brake specs/service limits:
>
> 1.6mm for front/rear pad thickness.
> 2.0mm for rear lining thickness.


Bill B. Johnson 10-22-2003 03:43 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
In article <Xns941B83580C5E3MyMessagesRock@151.164.30.93>, Ed
<do.not@spam.me> wrote:

> Jim Yanik <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in
> news:Xns941B6FE612D52jyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21:
>
> > "tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote in
> > news:gX0lb.1201$8j5.41536@news.uswest.net:
> >
> >> Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
> >> Tom

> >
> >
> > City driving or a lot of stop n' go driving is harder on brakes,so you
> > can't go by mileage alone.
> >

>
> Driving style prevails, as is the quality of the pads. I had 92K miles on a
> set of pads in a manual Sentra, 60K miles on a set of pads in an automatic
> Sentra, 30K miles on the original pads in the Accord and they're still have
> 66% tread. Most of my driving is city/suburb. Automatic transmission is
> harsher on the pads. If you go easy on the brakes, they will last longer.


Great point. Two neighbors could buy identical new vehicles on the same
day. Due to driving style--the brakes on one of the vehicles may last one
year but the brakes on the other identical vehicle may last 4 years.

Bill B. Johnson 10-22-2003 03:43 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
In article <Xns941B83580C5E3MyMessagesRock@151.164.30.93>, Ed
<do.not@spam.me> wrote:

> Jim Yanik <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in
> news:Xns941B6FE612D52jyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21:
>
> > "tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote in
> > news:gX0lb.1201$8j5.41536@news.uswest.net:
> >
> >> Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
> >> Tom

> >
> >
> > City driving or a lot of stop n' go driving is harder on brakes,so you
> > can't go by mileage alone.
> >

>
> Driving style prevails, as is the quality of the pads. I had 92K miles on a
> set of pads in a manual Sentra, 60K miles on a set of pads in an automatic
> Sentra, 30K miles on the original pads in the Accord and they're still have
> 66% tread. Most of my driving is city/suburb. Automatic transmission is
> harsher on the pads. If you go easy on the brakes, they will last longer.


Great point. Two neighbors could buy identical new vehicles on the same
day. Due to driving style--the brakes on one of the vehicles may last one
year but the brakes on the other identical vehicle may last 4 years.

Bill B. Johnson 10-22-2003 03:43 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 
In article <Xns941B83580C5E3MyMessagesRock@151.164.30.93>, Ed
<do.not@spam.me> wrote:

> Jim Yanik <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in
> news:Xns941B6FE612D52jyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21:
>
> > "tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote in
> > news:gX0lb.1201$8j5.41536@news.uswest.net:
> >
> >> Unless you ride the brakes, it should go 50K
> >> Tom

> >
> >
> > City driving or a lot of stop n' go driving is harder on brakes,so you
> > can't go by mileage alone.
> >

>
> Driving style prevails, as is the quality of the pads. I had 92K miles on a
> set of pads in a manual Sentra, 60K miles on a set of pads in an automatic
> Sentra, 30K miles on the original pads in the Accord and they're still have
> 66% tread. Most of my driving is city/suburb. Automatic transmission is
> harsher on the pads. If you go easy on the brakes, they will last longer.


Great point. Two neighbors could buy identical new vehicles on the same
day. Due to driving style--the brakes on one of the vehicles may last one
year but the brakes on the other identical vehicle may last 4 years.

Daniel 10-22-2003 09:37 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 

Good point. Besides, often all 4 pads on same axle wear unevenly: from pad
to pad and on the 4 corners of the same pad itself: I have measured before
pad material left from 2mm to 4mm on all 4 pads for same axle. Because of
this, when I inspect pads, I inspect all 4 pads, I even remove the pads for
measurement with a small ruler on all 4 corners of each pad. Most mechanics
in garages dont bother and visual inspect only one side of the pad on one
wheel. If they find 4 or 5 mm, they might say 50 % life left, without
noticing another pad might have only 2mm left: due for an immediate change.






"Mike" <mikeckane2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:377268b.0310212328.da80a6e@posting.google.com ...
> The manual's limits are what you can get without hardware damage. But
> if the pad has less than 25%-30% left, then its' time to change. You
> are likely to start noticing brake fades and the thinner pads wear
> faster than newer ones. 4-5mm (front) is about where I'll change mine.
> (I think the accord started with 5mm at the rear? Dunno)
>
>

..



Daniel 10-22-2003 09:37 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 

Good point. Besides, often all 4 pads on same axle wear unevenly: from pad
to pad and on the 4 corners of the same pad itself: I have measured before
pad material left from 2mm to 4mm on all 4 pads for same axle. Because of
this, when I inspect pads, I inspect all 4 pads, I even remove the pads for
measurement with a small ruler on all 4 corners of each pad. Most mechanics
in garages dont bother and visual inspect only one side of the pad on one
wheel. If they find 4 or 5 mm, they might say 50 % life left, without
noticing another pad might have only 2mm left: due for an immediate change.






"Mike" <mikeckane2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:377268b.0310212328.da80a6e@posting.google.com ...
> The manual's limits are what you can get without hardware damage. But
> if the pad has less than 25%-30% left, then its' time to change. You
> are likely to start noticing brake fades and the thinner pads wear
> faster than newer ones. 4-5mm (front) is about where I'll change mine.
> (I think the accord started with 5mm at the rear? Dunno)
>
>

..



Daniel 10-22-2003 09:37 PM

Re: When To Change Brakes
 

Good point. Besides, often all 4 pads on same axle wear unevenly: from pad
to pad and on the 4 corners of the same pad itself: I have measured before
pad material left from 2mm to 4mm on all 4 pads for same axle. Because of
this, when I inspect pads, I inspect all 4 pads, I even remove the pads for
measurement with a small ruler on all 4 corners of each pad. Most mechanics
in garages dont bother and visual inspect only one side of the pad on one
wheel. If they find 4 or 5 mm, they might say 50 % life left, without
noticing another pad might have only 2mm left: due for an immediate change.






"Mike" <mikeckane2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:377268b.0310212328.da80a6e@posting.google.com ...
> The manual's limits are what you can get without hardware damage. But
> if the pad has less than 25%-30% left, then its' time to change. You
> are likely to start noticing brake fades and the thinner pads wear
> faster than newer ones. 4-5mm (front) is about where I'll change mine.
> (I think the accord started with 5mm at the rear? Dunno)
>
>

..




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:48 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.05309 seconds with 5 queries