Re: Which Year Accord to Buy?
"J. Perry" <j_perry@musicians.net> wrote in
news:10rflmmiheo6rd4@corp.supernews.com: > "Cosmin N." <no@email.com> wrote in message > news:C-mdnZEBut4xkyjcRVn-3Q@rogers.com... >> N.E.Ohio Bob wrote: >> > Cosmin N. wrote: >> > >> >> So if you can find a mint 94-97,they are great cars. >> > >> > >> > I never did like the '95 that Mom bought. The car wasn't as >> > comfortable as my '92, and the armrest was tilted so my arm slid off, >> > and the clock was in the radio instead if up on the top edge of the > dash. >> > The whole car was designed to be cheaper to build, and it showed. >> > Honda didn't fix all the cheapness till the '98's came out. bob >> >> I almost positive the clock was not in the radio, although the radio >> might have had its own clock (my aftermarket one did, I replaced the >> stock one 4 years ago). It was at the top edge of the dashboard, like in >> all Hondas I've been in. >> >> I'm not sure why you had a feeling they wre cheaply made, especially >> when compared to the 98-02. I had a top of the line 94 EXR with leather, >> so I don't know what were the fabrics Honda used in that generation, but >> pretty much everything else I can think of was better than on the 98-02. >> >> In any case, the op asked which Accord to buy, and quite frankly, they >> are all great cars. I preffer the 94-97 and 03-05 generations, but there >> isn't much wrong with any other Accord. >> >> Cosmin > > Didn't the automatic transmission problems begin with the 1998-2002 > generation Accords? > > J. Perry > > > the euro 98-02 models (1.6/1.8/2.0) are known for their bad fuel consumption marcel |
Re: Which Year Accord to Buy?
"J. Perry" <j_perry@musicians.net> wrote in
news:10rflmmiheo6rd4@corp.supernews.com: > "Cosmin N." <no@email.com> wrote in message > news:C-mdnZEBut4xkyjcRVn-3Q@rogers.com... >> N.E.Ohio Bob wrote: >> > Cosmin N. wrote: >> > >> >> So if you can find a mint 94-97,they are great cars. >> > >> > >> > I never did like the '95 that Mom bought. The car wasn't as >> > comfortable as my '92, and the armrest was tilted so my arm slid off, >> > and the clock was in the radio instead if up on the top edge of the > dash. >> > The whole car was designed to be cheaper to build, and it showed. >> > Honda didn't fix all the cheapness till the '98's came out. bob >> >> I almost positive the clock was not in the radio, although the radio >> might have had its own clock (my aftermarket one did, I replaced the >> stock one 4 years ago). It was at the top edge of the dashboard, like in >> all Hondas I've been in. >> >> I'm not sure why you had a feeling they wre cheaply made, especially >> when compared to the 98-02. I had a top of the line 94 EXR with leather, >> so I don't know what were the fabrics Honda used in that generation, but >> pretty much everything else I can think of was better than on the 98-02. >> >> In any case, the op asked which Accord to buy, and quite frankly, they >> are all great cars. I preffer the 94-97 and 03-05 generations, but there >> isn't much wrong with any other Accord. >> >> Cosmin > > Didn't the automatic transmission problems begin with the 1998-2002 > generation Accords? > > J. Perry > > > the euro 98-02 models (1.6/1.8/2.0) are known for their bad fuel consumption marcel |
Re: Which Year Accord to Buy?
Heard it many times 98-02 had issues, atleast the one I have 02 EX
Manual Accord, had the moonroof unit replaced while it was still under warranty, it still rattles, replaced air vents nobs a few times, still rattle. There is just continuous noises in the car all the time from the doors... |
Re: Which Year Accord to Buy?
Heard it many times 98-02 had issues, atleast the one I have 02 EX
Manual Accord, had the moonroof unit replaced while it was still under warranty, it still rattles, replaced air vents nobs a few times, still rattle. There is just continuous noises in the car all the time from the doors... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands