Re: 2003 Accent: old vs. new model
 

Matt Whiting wrote:
> hyundaitech wrote:
>
>> According to technical service bulletin 03-90-021:
>>
>> "Early production 2003 Model Year Accents (before January 06, 2003
>> production) are not equipped with side impact airbags."
>>
>>
>> www.hmaservice.com
>>
>> It's your friend.
>
>
> It would be even a better friend if it worked with Netscape. I couldn't
> even get it to work with IE two evenings ago when I tried to view the
> Elantra brake system. The text came up, but the pictures just has the
> "broken picture" icon in each frame.

That seems to happen occasionally, but in general it works fine as long
as you use IE. I agree that it's truly stupid to not make it usable with
other browsers. It also really sucks that you have to use the assigned
password and cannot change it. Considering that the site is open to the
public, what's the point of heavy-handed security.

Re: 2003 Accent: old vs. new model
 

Brian Nystrom wrote:
> Matt Whiting wrote:
>
>> hyundaitech wrote:
>>
>>> According to technical service bulletin 03-90-021:
>>>
>>> "Early production 2003 Model Year Accents (before January 06, 2003
>>> production) are not equipped with side impact airbags."
>>>
>>>
>>> www.hmaservice.com
>>>
>>> It's your friend.
>>
>>
>>
>> It would be even a better friend if it worked with Netscape. I
>> couldn't even get it to work with IE two evenings ago when I tried to
>> view the Elantra brake system. The text came up, but the pictures
>> just has the "broken picture" icon in each frame.
>
>
> That seems to happen occasionally, but in general it works fine as long
> as you use IE. I agree that it's truly stupid to not make it usable with
> other browsers. It also really sucks that you have to use the assigned
> password and cannot change it. Considering that the site is open to the
> public, what's the point of heavy-handed security.

Especially when the password is VERY cryptic and not easily remembered.
Netscape remembers my passwords for me, but I don't trust IE/Windows
with this as they are too easily hacked.

Matt

Re: 2003 Accent: old vs. new model
 

Brian Nystrom wrote:
> Matt Whiting wrote:
>
>> hyundaitech wrote:
>>
>>> According to technical service bulletin 03-90-021:
>>>
>>> "Early production 2003 Model Year Accents (before January 06, 2003
>>> production) are not equipped with side impact airbags."
>>>
>>>
>>> www.hmaservice.com
>>>
>>> It's your friend.
>>
>>
>>
>> It would be even a better friend if it worked with Netscape. I
>> couldn't even get it to work with IE two evenings ago when I tried to
>> view the Elantra brake system. The text came up, but the pictures
>> just has the "broken picture" icon in each frame.
>
>
> That seems to happen occasionally, but in general it works fine as long
> as you use IE. I agree that it's truly stupid to not make it usable with
> other browsers. It also really sucks that you have to use the assigned
> password and cannot change it. Considering that the site is open to the
> public, what's the point of heavy-handed security.

Especially when the password is VERY cryptic and not easily remembered.
Netscape remembers my passwords for me, but I don't trust IE/Windows
with this as they are too easily hacked.

Matt

Re: 2003 Accent: old vs. new model
 

Brian Nystrom wrote:
> Matt Whiting wrote:
>
>> hyundaitech wrote:
>>
>>> According to technical service bulletin 03-90-021:
>>>
>>> "Early production 2003 Model Year Accents (before January 06, 2003
>>> production) are not equipped with side impact airbags."
>>>
>>>
>>> www.hmaservice.com
>>>
>>> It's your friend.
>>
>>
>>
>> It would be even a better friend if it worked with Netscape. I
>> couldn't even get it to work with IE two evenings ago when I tried to
>> view the Elantra brake system. The text came up, but the pictures
>> just has the "broken picture" icon in each frame.
>
>
> That seems to happen occasionally, but in general it works fine as long
> as you use IE. I agree that it's truly stupid to not make it usable with
> other browsers. It also really sucks that you have to use the assigned
> password and cannot change it. Considering that the site is open to the
> public, what's the point of heavy-handed security.

Especially when the password is VERY cryptic and not easily remembered.
Netscape remembers my passwords for me, but I don't trust IE/Windows
with this as they are too easily hacked.

Matt