Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
 

dgk wrote:

> If you want to level the playing field, then let's have national
> health coverage like all the other industrialized countries. Get it
> off the back of the corporations. Why should GM have to pay for it
> while Honda doesn't?

This is the most pro-capitalist thing we could do.

Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
 

do_not_spam_me@my-deja.com wrote:
> dgk wrote:
>
>> If you want to level the playing field, then let's have national
>> health coverage like all the other industrialized countries. Get it
>> off the back of the corporations. Why should GM have to pay for it
>> while Honda doesn't?
>
> This is the most pro-capitalist thing we could do.
>
Not in my book it isn't. I'm not denying that our current
healthcare system needs fixing. Handing it to the government isn't
the fix it -- or much of anything else for that matter.

Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
 

do_not_spam_me@my-deja.com wrote:
> dgk wrote:
>
>> If you want to level the playing field, then let's have national
>> health coverage like all the other industrialized countries. Get it
>> off the back of the corporations. Why should GM have to pay for it
>> while Honda doesn't?
>
> This is the most pro-capitalist thing we could do.
>
Not in my book it isn't. I'm not denying that our current
healthcare system needs fixing. Handing it to the government isn't
the fix it -- or much of anything else for that matter.