GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks.

GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks. (https://www.gtcarz.com/)
-   Hyundai Mailing List (https://www.gtcarz.com/hyundai-mailing-list-137/)
-   -   Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences (https://www.gtcarz.com/hyundai-mailing-list-137/repost-1997-tib-1-8-2-0-exhaust-differences-49126/)

Dan Caron 11-05-2003 05:47 PM

Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
 
I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is what
was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin wall
tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an uncommon
problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike the
thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much shorter
( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and 2.0
engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast into
it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect the
cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
Thanks in advance for any help you provide.



theta00k@yahoo.com 11-06-2003 08:21 AM

Re: Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
 
In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron" <tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
>Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is what
>was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
>manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
>because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin wall
>tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an uncommon
>problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
>(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike the
>thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much shorter
>( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
> Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and 2.0
>engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
>differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast into
>it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
> Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect the
>cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
>differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?


How many miles on it?

Dan Caron 11-06-2003 01:14 PM

Re: Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
 
It has over 221k miles and still running strong.
<theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"

<tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is

what
> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin

wall
> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an

uncommon
> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike

the
> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much

shorter
> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and

2.0
> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast

into
> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect

the
> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?

>
> How many miles on it?




theta00k@yahoo.com 11-06-2003 02:06 PM

Re: Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
 
In article <wcwqb.14447$Mc.4462@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron" <tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>It has over 221k miles and still running strong.


OK, the manifold you got is for the what they call CCC(close couple
converter)-type exhaust of the Beta engine, so to answer your question, yes,
there are other differences besides the flex pipe and manifold.

><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
>> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"

><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
>> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is

>what
>> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
>> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
>> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin

>wall
>> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an

>uncommon
>> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
>> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike

>the
>> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much

>shorter
>> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
>> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and

>2.0
>> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
>> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast

>into
>> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
>> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect

>the
>> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
>> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?

>>
>> How many miles on it?

>
>


Dan Caron 11-06-2003 04:07 PM

Re: Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
 
Thanks for the info. So what you're basically saying is I would need to
replace my complete exhaust system to use the new manifold, right?
<theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:boe634$398_002@west.earthlink.net...
> In article <wcwqb.14447$Mc.4462@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"

<tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
> >It has over 221k miles and still running strong.

>
> OK, the manifold you got is for the what they call CCC(close couple
> converter)-type exhaust of the Beta engine, so to answer your question,

yes,
> there are other differences besides the flex pipe and manifold.
>
> ><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
> >> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"

> ><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
> >> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car

is
> >what
> >> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an

exhaust
> >> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this

purchase
> >> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin

> >wall
> >> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an

> >uncommon
> >> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my

new
> >> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold,

unlike
> >the
> >> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much

> >shorter
> >> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
> >> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8

and
> >2.0
> >> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
> >> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast

> >into
> >> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
> >> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly

connect
> >the
> >> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
> >> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
> >>
> >> How many miles on it?

> >
> >




theta00k@yahoo.com 11-06-2003 09:49 PM

Re: Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
 
In article <%Jyqb.15443$Mc.9618@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron" <tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>Thanks for the info. So what you're basically saying is I would need to
>replace my complete exhaust system to use the new manifold, right?


Yes

><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:boe634$398_002@west.earthlink.net...
>> In article <wcwqb.14447$Mc.4462@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"

><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>> >It has over 221k miles and still running strong.

>>
>> OK, the manifold you got is for the what they call CCC(close couple
>> converter)-type exhaust of the Beta engine, so to answer your question,

>yes,
>> there are other differences besides the flex pipe and manifold.
>>
>> ><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
>> >> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
>> ><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
>> >> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car

>is
>> >what
>> >> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an

>exhaust
>> >> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this

>purchase
>> >> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin
>> >wall
>> >> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an
>> >uncommon
>> >> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my

>new
>> >> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold,

>unlike
>> >the
>> >> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much
>> >shorter
>> >> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
>> >> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8

>and
>> >2.0
>> >> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
>> >> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast
>> >into
>> >> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
>> >> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly

>connect
>> >the
>> >> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
>> >> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
>> >>
>> >> How many miles on it?
>> >
>> >

>
>



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.06176 seconds with 5 queries