b20vtec eg hb vs gsrb20 eg hb (1/4 mile) track
07-26-2006, 07:42 PM
#1
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brampton
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 672 
b20vtec eg hb vs gsrb20 eg hb (1/4 mile) track
b20vtec eg hb
b16a2 head
b20b bottom
short ram intake
2.5 exhaust
vs
gsrb20 eg hb
b16a head
b20z bottom
short ram intake
headers
type r cams.
good race. came down to the drivers...
Video - b20vtec grey eg(b16a2/b20b. intake/exhaust.) vs gsrb20 green eg(b18c1/b20z. type r cams,intake/headers) 1/4 mile race. came down to the drivers. lol
b16a2 head
b20b bottom
short ram intake
2.5 exhaust
vs
gsrb20 eg hb
b16a head
b20z bottom
short ram intake
headers
type r cams.
good race. came down to the drivers...
Video - b20vtec grey eg(b16a2/b20b. intake/exhaust.) vs gsrb20 green eg(b18c1/b20z. type r cams,intake/headers) 1/4 mile race. came down to the drivers. lol
07-28-2006, 07:57 PM
#7
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brampton
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 672
Originally Posted by NOTORIOUS VR
uh... a stock GSR in an EG should do 14.0... so what was the point of building a frankenstein that goes slower?
show me some slips and i'll believe it..
07-28-2006, 09:05 PM
#8
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North York
Posts: 321
Rep Power: 708
I had an EG B16B go 14.2 with 2.2 60 fts @ 97 mph
Bolt ons stock ecu tuning intake exhaust flywheel and clutch n pump
Then when i built it it went alot faster than that...oh and i had an ITR tranny
Bolt ons stock ecu tuning intake exhaust flywheel and clutch n pump
Then when i built it it went alot faster than that...oh and i had an ITR tranny
07-28-2006, 10:08 PM
#9
Average GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 589
Rep Power: 713
Originally Posted by alphaq69
i dont know man.. i havent seen any stock gsr in egs go that fast...
show me some slips and i'll believe it..
show me some slips and i'll believe it..
No need. It's basiclly a fact...
Well appart from the one's I see run mid 15's.....
07-29-2006, 12:54 AM
#10
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brampton
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 672
Originally Posted by 79camaro
I had an EG B16B go 14.2 with 2.2 60 fts @ 97 mph
Bolt ons stock ecu tuning intake exhaust flywheel and clutch n pump
Then when i built it it went alot faster than that...oh and i had an ITR tranny
Bolt ons stock ecu tuning intake exhaust flywheel and clutch n pump
Then when i built it it went alot faster than that...oh and i had an ITR tranny
my 60ft was 2.2 as well... and i crossed at 98.93mph. but i'm using a 2000 sir tranny..
07-29-2006, 03:10 AM
#11
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 669
Originally Posted by alphaq69
b16b? civic type r motor.. nice..
my 60ft was 2.2 as well... and i crossed at 98.93mph. but i'm using a 2000 sir tranny..
my 60ft was 2.2 as well... and i crossed at 98.93mph. but i'm using a 2000 sir tranny..
07-29-2006, 11:33 AM
#12
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brampton
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 672
Originally Posted by 96lude_srv
with that 60ft and mph, your cas has no torque or your not launching it right.
but my boy's h22 coupe. with i/h/camgears. pulled a 14.25. and he dynoed at 180whp.
i dont think my car is anywhere close to being 180whp.. maybe 165whp - 170max.. if i'm lucky. and he only ran a tenth of a second faster than i did.
07-29-2006, 12:48 PM
#13
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 669
what year is his coupe? 92-95??? if i remember correctly, they are only 100lbs heavier than the eg,so around 14.0-14.25 should be correct. I thought b20vtec are torque monster, there's definitely something wrong with your 14.5sec. I ran 14.9 ,2.3sec 60ft in my h22 96prelude that weigh about 3000lbs, with I/e/flywheel/stock header. 
Last edited by 96lude_srv; 07-29-2006 at 12:51 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
07-29-2006, 12:52 PM
#14
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brampton
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 672
Originally Posted by 96lude_srv
what year is his coup? 92-95??? if i remember correctly, they are only 100lbs heavier than the eg,so around 14.0-14.25 should be correct. I thought b20z are torque monster, there's definitely something wrong with your 14.5
what year is his coupe? 92-95??? if i remember correctly, they are only 100lbs heavier than the eg,so around 14.0-14.25 should be correct. I thought b20vtec are torque monster, there's definitely something wrong with your 14.5
what year is his coupe? 92-95??? if i remember correctly, they are only 100lbs heavier than the eg,so around 14.0-14.25 should be correct. I thought b20vtec are torque monster, there's definitely something wrong with your 14.5
i have the gray civic.. and i ran the 14.3. b16a2 head, b20b block.
Originally Posted by 96lude_srv
what year is his coupe? 92-95??? if i remember correctly, they are only 100lbs heavier than the eg,so around 14.0-14.25 should be correct. I thought b20vtec are torque monster, there's definitely something wrong with your 14.5sec. I ran 14.9 ,2.3sec 60ft in my h22 96prelude that weigh about 3000lbs, with I/e/flywheel/stock header.
the coupe is a 1993 dx.
it's not even at all a built b20vtec. everything is stock! lol
so 14.3 to me.. is pretty good. i raced an jdm h22a eghb with i/e. and all i had was my intake at the time with stock dx exhaust. and he beat me by a car. and his car is a 92. 1400kgs it says on his door. 3080lbs plus 150, my friend weighs lets say,. 3230lbs..
Last edited by alphaq69; 07-29-2006 at 01:00 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
