Kill Stories Talk about a win or a loss.

b20vtec eg hb vs gsrb20 eg hb (1/4 mile) track

Old 07-26-2006, 07:42 PM
  #1  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
alphaq69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brampton
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 497
alphaq69 street rep is low. keep going
b20vtec eg hb vs gsrb20 eg hb (1/4 mile) track

b20vtec eg hb

b16a2 head
b20b bottom
short ram intake
2.5 exhaust

vs

gsrb20 eg hb

b16a head
b20z bottom
short ram intake
headers
type r cams.

good race. came down to the drivers...

Video - b20vtec grey eg(b16a2/b20b. intake/exhaust.) vs gsrb20 green eg(b18c1/b20z. type r cams,intake/headers) 1/4 mile race. came down to the drivers. lol
alphaq69 is offline  
Old 07-27-2006, 03:21 PM
  #2  
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (4)
 
fastestcivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,255
Rep Power: 592
fastestcivic street rep is low. keep going
good race bud....keep it up
fastestcivic is offline  
Old 07-28-2006, 12:22 PM
  #3  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 494
96lude_srv street rep is low. keep going
did i see 14.5 for a b20vtec eg???
96lude_srv is offline  
Old 07-28-2006, 03:23 PM
  #4  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
alphaq69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brampton
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 497
alphaq69 street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by 96lude_srv
did i see 14.5 for a b20vtec eg???
lol
14.3.. my motor is stock man.. what do u want from me? lol stock cams and eeverything.
alphaq69 is offline  
Old 07-28-2006, 04:01 PM
  #5  
user
 
NOTORIOUS VR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: T.O.
Posts: 1,153
Rep Power: 551
NOTORIOUS VR will become famous soon enough
uh... a stock GSR in an EG should do 14.0... so what was the point of building a frankenstein that goes slower?
NOTORIOUS VR is offline  
Old 07-28-2006, 04:15 PM
  #6  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 494
96lude_srv street rep is low. keep going
it's probably the driver, what your 60ft?

it's probably the driver, what your 60ft?

Last edited by 96lude_srv; 07-28-2006 at 04:21 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
96lude_srv is offline  
Old 07-28-2006, 07:57 PM
  #7  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
alphaq69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brampton
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 497
alphaq69 street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by NOTORIOUS VR
uh... a stock GSR in an EG should do 14.0... so what was the point of building a frankenstein that goes slower?
i dont know man.. i havent seen any stock gsr in egs go that fast...

show me some slips and i'll believe it..
alphaq69 is offline  
Old 07-28-2006, 09:05 PM
  #8  
Junior GTcars Poster
 
79camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North York
Posts: 321
Rep Power: 533
79camaro street rep is low. keep going
I had an EG B16B go 14.2 with 2.2 60 fts @ 97 mph
Bolt ons stock ecu tuning intake exhaust flywheel and clutch n pump
Then when i built it it went alot faster than that...oh and i had an ITR tranny
79camaro is offline  
Old 07-28-2006, 10:08 PM
  #9  
Average GTcars Poster
 
X_LUDWIK_X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 589
Rep Power: 538
X_LUDWIK_X will become famous soon enough
Originally Posted by alphaq69
i dont know man.. i havent seen any stock gsr in egs go that fast...

show me some slips and i'll believe it..


No need. It's basiclly a fact...


Well appart from the one's I see run mid 15's.....
X_LUDWIK_X is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 12:54 AM
  #10  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
alphaq69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brampton
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 497
alphaq69 street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by 79camaro
I had an EG B16B go 14.2 with 2.2 60 fts @ 97 mph
Bolt ons stock ecu tuning intake exhaust flywheel and clutch n pump
Then when i built it it went alot faster than that...oh and i had an ITR tranny
b16b? civic type r motor.. nice..

my 60ft was 2.2 as well... and i crossed at 98.93mph. but i'm using a 2000 sir tranny..
alphaq69 is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 03:10 AM
  #11  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 494
96lude_srv street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by alphaq69
b16b? civic type r motor.. nice..

my 60ft was 2.2 as well... and i crossed at 98.93mph. but i'm using a 2000 sir tranny..
with that 60ft and mph, your cas has no torque or your not launching it right.
96lude_srv is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 11:33 AM
  #12  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
alphaq69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brampton
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 497
alphaq69 street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by 96lude_srv
with that 60ft and mph, your cas has no torque or your not launching it right.
maybe i'm not launching it right... i'm not sure...
but my boy's h22 coupe. with i/h/camgears. pulled a 14.25. and he dynoed at 180whp.

i dont think my car is anywhere close to being 180whp.. maybe 165whp - 170max.. if i'm lucky. and he only ran a tenth of a second faster than i did.
alphaq69 is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 12:48 PM
  #13  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 494
96lude_srv street rep is low. keep going
what year is his coupe? 92-95??? if i remember correctly, they are only 100lbs heavier than the eg,so around 14.0-14.25 should be correct. I thought b20vtec are torque monster, there's definitely something wrong with your 14.5sec. I ran 14.9 ,2.3sec 60ft in my h22 96prelude that weigh about 3000lbs, with I/e/flywheel/stock header.

Last edited by 96lude_srv; 07-29-2006 at 12:51 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
96lude_srv is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 12:52 PM
  #14  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
alphaq69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brampton
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 497
alphaq69 street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by 96lude_srv
what year is his coup? 92-95??? if i remember correctly, they are only 100lbs heavier than the eg,so around 14.0-14.25 should be correct. I thought b20z are torque monster, there's definitely something wrong with your 14.5

what year is his coupe? 92-95??? if i remember correctly, they are only 100lbs heavier than the eg,so around 14.0-14.25 should be correct. I thought b20vtec are torque monster, there's definitely something wrong with your 14.5
oh man.. lol the guy i was racing has the b20z block.. his clutch was slipping 3rd & 4th gear..

i have the gray civic.. and i ran the 14.3. b16a2 head, b20b block.

Originally Posted by 96lude_srv
what year is his coupe? 92-95??? if i remember correctly, they are only 100lbs heavier than the eg,so around 14.0-14.25 should be correct. I thought b20vtec are torque monster, there's definitely something wrong with your 14.5sec. I ran 14.9 ,2.3sec 60ft in my h22 96prelude that weigh about 3000lbs, with I/e/flywheel/stock header.
my car weighs 1455kgs(says right on the door) = 3201lbs. with me in it. another 175. so 3376lbs all together! my car has intake/exhaust. lol
the coupe is a 1993 dx.

it's not even at all a built b20vtec. everything is stock! lol
so 14.3 to me.. is pretty good. i raced an jdm h22a eghb with i/e. and all i had was my intake at the time with stock dx exhaust. and he beat me by a car. and his car is a 92. 1400kgs it says on his door. 3080lbs plus 150, my friend weighs lets say,. 3230lbs..

Last edited by alphaq69; 07-29-2006 at 01:00 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
alphaq69 is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 01:00 PM
  #15  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
IamSlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 474
IamSlow street rep is low. keep going
close call though
IamSlow is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: b20vtec eg hb vs gsrb20 eg hb (1/4 mile) track


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Page generated in 0.18682 seconds with 24 queries