Video: CL65 AMG vs WS6
 

Right Click & Save Target As:

http://www.n2s1.net/RacingVideos/HAVOC_VS_CL65AMG_.WMV

As much as I want Merc to win this it is too close to call it a win. Keep in mind the price difference, 30k nad 170k. imagine what canyou do with that pontiac for 140 g's of difference.

Who cares what you can do with a pontiac for 140g's. Why do people always bring up that arguement? You think the guy in the benz is saying "ohh, maybe I should have bought a discontinued pontiac and dumped 140g's into it". No, he is probably thinking "I can't wait to get home to my trophy wife, what the is this black pontiac trying to do?"

nah.. benz has it.. Man, crazy, my boss owns a 2005 benz like that....

Exactly...

And IMO the SL took the win, beacuse it pulled on the WS6 every time... it's just the jump the N/A V8 has with nitrous, so the SL has to make up ground.

lol... man, the guy in the benz is like whatever.. i really dont care cause i get 100X more looks in this bad boy CL65 all the way

nice vid.. and cars

Pretty sad if the only way you can get a girlfriend is with a $200K car.

Are you joking? Minus the badge the CL65 AMG looks like any bland dime a dozen CL coupe and the WS6 is actually a rarer sight.

what.. dime a dozen. lol

how many CL 600 are there in Toronto ?

thats a lot

I was referring to all of the regular CL's which are very common and look identical to the 600 AMG.

^^^ And the CL's are STILL rarer then the WS6's.. so i don't know what u'r talking about... AMG or not.

And about it being sad needing a 200k car to have a wife... no one said that or implied that... but sounds like u'r insecure.

Bingo.

The 'rich man' defence is always... 'well I'll talk my $1xx,xxx car and go home and my gorgeous GF'

That is just as pathetic as the 'poor mans' 'what could I do with the money difference' argument.

Face it, losers drive nice cars and having all that money doesn't change . Wow, you have an AMG... thats amazing... you're still go home and jerk it to amatuerallure.com :hah:

The problem here is relating the value of someones car to the quality of their life style in order to justify why a car of much less value (no one is arguing the T/A is cheaper) kept up, and possibly beat it.

In highschool, when your scrawny 90pd when wet ass's couldn't finish the 12min run in gym class... did you point out that you had a 3000sq/ft house to justify your failure? I Doubt it.

Why's it necessary now?

meh there both in hottttt cars......but your paying for the luxury and amenitys (sic) on the benz sure the firechicken is a great car and im a die hard GM boy but if i had the money i would take that benz any day of the week.....and the benz took it hands down they were just shuttin them down way early

Never implied that he purchased the car to get a girlfriend. I was just trying to point out, that win or lose, the guy in the CL65 probably wouldn't have given a .

Crank up the boost on that AMG like 2 psi, and the results would be humorous.. :laugh:

Let's see that race again from a dig.

$179,000 or not, the benz is gonna get beat.

scott

Perhaps you should read the quote again.

BTW you sound like a man suffering from SPS.

ya.. so I read it again.. now what?

YOU are the one that is implying that a $200k car is needed to get a GF.. no one else. :eyes:

I said:

I suggest you register for remedial english.

Ok this is getting stupid...

You want me to take english classes?

To me, you saying that "it's sad if the only way you can get a GF is with a $200K car" means you are implying a 200K car is need to get a GF. Which is what I've been saying the past 3 posts.

So instead of telling me that I need english classes, why don't you explain how what you said doesn't mean what I just posted 4 times in a row now.

:retard:

ok.. thats enough talking..


both cars are nice.. and no one relly meant that they want a 200k car to get a GF

leave it at that

Obviously English is not your first language, nor have you been speaking it for very long because you seem to have much difficulty grasping the meaning of the sentence. I will do my best to clarify it:

Had I not included "pretty sad if" and said “the only way you can get a girlfriend is with a $200K car.” Then that would mean exactly what you said; which would be to imply that only a $200k car can get you a girlfriend.

However, you obviously do not understand the meaning of “if” or how it changed the nature and meaning of the sentence.

I said:

“Pretty sad IF the only way you can get a girlfriend is with a $200K car.”

“If” was being used as a conjugation:

“In the event that”

“Granting that”

“On the condition that”

Thus the sentence meant that it is pathetic IF the only way one can procure a girlfriend is by having a $200k car. It clearly did not mean that I was asserting that having a $200k car is the ONLY means to the end. That is why what you said 4 times now is actually incorrect.

Would you like a further explanation? I will be happy to assist you if it is still not clear.

Couldn't agree more

-Mike

Seeing as you're only working on the sentance and not regarding anything said before your post, you can get away with your explanation, but you originally posted that because you wanted to imply that a $200K is needed to get a GF. Otherwise you wouldn't have said that. :supergay:

But thanks for the engslish lesson there professor, I couldn't have done it without you.

:offtopic1