General Automotive Chat all general talk about cars. if they dont have a home below or you feel it doesnt fit, post in here.

350 tbi stock..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2005 | 06:30 PM
  #1  
MetalliCamaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
GTcars Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,225
From: Andover, maine
Rep Power: 784
MetalliCamaro street rep is low. keep going
350 tbi stock..

I thought 1982-1992 camaros never came with 350 Tbi..
i deleted all the other cars and times, but i found this on this site.. I was thinking all these times were with stock camaros..
Year Engine 0-60 1/4 Mile Top Speed
1982 350 TBI 9.7 16.0 116
Old Jun 29, 2005 | 07:23 PM
  #2  
69z-28's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,626
From: palatine,il (chicago)
Rep Power: 917
69z-28 street rep is low. keep going
they didnt. whoever said that is a *******.
Old Jun 29, 2005 | 08:43 PM
  #3  
archemedes's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,868
From: Saraland AL
Rep Power: 1121
archemedes street rep is low. keep going
350 went away in '80 I think (before third gen production started) and came back late 80's except canada they never lost the 350
Old Jun 29, 2005 | 09:49 PM
  #4  
1BADVETTE's Avatar
Drama Queen
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,034
From: Maumelle, AR
Rep Power: 821
1BADVETTE street rep is low. keep going
and I highly doubt a car running 16's in the 1/4 is trapping 1xx

edit: I guess that 116 is for top speed of the car, not 1/4 trap, sorry.
Old Jun 30, 2005 | 11:25 AM
  #5  
MetalliCamaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
GTcars Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,225
From: Andover, maine
Rep Power: 784
MetalliCamaro street rep is low. keep going
thats what i thought, but its on this site.. i was shocked, but i am now knwoing those are not stock times, Lol Not stock at all!
Old Jun 30, 2005 | 11:33 AM
  #6  
archemedes's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,868
From: Saraland AL
Rep Power: 1121
archemedes street rep is low. keep going
'82 would have still been carb regaurdless and I doubt the pathetic excuse for a 350 that year could get that car to do 16 in a quarter, the compression was lower than my gp with a s/c, they were rated around 200 hp and that was upping the estimate the carbs were horrible (computer controlled partially)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blue89vert
Car Care / Detailing / Paint / Visual Mods
3
Mar 25, 2006 01:28 PM
blue89vert
chevy / gmc
5
Mar 25, 2006 01:27 PM
blue89vert
chevy / gmc
11
Jan 25, 2006 06:26 PM
crxzc
Want To Buy
0
Jul 20, 2005 09:54 PM
red_johnny
Cars For Sale
44
Jun 24, 2005 01:57 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 AM.

Page generated in 0.08621 seconds with 16 queries