2 SSs Walpaper
GTcars - Post God !
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,032
From: Macomb, Michigan
Rep Power: 952 
As I've always said, if you were like half a mile away from a 98+ Camaro with a 2000 concorde next to it, you couldn't really tell the difference. The styling cues of the Concorde are very similiar to the 98+ Camaro, and that's a total turnoff to me, personally. And yes, Arch has made a point that the 4th gens have twins too, but the 4th gen twin is not as popular as a Chrysler Concorde (atleast they're all over here in the Detroit area)
And Drake, yes, your Camaro is purdier than normal SS's... cause that manta decal (or was it painted?) is gat **** gorgeous.
And Drake, yes, your Camaro is purdier than normal SS's... cause that manta decal (or was it painted?) is gat **** gorgeous.
GTcars - Post God !
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,868
From: Saraland AL
Rep Power: 1126
Originally Posted by meissenation
As I've always said, if you were like half a mile away from a 98+ Camaro with a 2000 concorde next to it, you couldn't really tell the difference. The styling cues of the Concorde are very similiar to the 98+ Camaro, and that's a total turnoff to me, personally. And yes, Arch has made a point that the 4th gens have twins too, but the 4th gen twin is not as popular as a Chrysler Concorde (atleast they're all over here in the Detroit area)
And Drake, yes, your Camaro is purdier than normal SS's... cause that manta decal (or was it painted?) is gat **** gorgeous.
And Drake, yes, your Camaro is purdier than normal SS's... cause that manta decal (or was it painted?) is gat **** gorgeous.
GTcars Regular
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,152
From: Austin, TX
Rep Power: 850
Its a "Manta" decal.....good enough for now. 
Just for sh*ts & giggles:
They both closely resemble their respective Camaros.....
To be honest, I've seen both of these cars from far away and accidentally mistaken them for Camaros....just for an instant though. :banghead:
Just for sh*ts & giggles:
They both closely resemble their respective Camaros.....
To be honest, I've seen both of these cars from far away and accidentally mistaken them for Camaros....just for an instant though. :banghead:
GTcars Regular
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,152
From: Austin, TX
Rep Power: 850
I am just referring to the front end of both these vehicles. The storm has very similar headlights, grill, & turn signal placement.
If you look at the rest of the cars, they look nothing like a Camaro.
That Storm is **** @ss ugly though.
If you look at the rest of the cars, they look nothing like a Camaro.
That Storm is **** @ss ugly though.
GTcars - Post God !
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,173
From: Valencia, CA
Rep Power: 967
i think since you have a 98-02 jason you see the difference easily between concord and camaro, and its the same with me, cuz i can easily see the difference between the storm and the 93-97.
so it just depends on what year you own.
so it just depends on what year you own.
GTcars Regular
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,152
From: Austin, TX
Rep Power: 850 
Sorry Grant, heh.They are both similar to the lesser cars, it just seems like the arguement I always hear for not liking the 98+ is that is looks like a Concorde from the front.....well, better that than the god-aweful Storm.
Don't get me wrong though, I've owned a 93-97 & a 98+, so I like 'em both.
Post Wench
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,392
From: Nemacolin, PA
Rep Power: 1046
Originally Posted by Knowklew
I love how most of the LT1 guys are so anti LS1...
Personally, I like them both around the same, all depends on the car. Though I lean more to the 93-97, and that's why I own one.
And Drake your car, is def. much better looking than wither/both of those cars.
