ricernoob

Hello idiot...it's an S2000. Just in case you didn't know, they weigh half the amount of your parents freakin M5. So do the math and you'll find out that it doesn't really need to "fly".

It's a lightweight roadster with a different approach.

P.s. stop advertising your parents' car.

P.s.s. don't try to convince me that you somehow have anything to do with the ownership of that car cos you paid for an oil change or something.....

spec_v_24

and I also bet that s2000 will rock most cars out there. I know these guys build their cars for track and do take them to the track and what's better than a built n/a monster? And from the mods, it's pretty well built with parts A LOT of people can't afford to buy.
But this still doesn't explain why the guy's a ? Is it cause he won't race you guys at a light on the street while innocent people are walking on the sidewalk and normal people driving hoping not to get hit by stupid street racers?! If it is... you guys are losers!

midnighter

I can't say I would've done the same to the exterior...

Supra_RZ

iTrader: (1)

agree




that car dosen't even come close to being rice. The Spoon S2000 is made for the Circuit, with a little more mods to the engine this car can beat your parents heavy *** V10 $80 000 M5. if you don't believe me ,buy a couple of "Best Motoring" video's and u will see that the
S2000 is kicking *** on the circuit.

ricernoob

only an Elise/Exige is better than an S2K...

NOTHING ELSE COMES CLOSE.

Hellbent

AHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHH AHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAA
HAHAHAHAH


Yes Like Best Motoring is the shiznit Right, cause they have REAL Accurate tests huh
Best Motoring- ONly show where a Skyline beats a Ferrari. LOL HAHAHA
BTW- and SInce we are in M5 Terrotry, I like to point out that the M5 does 0-60MPH in 4.4 secs, 0-100MPH in 10secs, the 1/4mile in 12.6 secs, does a 0.87G on the Skidpad. But of course those numbers mean of the driver is .
and Besides, half of you people I know given the choice would rather choose an M5 than a S2000 if you can pick for free.

SupraRZ- Iam not making fun, and your prolly Older than me, but you should release that Best Motoring has the worst standards in the Auto INdustry, their an Entertainment Show, not a Real Factual show. They love to Japanesse cars, according to them, everything else is .
That Marketing Keichii Tsuchiya made fun of Ieda Akira for buying a Lambo, right let me think, has that marketing ever won a Le Mans race, nope, has Ieda Akira, Yup he has.



I hate to do this, cause Iam gonna conradict myself a little bit, But I'll post the Top Gear Track times, For those not familiar, Top Gear tests all their cars on the same track, same layout, and the same driver, to make sure its even as possibel.

http://www.topgear.com/content/tgonbbc2/laptimes/thestig/

Notice were teh M5 is, for gods sake, it pull the same time as teh Porsche Cayman, Its faster than a Ferrari 575 GTC, Porsche GT3, Lotus Exige for petes sake.

_skitzo_

Nice work on it, not to crazy about the rear wing, is there any motor work done to this thing or just cosmetic?

SleeperEG6

hmmm im not a fan with the lights in the front bumper, i guess the second bumper looks better than that light one, but i would have gone all OEM and boost n/a is nice but boost is real power

m5racer

actually you ****en loseri made this account beforei could drive so i knind of had no car. and jsut soyou know i drivean 01 a4 that i paid for myslef so you should just go **** your self.... oh ya and how did this go fromme saying thiscarlooks liek to the fact that im advertising my dadys car and also i have never tried to convince you that this is my car you retard and no i have nothing to do with the ownership and i have never paied for an oil change... and now that you brought up the fact that someone in my family does own an M5 i think it is 100000x better then any honda box and even if the honda is faster i dont give a cause you and i both know that no riced out little rocket will ever make a girls wet like a BMW

spec_v_24

Too bad those specs are from the newer e60 M5's, which is a friggin monster. I believe ricernoob is comparing the s2000 to the older e39 M5 in which I would rather pick the s2000 over. And an s2000 with the right mods will walk all over the e39 on the track any day of the week! Not taking any sides here, I like neither Hondas or BMW's, just saying that I think the s2000 is better than the m5 (e39 model).
BUT this still doesn't explain why the driver is a , which really is what people are trying to figure out!

ricernoob

I URGE EVERYONE TO READ THIS KID'S RESPONSE.

He is a true car enthusiat, is he not? To him, a car is a means of getting a chic's wet...wow buddy, where to go. You should go to e46fanatics.com, that's where all the poser's like yourself hang out.

Once again, why don't you stop advertising your family's cars.

You got plenty of growing up to do, kid.

I personally think the e39 M5 is the finest M-car ever made (aside from the e30 M3). I have enormous respect for that car, but at the end of the day, it's just a highway cruise machine.

The S2K, on the other hand, is a thing of beauty and only a TRUE ENTHUSIAST can appreciate a car like that. Not a frikin -talking, punk a$$ kid with his family's cars in his sig.

And yes, you are correct, I was referring to the e39, not the new e60. Speaking of which, I have no patience for that car. It is no longer a true car really. I would like to drive my cars and gain the highest satisfaction out of them WITHOUT ENTERING A FREAKIN PASSWORD!!! lol, thats all the new M5 is, a piece of $hit gadgetry and computer controlled machine. Needless to say, I TRULY HATE IT

Supra_RZ

iTrader: (1)

im not trying to flame u or anything but i have driven the 2006 M5 and it is one hell of a machine, also if u have driven it ( not sure if u did ) i bet u wouldn't say that.

ricernoob

I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that the new M5 could possibly be the nicest car to drive currently available on the wide-scale basis.

However, I wasn't complaining about its driveability. I just hate the fact that cars are so run by computer/gadgets these days. They call em' high-tech, I call it WHY-TECH????!!! Do you see my point....again, I would just like to get in, turn the key, depress the cluth, shift some gears and enjoy a pure driving experience. lol i DO NOT wana enter passwrods to magically unlock an extra 100 ponies out of the motor. fvcking ghey as hell

just my opinion guys...no offence to anyone or their taste.

While we're on this discussion of technology, have you read reviews for the new S-Class? Doesn't it just make you go like "WHY"??????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I mean some of the gadgetry in there just makes u go like "do i need that to drive"? For instance, to change the radio station you can't just press the preset button. u have to go in a menu, and then in another, and so on. Basically three or four inputs required to CHANGE ONE RADIO CHANNEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

rabbitman

iTrader: (3)

I personally, would never even consider test driving the new M5, simply based on the reviews I have read and watched. They've all said it's an awesome car to drive, but the problem is all the BS that's required to get it ready to drive. Screw that. I'll stick with cars that don't require you to put in the driving style that you want, the tranny setup that you want, and all that other crap, before you can even leave your driveway. I beleive it was Clarkson who said, "The new M5 is a German geeks wet dream".

ricernoob

EXACTLY.