Vid: 13.1 N/A DC5
 

This same kid hit 12.8's .9's. Wish i could find that vid :mad:
Other than the slicks, all else is street trim...
...http://bsr.njsr.org/2004/061204/2.wmv

Wow, that yellow neon does work pretty good :D

that turbo worked good to :D :retard: ....
nice (((("""""""""" N/A """""""""")))) DC5 ....
......your right i also seen him doing 12.9, i'll try to find it

kind of sad, though, if u think about it.

a N/A 4 banger right next to it running 0.1sec less. well, he did have slicks, but still :laugh: :p

both had mods done....i wish i found that race

Gotta respect a quick N/A street car:thumbsup

:thumbsup your 110% right bud

They were both built for different applications. The RSX has a high revving low torque naturally aspirated 4cyl, the neon has a low revving high torque 4cyl turbo. The turbo car is obviously making more power. It's trapping 4-5mph higher in a heavier body.

Captain Obvious to the rescue!

haha, just messing with u bro! But thanks for pointing out the obvious :laugh:

You're welcome :smilie_fi

^^^its ok bro some people need the explanation;)....and both cars had mods to so i still give the bigger ups :) to the NA...

Peon fo life fooo's!!!

:hah: :retard:
http://img114.echo.cx/img114/8950/peon9ro.jpg

N/A is the way to go, more reliable, and more consistent. Turbos have their bad days lol. That was a nice run by both of them :thumbsup

I'd take turbo over N/A. Unless the N/A engine was over 4L and revved to the middle of nowhere

Yeah ing right... you're saying a 250hp naturally aspirated engine is more reliable then a 250hp turbocharged engine of the same displacement? I'm going to have to go ahead here and disagree with you...