Vid/Pic: AMS EVO 775whp @ 39 PSI GT42R
#16
Who cares when it spools or how hard you have to launch. I can GURANTEE that this car will destroy any car here from a roll, off the line, on the hwy...whatever you want.
OH and BTW....8500rpm isnt even close to the redilne....if you notice that dyno sheet is cutoff @ 8.5k...the car pulls all the way to 10,000 rpm....almost all 2L GT42R cars pull to at least 9K rpm, so really the power band is about 4 K rpm, wich is enough to haull anyones ***.
OH and BTW....8500rpm isnt even close to the redilne....if you notice that dyno sheet is cutoff @ 8.5k...the car pulls all the way to 10,000 rpm....almost all 2L GT42R cars pull to at least 9K rpm, so really the power band is about 4 K rpm, wich is enough to haull anyones ***.
#18
Considering the ENORMOUS size of a GT42R, that thing spools surprisingly quick on that tiny engine.
But, those are pathetic number for that boost level and that turbo. That is a 1000-1300hp (depending on wheel trim) turbo.
Then again the drivetrain loss from an AWD setup, but this car is running FWD is it not? (didnt watch video)
But, those are pathetic number for that boost level and that turbo. That is a 1000-1300hp (depending on wheel trim) turbo.
Then again the drivetrain loss from an AWD setup, but this car is running FWD is it not? (didnt watch video)
#19
Originally Posted by blackout_89t
Considering the ENORMOUS size of a GT42R, that thing spools surprisingly quick on that tiny engine.
But, those are pathetic number for that boost level and that turbo. That is a 1000-1300hp (depending on wheel trim) turbo.
Then again the drivetrain loss from an AWD setup, but this car is running FWD is it not? (didnt watch video)
But, those are pathetic number for that boost level and that turbo. That is a 1000-1300hp (depending on wheel trim) turbo.
Then again the drivetrain loss from an AWD setup, but this car is running FWD is it not? (didnt watch video)
#20
Chill, I wasnt saying the numbers themself are pathetic, that is pretty outstanding for a 4 cylinder.
But, that turbo should be making more power than that at those high high boost levels. I am actually VERY impressed the engine can handle that amount of boost.
But, that turbo should be making more power than that at those high high boost levels. I am actually VERY impressed the engine can handle that amount of boost.
#21
Originally Posted by blackout_89t
Chill, I wasnt saying the numbers themself are pathetic, that is pretty outstanding for a 4 cylinder.
But, that turbo should be making more power than that at those high high boost levels. I am actually VERY impressed the engine can handle that amount of boost.
But, that turbo should be making more power than that at those high high boost levels. I am actually VERY impressed the engine can handle that amount of boost.
#22
Originally Posted by FastWrx
Pathetic??? Sure Bud! 775whp plus drive train loss of a FWD is about 900Crank HP....integrate the AWD loss and its close to 1000HP! 39 psi of boost has been going on for some time now, so dont be suprised....there are cars (many of them) running 45-50 psi. For a 2L to make that kind of jam and the motor not even fully broken in...I say thats pretty en sick....3-4 more psi of boost and shes over the 800WHP mark wich is over the 1000crank mark. Non the less that thing hits like a sledge hammer when it comes on....
#23
Originally Posted by Bullet
launching an AWD car anything over 3200 is brutal on the tranny. everyone knows the obvious 'hook-up' advantages to an awd car, that is why you don't have to launch them high.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)