Automotive Pictures & videos all car videos and pictures from supercars to modified hondas.

what about the 2009 pontiac trans am?!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2007, 10:05 PM
  #1  
Experienced GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
 
drift_n_shift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 2,162
Rep Power: 0
drift_n_shift has a spectacular aura aboutdrift_n_shift has a spectacular aura about
what about the 2009 pontiac trans am?!!

well, someguy has taken the time to create what a 2009 pontiac firebird/trans am should look like, and personally, i think he hit the nail on the head..
Attached Thumbnails what about the 2009 pontiac trans am?!!-firebird2008nl2.jpg  
drift_n_shift is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 10:07 PM
  #2  
Average GTcars Poster
 
R/T kota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 717
R/T kota street rep is low. keep going
Needs a shaker hood.
Other than that, I think it looks bad ***.
R/T kota is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 10:50 PM
  #3  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
gtcamry92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mississauga
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 667
gtcamry92 street rep is low. keep going
Thats awesome....resembles the 2nd gen firebird and doesn't look tacky at all...

I'd be first in line for something along the lines of a 3rd gen tho
gtcamry92 is offline  
Old 01-29-2007, 01:15 AM
  #4  
Junior GTcars Poster
 
87Shelbyz_Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shwa
Posts: 230
Rep Power: 710
87Shelbyz_Turbo street rep is low. keep going
They make them all the damn same the camaro now this If they wanna make a car that will sell Just make a new transam same outline as the original one put with newer parts sheetmeatal etc. That's my 2 cents
87Shelbyz_Turbo is offline  
Old 01-29-2007, 01:53 AM
  #5  
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (4)
 
fastestcivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,255
Rep Power: 772
fastestcivic street rep is low. keep going
looks good a lil on the camaro side but meh..i would drive it:thumbsup:
fastestcivic is offline  
Old 01-29-2007, 01:58 AM
  #6  
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (1)
 
Supra_RZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto East
Posts: 3,516
Rep Power: 0
Supra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to all
looks alright....ii wouldn't mind driving one of those
Supra_RZ is offline  
Old 01-29-2007, 07:06 AM
  #7  
Junior GTcars Poster
 
95ProbeGT_Cory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Richomond Hill
Posts: 362
Rep Power: 714
95ProbeGT_Cory street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by gtcamry92
Thats awesome....resembles the 2nd gen firebird and doesn't look tacky at all...

I'd be first in line for something along the lines of a 3rd gen tho

Why?

Third gens are some of the ugliest F-Bodies ever built.
95ProbeGT_Cory is offline  
Old 01-29-2007, 11:36 AM
  #8  
Experienced GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
 
drift_n_shift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 2,162
Rep Power: 0
drift_n_shift has a spectacular aura aboutdrift_n_shift has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by 95ProbeGT_Cory
Why?

Third gens are some of the ugliest F-Bodies ever built.
ok there...
drift_n_shift is offline  
Old 01-29-2007, 12:19 PM
  #9  
Average GTcars Poster
 
Charlie_Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Scarbrough
Posts: 517
Rep Power: 0
Charlie_Chaos can only hope to improve
Originally Posted by R/T kota
Needs a shaker hood.
Other than that, I think it looks bad ***.
:thumbsup: That's it.

My biggest problem would be deciding on which one I wanted more. Camaro

or Trans Am .

"Third gens are some of the ugliest F-Bodies ever built." Hey buddy, Go

drive your ugly Probe POS off a Cliff . Probe's .... Now THAT'S some Ugly.
Charlie_Chaos is offline  
Old 01-29-2007, 12:26 PM
  #10  
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (3)
 
rabbitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 4,367
Rep Power: 789
rabbitman is a jewel in the roughrabbitman is a jewel in the roughrabbitman is a jewel in the roughrabbitman is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by fastestcivic
looks good a lil on the camaro side but meh..i would drive it:thumbsup:
Umm, the camaro and firebird were always the same car, just with different noses, and lights. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOBBBBB!!!!!!!!
rabbitman is offline  
Old 01-29-2007, 12:56 PM
  #11  
Average GTcars Poster
 
JDm_92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cobourg
Posts: 452
Rep Power: 0
JDm_92 should buy a rope to hang!JDm_92 should buy a rope to hang!
Thats just a photoshopped camaro....BOO!!
JDm_92 is offline  
Old 01-29-2007, 03:14 PM
  #12  
Experienced GTcars Poster
iTrader: (2)
 
Midnight Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto,Ontario
Posts: 2,065
Rep Power: 748
Midnight Racer street rep is low. keep going
looks good
Midnight Racer is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 02:35 PM
  #13  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
mario_adams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: parry sound
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 635
mario_adams street rep is low. keep going
very nice camaro always was a fan
mario_adams is offline  
Old 02-04-2007, 12:08 AM
  #14  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
brandon6976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 702
brandon6976 will become famous soon enough
thats just some guys photoshop though right ?? I know they were always similar cars but thats a little too like the camaro for me. Personally I always loved the trans am over the camaro
brandon6976 is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 10:33 PM
  #15  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
1981 Trans Am's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 706
1981 Trans Am street rep is low. keep going
Heres some pics of the actual ones they want to put in production
Attached Thumbnails what about the 2009 pontiac trans am?!!-09transam.jpg   what about the 2009 pontiac trans am?!!-concept_trans-am.jpg  
1981 Trans Am is offline  


Quick Reply: what about the 2009 pontiac trans am?!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 PM.

Page generated in 0.13679 seconds with 27 queries