MTX or Rockford?
#7
Whats wrong with you people? Care to explain *WHY*?? Not that I dont agree with some of you, but just saying 'ROCKFORD IS BETTER' is meaningless unless its backed with some sort of a reason. So far chivan is the only one whose made an attempt to back their statements. For the rest of ya, your statements are useless.
#14
Rockford for amps because they have a good heating system. but do NOT run rockford amps with mtx subs......mtx is really picky about their amps
MTX for SUBS too many reasons. ex:
mtx stitch their cones to the rubber, rf glues it to the rubber
mtx has a better "spider" ventilating system design
mtx uses the same quality they build for all subs ex: a mzs is built with the quality of a 9500
ive had all types of setups. rockford amps are good
mtx is good for other mtx setups.
~Nick
MTX for SUBS too many reasons. ex:
mtx stitch their cones to the rubber, rf glues it to the rubber
mtx has a better "spider" ventilating system design
mtx uses the same quality they build for all subs ex: a mzs is built with the quality of a 9500
ive had all types of setups. rockford amps are good
mtx is good for other mtx setups.
~Nick
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lilracer_b18
Car Audio For Sale
4
05-31-2006 01:46 AM
E.L.F's 84 Benz
Car Audio For Sale
5
10-10-2005 11:47 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)