MTX or Rockford?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 30, 2007 | 09:41 AM

ricerz

Thread Starter

~~ Hardcore Newb ~~

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 35

From: Mississauga

Rep Power: 730

MTX or Rockford?

Hi, just wanted to get some opinions on which sub and amp would you think would be better? MTX or Rockford?

Mar 30, 2007 | 10:17 AM

Coolieboi

Junior GTcars Poster

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 375

From: Sarsborough

Rep Power: 718

Coolieboi is an unknown quantity at this point

I've had both set-ups and the rockford set up was better...

Mar 30, 2007 | 11:22 AM

turbo_dreamz07

~~ Hardcore Newb ~~

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 88

From: toronto

Rep Power: 740

turbo_dreamz07 street rep is low. keep going

hard choice... the 9500 mtx sub is killer, id go with rockford amp for sure and a t2 or 9500 sub thats would bump hard

Mar 31, 2007 | 12:42 AM

SlvrTarantula

Junior GTcars Poster

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 382

From: Markham, GTA North

Rep Power: 0

SlvrTarantula has a little shameless behaviour in the past

You should at least change the title to warn people that reading this thread will cause a loss of brain cells..

Mar 31, 2007 | 12:48 PM

chivan

~~ Hardcore Newb ~~

Joined: Jan 2007

Posts: 20

From: scarborough

Rep Power: 706

rockford's equipment is harder hitting then anything in their class...

Mar 31, 2007 | 03:41 PM

Addicted2VTec

~~ Hardcore Newb ~~

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 3

From: Mississauga

Rep Power: 0

Addicted2VTec street rep is low. keep going

Rockford!!

Mar 31, 2007 | 07:47 PM

SlvrTarantula

Junior GTcars Poster

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 382

From: Markham, GTA North

Rep Power: 0

Whats wrong with you people? Care to explain *WHY*?? Not that I dont agree with some of you, but just saying 'ROCKFORD IS BETTER' is meaningless unless its backed with some sort of a reason. So far chivan is the only one whose made an attempt to back their statements. For the rest of ya, your statements are useless.

Apr 6, 2007 | 05:45 PM

ricerz

Thread Starter

~~ Hardcore Newb ~~

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 35

From: Mississauga

Rep Power: 730

MTX MZS1004 (300RMS) or Rockford P2(200RMS)

Which is better?

Apr 6, 2007 | 11:53 PM

Fresh_Prince

Skilled GTcars Poster

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 797

From: Toronto,On

Rep Power: 743

Fresh_Prince street rep is low. keep going

^out of those two i think the mtx would be better
but the rf would have more bang for the buck

however as you get to the high end side (i.e : 9500 vs T2) rockford
is better

Apr 7, 2007 | 01:09 AM

#10

Birdman

~~ Hardcore Newb ~~

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 12

From: Burlington

Rep Power: 737

Yea, it really depends on the model sub and what your looking for. More SPL or more SQ

Apr 7, 2007 | 08:13 AM

#11

NoiSeeVT

~~ Hardcore Newb ~~

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 20

Rep Power: 764

I'vs had MTX, no rockford, but they are pretty cosistant and reliable amps. They are built to be run hard.

David

Apr 8, 2007 | 06:01 PM

#12

fijiisland11

Junior GTcars Poster

Joined: Jan 2007

Posts: 265

From: Brampton

Rep Power: 711

fijiisland11 street rep is low. keep going

Rockford, but it really depends on the model and what your looking to get out of it.

Apr 9, 2007 | 07:12 PM

#13

bitlord

~~ Hardcore Newb ~~

Joined: Jan 2007

Posts: 15

From: Toronto

Rep Power: 707

rockford!

Apr 9, 2007 | 07:49 PM

#14

nicholas316

~~ Hardcore Newb ~~

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 137

From: ajax

Rep Power: 713

nicholas316 street rep is low. keep going

Rockford for amps because they have a good heating system. but do NOT run rockford amps with mtx subs......mtx is really picky about their amps

MTX for SUBS too many reasons. ex:

mtx stitch their cones to the rubber, rf glues it to the rubber
mtx has a better "spider" ventilating system design
mtx uses the same quality they build for all subs ex: a mzs is built with the quality of a 9500

ive had all types of setups. rockford amps are good
mtx is good for other mtx setups.
~Nick