I know we went over this once on the old board but...
05-12-2005, 01:44 PM
#31
GTcars Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mentor on the Lake, OH
Posts: 1,313
Rep Power: 731 
hey chris, its funny ur askin about black euros cause i was just pondering how they would look on my car as well. honestly i think they would look good, i dunno how i feel about the berger panel w/ em tho
05-12-2005, 01:56 PM
#33
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 269
Rep Power: 701
Thats the ugliest thing I have seen on a Camaro that wasn't already black. What is the point of it? Those pics of the black lights looks bad to me, becaus the two inside lights are sagging. Don't you see that? Man that sucks. IMO....
05-12-2005, 02:11 PM
#34
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Saraland AL
Posts: 15,868
Rep Power: 1052
Originally Posted by Klique
Thats the ugliest thing I have seen on a Camaro that wasn't already black. What is the point of it? Those pics of the black lights looks bad to me, becaus the two inside lights are sagging. Don't you see that? Man that sucks. IMO....
05-12-2005, 04:11 PM
#36
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Macomb, Michigan
Posts: 6,032
Rep Power: 879
Originally Posted by ProjectCamaro
That's what they did. I don't remember where but someone posted pictures from cardomain and they had to attach them so Brian could see them. The new server I'm moving the site to allow's me to do that so when I ban someone I can ban them from ever even looking at the site.
Exactly. My IP is banned from the cardomain.com domain entirely. I emailed them and complained, but they didn't respond yet.
I think those blacks look pretty good with the berger, actually! And here I thought with berger you could only do stock lights. I think that looks really good.
the fake carbon fiber ones look ok, but it's more checkered grey/black than "carbon fiber." I have the TYC "carbon fiber" ones (just tinted), that's why I tinted it. The checker with the lense (the lense bothered me the most), it all just looked cheap, the tint hides it.
Now, if someone made tail lights where the inside was TRUE carbon fiber, not only would I **** a brick but I'd buy them.
05-12-2005, 07:29 PM
#37
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: indiana
Posts: 3,781
Rep Power: 792
Originally Posted by Klique
Thats the ugliest thing I have seen on a Camaro that wasn't already black. What is the point of it? Those pics of the black lights looks bad to me, becaus the two inside lights are sagging. Don't you see that? Man that sucks. IMO....
There was a Camaro produced called a Beger Camaro and they came w/ the rear panel painted black. The ZL1's also had them but im not really sure the difference between the two..If any... (I think)
05-12-2005, 08:04 PM
#39
Originally Posted by Klique
Thats the ugliest thing I have seen on a Camaro that wasn't already black. What is the point of it?
05-12-2005, 11:15 PM
#41
GTcars Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mentor on the Lake, OH
Posts: 1,313
Rep Power: 731
Originally Posted by camaro94
I'm only half & half on the berger panel. On some Camaro's it looks good, and on others I think it looks like crap.
05-13-2005, 08:29 AM
#43
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: indiana
Posts: 3,781
Rep Power: 792
Originally Posted by meissenation
Only thing that holds me back from berger panels is that it's the new "cool thing" to do that everyone's doing... atleast on the message boards.
05-13-2005, 12:28 PM
#45
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 269
Rep Power: 701
After viewing that Berger info site, I can see the REAL Berger Camaro SS....sweet. The back panel still looks gay as hell, but looks MUCH better with the "Berger" writing on it. Plus that car has ballz to back up such a ugly panel.