GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks.

GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks. (https://www.gtcarz.com/)
-   chevy / gmc (https://www.gtcarz.com/chevy-gmc-70/)
-   -   Which thermostat (https://www.gtcarz.com/chevy-gmc-70/thermostat-102508/)

96camaro 05-22-2006 10:06 PM

Which thermostat
 
I'm considering getting a new thermostat for my 3.8, but I don't know which to get the 160 or the 180. Does anyone have any input on this subject?

NoRiceInside 05-22-2006 11:11 PM

stock.

Shodown 05-23-2006 03:35 AM

I have a 160. When I bought it, I didnt even know they made a 180. What is better? I have no idea.

Sinister95Z 05-23-2006 04:02 AM

I say go for a 160 if you are going to get the computer tuned for it. If you are not getting a tune then stay stock.

96camaro 05-24-2006 11:35 PM

Never mind then, I didn't realize that I'd need a tune for it to work. I can't justify getting a tune for a 15 dollar part. Thanks guys.

NoRiceInside 05-25-2006 02:04 AM

well it usually works the other way around. once you get a tune, the tuning company will recommend a 160 stat.

and the difference of a 160 to a 180, its just the temperature at which the stat opens. so a 160 obviously runs the engine cooler. you might be okay running a 180 without a tune, because a 160 is just too cool for stock ECU...

but really, i dont think a stat is worth anything, even with a tune.

blue89vert 05-25-2006 09:06 PM

You have a V6!:eek: I thought all along you had a z28.

96camaro 05-26-2006 07:31 PM

I actually get alot of people that think I have a Z28, but no it's just a 3.8.

97rs4life 07-01-2006 02:12 PM


Originally Posted by 96camaro
Never mind then, I didn't realize that I'd need a tune for it to work. I can't justify getting a tune for a 15 dollar part. Thanks guys.

You don't need a tune for the 160* thermo....when you get a tune they can change your fan settings to lower, but you can easily run a 160* thermo in your car without problems


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.05969 seconds with 5 queries