Chit Chat For all general off topic chat on GTcars.

2011 Trans Am

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2007, 12:43 AM
  #16  
I Love Triangle Cheese!!
 
97z2801ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Z ya around
Posts: 12,007
Rep Power: 0
97z2801ss should buy a rope to hang!97z2801ss should buy a rope to hang!97z2801ss should buy a rope to hang!97z2801ss should buy a rope to hang!97z2801ss should buy a rope to hang!97z2801ss should buy a rope to hang!97z2801ss should buy a rope to hang!
i think the new camaro is cool

that bird isnt so good
97z2801ss is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 01:15 AM
  #17  
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
2000v6cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: tucson, az
Posts: 2,083
Rep Power: 724
2000v6cam street rep is low. keep going
yea i dont like it, it looks like some guy just threw it together really quick and didnt put any thought into making it look good or anything like a trans am
2000v6cam is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 05:13 AM
  #18  
GTcars - Post God !
 
Bernotas05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 7,679
Rep Power: 864
Bernotas05 street rep is low. keep going
Yes is pontiac stoops down that low and builds something that gay Ill kill myself.
Bernotas05 is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 08:23 AM
  #19  
Average GTcars Poster
 
sman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Burton, Michigan
Posts: 694
Rep Power: 679
sman street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by Mikerock
thank god someone finally feels the same way i do.
x3
sman is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 08:52 AM
  #20  
GTcars Regular
 
rice burner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,376
Rep Power: 735
rice burner street rep is low. keep going
I say that birds front end looks like a sunfire .. the sides ...from a rx-8 and the rear ...aston martin db9. Gm needs to work on that!
rice burner is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 02:59 PM
  #21  
Junior GTcars Poster
 
tomm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Farmington, NM
Posts: 257
Rep Power: 721
tomm street rep is low. keep going
also the 3rd generation lights. they shouldve kept the original lights instead. that would have looked way better.
tomm is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 11:01 PM
  #22  
GTcars - Post God !
 
NoRiceInside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Valencia, CA
Posts: 7,173
Rep Power: 896
NoRiceInside street rep is low. keep going
i dont think either the camaro nor this new bird are going to last. they didnt try hard enough with the GTO, now theyre trying too hard with this retro. it doesnt even make sense. its a retro from 70s, and IMO those werent the best years. even the red concept from that other guy is backwards. its the 60s body style, but the hood and fender vents are the 70s. ***** retarded.

no retro, gm!!!!!!!
NoRiceInside is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 11:18 PM
  #23  
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (1)
 
Mike Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,249
Rep Power: 0
Mike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep going
I agree that the whole retro thing should die. It's just another fad that will die.
Just give it a good muscular(sp) look and people will like it.

I personally really liked the look of the 2005 GTO's with the apperance package. The whole problem with it is that they named it a GTO so people compared it to the original.
Mike Jones is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 11:39 PM
  #24  
GTcars - Post God !
 
Bernotas05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 7,679
Rep Power: 864
Bernotas05 street rep is low. keep going
Yes really you cant improve too much on the looks of the 4th gen birds and maro. If I was the brains in gm Id just us the 93-02 body style and just work off that.
Bernotas05 is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 11:49 PM
  #25  
GTcars - Post God !
 
NoRiceInside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Valencia, CA
Posts: 7,173
Rep Power: 896
NoRiceInside street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by ProjectCamaro
I personally really liked the look of the 2005 GTO's with the apperance package.
the rear fascia of the appearance package wasnt so hot, but the front was. i still badly want an 06 GTO in either spice red or cyclone gray.
NoRiceInside is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 12:45 AM
  #26  
GTcars - Post God !
 
SOMBirdV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 5,199
Rep Power: 881
SOMBirdV6 street rep is low. keep going
Id take a LS2 GTO with the appearance package in a heart beat. That T/A looks like dogshit.
SOMBirdV6 is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 12:25 PM
  #27  
Experienced GTcars Poster
 
Mikerock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, wa
Posts: 2,152
Rep Power: 763
Mikerock street rep is low. keep going
yeah i would buy a gto over anything else.

i got to drive one too.
Mikerock is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 01:56 PM
  #28  
GTcars - Post God !
 
FamousZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: indiana
Posts: 3,781
Rep Power: 795
FamousZ street rep is low. keep going
I don't like the front end on that.. But is it just me or does the back sorta have a viper look?
FamousZ is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 12:56 AM
  #29  
GTcars - Post God !
 
MeenZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: so. cali
Posts: 6,012
Rep Power: 900
MeenZ28 has a spectacular aura aboutMeenZ28 has a spectacular aura aboutMeenZ28 has a spectacular aura about
I like the 5th gen camaro. Thats all Im going to say about any of this.
MeenZ28 is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 12:51 AM
  #30  
GTcars Regular
 
MyFirstCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New york
Posts: 1,273
Rep Power: 692
MyFirstCamaro street rep is low. keep going
if you glance quickly at the back its kinda looks like a corvette ( more like what a concept corvette would look like) i dont know what to think of it yet....i dont think its as nice as the camaro
MyFirstCamaro is offline  


Quick Reply: 2011 Trans Am



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 AM.

Page generated in 0.14648 seconds with 25 queries