B6T dynoed his car
Thread Starter
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 764 
Originally Posted by B6T
And then it blew up. Last I checked, my engine was still in one piece... 
actually no, thats not how it went down, but thanks for trying.
stock my engine makes more then yours does
Experienced GTcars Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,518
From: Mississauga
Rep Power: 807
Originally Posted by Cracky
actually no, thats not how it went down, but thanks for trying.
stock my engine makes more then yours does
stock my engine makes more then yours does
I'm not going to deny that a Honda B16A is better then a Mazda B6T... Honda makes some of the best naturally aspirated piston engines in the world. Mazda makes very good turbo engines... and thats what a guy in his B16 powered CRX found out first hand. 160hp vs 132hp, it didn't matter when he was a few car lengths behind
Thread Starter
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 764
Originally Posted by SuprAdam
With a power band worse than a supra. 
HA you ****ing wish rice boi. NOTHING comes close to the ungodly gay supra power bands... Massive turbos with NO rev range at all. oh ya spooled up at 6500..redline at 7500. amazing
Originally Posted by B6T
The fact of the matter is that your engine blew up. It doesn't matter how it went down... it still blew up. Mine hasn't... yet
I'm not going to deny that a Honda B16A is better then a Mazda B6T... Honda makes some of the best naturally aspirated piston engines in the world. Mazda makes very good turbo engines... and thats what a guy in his B16 powered CRX found out first hand. 160hp vs 132hp, it didn't matter when he was a few car lengths behind
I'm not going to deny that a Honda B16A is better then a Mazda B6T... Honda makes some of the best naturally aspirated piston engines in the world. Mazda makes very good turbo engines... and thats what a guy in his B16 powered CRX found out first hand. 160hp vs 132hp, it didn't matter when he was a few car lengths behind
actually how it went down makes a difference.
Mazda makes great part spewing engines well your car is even lighter than a crx...and im sure it was pushing more then 132 hp. if you are talking about your n/a rotard..i call bs.
Last edited by Cracky; Aug 7, 2006 at 08:55 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Experienced GTcars Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,518
From: Mississauga
Rep Power: 807
No the rotard isn't fast. It's about as fast as your car.
The CRX is a similar weight. Considering my engine was stock, he had a power advantage. See, you're already making excuses... typical Honda guy...
The CRX is a similar weight. Considering my engine was stock, he had a power advantage. See, you're already making excuses... typical Honda guy...
Originally Posted by yourlordandsavior
you ****ing *********** lick my ***
Originally Posted by Black_Jew
This thread is F@#$ing gay
Junior GTcars Poster
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 275
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 780
Originally Posted by pg29
LOLLLLLL, at first i was like, thats a pretty funky torque curve. but now i see it. think HARD people.
Experienced GTcars Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,518
From: Mississauga
Rep Power: 807
Originally Posted by Cracky
HA you ****ing wish rice boi. NOTHING comes close to the ungodly gay supra power bands... Massive turbos with NO rev range at all. oh ya spooled up at 6500..redline at 7500. amazing
GTcars Regular
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,437
From: Brampton
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by B6T
Sounds like your powerband when your car was turbo... didn't you tell me yours spooled at 5500rpm? A turbo that size is pretty useless on a stock B16... no wonder you sold all your .
Originally Posted by Cracky
Garrett GT3040R turbo
Full boost @5.3k on a b16
Full boost @5.3k on a b16
