Is the dodge neon that bad of a car?
#61
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
Not that any lower class german car is known for great interiors. Love the spray balm rubber VW uses on everything.
Loose the cheapo skirts and that sho-gun front end is f&f 1 style.
Loose the cheapo skirts and that sho-gun front end is f&f 1 style.
#63
Originally Posted by YellowCavy
Wheres your timeslip buddy? My car currently runs mid-high 16s, and I beat older neons all the time...how do they run low 15s stock?
My bone stock NEON (gayest ****in name ) runs 16s and im not even that great of a driver.
And let me tell u how older neons run 15s, the 2gn R/T runs low 16s with a good driver, the older R/T is significantly lighter and they had a meazly 2.0 dohc .
Point is grab an older neon for like 3 grand, spend 3 grand on a Hahn Stage 2 turbo kit. Stick on slicks and free flowing exhaust and run low 13s ...
any car can be made fast, most of us here are driving low end cars and attempting to make them fast, neon is just another one of the cars.
And guys, chill with the Ecotec lol starting to sound like the die-hard honda fans. (yes yes i love those too chek the last vid i posted)
#64
try putting 1200hp into a vtec 4 cylinder, lol, the ecotec has accomplished that.
Yes neons can go fast too, along with any other vehicle, something a lot of import guys need to realize, because they are the ones saying neons suck, cavaliers suck. they have no respect for either vehicles, but their precious honda civic is so much better...somehow.
he bragged about beating ecotecs which run low-mid 15s with his stock neon, how does a stock older neon run high 14s, low 15s (thats what it would need to run to beat ecotecs lol)? sure i know they can get into the 15s. but the low 15s you would need mods. im stating facts to show how much he was bsing. and i said i beat stock neons with my shitty engine that runs 16s. i only have an intake so im not really modified.
Yes neons can go fast too, along with any other vehicle, something a lot of import guys need to realize, because they are the ones saying neons suck, cavaliers suck. they have no respect for either vehicles, but their precious honda civic is so much better...somehow.
he bragged about beating ecotecs which run low-mid 15s with his stock neon, how does a stock older neon run high 14s, low 15s (thats what it would need to run to beat ecotecs lol)? sure i know they can get into the 15s. but the low 15s you would need mods. im stating facts to show how much he was bsing. and i said i beat stock neons with my shitty engine that runs 16s. i only have an intake so im not really modified.
#65
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
Loose the cheapo skirts and that sho-gun front end is f&f 1 style.
Originally Posted by StealthZ
ok...high 14s
#66
Originally Posted by Munford
And what do you drive if I may ask? If that Mullet racer in your signature is yours I may actually laugh.
Yeah, high 14's... stock. Im not saying my cars the fastest thing ever, but its a hell of a lot faster then some Cavilier with a big bad ecotech.
Yeah, high 14's... stock. Im not saying my cars the fastest thing ever, but its a hell of a lot faster then some Cavilier with a big bad ecotech.
What I drive? a 1992 z28 mullet mobile. Much like this one. Other then this one has visible exhaust mods but apperance wise is stock.
Which in return means even with your sho-gun front end and shitty side skirts. The mullet machine is still a better car , more reliable and turns more heads. So kindly **** off.
#68
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
That mullet racer in my sig is worth 5-10 of your DSMs. It also runs low 13s bone stock on shitty 70s vinyl tires. So shut the **** up. To top things off it will always hold value were as your car "the definition of unreliable" wont be worth dick in 20 years. No it is not my car.. dont belive me? go have a search on what bad boys like that are going for. As for taste that you may actually laugh well thats your opinion but IMO your car is ugly and is no comparison.
What I drive? a 1992 z28 mullet mobile. Much like this one. Other then this one has visible exhaust mods but apperance wise is stock.
Which in return means even with your sho-gun front end and shitty side skirts. The mullet machine is still a better car , more reliable and turns more heads. So kindly **** off.
What I drive? a 1992 z28 mullet mobile. Much like this one. Other then this one has visible exhaust mods but apperance wise is stock.
Which in return means even with your sho-gun front end and shitty side skirts. The mullet machine is still a better car , more reliable and turns more heads. So kindly **** off.
If you dont drive the car in your signature, why the **** would I care if its worth 5-10 times more than my car and run the 1/4 faster? Its still ugly IMO.
I could put a Lamborghini or Ferrari in my signature and then tell you how much more its worth than your car, but you probably wouldnt care.
Im not saying my DSM is best car ever made, infact I hate the thing and am selling it because, like you said its "the definition of unreliable". So what ever, I think your cars ugly and a piece of , and you think my cars ugly and a piece of , the end
Last edited by Munford; 10-18-2006 at 12:40 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#69
Originally Posted by 1 sic sohc
i'm bull shiting lol you don't even have a ecotec so how do you know what it runs, you don't end of story.
#70
Originally Posted by Munford
Im a little confused, which one do you drive? The ugly piece of thats worth 5-10 times more than my car (im not arguing that, it probably is) or the Joe Dirt Z28 (which also happens to be an ugly piece of ).
If you dont drive the car in your signature, why the **** would I care if its worth 5-10 times more than my car and run the 1/4 faster? Its still ugly IMO.
I could put a Lamborghini or Ferrari in my signature and then tell you how much more its worth than your car, but you probably wouldnt care.
Im not saying my DSM is best car ever made, infact I hate the thing and am selling it because, like you said its "the definition of unreliable". So what ever, I think your cars ugly and a piece of , and you think my cars ugly and a piece of , the end
If you dont drive the car in your signature, why the **** would I care if its worth 5-10 times more than my car and run the 1/4 faster? Its still ugly IMO.
I could put a Lamborghini or Ferrari in my signature and then tell you how much more its worth than your car, but you probably wouldnt care.
Im not saying my DSM is best car ever made, infact I hate the thing and am selling it because, like you said its "the definition of unreliable". So what ever, I think your cars ugly and a piece of , and you think my cars ugly and a piece of , the end
#71
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
LEARN TO READ. Perhaps you can re read my whole post again tony. Had no idea joe dirt drove a z28. Can't tell a charger from a z28? lmao
Last edited by Munford; 10-18-2006 at 02:18 PM.
#73
Originally Posted by Munford
I was refering to the white trashyness of your car, hence the mullet comment before.
heres a little trivia
Really? sorry but you have been watching to much trailer park boys. The fact of the matter is you your father or anyone you know wouldent be able to afford one. Let alone a trailer park recipient. Good way to bash a car judgeing by a hairstyle at the time. Your dad banged your mom with that ferra facet hair doo didnt he? I mean your here arent you? Did kowalski on vanishing point have a mullet? LOL I dont think they even hit the streets till the late 70s , the t/a in my pic is from the early 70s.
1992 z28 mullet mobile at the time? yeah prolly that was right before the Kurt cocane era so yes mullets were popular. In 15 years people will laugh at your car because it was nothing more then a econo car with a cheapo body kit. If your going to insult a car do it rather then point out a hairstyle at the time. I guess since you drive a import powered car that means you have a small asian dick? probibly but thats besides the point.
Yes the camaro is SEXY.