Domestics suck
02-16-2007, 04:58 PM
#63
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 4,367
Rep Power: 785 
Originally Posted by Get-U-$um
No, you'd be much safer to go fast in your 1983 VW Rabbit. My brother had one of those, that piece of ****ing was so rotten that when the scrap yard came to get it, the guy went to lift it up with the tow truck and the whole ****ing sub frame ripped apart from the body. Was your voyager an upstanding vehicle when you had it? Or was it a million mile thrashed mom-wagon when you got it? And you base your final assumption of Mopar on this? "Everyone Knows what I think of Vettes"..No, I dont. Please enlighten me on how a 1983 Volkswagon economy throw-away car is superior. Please try.
Sub frame? Really. Hmm, seems to me the Rabbit was a uni body, and didn't even come with a front crossmember. I'd like to see you rip the subframe out, seeing as there isn't one. Every one seeems to have a story of how bad the Rabbits are, and well, yeah they rust just like every other car on the road. Hence the reason my 83 came from BC.
Hmm, Vette vs Rabbit. Well, lets just go autocrossing, and see what happens. The new C5, and C6, are finally able to do that.
As for driving a Rabbit fast, now there's a good idea. Anything over 160-170 km/h and they get light in the rear. Then the doors start to pull away from the body, unless you've caged it. Then they start to float on the front end as well, etc,etc. What I said, was I rented a NEW Dodge car, and it was so loud at 120km/h you couldn't talk in it. IIRC it had about 6000 kms on it.
02-16-2007, 10:40 PM
#64
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by rabbitman
LMAO. Please, I've owned an Omni, which still has been one of the most reliable vehicles I've ever owned. The Grand Voyager we owned wasn't too bad, other than the retarded motor setup it had, along with a ****ing terrible transmission. Dodge HAD a rep for building shitboxes for years, and are only now trying to rid themselves of that image.
Sub frame? Really. Hmm, seems to me the Rabbit was a uni body, and didn't even come with a front crossmember. I'd like to see you rip the subframe out, seeing as there isn't one. Every one seeems to have a story of how bad the Rabbits are, and well, yeah they rust just like every other car on the road. Hence the reason my 83 came from BC.
Hmm, Vette vs Rabbit. Well, lets just go autocrossing, and see what happens. The new C5, and C6, are finally able to do that.
As for driving a Rabbit fast, now there's a good idea. Anything over 160-170 km/h and they get light in the rear. Then the doors start to pull away from the body, unless you've caged it. Then they start to float on the front end as well, etc,etc. What I said, was I rented a NEW Dodge car, and it was so loud at 120km/h you couldn't talk in it. IIRC it had about 6000 kms on it.
Sub frame? Really. Hmm, seems to me the Rabbit was a uni body, and didn't even come with a front crossmember. I'd like to see you rip the subframe out, seeing as there isn't one. Every one seeems to have a story of how bad the Rabbits are, and well, yeah they rust just like every other car on the road. Hence the reason my 83 came from BC.
Hmm, Vette vs Rabbit. Well, lets just go autocrossing, and see what happens. The new C5, and C6, are finally able to do that.
As for driving a Rabbit fast, now there's a good idea. Anything over 160-170 km/h and they get light in the rear. Then the doors start to pull away from the body, unless you've caged it. Then they start to float on the front end as well, etc,etc. What I said, was I rented a NEW Dodge car, and it was so loud at 120km/h you couldn't talk in it. IIRC it had about 6000 kms on it.
"autocrossing,?
With what your rabbit??? Hop,hop,hop.......
:thumbsup:
02-16-2007, 11:10 PM
#67
Skilled GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 741
Rep Power: 0
Shows how ignorant you are.... try taking a turn in your charger....
And about the Neon problems i find that strange considering i own one and i have a couple of friends who own them too, for daily drivers they really arnt bad, yes Chrysler has problems when it comes to proper wind noise cancelation and on my car 2 of my wheel bearings had sand in them :S causing horrible roaring sound, but other than that the only complaint i have is that at 120 km/k in 5th gear the revs are almost at 3000 and the engine is a little loud.
And about the Neon problems i find that strange considering i own one and i have a couple of friends who own them too, for daily drivers they really arnt bad, yes Chrysler has problems when it comes to proper wind noise cancelation and on my car 2 of my wheel bearings had sand in them :S causing horrible roaring sound, but other than that the only complaint i have is that at 120 km/k in 5th gear the revs are almost at 3000 and the engine is a little loud.
02-16-2007, 11:15 PM
#68
GTcars Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brampton
Posts: 1,437
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by canadiancharger
Sorry,
I thought it was a civic...
By the way...
What happens after his 1/4 mile runs out...Charger R/T 1/8 Mile MPH: 77.560/ Honda S2000 1/8 Mile MPH: 80.310
Three seconds, ouch!!
I thought it was a civic...
By the way...
What happens after his 1/4 mile runs out...Charger R/T 1/8 Mile MPH: 77.560/ Honda S2000 1/8 Mile MPH: 80.310
Three seconds, ouch!!
Originally Posted by canadiancharger
Sorry that was half mile... Chief
You do realize you posted mile per hour readings and not time readings, correct? You do realize you posted that the s2000 has a higher mile per hour reading than the charger at the same point on the track, correct? And in case you don't understand what that means, the s2000 is faster than the charger at that point on the track, idiot you proved yourself wrong.
Clearly you copy and pasted data from some other source and posted it without even understanding what the data means.
How do you make a typo for info you copy and pasted?
02-16-2007, 11:21 PM
#69
Average GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 714
Faster and quicker on a drag strip are 2 different things.
I`ve seen dometics run a quick et with a not so great MPH and seen imports run a fast MPH with a slow ET
On the drag strip its about who gets there first, not who has the higher speed.
I`ve seen dometics run a quick et with a not so great MPH and seen imports run a fast MPH with a slow ET
On the drag strip its about who gets there first, not who has the higher speed.
02-16-2007, 11:27 PM
#70
GTcars Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brampton
Posts: 1,437
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by R/T kota
Faster and quicker on a drag strip are 2 different things.
I`ve seen dometics run a quick et with a not so great MPH and seen imports run a fast MPH with a slow ET
On the drag strip its about who gets there first, not who has the higher speed.
I`ve seen dometics run a quick et with a not so great MPH and seen imports run a fast MPH with a slow ET
On the drag strip its about who gets there first, not who has the higher speed.
I am well aware of this information and I am sure now he will try to regurgitate what you just said for his next defense and still fail miserably.
02-16-2007, 11:32 PM
#71
Average GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 714
Originally Posted by SuprAdam
That has nothing to do with what HE posted.
I am well aware of this information and I am sure now he will try to regurgitate what you just said for his next defense and still fail miserably.
I am well aware of this information and I am sure now he will try to regurgitate what you just said for his next defense and still fail miserably.
02-17-2007, 01:13 AM
#72
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Young gun
Shows how ignorant you are.... try taking a turn in your charger....
And about the Neon problems i find that strange considering i own one and i have a couple of friends who own them too, for daily drivers they really arnt bad, yes Chrysler has problems when it comes to proper wind noise cancelation and on my car 2 of my wheel bearings had sand in them :S causing horrible roaring sound, but other than that the only complaint i have is that at 120 km/k in 5th gear the revs are almost at 3000 and the engine is a little loud.
And about the Neon problems i find that strange considering i own one and i have a couple of friends who own them too, for daily drivers they really arnt bad, yes Chrysler has problems when it comes to proper wind noise cancelation and on my car 2 of my wheel bearings had sand in them :S causing horrible roaring sound, but other than that the only complaint i have is that at 120 km/k in 5th gear the revs are almost at 3000 and the engine is a little loud.
That tells me everything I needed to know...
Your a
Originally Posted by SuprAdam
That has nothing to do with what HE posted.
I am well aware of this information and I am sure now he will try to regurgitate what you just said for his next defense and still fail miserably.
I am well aware of this information and I am sure now he will try to regurgitate what you just said for his next defense and still fail miserably.
Show me a pick of your piece of !!!!!
Last edited by canadiancharger; 02-17-2007 at 01:15 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
02-17-2007, 02:22 AM
#73
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 711
Originally Posted by R/T kota
02-17-2007, 07:51 AM
#74
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 4,367
Rep Power: 785
Originally Posted by canadiancharger
Holly **** your an idiot!!!!
"autocrossing,?
With what your rabbit??? Hop,hop,hop....... :thumbsup:
"autocrossing,?
With what your rabbit??? Hop,hop,hop.......
:thumbsup:
02-17-2007, 10:44 AM
#75
Skilled GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 741
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by canadiancharger
You own a "Neon"?
That tells me everything I needed to know...
Your a
That tells me everything I needed to know...
Your a
ummm yea... y dont u come out to a meet, ill show u my slow neon, I hope ur charger has 700 hp by then cause ull need it