Get a free head-set for your phone, No Catch.
#1
Get a free head-set for your phone, No Catch.
www.freeheadset.org
They have almost every phone imaginable..you just have to pay shipping (like 3$).
Both my buddies got theirs in 2 weeks, and i just ordered one for my T720 5 mins ago. :thumbsup
They have almost every phone imaginable..you just have to pay shipping (like 3$).
Both my buddies got theirs in 2 weeks, and i just ordered one for my T720 5 mins ago. :thumbsup
#6
Originally Posted by goneinsixtyseconds
free? nothing's free in the world, there's ALWAYS a catch
Brain tumor activity in his brain grew 400% on the side of the head he held his phone on.
Since most of us have been using the ing things, they want to promote these to combat "unsafe driving", but it's all a ing tactic to avoid admitting that they infact do cause soft tissue damage.
Which is comfusing..because if we wear it around our belts, and have a headset to our ears, then wont our livers take just as much damage as our brains would?
I guess it's less noticable this way.
#7
Here you go..i highlighted some of the more important stuff.
Ive wanted to get rid of my cell phone for a long time now, and some people i know constantly yap on the POS, CONSTANTLY..and these thing emit such a low power level too..
When my contract is up in October, im not renewing it.
Long term cell-phone use linked to rare brain tumor
KNIGHT RIDDER NEWSPAPERS 14 October 2004
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - People who have used cell phones for at least 10 years may have an increased risk of developing a rare brain tumor, according to a study published yesterday in the international journal Epidemiology.
A team of researchers at Institute of Environmental Medicine at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, found almost a fourfold increase of the tumors - known as acoustic neuromas - on the side of the head where the phone was most often held.
The work was done as part of the World Health Organization's cell-phone research agenda, and experts in the field said it must be taken seriously and is likely to rekindle consumer worries about the risks of using the phones.
"The Karolinska researchers are respected around the world and this study will force health agencies to take a fresh look at mobile phone risks," said Louis Slesin, publisher of Microwave News, who has been covering the industry since its early days. "This study should put an end to the industry's call to stop mobile phone health research."
At least one past study conducted for the cell-phone industry had also suggested a link between the phones and this type of tumor. But cell-phone industry officials yesterday said the Swedish research is just one study and that no conclusions can be drawn from it.
The study, involving 150 acoustic neuroma patients and 600 healthy people, is one of at least six studies that have investigated possible links between cell-phone use and acoustic neuromas. Most of those studies had fewer long-term users than the Karolinska study.
Acoustic neuromas are slow-growing non-cancerous tumors that develop on a nerve linking the brain and the inner ear. The most common first symptom is hearing loss, but as the tumor grows it can push against brain tissue. If not treated, it can be life-threatening. Such tumors are very rare, occurring in about one person per 100,000 in the general population.
"It's a natural place to look (for a problem) because this is the area of the head that is exposed," said Anders Ahlbom, director of the Institute of Environmental Medicine at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. When a cell phone is in use, it emits radio-frequency radiation, some of which is absorbed in areas of the head closest to the handset.
To conduct the three-year study, the Karolinska researchers interviewed people who had developed the tumors - asking about their cell-phone use, how many different phones they had used, the make and model, duration of calls, whether they used a hands-free set and on which side of the head they held the phone.
Researchers said they found no association between the tumors and the amount of use measured in hours or cumulative number of calls, but rather on the length of time those in the study had been regular users of cell phones. Regular use was defined as an average of at least once a week during six months or more.
Ahlbom said in a phone interview that the data are strong and statistically significant, but the findings must be confirmed by follow-up studies. He said the mechanism by which cell-phone radiation might cause tumors remains unknown.
Dr. David Savitz, chairman of the department of epidemiology at the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, said the new findings "suggest something a little bit troublesome."
"It is significant in the sense that it is the first well-designed study to show this," Savitz said. "There was an earlier study that came out but it didn't have as many people with long-term use."
Dr. Henry Lai, research professor of bioengineering at the University of Washington in Seattle, also said the Karolinska study is not the first to show a link between cell phones and acoustic neuromas.
"Another Swedish researcher, Dr. (Lennart) Hardell found similar results in 2002," Lai said, "so this is, in effect, a replication. I think the data are quite solid and are cause for concern on longterm cell-phone use."
At least three federal agencies, the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Communications Commission and the Environmental Protection Agency, have some role in regulating radio frequency radiation, but only recently has the federal government committed funds to studying the cell-phone issue, and those studies are not expected to be completed for five to seven years.
Dr. George Carlo, an epidemiologist then working at George Washington University School of Medicine, coordinated the industry-supported project that began in the mid-1990s. When the money ran out in 2000, Carlo said more research was needed because one study showed the risk of acoustic neuroma was 50 percent higher in people who used cell phones for six years or more, and that there appeared to be a correlation between brain tumors on the right side of the head and the use of the phones on that side.
KNIGHT RIDDER NEWSPAPERS 14 October 2004
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - People who have used cell phones for at least 10 years may have an increased risk of developing a rare brain tumor, according to a study published yesterday in the international journal Epidemiology.
A team of researchers at Institute of Environmental Medicine at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, found almost a fourfold increase of the tumors - known as acoustic neuromas - on the side of the head where the phone was most often held.
The work was done as part of the World Health Organization's cell-phone research agenda, and experts in the field said it must be taken seriously and is likely to rekindle consumer worries about the risks of using the phones.
"The Karolinska researchers are respected around the world and this study will force health agencies to take a fresh look at mobile phone risks," said Louis Slesin, publisher of Microwave News, who has been covering the industry since its early days. "This study should put an end to the industry's call to stop mobile phone health research."
At least one past study conducted for the cell-phone industry had also suggested a link between the phones and this type of tumor. But cell-phone industry officials yesterday said the Swedish research is just one study and that no conclusions can be drawn from it.
The study, involving 150 acoustic neuroma patients and 600 healthy people, is one of at least six studies that have investigated possible links between cell-phone use and acoustic neuromas. Most of those studies had fewer long-term users than the Karolinska study.
Acoustic neuromas are slow-growing non-cancerous tumors that develop on a nerve linking the brain and the inner ear. The most common first symptom is hearing loss, but as the tumor grows it can push against brain tissue. If not treated, it can be life-threatening. Such tumors are very rare, occurring in about one person per 100,000 in the general population.
"It's a natural place to look (for a problem) because this is the area of the head that is exposed," said Anders Ahlbom, director of the Institute of Environmental Medicine at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. When a cell phone is in use, it emits radio-frequency radiation, some of which is absorbed in areas of the head closest to the handset.
To conduct the three-year study, the Karolinska researchers interviewed people who had developed the tumors - asking about their cell-phone use, how many different phones they had used, the make and model, duration of calls, whether they used a hands-free set and on which side of the head they held the phone.
Researchers said they found no association between the tumors and the amount of use measured in hours or cumulative number of calls, but rather on the length of time those in the study had been regular users of cell phones. Regular use was defined as an average of at least once a week during six months or more.
Ahlbom said in a phone interview that the data are strong and statistically significant, but the findings must be confirmed by follow-up studies. He said the mechanism by which cell-phone radiation might cause tumors remains unknown.
Dr. David Savitz, chairman of the department of epidemiology at the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, said the new findings "suggest something a little bit troublesome."
"It is significant in the sense that it is the first well-designed study to show this," Savitz said. "There was an earlier study that came out but it didn't have as many people with long-term use."
Dr. Henry Lai, research professor of bioengineering at the University of Washington in Seattle, also said the Karolinska study is not the first to show a link between cell phones and acoustic neuromas.
"Another Swedish researcher, Dr. (Lennart) Hardell found similar results in 2002," Lai said, "so this is, in effect, a replication. I think the data are quite solid and are cause for concern on longterm cell-phone use."
At least three federal agencies, the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Communications Commission and the Environmental Protection Agency, have some role in regulating radio frequency radiation, but only recently has the federal government committed funds to studying the cell-phone issue, and those studies are not expected to be completed for five to seven years.
Dr. George Carlo, an epidemiologist then working at George Washington University School of Medicine, coordinated the industry-supported project that began in the mid-1990s. When the money ran out in 2000, Carlo said more research was needed because one study showed the risk of acoustic neuroma was 50 percent higher in people who used cell phones for six years or more, and that there appeared to be a correlation between brain tumors on the right side of the head and the use of the phones on that side.
When my contract is up in October, im not renewing it.
#9
Originally Posted by goneinsixtyseconds
woah, thanks zlatko i was just joking around, wasn't expecting you'd post a documentary of the explaination .. hehe ... but thanks anyways
Nah..it's cool , im getting rid of my cell phone as soon as my contract is up, the thing also feels like a leash.
#11
Experienced GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: cruizin on a street near you
Posts: 2,087
Rep Power: 745
Originally Posted by Zlatko
Bastard..
Nah..it's cool , im getting rid of my cell phone as soon as my contract is up, the thing also feels like a leash.
Nah..it's cool , im getting rid of my cell phone as soon as my contract is up, the thing also feels like a leash.
a leash?.....your gf call you on it?....how does your hand talk to you?
#12
Originally Posted by munch
a leash?.....your gf call you on it?....how does your hand talk to you?
Dont be jealous cause she likes me more than you!
Also, it seems no matter how many times i change my number, your mom always calls me..tell her the baby aint mine..i was in cuba when she got pregrnant..it could have been the mailman...the fedex guy..the plumber..the neighbour across the street...hell even those little boys that sell cookies..
But it aint mine.
#13
Experienced GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: cruizin on a street near you
Posts: 2,087
Rep Power: 745
Originally Posted by Zlatko
It uses it's own cell phone, which is in my right hand pocket. Mine is on the left.
Dont be jealous cause she likes me more than you!
Also, it seems no matter how many times i change my number, your mom always calls me..tell her the baby aint mine..i was in cuba when she got pregrnant..it could have been the mailman...the fedex guy..the plumber..the neighbour across the street...hell even those little boys that sell cookies..
But it aint mine.
Dont be jealous cause she likes me more than you!
Also, it seems no matter how many times i change my number, your mom always calls me..tell her the baby aint mine..i was in cuba when she got pregrnant..it could have been the mailman...the fedex guy..the plumber..the neighbour across the street...hell even those little boys that sell cookies..
But it aint mine.
im not jealous i got my own hands that love me
well from the pictures ive seen she was with you in cuba so we will be needing you for a pertinity test...we well scedual something on maury povich