Mustang owner claims Mustang Hotter than any Ferrari
Basically, he says:
Mustangs are built stronger, better, go faster and have better looks than any Ferrari. This is not the first time ive heard mustang owners say this, so please discuss. [13:14] MUSTANG OWNER: my car is better than a Ferrari anyway [13:14] MUSTANG OWNER: looks better too [13:15] MUSTANG OWNER: faster [13:22] MUSTANG OWNER: better [13:22] MUSTANG OWNER: stronger [13:22] MUSTANG OWNER: faster [13:29] MUSTANG OWNER: don't forget about that Mustang torque that no other car makes |
Ford Rocks
I like mustangs but don't consider them SUPERCAR! :supergay:
|
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
Basically, he says:
Mustangs are built stronger, better, go faster and have better looks than any Ferrari. This is not the first time ive heard mustang owners say this, so please discuss. what a :loser: |
looks like a made up conversaton to me. :supergay:
|
Originally Posted by mike_hall_z24
looks like a made up conversaton to me. :supergay:
I edited his name out because he didnt want to become famous for it. :) Anyways, glad i fooled everyone with my made up conversation, you got me :appl: :knock_tee |
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
ya, i took the time to make up a conversation, just so some retarded newb could point it out :retard:
I edited his name out because he didnt want to become famous for it. :) Anyways, glad i fooled everyone with my made up conversation, you got me :appl: :knock_tee |
I love mustangs to and what year is it but the only mustang i think that could beat a ferrari is one that is strictly meant for drag with NOS
ither then that a Enzo ferrari would tear the shiot out of the mustangs |
There's nothing wrong with Mustangs, it's their drivers saying stupid like my car is better/faster/stronger than a Ferrari. Here's youre sign... :smilie_fi
|
This thread = :supergay:
|
Originally Posted by B6T
This thread = :supergay:
Mustang owners. :loser: |
Originally Posted by blackout_89t
agreed.
Mustang owners. :loser: Not all Mustang owners are created equal. But I also think the same about some Sport Compact owners. There are always a few bad apples who spoil the bunch. |
Originally Posted by B6T
This thread = :supergay:
|
Originally Posted by fastestcivic
agree and no point b/c we all no the truth
TEH CIVIC CANT LOSE ? :D |
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
Basically, he says:
Mustangs are built stronger, better, go faster and have better looks than any Ferrari. This is not the first time ive heard mustang owners say this, so please discuss. Whoever this guy is...he needs to have his head examined. There is now way, shape or form on the face of the ENTIRE universe that any foken POS Rustang can ever stand next to a Ferrari in all categories....except for drag racing. Sigh..what a TOOL :loser: |
umm that mustang owner huffs teh glu :retard:
|
i think this will change ur mind. ( not saying mustangs are better...but i think i would take this over a ferrari. go check out uniqueperformance.com look at the shelby gt500 super snake
here is the link http://uniqueperformance.com/supersnakeGT500E.aspx |
lol
......Mustang vs. Ferrari.....
"What's the retail on one of those?" "More than you can afford pal, FERRARI!" (VRoooooomm)..."Smoke Him" hehe F&F Supra vs. Ferrari..and that ferrari guy got pumped. It really comes down to the driver. But Mustangs hotter than ANY Ferrari........ :stroke: I don't hate Mustangs, but that guy has got some problems. (btw..i own a 1.5l civic now :smilie_au (damn hehe) -Darren |
Yeah sure the supra beat the ferrari. But its not just about the 1/4 mile. Ferrari's are probably a crazy experience to drive or ride in.
If I got dusted by some 10 second 80s gutted civic hatch would i care? Does that make me want to get civic? hell no. |
ferrari's are fast yeah but not the fastest. i mean if your talking 1/4 mile...hell there are alot of street cars in GTA that would put ferrari's to shame as far as speed....but damn its a ferrari. thats why people buy them...its for the speed, the style, the suspension, the breaks, the looks, its for personal status. you cant compare a mustang to a ferrari. and i have a mustang. damn right mustangs are sweet looking....they symbolize muscle, power, torque, and have a very long history behind them, and yes i have seen some mustangs that look better then some ferrari's but id still take a ferrari because its a ferrari (except for that super snake). HOW COME EVERYONE ALWAYS WANTS TO BEAT A FERRARI????? same reason everyone always wants to beat the first place team
|
i own a super clean 93 mustang, if anyone wants to trade their ferrari for my car, im willing :D
|
we talking about the saleen S7 here or something? or maybe he shelby versions? cause then honestly i can see how someone would say that..
if hes talking some 1980s style shitbox then :hah: |
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
Basically, he says:
Mustangs are built stronger, better, go faster and have better looks than any Ferrari. This is not the first time ive heard mustang owners say this, so please discuss. |
Originally Posted by biggy
we talking about the saleen S7 here or something? or maybe he shelby versions? cause then honestly i can see how someone would say that..
if hes talking some 1980s style shitbox then :hah: 1 guy owns a 99 the other guy has a 95 but the owner at the time made reference to a CLEAN FOX BODY over any Ferrari. the owner of the 95 was specifically talking about his car. |
wow, if they believe that its kinda funny
those new shelbys tho, they look really nice , still i dunno if its "ferrari" caliber when it comes to style |
Originally Posted by blackout_89t
agreed.
Mustang owners. :loser: Your a loser and not just because of the endless pointless points you make. Hope your happy with topping out your supra at 500hp and a 1/4 time of 15.4 dyno queens what??? I still dont understand supra owners.....wanna race....from a roll....LOL :loser: Zexhuffer |
Originally Posted by Zexhuffer
Your a loser and not just because of the endless pointless points you make.
Hope your happy with topping out your supra at 500hp and a 1/4 time of 15.4 dyno queens what??? I still dont understand supra owners.....wanna race....from a roll....LOL :loser: Zexhuffer |
A supra is just over priced rice!!!!!
But a Ferrari is just that a Ferrari. Mustangs are just a dime a dozen. So what if you can put some decent cash in a Stang to beat a Ferrari in the 1/4 mile at the end of the day its still a MUSTANG!!! This was brought to you from a guy who owns 2 Stangs. I just don't get some people. sheesh!!! |
funny thing is, your 65 is mint...
but if you were a regular mustang guy, you wouldnt trade it for an enzo :retard: http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/enzo-1.jpg |
honestly those enzos are the ugliest ferraris evar.
|
Originally Posted by Supramanz
honestly those enzos are the ugliest ferraris evar.
sorry, Ferrari is a Ferrari.. there are some hot stangs out there.. but when talking in regards to Fox bodies and sn95s, im sorry. :D |
^hey the guy talking about his sn95 95 stang wasnt "Last50h_302" or whatever is it?? :laugh:
-Jay |
Originally Posted by Z28 MeTaL HeAd
^hey the guy talking about his sn95 95 stang wasnt "Last50h_302" or whatever is it?? :laugh:
-Jay :thumbsup maybe, im not supposed to say :D |
:laugh: :laugh:
:ttiwwop: -Jay |
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
let me guess, you would take a 1989 GT mustang over that :loser: :retard:
sorry, Ferrari is a Ferrari.. there are some hot stangs out there.. but when talking in regards to Fox bodies and sn95s, im sorry. :D |
Originally Posted by Stang6589
A supra is just over priced rice!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
funny thing is, your 65 is mint...
but if you were a regular mustang guy, you wouldnt trade it for an enzo :retard: http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/enzo-1.jpg The 65 I would not trade. |
Originally Posted by B6T
Yeah I can see how you would say that if all you knew about was carbs and live axles.
|
My point is that if you actually knew what you were talking about, you wouldn't have said that a Supra is over priced, or rice. I just don't see how you can say that a car which can make well over 750hp with 3.0L of displacement and stock internals is "over priced rice". So what if they have shitty traction, I guess that's because the suspension is designed for more then just straight lines. That car was pretty impressive and had lots of technology considering it came out in the early 90's. But I guess since you can't buy one for $3000 like you can with a 5.0L, I guess it is overpriced.
If you want to see a riced out Supra, go to the JRP meet tomorrow. |
$30 K for a 93 supra seems still steap. + more for modding to make the 750 RWHP on stock internals....
nice cars, pricey... and id still take a Ferrari despite the 10 second supra in F&F beating one. :retard: |
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
$30 K for a 93 supra seems still steap. + more for modding to make the 750 RWHP on stock internals....
nice cars, pricey... and id still take a Ferrari despite the 10 second supra in F&F beating one. :retard: |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands