^hey the guy talking about his sn95 95 stang wasnt "Last50h_302" or whatever is it?? :laugh:

-Jay

:thumbsup maybe, im not supposed to say :D

:laugh: :laugh:
:ttiwwop:

-Jay

what me? are you nuts? I would take that over any mustang. Im saying generally speaking thats the ugliest ferrari ever. read my other post. Just for thinking that you get the pink flag of gayness :supergay:

Yeah I can see how you would say that if all you knew about was carbs and live axles.

I would trade my 89 Fox body anyday for a Ferrari.
The 65 I would not trade.

Yes I do know carbs and I do know about live axles, but I also know about turbo's and Fuel Injection. So what is your point?

My point is that if you actually knew what you were talking about, you wouldn't have said that a Supra is over priced, or rice. I just don't see how you can say that a car which can make well over 750hp with 3.0L of displacement and stock internals is "over priced rice". So what if they have shitty traction, I guess that's because the suspension is designed for more then just straight lines. That car was pretty impressive and had lots of technology considering it came out in the early 90's. But I guess since you can't buy one for $3000 like you can with a 5.0L, I guess it is overpriced.

If you want to see a riced out Supra, go to the JRP meet tomorrow.

$30 K for a 93 supra seems still steap. + more for modding to make the 750 RWHP on stock internals....

nice cars, pricey...


and id still take a Ferrari despite the 10 second supra in F&F beating one. :retard:

Well said 2Tone. Well said.

wow regular mustang guys must be pretty smart then

they wouldnt trade one worst handling, worst braking, you can argue that most stangs especially 80s,90s mustangs are possibly the ugliest things on the road, shitty interiors, seats thats are like couches, did i mention handles like a pig? Who the hell cares how fast it is.

Now tune a ferrari, and see how many mustangs can keep up. Well how many mustangs period can anyway when lets say an enzo is stock? 0-100mph in 6sec flat.

so the enzo motor is a detuned f1 motor, 3L all motor. The track version makes almost 1000hp. out of 3L. not 5 or 4.6 or whatever. They have the most advanced techonology in them, best traction controls, they weigh nothing. On top they rev to 18-19 thousand rpm.

hahaha, lets see a pig like a mustang rev only half... hahaha... that motors probably gonna shake all its bolts off the engine and the car.

Theres about $500,000 difference in the price tag too.So I hope to hell its better in all area's. This is like trying to compare apples to banana's.

I have only test drove a handful of Rustangs in my day and although they are modestly impressive in a straight line, I doubt very highly they could do much in corners and they do ride like tanks at the best of times so which is better?

Do the ing math. :la:

so then why do these mustang bananas try to say their stangs are better?

mustangs, a poor mans vette :appl: