ok now its just disrespectful
#17
how in the hell are you looking at it as just me? i have been talking this whole time representing all the regular users on this board because they are all as disadvantaged as me.
#22
Disadvantaged from one thread? You talk like we screw with the threads (locking, deleating, moving, editing) on a moments notice without warning and whenever we feel like everysingle day. As far as i know thats not the case. I rarely modify threads. I post in lock ones for the hell of it sometimes sure - forgive me if thats blatenly abusing my "powers".
#26
and not everyone agrees that a thread should be locked. That happens many instances. So who is in the right? the person that locked it originally? Maybe they were wrong for locking it in the first place. Maybe they weren't. And if someone unlocks it because they don't agree, who's to say they are wrong or right.
And if given the option, if a thread is locked, and I still have something to say about it, I will. And I won't bother to unlock a thread that someone else has locked 90% of the time, because they will just go in and lock it back up, whether they are in the right or the wrong. So take it up with whoever locked it, because that's who is 'officially' cutting the rest of the members off.
It's not really losing its effectiveness by locking a thread, because now a smaller number of people can actually even do anything in that thread, and hence that can stop most arguments, wars, or whatever was going on. And if the thread is that bad, delete it. That will stop anyone from talking in there.
and the thread you are complaining about was actually someone doing some good, and working to make the site look better, by removing stuff that did nothing but cause issues, and were even big enough to apologize for it. Nothing wrong with that.
there were supermods in the old version of the pc forum, too, and the same behaviors were done there, but I don't recall seeing all this b*tching about it there.
representing all the regular uses? Do you know that for a fact? Or have you been self-appointed to that representational status?
how have we lost a lot of users? No more then we ever have from the beginning.
must not ever feel like working a day in your life. All companies do have managers that abuse their powers, no matter what.
And if given the option, if a thread is locked, and I still have something to say about it, I will. And I won't bother to unlock a thread that someone else has locked 90% of the time, because they will just go in and lock it back up, whether they are in the right or the wrong. So take it up with whoever locked it, because that's who is 'officially' cutting the rest of the members off.
It's not really losing its effectiveness by locking a thread, because now a smaller number of people can actually even do anything in that thread, and hence that can stop most arguments, wars, or whatever was going on. And if the thread is that bad, delete it. That will stop anyone from talking in there.
and the thread you are complaining about was actually someone doing some good, and working to make the site look better, by removing stuff that did nothing but cause issues, and were even big enough to apologize for it. Nothing wrong with that.
there were supermods in the old version of the pc forum, too, and the same behaviors were done there, but I don't recall seeing all this b*tching about it there.
representing all the regular uses? Do you know that for a fact? Or have you been self-appointed to that representational status?
how have we lost a lot of users? No more then we ever have from the beginning.
i wouldnt work at a company where managers abuse their powers,
#28
Everyone on this board has tried crying about this **** before. It doesn't work, nobody cares, the end.
NoRice, I agree with you - but just learn to deal with the fact that nobody really gives a ****, and things will be alright.
NoRice, I agree with you - but just learn to deal with the fact that nobody really gives a ****, and things will be alright.