Turbo Dodge Update, I finally found a fast one...
04-08-2005, 08:14 PM
#46
The GTi is recognized as the first sport compact that went good and was meant to. The Omni GLH (goes like hell) Turbo 2.2L was almost called the coyote (rabbit killer) they even came out with the Omni GLHS (goes like hell some more) that ran high 14s in the 80s. B16? where? Your trying (pretty hard too..young and ing stupid) to say that, for example, a C5 Vette wrote the book on musclecars when a well tuned 1969 1/2 440 sixpak dodge superbee will kick its *** from now till next wednesday...stock. It can be on like donkey kong. 
Last edited by Get-U-$um; 04-08-2005 at 08:18 PM.
04-08-2005, 09:19 PM
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Get-U-$um
The GTi is recognized as the first sport compact that went good and was meant to. The Omni GLH (goes like hell) Turbo 2.2L was almost called the coyote (rabbit killer) they even came out with the Omni GLHS (goes like hell some more) that ran high 14s in the 80s. B16? where? Your trying (pretty hard too..young and ing stupid) to say that, for example, a C5 Vette wrote the book on musclecars when a well tuned 1969 1/2 440 sixpak dodge superbee will kick its *** from now till next wednesday...stock. It can be on like donkey kong.
Only if the 440 has the 6 pack. you take the same car without the six pack, the car is a sled.
04-09-2005, 04:18 AM
#48
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 704 
"Todd, you are the exact same as every one else. You come on here and talk all kinds of about everyone else."
no actually im not talking about anyone, just defending some friends, Beaner so ur car isnt done yet? And im not one here telling everyone to off, Im not calling anyone out am I? Yes my car is apart, sorry i dont drive it in the snow, its still too cold out, my car isnt out yet so i dont talk any smack, and im not cutting everyone up am I?
besides I still have to apply a few more coats of varnish on my car, geese these uv rays are killer on my oak finish....LOL
no actually im not talking about anyone, just defending some friends, Beaner so ur car isnt done yet? And im not one here telling everyone to off, Im not calling anyone out am I? Yes my car is apart, sorry i dont drive it in the snow, its still too cold out, my car isnt out yet so i dont talk any smack, and im not cutting everyone up am I?
besides I still have to apply a few more coats of varnish on my car, geese these uv rays are killer on my oak finish....LOL
04-09-2005, 10:20 AM
#49
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Aurora
Posts: 289
Rep Power: 708
Bahahaha, good times.
04-09-2005, 02:45 PM
#50
Experienced GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 1,518
Rep Power: 734
Originally Posted by Get-U-$um
The GTi is recognized as the first sport compact that went good and was meant to. The Omni GLH (goes like hell) Turbo 2.2L was almost called the coyote (rabbit killer) they even came out with the Omni GLHS (goes like hell some more) that ran high 14s in the 80s. B16? where? Your trying (pretty hard too..young and ing stupid) to say that, for example, a C5 Vette wrote the book on musclecars when a well tuned 1969 1/2 440 sixpak dodge superbee will kick its *** from now till next wednesday...stock. It can be on like donkey kong.
04-09-2005, 04:11 PM
#51
Beaner, The One And Only
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bramladesh
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 707
Originally Posted by B6T
Didn't the GLHS have something like 150hp, even with the turbo? Yeah I bet it would run 12's, let alone 14's
04-09-2005, 04:13 PM
#52
Beaner, The One And Only
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bramladesh
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 707
Originally Posted by TOILETDUCK
Beaner so ur car isnt done yet?
04-09-2005, 04:46 PM
#53
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 700
Can anyone say .. KABOOOOMM... thats what happends when a tubro dodge gets tuned.. dodge is known for big displacment .. not lil engines with tubros.. they should have just left it to hondas to fill that task.. 
04-09-2005, 04:52 PM
#54
Beaner, The One And Only
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bramladesh
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 707
Originally Posted by Dazed_and_Confused
Can anyone say .. KABOOOOMM... thats what happends when a tubro dodge gets tuned.. dodge is known for big displacment .. not lil engines with tubros.. they should have just left it to hondas to fill that task..
04-09-2005, 06:55 PM
#55
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 705
Originally Posted by 1cam8valves
No, 175HP/175TRQ, it ran 14's all day in 1986.
hate to mag race ... but i dunno about your numbers.... ive got a july 1986 issue of Road & Track showing the specs of the Omni GLH and GLH Turbo. It shows the GLH doing 9.4 to 60mph and 17.2 in the 1/4. The GLH Turbo shows up as 8.2 to 60mph and 16.2 in the 1/4. Both cars are 85 model year.
The Shelby GLH S went 6.7 to 60mph and 15.3 in the 1/4 according to the stats listed.
I understand that magazine times are not always 100% accurate, but the do give you an approximation. All the times stated are quite a bit off from 14's.
04-09-2005, 07:06 PM
#56
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 704
Originally Posted by 1cam8valves
No, 175HP/175TRQ, it ran 14's all day in 1986.
haha yeah maybe 14.99@8--- mph. so i guess 14s
04-09-2005, 08:43 PM
#57
Beaner, The One And Only
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bramladesh
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 707
Originally Posted by RickyDangerous
hate to mag race ... but i dunno about your numbers.... ive got a july 1986 issue of Road & Track showing the specs of the Omni GLH and GLH Turbo. It shows the GLH doing 9.4 to 60mph and 17.2 in the 1/4. The GLH Turbo shows up as 8.2 to 60mph and 16.2 in the 1/4. Both cars are 85 model year.
The Shelby GLH S went 6.7 to 60mph and 15.3 in the 1/4 according to the stats listed.
I understand that magazine times are not always 100% accurate, but the do give you an approximation. All the times stated are quite a bit off from 14's.
The Shelby GLH S went 6.7 to 60mph and 15.3 in the 1/4 according to the stats listed.
I understand that magazine times are not always 100% accurate, but the do give you an approximation. All the times stated are quite a bit off from 14's.
http://www.aros-max.co.uk/holleystuf...les/87glhs.pdf
Hmm, 14.9@*95MPH*, with better traction 14.7 is easily achieved with that MPH, I can dig up A LOT more stats but I figure this is enough. :thumbsup:
04-09-2005, 08:44 PM
#58
Beaner, The One And Only
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bramladesh
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 707
Originally Posted by biggy
haha yeah maybe 14.99@8--- mph. so i guess 14s
Read post #57.
04-09-2005, 09:01 PM
#59
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 705
Originally Posted by 1cam8valves
Car & Driver, 87' Shelby Charger GLH-S (Heavier than Omni)
http://www.aros-max.co.uk/holleystuf...les/87glhs.pdf
Hmm, 14.9@*95MPH*, with better traction 14.7 is easily achieved with that MPH, I can dig up A LOT more stats but I figure this is enough. :thumbsup:
http://www.aros-max.co.uk/holleystuf...les/87glhs.pdf
Hmm, 14.9@*95MPH*, with better traction 14.7 is easily achieved with that MPH, I can dig up A LOT more stats but I figure this is enough. :thumbsup:
04-09-2005, 10:29 PM
#60
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 704
Originally Posted by 1cam8valves
No, 95MPH Read post #57.
Read post #57.95 mph shows some decent potential i have to say, but as the time goes down that mph will also, so i doubt that thing could be driven much better in stock form.