dodge viper, avenger, charger r/t, dakota, daytona, durango, magnum

Pics : charger r/t

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 12:33 PM
  #1  
jdmgsr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 208
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 776
jdmgsr street rep is low. keep going
Pics : charger r/t


americans, gettin worse n worse

Last edited by jdmgsr; Feb 22, 2005 at 07:43 PM.
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 01:00 PM
  #2  
R/T kota's Avatar
Average GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 530
From: Hamilton
Rep Power: 782
R/T kota street rep is low. keep going
Its got too many doors
The charger was never a 4 door
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 01:08 PM
  #3  
Zlatko's Avatar
Average GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 0
Zlatko has a little shameless behaviour in the past
This car is an insult to the true charger's fans..and is an embarassment to Dodge.
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 01:12 PM
  #4  
Dimitri's Avatar
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 0
Dimitri is an unknown quantity at this point
Dodge Magnum without the hatch!
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #5  
SequenceGarage's Avatar
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 773
SequenceGarage street rep is low. keep going
ew four doors eweweweewe
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 03:31 PM
  #7  
BOOSTED_ITR's Avatar
GTcars Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,062
From: Oak/Sauga
Rep Power: 794
BOOSTED_ITR street rep is low. keep going
it looks.... :supergay:
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 04:05 PM
  #8  
shuller1458's Avatar
Average GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 570
Rep Power: 783
shuller1458 street rep is low. keep going
Looks like , but if those numbers are true it is very impressive in perfomance vise. 220 mph, that's Ferrari and Maclaren f1 territory. and 3.7 seconds, not bad. Probably weights like two tonns.
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #9  
Chigga's Avatar
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 185
From: M.
Rep Power: 775
Chigga street rep is low. keep going
um........ SuperCars.net is always full of idiots.

220mph in a Charger? who's going to buy the Vipers?
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #10  
NOTORIOUS VR's Avatar
user
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,153
From: T.O.
Rep Power: 796
NOTORIOUS VR will become famous soon enough
^^^ haha.. it's so true... 220 mph... ya ok... where's the aerodynamics to keep it on the ground? never mind that that thing looks like it needs more power to get there since it's shaped like a box to begin with.

And they'd never bring a car out like this that would step on the Vipers toes.
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #11  
GinoLicious's Avatar
Skilled GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 782
Rep Power: 787
GinoLicious street rep is low. keep going
I dont like it.
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 07:19 PM
  #12  
jdmgsr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 208
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 776
jdmgsr street rep is low. keep going
sorry guys, the specs i posted were incorrect, 220mph and 650hp are specs of the Ruf RT12 below.. the charger has 350hp
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 07:31 PM
  #13  
Bizness's Avatar
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 52
From: Lost!!!
Rep Power: 773
Bizness street rep is low. keep going
Thats nicer then the Charger^^^^...saw the Charger in Detroit...looked like *** as a 4 door!!!
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 08:40 PM
  #14  
shuller1458's Avatar
Average GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 570
Rep Power: 783
shuller1458 street rep is low. keep going
" the charger has 350hp"

That's more like it, showel that peice of up to squerell's ***.
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 09:05 PM
  #15  
Zlatko's Avatar
Average GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 0
Zlatko has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Originally Posted by jdmgsr
sorry guys, the specs i posted were incorrect, 220mph and 650hp are specs of the Ruf RT12 below.. the charger has 350hp
that.

ROOCK 650..soo sooo delicious.



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 AM.

Page generated in 0.08790 seconds with 6 queries