Small Car Crash Tests = Dodge Neon as the worst performer
03-07-2005, 10:12 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Small Car Crash Tests = Dodge Neon as the worst performer
LINK IS HERE
Small cars do poorly in side-impact crash tests
CTV.ca News Staff
The majority of small cars that underwent a side-impact crash safety test were rated "poor", according to the U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
Of the 14 cars tested, only the Chevrolet Cobalt and Toyota Corolla, when equipped with optional side-airbags, earned the Institute's second-highest rating of "acceptable."
However, when the optional side airbags were taken away, the Corolla and Cobalt were also rated "poor" for side-impact protection.
The crash tests were to mimic an SUV or pick-up truck hitting the cars head-on at 50 km/h (31 mph) with a relatively small woman sitting inside.
The Institute singled out the Dodge Neon as the worst performer. It was tested without side airbags.
"This car is a disaster," said Institute chief operating officer Adrian Lund.
"High forces were recorded on the head, torso, and pelvis of the dummy driver. If this had been a real driver in a real crash, it's likely it wouldn't have been survivable."
The other cars singled out for "poor" ratings include:
* Ford Focus (without optional airbags)
* Mazda 3 (without optional airbags)
* Mitsubishi Lancer (without optional airbags)
* Saturn ION (with optional airbags)
* Volkswagen New Beetle (with standard airbags)
* Suzuki Forenzo (with standard airbags)
* Suzuki Aerio (with standard airbags)
* Nissan Sentra (without optional airbags)
* Kia Spectra (with standard airbags)
* Hyundai Elantra (with standard airbags)
When the vehicle came with side airbags as an option, it was tested without them. If the manufacturer wanted them tested with the airbags, the Institute did so, referring the cost to the car maker.
The side airbags clearly made a difference for the ratings given to the Chevrolet Cobalt and Toyota Corolla, but the airbags aren't always enough.
Four of the cars, the New Beetle, Elantra, Forenza and Spectra, were all equipped with standard side airbags with head protection.
They rated good or acceptable for head injury, as did the Saturn ION with the optional side airbags. But the Institute said the structural integrity of the cars must be improved.
"Side airbags can protect the head, but if the vehicle structure doesn't hold up well then serious injuries to other body regions still can occur," says Lund.
"With better structures along with the side airbags, the performances of these vehicles would improve."
CTV.ca News Staff
The majority of small cars that underwent a side-impact crash safety test were rated "poor", according to the U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
Of the 14 cars tested, only the Chevrolet Cobalt and Toyota Corolla, when equipped with optional side-airbags, earned the Institute's second-highest rating of "acceptable."
However, when the optional side airbags were taken away, the Corolla and Cobalt were also rated "poor" for side-impact protection.
The crash tests were to mimic an SUV or pick-up truck hitting the cars head-on at 50 km/h (31 mph) with a relatively small woman sitting inside.
The Institute singled out the Dodge Neon as the worst performer. It was tested without side airbags.
"This car is a disaster," said Institute chief operating officer Adrian Lund.
"High forces were recorded on the head, torso, and pelvis of the dummy driver. If this had been a real driver in a real crash, it's likely it wouldn't have been survivable."
The other cars singled out for "poor" ratings include:
* Ford Focus (without optional airbags)
* Mazda 3 (without optional airbags)
* Mitsubishi Lancer (without optional airbags)
* Saturn ION (with optional airbags)
* Volkswagen New Beetle (with standard airbags)
* Suzuki Forenzo (with standard airbags)
* Suzuki Aerio (with standard airbags)
* Nissan Sentra (without optional airbags)
* Kia Spectra (with standard airbags)
* Hyundai Elantra (with standard airbags)
When the vehicle came with side airbags as an option, it was tested without them. If the manufacturer wanted them tested with the airbags, the Institute did so, referring the cost to the car maker.
The side airbags clearly made a difference for the ratings given to the Chevrolet Cobalt and Toyota Corolla, but the airbags aren't always enough.
Four of the cars, the New Beetle, Elantra, Forenza and Spectra, were all equipped with standard side airbags with head protection.
They rated good or acceptable for head injury, as did the Saturn ION with the optional side airbags. But the Institute said the structural integrity of the cars must be improved.
"Side airbags can protect the head, but if the vehicle structure doesn't hold up well then serious injuries to other body regions still can occur," says Lund.
"With better structures along with the side airbags, the performances of these vehicles would improve."
03-07-2005, 11:19 PM
#3
Average GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 607
Rep Power: 714 
while I dont want to burst the bubble of the validity of the test, it is done with a concrete block as the front of a car, if it was a real car, the crumple zones of the front of the vehicle crashing would improve the results. Just a point.
03-08-2005, 12:35 AM
#5
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 319
Rep Power: 708
Originally Posted by munch
i still wanna see what will happen to a smart car getting rear ended by a transport at 60....
09-09-2008, 02:12 PM
#7
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Markham
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 609
here's a story of mine:
i have '99 Ford Taurus and '02 Ford Focus....for both i pay $2133 yearly
so i'm on the market for new car to replace the Focus......my choise were '04 Dodge Neon SRT-4 and '05 Subaru STi
i called my insuarence and told them what would my rates be if I replace my focus with one of these cars......so they did their calculations and came up with these numbers......$1500 for Ford Taurus and Sti together...........and $3000 for Ford Taurus and Neon SRT-4....
i aksed my is this such a difference??
they told me straight up.....neon did very bad in colision ratings....where STi performed very well
so im on the market for STi in the nearest future
i have '99 Ford Taurus and '02 Ford Focus....for both i pay $2133 yearly
so i'm on the market for new car to replace the Focus......my choise were '04 Dodge Neon SRT-4 and '05 Subaru STi
i called my insuarence and told them what would my rates be if I replace my focus with one of these cars......so they did their calculations and came up with these numbers......$1500 for Ford Taurus and Sti together...........and $3000 for Ford Taurus and Neon SRT-4....
i aksed my is this such a difference??
they told me straight up.....neon did very bad in colision ratings....where STi performed very well
so im on the market for STi in the nearest future
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
virig
Honda Mailing List
0
07-15-2008 04:17 AM
gsrcharged
Car Parts For Sale
1
03-26-2008 11:22 PM
honda video
Honda Videos
0
01-09-2008 12:27 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)