Used Viper, Supra, Vette or Cobra?
what do you guys think?
ive seen some insane prices on Supras latley, and some respectable ones on Vipers... if you had a choice? ill add is some other cars for choice as well. were talking the 30K-55K range, not including tax. http://img182.echo.cx/img182/4433/5690926to.jpg http://images.trader.ca/autotrader/7....jpg.fpx?large http://images.trader.ca/autotrader/1....jpg.fpx?large http://images.trader.ca/autotrader/5....jpg.fpx?large |
I've always wanted to rip around on a track with a Viper. Ever since they were dominating sports car series.
|
Originally Posted by mazdubber
I've always wanted to rip around on a track with a Viper. Ever since they were dominating sports car series.
Vipers have such a sweet look.. but people always say "supras can make huge power"... but then again, if youre spending 35K you can get a newer cobra mustang and make 500HP... But a viper seems to be in a league of its own..styling and NA power. |
is it for a daily driver?
pick up a cheaper boxster and start modding :appl: |
Originally Posted by scottyp
is it for a daily driver?
pick up a cheaper boxster and start modding :appl: nah, a weekend fun car... :D and wednesday night meets :laugh: |
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
Vipers have such a sweet look.. but people always say "supras can make huge power"... but then again, if youre spending 35K you can get a newer cobra mustang and make 500HP...
But a viper seems to be in a league of its own..styling and NA power. |
gotta be the vette a viper is a bit much I think. A vette is gorgeous, fast and still a bit tasteful.
|
the rest, nothing sweeter than a KB Cobra :D
|
i thought TSR would all pick a supra :retard:
:laugh: interesting poll so far |
I voted for the Viper. That would be one sweet ride to own. My second vote would go to the 03 Cobra.
I'd also love an 07 Cobra with which rumors have it will retail in the 50,000 dollar Canadian range. |
http://www.trader.ca/Search/Details....ategory=&CAT=1
http://img182.echo.cx/img182/4433/5690926to.jpg 03 Black Z06 Price: $55,400 Mileage: 9,600 km This, my friend, is what it's all about. |
http://images.trader.ca/autotrader/7....jpg.fpx?large
1997 DODGE VIPER 10400 km $ 54,900.00 http://images.trader.ca/autotrader/1....jpg.fpx?large 2003 FORD MUSTANG Cobra Vert 551 km $ 49,995.00 http://images.trader.ca/autotrader/5....jpg.fpx?large 1995 TOYOTA SUPRA 62000 km $ 43,000.00 |
Viper. Fast, Looks good, and you'll pcik up more chicks with that car than any of the others.
|
Originally Posted by TurboSupra12
Viper. Fast, Looks good, and you'll pcik up more chicks with that car than any of the others.
supras get 16 year old chix who watced F&F and think its coo! theyre overpriced and old... mustang, poor mans sports car.. still , shitty made, shitty looks. overall . vette... aftermarket sucks, over rated power.. over priced when compared to an 03cobra... still not a viper :D viper, chick magnet :thumbsup ..nice NA power.. wicked looks. authentic sound. |
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
http://images.trader.ca/autotrader/1....jpg.fpx?large 2003 FORD MUSTANG Cobra Vert 551 km $ 49,995.00 Want a brand new 04? Try Kennedy Ford in Oakville. They have a silver vert for 40 G's, brand new ! That price is way out of whack on the one you posted. Christ, the new 07 Shelby Cobra is going to be a little more than that !! What a joke ! An 03 shouldn't fetch more than 33 K IMO. |
Supercharged Z06 for me guys:) Corvette is better track car than a Viper. and defenatly better then Supra and Mustang.
|
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
vette... aftermarket sucks, over rated power.. over priced when compared to an 03cobra... still not a viper :D
. i want to delete my Z06 reference. how disrespectful of u :knock_tee :laugh: also, i doubt anyone is going to agree with u on that dumbass aftermarket comment. |
Originally Posted by last5oh_302
WTF ?
Want a brand new 04? Try Kennedy Ford in Oakville. They have a silver vert for 40 G's, brand new ! That price is way out of whack on the one you posted. Christ, the new 07 Shelby Cobra is going to be a little more than that !! What a joke ! An 03 shouldn't fetch more than 33 K IMO. If the supra's werent so overpriced, i would take one over an old mustang or older vette of 93, but 30K for a 93 supra is INSANE! And a 97 supra vs stang, easily take the supra.. 97 supra vs viper, take the viper... mustangs are todays Honda Civics... Except honda motors are still better than ford... and make more HP per displacement. Viper is just a hot machine, itll turn more heads any day of the week than the other 3. and the LS aftermarket is WAY overpriced. it sucks |
viper.....nuff said
|
oh man... for a weekend fun car, A supra would be garbage. the mustang isnt really that fun without mods, and a vette, well you would get used to it
that leaves the Viper. You get looks and its a killer off the line. Like sokmeone said, style and N/A power= true love but then again insurnace on one of these is killer |
gotta go with the vette it corners a lot better!
|
if youre buying a 30-55K USED sports car, youre not worried usually about insurance or gas prices. :D
|
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
if youre buying a 30-55K USED sports car, youre not worried usually about insurance or gas prices. :D
as for handleing the viper isnt that good, but why would you need handling if your in a viper... Straight line racer :) saw one getthihng serviced at my buddies shop world fine cars... and wow, its nice. nice 10 inch tires on the back.. nice engine bay... i thought i was nicer than the 10 M3's, and porchses sitting around. |
Originally Posted by General
as for handleing the viper isnt that good, but why would you need handling if your in a viper... Straight line racer :)
|
no used 911 option?
|
'Vette
|
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
personally, i wouldnt take another ford. Theyre so shitty, especially the older foxes..better yet, the only time Ford has created a good mustang was in 2003. Other than that they could never compete with their rivals; underpowered mustangs :smilie_da
If the supra's werent so overpriced, i would take one over an old mustang or older vette of 93, but 30K for a 93 supra is INSANE! And a 97 supra vs stang, easily take the supra.. 97 supra vs viper, take the viper... mustangs are todays Honda Civics... Except honda motors are still better than ford... and make more HP per displacement. Viper is just a hot machine, itll turn more heads any day of the week than the other 3. and the LS aftermarket is WAY overpriced. it sucks This is where your comment about the Vette and LS1 powerplant in particular, are true. The LS1 was kept hush hush. There was zero aftermarket available for the LS1 only up until recemtly, and still the aftermarket scene pales in comparison to what's offered for Ford. This was one good reason the F-Body died. IMO Ford make and have always made an excellent product in the Mustang. It's a long lasting tradition that has ALWAYS stood the tests of time. Take a look at GM shares right now. I feel bad for anyone that still owns any. |
Supra
|
Originally Posted by last5oh_302
I disagree. Ford played the market in a very well planed out way. In the 80's and early part of the 90's, the Mustang walked anything GM produced all day, everyday.
Since GM introduced the LS1 those statistics changed, stock for stock.. Take a look at GM shares right now. I feel bad for anyone that still owns any |
Originally Posted by l_bilyk
correction, LT1. Since the LT1, the chevys have been blowing the doors off similarly priced fords.. the LS1 opened up the gap even more.
|
Originally Posted by midnighter
Since when have Mustangs and F-bodies been similarly priced?
what else is in the pony car segment? i mean really what else is there? mustang, camero, firechicken. thats it. and now it's just the mustang... unless you consider that turd of a charger a pony car |
here's a better example :D http://utopia.duth.gr/~nm4434/Toyota...ra%20BLACK.jpg (sorry if it had to be off autotrader, but that's just one i had lyin around... much better don't you think) |
Well its a close call between the vettez06 and the viper for me. Im not even going to talk about the other choices lol.
That pic of the Blue viper looks like its a GTS which is a damn nice ride. It definately beats the vette in the looks category same with performance also. But stock parts on the viper are rediculously expensive and i dont even wanna know what aftermarket will cost. For Both rides repairing parts would be costly but it all depends on how much u can afford to put into your car. I hope when i turn 25 and my insurance drops to able to afford a used viper or vette. It was tobe triple black though just like all my cars :la: |
Originally Posted by midnighter
Since when have Mustangs and F-bodies been similarly priced?
LT1'S were not walking Mustangsl. I disagree. Most LT1'S in stock form were a 14 second car at best, just like a Mustang. |
Originally Posted by l_bilyk
I doubt that the lack of genIII aftermarket has ANYTHING to do with GM shares... you're talking about a small niche vehicles that have little impact on the entire company. Plus the genIII was introduced in affordable form in 98 and then dissapeared a few years later. How long have the mod-motors been in the mustang?
What has GM produced in the sports car department that's affordable for the average person ? The Vette ? They price themselves out right of the market with anything they make anyway, just like they did with the F-Body. What's this SSR, or whatever it's called, pickup truck thingy ? It's ugly and for 80 G's before taxes it's all yours ! LOL ! That's why their shares are going down like a truck stop hooker. |
Originally Posted by monopoly
I hope when i turn 25 and my insurance drops to able to afford a used viper or vette. It was tobe triple black though just like all my cars :la:
|
Originally Posted by ricernoob
I'm not quite sure about that one. When you turn 25 and if you choose to drive something as fast/expensive as a Z06 or Viper your age-based discount will be offset by the car...know what I mean?
|
Originally Posted by last5oh_302
I didn't mean the lack of F-Bodies in particular. The lack of aftermarket availability for them didn't help though. I meant the lack of GM producing anything !
What has GM produced in the sports car department that's affordable for the average person ? The Vette ? They price themselves out right of the market with anything they make anyway, just like they did with the F-Body. What's this SSR, or whatever it's called, pickup truck thingy ? It's ugly and for 80 G's before taxes it's all yours ! LOL ! That's why their shares are going down like a truck stop hooker. Now as far as the vette goes, it's always been removed from all the other GM cars. The C5 cost something like 150 mil to bring to production. Thats dirt cheap considering the GENIII tech that trickled down into the trucks, and the hydroforming process (that is now used by daimler). Not to mention good C5 sales and the beating they gave ferarri in every race the two met. Anyways... the f-bodies are dead but that doesnt matter. Next year the solstice and sky are coming out, aimed right at the miata (which is pretty much the best selling sports car of all time). And by the looks of the solstice and the upcoming miata, you'd have to be a grade A moron to buy the miata. It looks worse, has less power and is a unibody car as opposed to a mini-corvette architecture of the solstice. Is it going to steal mustang sales like the camaro did? Probably not. But I bet that alot of the chicks that would normally be buying the 6cyl stangs will look at the solstice. It's less practical, but arguably 'cuter.' I'll give you the SSR thing. That leaves me scratching my head. |
Originally Posted by ricernoob
I'm not quite sure about that one. When you turn 25 and if you choose to drive something as fast/expensive as a Z06 or Viper your age-based discount will be offset by the car...know what I mean?
|
Originally Posted by l_bilyk
Again, I dont think the 'sports car' thing had anything to do with it. Unions killed GM in the early 90's. Less money was available for product development. The regal and everything on that platform didn't sell anywhere near what GM thought they would. Trucks were more expensive, albeit better in the long run.
Now as far as the vette goes, it's always been removed from all the other GM cars. The C5 cost something like 150 mil to bring to production. Thats dirt cheap considering the GENIII tech that trickled down into the trucks, and the hydroforming process (that is now used by daimler). Not to mention good C5 sales and the beating they gave ferarri in every race the two met. Anyways... the f-bodies are dead but that doesnt matter. Next year the solstice and sky are coming out, aimed right at the miata (which is pretty much the best selling sports car of all time). And by the looks of the solstice and the upcoming miata, you'd have to be a grade A moron to buy the miata. It looks worse, has less power and is a unibody car as opposed to a mini-corvette architecture of the solstice. Is it going to steal mustang sales like the camaro did? Probably not. But I bet that alot of the chicks that would normally be buying the 6cyl stangs will look at the solstice. It's less practical, but arguably 'cuter.' I'll give you the SSR thing. That leaves me scratching my head. http://www.detnews.com/2005/insiders...tos-161237.htm Here's a quote from another site: GM has about 20% overcapacity in NA right now. That means 1/5th of its plants are already sitting empty or shouldn't be used even if they are operating, given their current and predicted production levels. Basically, no large company can afford to carry that kind of overhead. As for the employment legacy issues, GM has to live with what it agreed to with the unions, but it certainly isn't going to add to the problem by hiring more union workers in NA; they have to stop the bleeding somehow. Bottom line, they will be laying off another 15-20,000 auto workers over the next few years. GM's Chinese operations are by far and away the most profitable part of its auto making operations. Quality has been very high and they will have no qualms about exporting Chinese assembled vehicles to other countries. GM has seen the future, it is called Wal-Mart...... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands