Vid: 2005 NA Mustang
|
:eek:
|
SON :eek:
couldn't see the time, but i think it was in the 11's? never been a fan of Mustangs, but the new one is lighter (somewhere around 200-300lbs) than the 350Z and handles better. wow. |
nice! :)
|
:hitit:
|
Originally Posted by ricernoob
SON :eek:
couldn't see the time, but i think it was in the 11's? never been a fan of Mustangs, but the new one is lighter (somewhere around 200-300lbs) than the 350Z and handles better. wow. |
Originally Posted by goneinsixtyseconds
haha, i think people wish the new mustangs ran 11's stock, but most tests/comparisons that i've seen for the 05 stangs have pegged the 1/4 at high 13's, if not low 14's for the average driver
From what I have seen those numbers have been pretty much the same for a number of years. The 05#'s are no different, it all comes down to driver knowledge. Nice vid by the way and that exhaust tune sounded real raspy. :thumbsup |
Originally Posted by goneinsixtyseconds
haha, i think people wish the new mustangs ran 11's stock, but most tests/comparisons that i've seen for the 05 stangs have pegged the 1/4 at high 13's, if not low 14's for the average driver
|
I dont know what you idiots are arguing about but that car didnt seem stock to me at all.
|
Originally Posted by goneinsixtyseconds
haha, i think people wish the new mustangs ran 11's stock, but most tests/comparisons that i've seen for the 05 stangs have pegged the 1/4 at high 13's, if not low 14's for the average driver
the 05 GT should be in the low 14's, and maybe high 13's (depending on so many variables) |
Originally Posted by ricernoob
what in the fizzuk? who the hell ever said a stock GT runs 11's stock? (not even a Cobra comes close, let alone a GT :eyes: )...so yea, i don't know where you got that piece of info from.
the 05 GT should be in the low 14's, and maybe high 13's (depending on so many variables) |
Originally Posted by goneinsixtyseconds
just assuming that the car in this vid is stock (since the 05's were just released and it's n/a) sure it could have swapped internals, so chill, i was just saying it'd run high 13's and low 14's, no need to get all "fizzuk" on me, whatever that means
|
Originally Posted by goneinsixtyseconds
haha, i think people wish the new mustangs ran 11's stock, but most tests/comparisons that i've seen for the 05 stangs have pegged the 1/4 at high 13's, if not low 14's for the average driver
Actually 05's dont run 11's stock but that was NOT a stock stang it was N/A thats why it was in mid-low 11's. :appl: |
[QUOTE=goneinsixtyseconds]haha, i think people wish the new mustangs ran 11's stock, but most tests/comparisons that i've seen for the 05 stangs have pegged the 1/4 at high 13's, if not low 14's for the average driver[/QUOTE
No stock 4.7's dont run 11's but they can. Very easily too. That was not a stock 05 it was just Nituraly Aspirated. I'd Hate to see it with boost :eek: |
Originally Posted by HandicapCivic
Actually 05's dont run 11's stock but that was NOT a stock stang it was N/A thats why it was in mid-low 11's. :appl:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands